Skip to main content
Log in

The uses of the four positions of theCatuskoti and the problem of the description of reality in Mahāyāna Buddhism

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliography

(Appendices II and III)

  • Bahm, A. J. (1957) ‘Does Seven-Fold Predication Equal Four-Cornered Negation Reversed?’, inPhilosophy East and West 7, 127–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chari, C. T. K. (1954) ‘On the Dialectical Affinities Between East and West II’, inPhilosophy East and West 3/4, 321–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chari, C. T. K. (1955) ‘Quantum Physics and East-West Rapprochement’,Philosophy East and West 5, 61–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang Chung-yuan (1967) ‘Ch'an Buddhism: Logical and Illogical’,Philosophy East and West 17, 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, R. S. Y. (1974) ‘Topics on Being and Logical Reasoning’,Philosophy East and West 24, 295–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ichimura Shohei (1973) ‘Buddhist Thoughts on the Relationship Between Religion and Logical Thinking Especially in Theravāda and Zen’,The Mahā Bodhi 1973, 42–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayatilleke, K. N. (1950) ‘Some Problems of Translation and Interpretation II’, inUniversity of Ceylon Review 7, 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayatilleke, K. N. (1963)Early Buddhist Theory of Knowledge (London: George Allen and Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayatilleke, K. N. (1967) ‘The Logic of Four Alternatives’, inPhilosophy East and West 17, 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, J. (1969)∑ημειωτικη Recherches pour une sémanalyse (Paris: Editions du Seuil).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, I. and Mjall, L. (1967) ‘K probleme tetralemmy’, in∑ημειωτικη Trudy po znakovym sistemam (Tartu)3, 60–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunst, A. (1957) ‘The Principle of Excluded Middle in Buddhism’, inRocznik Orientalistyczny 21, 141–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäll (Mjall), L. (1965) ‘Nuleboï put'’, in∑ημειωτικη Trudy po znakovym sistemam (Tartu)2, 189–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäll (Mjall), L. (1968) ‘Une approche possible du Śūnyavāda’, inTel Quel 32 (Hiver 1968), 54–62 (French version of ‘Ob odnom vozmožnom podxode k ponimaniju Śūnyavāda', inTerminologia indica 1 [Tartu, 1967] 13–24).

    Google Scholar 

  • Matilal, B. K. (1971)Epistemology, Logic, and Grammar in Indian Philosophical Analysis (Janua linguarum, Series minor, 111) (The Hague: Mouton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura Hajime (1954) ‘Kūkan no kigo-ronrigaku-teki ketsumei’, inIndogaku-Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū 5, 219–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura Hajime (1958) ‘Buddhist Logic Expounded by Means of Symbolic Logic’, inIndogaku-Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū 7/1, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raju, P. T. (1954) ‘The Principle of Four-Cornered Negation in Indian Philosophy’, inReview of Metaphysics 7, 694–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R. H. (1957) ‘Some Logical Aspects of Nāgārjuna's System’, inPhilosophy East and West 6, 291–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R. H. (1958) ‘Mysticism and Logic in Sêng-chao's Thought’, inPhilosophy East and West 8, 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R. H. (1967)Early Mādhyamika in India and China (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R. H. (1969) Review of: K. N. Jayatilleke,Early Buddhist Theory of Knowledge, in Philosophy East and West 19, 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R. H. (1972) ‘Some Methodological Approaches to the Unexplained Points’, inPhilosophy East and West 22, 309–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schayer, St. (1931)Ausgewähle Kapitel aus der Prasannapadā (Kraków: Polska Akademja Umiejętności, Prace Komisji Orjentalistyznej, No. 14).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schayer, St. (1933) ‘Altindische Antizipationen der Aussagenlogik’, inBulletin de l'Académie Polonaise, Classe de Philologie, 1933, 90–96.

  • Seyfort Ruegg, D. (1969)La théorie du tathāgatagarbha et du gotra (Publications de l'École française d'Extrême-Orient, volume LXX, Paris: Adrien-Maisonneuve).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfort Ruegg, D. (1971) ‘On the Knowability and Expressibility of Absolute Reality in Buddhism’, inIndogaku-Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū 20/1, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staal, J. F. (1962) ‘Negation and the Law of Contradiction in Indian Thought’, inBulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 25, 52–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staal, J. F. (1966) ‘Analyticity’, inFoundations of Language 2, 89–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staal, J. F. (1975)Exploring Mysticism (Berkeley: Univ. of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruegg, D.S. The uses of the four positions of theCatuskoti and the problem of the description of reality in Mahāyāna Buddhism. J Indian Philos 5, 1–71 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02431703

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02431703

Navigation