Abstract
This paper examines the role of pramāṇa in Jayānanda’s commentary to Candrakīrti’s Madhyamakāvatāra. As the only extant Indian commentary on any of Candrakīrti’s works (available only in Tibetan translation), written in the twelfth century when Candrakīrti’s interpretation of Madhyamaka first became widely valued, Jayānanda’s Madhyamakāvatāraṭīkā is crucial to our understanding of early Prāsaṅgika thought. In the portions of his text examined here, Jayānanda offers a pointed critique of both svatantra inferences and the broader Buddhist epistemological movement. In developing this critique, he cites at length Candrakīrti’s Prasannapadā treatment of svatantra, and so comes to comment on the locus classicus for the Svātantrika-Prāsaṅgika distinction. For Jayānanda, svatantra inferences are emblematic of the Dignāga-Dharmakīrti epistemological tradition, which asserts an unwarranted validity to human cognition. As such, Nāgārjuna’s philosophy admits neither svatantra inference, nor pramāṇa (as “valid cognition”) more generally. Instead, Jayānanda argues for Nāgārjuna’s “authority” (pramāṇa) as our prime means for knowing reality. Jayānanda’s account of authority offers a helpful counterbalance to the current trend of portraying Prāsaṅgika Madhyamaka as a form of skepticism.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Arnold D. (2005a) Buddhists, brahmins, and belief: Epistemology in South Asian philosophy of religion. Columbia University Press, New York
Arnold D. (2005b) Materials for a Mādhyamika critique of foundationalism: An annotated translation of Prasannapadā 55.11–75.13. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 28(2): 411–467
Bendall, C. (Ed). (1903). Subhāṣitasaṃgraha. Muséon, IV, 375–402.
Bhattacarya K., Johnston E.H., Kunst A. (1998) The dialectical method of Nāgārjuna: Vigrahavyāvartanī (4th ed.). Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi
Buescher H. (2007) Sthiramati’s Triṃśikāvijñaptibhāṣya: Critical editions of the Sanskrit text and its Tibetan translation. Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Vienna
Cabezón J.I. (1988) The Prāsaṅgika’s view on logic: Tibetan dGe lugs pa exegesis on the question of svatantras. Journal of Indian Philosophy 16(3): 217–224
de Jong J.W. (1978) Textcritical notes on the Prasannapadā. Indo-Iranian Journal 20: 25–59
Dreyfus, G.B.J., McClintock, S.L. (eds) (2003) The Svātantrika-Prāsaṅgika distinction: What difference does a difference make?. Wisdom Publications, Boston
Dunne J.D. (2004) Foundations of Dharmakīrti’s philosophy. Wisdom Publications, Boston
Franco E. (1997) Dharmakīrti on compassion and rebirth. Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien, Vienna
Franco E. (2003) The oldest philosophical manuscript in Sanskrit. Journal of Indian Philosophy 31: 21–31
Franco E. (2004) A note on Nāgārjuna and the Naiyāyikas. In: Hino S., Wada T. (eds) Three mountains and seven rivers: Prof. Musashi Tachikawa’s felicitation volume. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, Delhi, pp 203–208
Franco E. (2010) The discussion of Pramāṇas in the Spitzer manuscript. In: Gillon B.S. (eds) Logic in classical India: Papers of the 12th world Sanskrit conference. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, Delhi, pp 121–138
Garfield, J. L. (2002). Epochē and Śūnyatā: Skepticism East and West. In Empty words: Buddhist philosophy and cross-cultural interpretation (pp 3–23). New York: Oxford University Press.
Gnoli R. (1960) The Pramāṇavārttikam of Dharmakīrti: The first chapter with the autocommentary. Istituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente, Rome
Hattori, M. (1968). Dignāga on perception. Harvard oriental series (Vol. 47). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hopkins, J. (1983). Meditation on emptiness. London: Wisdom Publications (rev. ed., Boston: Wisdom Publications, 1996).
Hopkins J. (1989) A Tibetan delineation of different views of emptiness in the Indian middle way school: Dzong-ka-ba’s two interpretations of the locus classicus in Chandrakīrti’s Clear Words showing Bhāvaviveka’s assertion of commonly appearing subjects and inherent existence. Tibet Journal 14(1): 10–43
Jackson R.R. (1993) Is enlightenment possible? Dharmakīrti and rGyal tshab rje on knowledge, rebirth, no-self and liberation. Snow Lion Publications, Ithaca, NY
Jayānanda. Madhyamakāvatāraṭīkā (dBu ma la ’jug pa’i ’grel bshad). bstan ’gyur, sde dge edition, Tohoku 3870; dbu ma, vol. ya. Peking edition, 5271; vol. 99 (dbu ma’i ’grel, vol. ra).
Jayānanda. Tarkamudgarakārikā (rTog ge tho ba). bstan ’gyur, sde dge edition, Tohoku 3869; dbu ma, vol. ya.
Krasser H. (2003) On the ascertainment of validity in the Buddhist epistemological tradition. Journal of Indian Philosophy 31: 161–184
La Vallée Poussin, L. de. (1970a). Mūlamadhyamakakārikās de Nāgārjuna avec la Prasannapadā Commentaire de Candrakīrti. Bibliotheca Buddhica (Vol. 4). Osnabrück: Biblio Verlag, 1970.
La Vallée Poussin, L. de. (1970b). Madhyamakāvatāra par Candrakīrti. Bibliotheca Buddhica (Vol. 9). Osnabrück: Biblio Verlag.
Lang, K. (1986). Āryadeva’s Catuḥśataka: On the Bodhisattva’s cultivation of merit and knowledge. Indiske Studier (Vol. 7). Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.
MacDonald A. (2000) The Prasannapadā: More manuscripts from Nepal. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens 44: 165–181
MacDonald A. (2003) Interpreting Prasannapadā 19.3–7 in context: A response to Claus Oetke. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens 47: 143–195
Oetke C. (2003) Prasannapadā 19,3-7 and its context. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens 47: 111–142
Onoda S. (1988) On the Tibetan controversy concerning the various ways of relying to prasaṅgas. Tibet Journal 13(2): 36–41
Ruegg D.S. (1977) The use of the four positions of the Catuṣkoṭi and problem of the description of reality in Mahāyāna Buddhism. Journal of Indian Philosophy 5: 1–71
Ruegg D.S. (1994) Pramāṇabhūta, *pramāṇa(bhūta)-puruṣa, pratyakṣadharman and sākṣātkṛtadharman as epithets of the Ṛṣi, Ācārya and Tathāgata in grammatical, epistemological and Madhyamaka texts. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 57(2): 303–320
Ruegg D.S. (1995) Validity and authority or cognitive rightness and pragmatic efficacy? On the concepts of pramāṇa, pramāṇabhūta and pramāṇa(bhūta)puruṣa. Asiatische Studien/Études asiatiques 49(4): 817–827
Ruegg D.S. (2000) Three studies in the history of Indian and Tibetan Madhyamaka philosophy. Studies in Indian and Tibetan Madhyamaka thought, part I. Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien, Vienna
Ruegg D.S. (2002) Two prolegomena to Madhyamaka philosophy. Studies in Indian and Tibetan Madhyamaka thought, part II. Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien, Vienna
Śākyabuddhi. Pramāṇavārttikaṭīkā (Tshad ma rnam ’grel kyi ’grel bshad). bstan ’gyur, sde dge edition, Tohoku 4220; tshad ma, vols. je-nye.
Siderits M. (1981) The Madhyamaka critique of epistemology II. Journal of Indian Philosophy 9: 121–160
Silk J.A. (2002) Possible Indian sources for the term tshad ma’i skyes bu as pramāṇapuruṣa. Journal of Indian Philosophy 30: 111–160
Steinkellner, E. (1983). Tshad ma’i skyes bu. Meaning and historical significance of the term. In E. steinkellner & H. Tauscher (Eds.), Contributions on Tibetan and Buddhist religion and philosophy (Vol. 2, pp. 275–284). Vienna: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.
Steinkellner, E. (1992). Early Tibetan ideas on the ascertainment of validity (nges byed kyi tshad ma). In Tibetan studies: Proceedings of the 5th seminar of the International Association for Tibetan studies. Monograph series of Naritasan Institute for Buddhist Studies: Occasional Papers (Vol. 2, pp. 257–273). Narita: Narita-san Shinshō-ji.
Tillemans, T. J. F. (1992). Tsong kha pa et al. on the Bhāvaviveka-Candrakīrti Debate. In Tibetan studies: Proceedings of the 5th seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies. Monograph series of Naritasan Institute for Buddhist Studies: Occasional papers (Vol 2, pp. 315–326). Narita: Narita-san Shinshō-ji.
Tillemans, T. J. F. (1993). Persons of authority: The sTon pa tshad ma’i skyes bur sgrub pa’i gtam of A lag sha Ngag dbang bstan dar, A Tibetan work on the central religious questions in Buddhist epistemology. Tibetan and Indo-Tibetan studies, (Vol. 5). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Tillemans, T. J. F. (1999a). Dharmakīrti, Āryadeva and Dharmapāla on scriptural authority. In Scripture, logic, language: Essays on Dharmakīrti and his Tibetan successors (pp. 27–36). Boston: Wisdom Publications.
Tillemans, T.J. F. (1999b). How much of a proof is scripturally based inference? In Scripture, logic, language (pp. 37–51). Boston: Wisdom Publications.
van Bijlert V.A. (1989) Epistemology and spiritual authority. Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien, Vienna
van der Kuijp L.W.J. (1993) Jayānanda. A twelfth century Guoshi from Kashmir among the Tangut. Central Asiatic Journal 37(3/4): 188–197
van der Kuijp L.W.J. (1999) Remarks on the ‘person of authority’ in the dGa’ ldan pa/dGe lugs pa school of Tibetan Buddhism. Journal of the American Oriental Society 119(4): 646–672
Vose K. (2009) Resurrecting Candrakīrti: Disputes in the Tibetan creation of Prāsaṅgika. Wisdom Publications, Boston
Walleser, M. (Ed). (1970). Buddhapālita Mūlamadhyamakavṛtti. Bibliotheca Buddhica (Vol. 16). Osnabrück: Biblio Verlag.
Westerhoff J. (2010) The dispeller of disputes: Nāgārjuna’s Vigrahavyāvartanī. Oxford University Press, New York
Yonezawa Y. (2001) Introduction to the facsimile edition of a collection of Sanskrit palm-leaf manuscripts in Tibetan dBu med script. The Institute for Comprehensive Studies of Buddhism, Tokyo
Yonezawa Y. (2004) *Lakṣaṇaṭīkā. Sanskrit notes on the Prasannapadā (1). Journal of the Naritasan Institute for Buddhist Studies 27: 115–154
Yoshimizu C. (2006) Indo-Tibet Chūgan-shisō-shi no saikouchiku ni mukete [Toward reconstructing the history of Indian and Tibetan Madhyamaka thought: The launch of the study of dBu ma tshig gsal gyi ti ka I]. Tetsugaku-shisō ronshū 32: 73–114
Yotsuya, K. (1999). The critique of svatantra reasoning by Candrakīrti and Tsong-kha-pa: A study of philosophical proof according to two Prāsaṅgika Madhyamaka traditions of India and Tibet. Tibetan and Indo-Tibetan studies (Vol. 8). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vose, K. Authority in Early Prāsaṅgika Madhyamaka. J Indian Philos 38, 553–582 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-010-9105-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-010-9105-9