Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
  1. Home
  2. Journal of Indian Philosophy
  3. Article
Sa skya Paṇḍita’s Classification of Arguments by Consequence Based on the Type of the Logical Reason: Editorial Conundrum and Mathematics for Commentators
Download PDF
Your article has downloaded

Similar articles being viewed by others

Slider with three articles shown per slide. Use the Previous and Next buttons to navigate the slides or the slide controller buttons at the end to navigate through each slide.

Is There Anything Like Indian Logic? Anumāna, ‘Inference’ and Inference in the Critique of Jayarāśi Bhaṭṭa

29 May 2019

Piotr Balcerowicz

Proofs, Grounds and Empty Functions: Epistemic Compulsion in Prawitz’s Semantics

11 August 2021

Antonio Piccolomini d’Aragona

Peirce’s Dragon-Head Logic (R 501, 1901)

24 February 2022

Minghui Ma & Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen

Dignāga and Dharmakīrti on Fallacies of Inference: Some Reflections

29 July 2020

Bhima Kumar Kukkamalla

Moderate anti-exceptionalism and earthborn logic

07 June 2021

Jaroslav Peregrin & Vladimír Svoboda

Another way logic might be normative

21 February 2021

J. W. Evershed

Logical Consequence in Avicenna’s Theory

05 September 2018

Saloua Chatti

Validities, antivalidities and contingencies: A multi-standard approach

05 July 2021

Eduardo Barrio & Federico Pailos

Fallacies and Their Place in the Foundations of Science

14 March 2023

John Woods

Download PDF
  • Open Access
  • Published: 17 August 2018

Sa skya Paṇḍita’s Classification of Arguments by Consequence Based on the Type of the Logical Reason: Editorial Conundrum and Mathematics for Commentators

  • Pascale Hugon  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6100-38841 

Journal of Indian Philosophy volume 46, pages 845–887 (2018)Cite this article

  • 435 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

Abstract

This paper examines a passage of the eleventh chapter of the Rigs gter of Sa skya Paṇḍita (1182–1251) on the division of arguments by consequence (thal ʾgyur) of the form “Because S is P, it follows that it is Q” with respect to the type of relation between P and Q. This passage appears in quite different versions in several available recensions of the Rigs gter, all of which are problematic to some extent. The different interpretations of the commentators can be shown to derive from their reliance on different versions of the text, which they strove to make sense of through two distinct strategies. Following up on the examination of a division of arguments by consequence along the same line in the works of Sa skya Paṇḍita’s Tibetan predecessors, in particular Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge (1109–1169) and mTshur ston gZhon nu seng ge (ca. 1150–1210) (see Hugon, in J Indian Philos 44(5):883–938, 2016b), I evaluate the diverging versions of the Rigs gter against a coherent logical scenario founded on Sa skya Paṇḍita’s discussion pertaining to the types of logical reasons in inference in the tenth chapter of his work and comparison with the classification by Phya pa. I offer a hypothesis regarding the genesis of the problematic versions of the passage on the classification of consequences in the Rigs gter based on the comparison with the classification found in mTshur ston’s epistemological work. I propose that the composition of this portion of the Rigs gter might have involved a textual reuse of mTshur ston’s classification, even though mTshur ston and Sa skya Paṇḍita disagree on background issues. This very disagreement imposed changes to the reused text that led to problematic readings.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the most common mistakes and prepare your manuscript for journal editors.

Learn more

References

Tibetan sources

  • bKaʾ gdams gsung ʾbum bKaʾ gdams gsung ʾbum phyogs sgrig thengs dang po/gnyis pa/gsum pa/bzhi pa. Ed. dPal brtsegs bod yig dpe rnying zhib ʾjug khang. Chengdu: Si khron mi rigs dpe skrun khang, Vols. 1–30: 2006; vols. 31–60: 2007; vol. 61–90: 2009; vol. 91–120: 2015.

  • sGron ma mTshur ston gZhon nu seng ge, Tshad ma shes rab sgron ma. Ed. by Pascale Hugon, Wien, 2004: Arbeitskreis für tibetische und buddhistische Studien – Universität Wien (Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde 60).

  • bsDus pa gTsang nag pa brTson ʾgrus seng ge, Tshad ma rnam par nges paʾi ṭi ka legs bshad bsdus pa. Otani University Tibetan Works Series, Volume II, Kyoto, 1989: Rinsen Book Co.

  • bsDus pa gnyis pa Bla ma dam pa bSod nams rgyal mtshan, sDe bdun gyi snying po rigs paʾi de kho na nyid rab tu gsal ba zhes bya ba bsdus pa gnyis pa. In Bla-ma Dam-pa Bsod-nams-rgyal-mtshan gyi bkaʾ ʾbum. Dehradun, 1999: Sakya College, 931–1137.

  • bsDus pa che ba Bla ma dam pa bSod nams rgyal mtshan, bsDus pa che ba rigs paʾi de kho na nyid rnam par nges pa. In Bla-ma Dam-pa Bsod-nams-rgyal-mtshan gyi bkaʾ ʾbum. Dehradun, 1999: Sakya College, 673–930.

  • rNam rgyal Chu mig pa Seng ge dpal, gZhan gyi phyogs thams cad las rnam par rgyal ba. In bKa’ gdams gsung ’bum, vol. 87, 315–448.

  • Pham byed gSer mdog paṇ chen Śākya mchog ldan, Tshad ma rigs paʾi gter dgongs rgyan lung dang rigs paʾi ʾkhor los lugs ngan pham byed. In The Complete Works (gSung ʾbum) of gSer mdog paṇ chen Śākya mchog ldan. Ed. Kunzang Tobgey, Timphu, 1975 [Reprint: Nagwang Topgyal, Delhi, 1988], vol. 9 (Ta).

  • ʾBras spungs dkar chag ʾBras spungs dgon du bzhugs su gsol ba’i dpe rnying dkar chag, 2 Vols. Ed. dPal brtsegs bod yig dpe rnying zhib ’jug khang. Beijing, 2004: Mi rigs dpe skrun khang.

  • Mun sel Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge, Tshad ma yid kyi mun pa sel pa. In bKaʾ gdams gsung ʾbum, vol. 8, 434–626.

  • Rigs gter dpe bsdur ma 1 Sa skya Paṇḍita Kun dgaʾ rgyal mtshan, Rigs gter rtsa ʾgrel dpe bsdur ma bzhugs. Chengdu, 2005: Si khron dpe skrun tshogs pa, Si khron mi rigs dpe skrun khang (Gangs ljongs rig gnas gter mdzod, Shes byaʾi gter bum 1).

  • Rigs gter dpe bsdur ma 2 Sa skya Paṇḍita Kun dgaʾ rgyal mtshan, Sa skya gong ma rnam lngaʾi gsung ʾbum dpe bsdur ma las sa paṇ kun dgaʾ rgyal mtshan gyi gsung pod gsum pa bzhugs / Sa skya bkaʾ ʾbum dpe bsdur ma las sa paṇ kun dgaʾ rgyal mtshan gyi gsung ʾbum pod gsum pa bzhugs so. Beijing, 2007: Krung goʾi bod rig pa dpe skrun khang.

  • Rigs gter nyi snying Rong ston Shes bya kun rig (sMra baʾi seng ge), Tshad ma rigs paʾi gter gyi rnam bshad nyi maʾi snying po. In Kun mkhyen rong ston chen poʾi bkaʾ ʾbum, vol. 9 (tha), sKye dgu mdo, 2004: Gangs ljongs rig rgyan gsung rab par khang.

  • Rigs gter nyi ma Glo bo mkhan chen bSod nams lhun grub, sDe bdun mdo dang bcas paʾi dgongs ʾgrel tshad ma rigs paʾi gter gyi ʾgrel paʾi rnam bshad rigs lam gsal baʾi nyi ma. Ed. by rDo rje rgyal po in Tshad ma rigs gter gyi ʾgrel pa. Xinning (Qinghai), 1991: Krung goʾi bod kyi shes rig dpe skrun khang, 1–262.

  • Rigs pa grub pa ʾU yug pa rigs paʾi seng ge, bsTan bcos tshad ma rigs paʾi gter gyi rgyan rigs pa grub pa. In gSung ʾbum / ʾU yug pa rigs paʾi seng ge, vol. 1. Beijing, 2007: Krung goʾi bod rig pa dpe skrun khang.

  • Rigs gter rnam bshad rGyal tshab rje Dar ma rin chen, Tshad ma rigs paʾi gter gyi rnam bshad legs par bshad paʾi snying po. Ed. by G. Dreyfus in collaboration with Sh. Onoda in: A Recent Rediscovery: Rgyal-tshab’s Rigs gter rnam bshad: A Facsimile Reproduction of a Rare Blockprint Edition. Kyoto, 1994 : Nagata Bunshodo (Biblia Tibetica 2).

  • Rigs gter ʾphro ba g.Yag ston Sangs rgyas dpal, sDe bdun gyi dgongs ʾgrel tshad ma rigs paʼi gter gyi de kho na nyid gsal bar byed pa rigs paʾi ʾod stong ʾphro ba. Ed. g.Yag ʾjam in Bod kyi bcu phrag rig mdzod chen mo, dpal ldan sa skya paʼi gsung rab, vol. 16 (tshad ma). Beijing, 2004: Mi rigs dpe skrun khang and mTsho sngon mi rigs dpe skrun khang.

  • Rigs gter rab gsal Go rams pa bSod nams seng ge, Tshad ma rigs paʼi gter gyi dkaʼ baʼi gnas rnam par bshad pa sde bdun rab gsal. In Sa skya bkaʼ ʼbum: The Complete Works of the Great Masters of the Sa skya Sect of the Tibetan Buddhism (sDe dge ed.), compiled by bSod nams rgya mtsho, Tokyo, 1968–1969: Tōyō Bunko, vol. 12 (Ga).

  • RT1 Sa skya Paṇḍita Kun dgaʾ rgyal mtshan, Tshad ma rigs paʾi gter and Tshad ma rigs paʾi gter gyi rang ʾgrel. In dPal ldan sa skya paʾi bka’ ʾbum – The Collected Works of the Founding Masters of Sa-skya, Reproduced from the 1736 Derge Edition, vol. 11 (da). New Delhi, 1993: Jayyed Press.

  • RT3ii Sa skya Paṇḍita Kun dgaʾ rgyal mtshan, Tshad ma rig (sic) gter gyi rang ʾgrel, TBRC W1CZ2047. [Tibetan library catalogue No. 004796].

  • RT4 Sa skya Paṇḍita Kun dgaʾ rgyal mtshan, Tshad ma rigs gter gyi rtsa ʾgrel dang rang ʾgrel. The root text and autocommentary of Tshad ma rigs gter, fundamental work on Buddhist logic by Sa-skya Paṇḍita-kun-dgaʾ-rgyal-mtshan. Reproduced from rare gold on indigo from the library of H.H. the Sa-skya Khri-ʾdzin. Dehradun, 1985: Sakya centre.

  • RT5 Sa skya Paṇḍita Kun dgaʾ rgyal mtshan, Tshad ma rigs paʾi gter ces bya baʾi rang ʾgrel. NGMPP ref. 15252, reel no. L179/10.

  • Tshad ma rigs paʾi snang ba Bo dong paṇ chen Phyogs las rnam rgyal, Tshad ma rigs paʾi snang ba. In Bo dong phyogs las rnam rgyal gyi gsung ’bum, vol. 8. In Encyclopedia Tibetica: The collected works of Bo-doṅ Pan-chen Phyogs-las-rnam-rgyal, ed. S.T. Kazi. New Delhi, 1969–1981: Tibet House.

  • Tshad ma’i don bsdus pa Blo gros mtshungs med, Tshad maʾi don bsdus pa, bKaʾ gdams gsung ʾbum, vol. 87, 587–708.

Modern Studies

  • Hugon, P. (2008). Trésors du raisonnement. Sa skya Paṇḍita et ses prédécesseurs tibétains sur les modes de fonctionnement de la pensée et le fondement de lʼinférence. Edition et traduction annotée du quatrième chapitre et d’une section du dixième chapitre du Tshad ma rigs pa’i gter. Wien: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien (Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde 69.1 and 69.2).

  • Hugon, P. (2013). Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge on Argumentation by Consequence (thal ʾgyur): The nature, function, and form of consequence statements. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 41(6), 671–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hugon, P. (2015). Text re-use in early Tibetan epistemological treatises. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 43(4), 453–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hugon, P. (2016a). Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge on Argumentation by Consequence (thal ʾgyur) (2): The analysis of the correspondence between a consequence and its reverse form and the thirteenfold typology of consequences. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 39, 51–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugon, P. (2016b). Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge and his successors on the classification of arguments by consequence (thal ʾgyur) based on the type of the logical reason. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 44(5), 883–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. (1983). Notes on two early printed editions of Sa-skya-pa works. The Tibet Journal, 8(2), 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. (1987). The Entrance Gate for the Wise (Section III). Sa-skya Paṇḍita on Indian and Tibetan Traditions of Pramāṇa and Philosophical Debate. Wien: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien (Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde 17.1 and 17.2).

  • Jackson, D. (1991a). Sources for the study of Tibetan Pramāṇa traditions preserved at the Bihar Research Society, Patna. In E. Steinkellner (Ed.), Studies in the Buddhist epistemological tradition. Proceedings of the second Dharmakīrti conference, Vienna, June 11–16, 1989 (pp. 97–106). Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.

  • Jackson, D. (1991b). Fragments of a “Golden” manuscript of Sa-skya Paṇḍita’s works. The Tibet Journal, 16(1), 3–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, B. (1997). Types of incompatibility (ʾgal ba) and types of non-cognition (ma/mi dmigs) in early Tibetan tshad ma literature. In H. Krasser, M. T. Much, E. Steinkellner, & H. Tauscher (Eds.), Tibetan studies: Proceedings of the 7th seminar of the international association for Tibetan Studies, Graz 1995 (pp. 495–510). Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.

  • Onoda, Sh. (1986). Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge’s classifications of Thal ʼgyur. Berliner Indologische Studien, 2, 65–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakai, M. (2018). On Dharmakīrti’s notion of contingency/dependence, with a special focus on vināśa. Journal of Indian Philosophy, Online first, 24 January 2018.

  • van der Kuijp, L. (1983). Contributions to the development of Tibetan Buddhist epistemology. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Kuijp, L. (1984). Marginalia to Sa-skya Paṇḍitaʼs Œuvre. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 7(1), 37–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Kuijp, L. (1986). Ldong-ston Shes-rab-dpal and a Version of the Tshad-ma rigs-paʾi-gter in thirteen Chapters. Berliner Indologische Studien, 2, 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Kuijp, L. (1993a). Two Mongol Xylographs (Hor par ma) of the Tibetan Text of Sa skya Paṇḍita’s Work on Buddhist Logic and Epistemology. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 16(2), 279–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Kuijp, L. (1993b). Apropos of some recently recovered manuscripts Anent Sa skya Paṇḍita’s Tshad ma rigs pa’i gter and Autocommentary. Berliner Indologische Studien, 7, 149–162.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Open access funding provided by Austrian Science Fund (FWF). Part of the work on this paper has been generously supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) in the context of the project P23422-G15 “Early bKaʾ gdams pa scholasticism.” I am grateful to Tsering Drongshar for his help in locating additional material and making sense of the editorial conventions adopted in the dpe bsdur ma editions. My thanks to Dennis Johnson for improving my English. I am responsible for the remaining errors.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Austrian Academy of Sciences, OEAW, IKGA, Hollandstrasse 11-13, 1020, Vienna, Austria

    Pascale Hugon

Authors
  1. Pascale Hugon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascale Hugon.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hugon, P. Sa skya Paṇḍita’s Classification of Arguments by Consequence Based on the Type of the Logical Reason: Editorial Conundrum and Mathematics for Commentators. J Indian Philos 46, 845–887 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-018-9365-3

Download citation

  • Published: 17 August 2018

  • Issue Date: November 2018

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-018-9365-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Sa skya Paṇḍita
  • thal ʾgyur
  • Tshad ma rigs gter
  • Tibet
  • Epistemology
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the most common mistakes and prepare your manuscript for journal editors.

Learn more

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.