Abstract
The terms wave and particle are of classical origin and are inadequate in dealing with the novelties of quantum mechanics with respect to classical physics. In this paper we propose to substitute the wave-particle terminology with that of features-event complementarity. This approach aims at solving some of the problems affecting quantum-mechanics since its birth. In our terminology, features are what is responsible for one of the most characterizing aspects of quantum mechanics: quantum correlations. We suggest that an (uninterpreted) basic ontology for quantum mechanics should be thought of as constituted by events, features and their dynamical interplay, and that its (interpreted) theoretical ontology (made up by three classes of theoretical entities: states, observables and properties) does not isomorphically correspond to the uninterpreted ontology. Operations, i.e. concrete interventions within the physical world, like preparation, premeasurement and measurement, together with reliable inferences, assure the bridge between interpreted and uninterpreted ontology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Auletta, G.: Foundations and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: In the Light of a Critical-Historical Analysis of the Problems and of a Synthesis of the Results. World Scientific, Singapore (2000); rev. ed. 2001
Auletta, G.: The problem of information. In: Auletta, G. (ed.) Proceedings of the I Workshop on the Relationships Between Science and Philosophy, pp. 109–127. Libreria Editrice Vaticana, Vatican City (2006)
Auletta, G., Tarozzi, G.: Wavelike correlations versus path detection: another form of complementarity. Found. Phys. Lett. 17, 889–895 (2004)
Auletta, G., Tarozzi, G.: On the physical reality of quantum waves. Found. Phys. 34, 1675–1694 (2004)
Auletta, G., Fortunato, M., Parisi, G.: Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Viewpoint. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)
Bohm, D.: Quantum Theory. Prentice-Hall, New York (1951)
Bohm, D., Hiley, B.J.: The Undivided Universe. An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory. Routledge, London (1993)
Bohr, N.: The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory. Nature 121, 580–590 (1928)
Braginsky, V.B., Khalili, F.Y.: Quantum Measurement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)
de Broglie, L.: Une Tentative d’Interpretation Causale et Non-linéaire de la Mécanique Ondulatoire. Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1956)
DeWitt, B.S.: Quantum mechanics and reality. Phys. Today 23(9), 30–40 (1970)
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N.: Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935)
Everett, H. III: ‘Relative state’ formulation of quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 454–462 (1957)
Heisenberg, W.: Über quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen. Z. Phys. 33, 879–893 (1925)
Heisenberg, W.: Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik. Z. Phys. 43, 172–198 (1927)
Heisenberg, W.: Physics and Philosophy. Harper, New York (1958)
Horodecki, M., Oppenheim, J., Winter, A.: Partial quantum information. Nature 436, 673–76 (2005)
Joos, E., Zeh, H.D.: The emergence of classical properties through interaction with the environment. Z. Phys., B Condens. Matter 59, 223–243 (1985)
van Orman, Q.W.: From a Logical Point of View, University Press Cambridge, Cambridge (1953). 2nd. ed. 1961; 1980
Rauch, H.: Reality in neutron interference experiments. In: Ellis, J., Amati, D. (eds.) Quantum Reflections, pp. 28–68. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)
Schrödinger, E.: Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem. I–II. Ann. Phys. 79, 361–376 (1926) and 489–527
Wheeler, John A.: The ‘past’ and the ‘delayed-choice’ double-slit experiment. In: Marlow, A.R. (ed.) Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory, pp. 9–49. Academic Press, New York (1978)
Zeilinger, A.: A foundational principle for quantum mechanics. Found. Phys. 29, 631–643 (1999)
Zeilinger, A.: Quantum entangled bits step closer to it. Science 289, 405–406 (2000)
Zurek, W.H.: Pointer basis of quantum apparatus: Into what mixture does the wave packet collapse? Phys. Rev. D, Part. Fields 24, 1516–1525 (1981)
Zurek, W.H.: Environment-induced superselection rules. Phys. Rev. D, Part. Fields 26, 1862–1880 (1982)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Auletta, G., Torcal, L. From Wave-Particle to Features-Event Complementarity. Int J Theor Phys 50, 3654–3668 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-011-0833-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-011-0833-8