Abstract
Using very general arguments, we prove that any entanglement measures based on distance must be maximal on pure states. Furthermore, we show that Bures measure of entanglement and geometric measure of entanglement satisfy the monogamy inequality on all pure multiqubit states. Finally, using the power of Bures measure of entanglement and geometric measure of entanglement, we present a class of tight monogamy relations for pure states of multiqubit systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Coffman, V., Kundu, J., Wootters, W.K.: . Phys. Rev. A 61, 052306 (2000)
Terhal, B.M.: . IBM J. Res. Dev. 48, 71 (2004)
Pawlowski, M.: . Phys. Rev. A 82, 032313 (2010)
Acín, A., Gisin, N., Masanes, L.: . Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 120405 (2006)
Tomamichel, M., Fehr, S., Kaniewski, J., Wehner, S.: . New J. Phys. 15, 103002 (2013)
Osborne, T.J., Verstraete, F.: . Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 220503 (2006)
Ou, Y.C., Fan, H.: . Phys. Rev. A 75, 062308 (2007)
Hiroshima, T., Adesso, G., Illuminati, F.: . Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 050503 (2007)
Kim, J.S., Das, A., Sanders, B.C.: . Phys. Rev. A 79, 012329 (2009)
Lancien, C., Di Martino, S., Huber, M., Piani, M., Adesso, G., Winter, A.: . Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 060501 (2016)
Bai, Y.K., Xu, Y.F., Wang, Z.D.: . Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 100503 (2014)
Song, W., Bai, Y.K., Yang, M., Cao, Z.L.: . Phys. Rev. A 93, 022306 (2016)
Luo, Y., Tian, T., Shao, L.H., Li, Y.: . Phys. Rev. A 93, 062340 (2016)
Seevinck, M.P.: . Quantum Inf. Process. 9, 273 (2010)
Ma, X., Dakic, B., Naylor, W., Zeilinger, A., Walther, P.: . Nat. Phys. 7, 399 (2011)
Verlinde, E., Verlinde, H.: . J. High Energy Phys. 1310, 107 (2013)
Vedral, V., Plenio, M.B., Rippin, M.A., Knight, P.L.: . Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2275 (1997)
Vedral, V., Plenio, M.B.: . Phys. Rev. A 57, 1619 (1998)
Wei, T.C., Goldbart, P.M.: . Phys. Rev. A 68, 042307 (2003)
Christandl, M., Winter, A.: . J. Math. Phys. 45, 829 (2004)
Streltsov, A., Adesso, G., Piani, M., Bruß, D.: . Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 050503 (2012)
Streltsov, A., Kampermann, H., Bruß, D.: . New J. Phys. 12, 123004 (2010)
Rungta, P., Bužek, V., Caves, C.M., Hillery, M., Milburn, G.J.: . Phys. Rev. A 64, 042315 (2001)
Gao, L.M., Yan, F.L., Gao, T. : Quantum Inf. Process. 19, 276 (2020)
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No: 11475054, the Hebei Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. A2020205014, A2018205125, and the Education Department of Hebei Province Natural Science Foundation under Grant No. ZD2020167.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: Proof of the Lemma
Appendix: Proof of the Lemma
It is evident that the following inequalities
and
hold on the domain D = {(x,y)|0 ≤ x,y,x2 + y2 ≤ 1}. By using the above inequalities, we can obtain the following conclusion.
Lemma
For η ≥ 1, we have
and
on the domain D = {(x,y)|0 ≤ x,y,x2 + y2 ≤ 1}.
Proof
Using the inequality (A.1), it is easy to verify that □
Then we get
When η ≥ 1, by the inequality (A.6), one derives
where in the second inequality we have used the property (1 + x)η ≥ 1 + xη for 0 ≤ x ≤ 1 and η ≥ 1. It implies that the inequality (A.4) holds, and completes the proof of the inequality (A.4).
Using the inequalities (A.1) and (A.2), we have
Inequalities (A.5) and (A.8) together yield
We can write (A.9) as
It follows that
that is
When η ≥ 1, the proof of inequality (A.3) is similar to the proof of the inequality (A.4). It is now obvious that the lemma holds.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gao, L., Yan, F. & Gao, T. Monogamy Inequality in Terms of Entanglement Measures Based on Distance for Pure Multiqubit States. Int J Theor Phys 59, 3098–3106 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-020-04564-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-020-04564-4