Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comments on “There Is No Axiomatic System for the Quantum Theory”

  • Published:
International Journal of Theoretical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a recent paper, Nagata (Int. J. Theor. Phys. 48(12):3532, 2009) claims to derive inconsistencies from quantum mechanics. In this paper, we show that the inconsistencies do not come from quantum mechanics, but from extra assumptions about the reality of observables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nagata, K.: Int. J. Theor. Phys. 48(12), 3532 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Feynman, R.P., Leighton, R.B., Sands, M.: Lectures on Physics. 3. Quantum Mechanics. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Suppes, P., de Barros, J.A.: Found. Phys. Lett. 7, 501 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Suppes, P., de Barros, J.A.: In: Weingartner, P., Schurz, G. (eds.) Law and Prediction in the Light of Chaos Research. Lecture Notes in Physics, pp. 189–201. Springer, Berlin (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Omnes, R.: The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Holland, P.R.: The Quantum Theory of Motion: An Account of the de Broglie-Bohm Causal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Suppes, P., de Barros, J.A., Sant’Anna, A.S.: Found. Phys. Lett. 9(6), 551–560 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Suppes, P., Zanotti, M.: Synthese 48, 191 (1981)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. de Barros, J.A., Suppes, P.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 793–797 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pitowski, I.: Quantum Logic. Springer, Heidelberg (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Suppes, P., de Barros, J.A., Oas, G.: In: Pratesi, R., Ronchi, L. (eds.) Conference Proceedings: Waves, Information, and Foundations of Physics, vol. 60, pp. 267–291. Società Italiana Di Fisica, Bologna (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Peres, A.: Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. D’Espagnat, B.: Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd edn. Preseus Books Publishing, Reading (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. de Barros, J.A., Suppes, P.: J. Math. Psychol. 53, 306 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Einstein, A., Podolski, B., Rosen, N.: Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935)

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bell, J.S.: Rev. Mod. Phys. 38(3), 447–452 (1966). doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.38.447

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Liberal Studies Program, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave. BH 238, San Francisco, CA, 94132, USA

    J. Acacio de Barros

Authors
  1. J. Acacio de Barros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Acacio de Barros.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Barros, J.A. Comments on “There Is No Axiomatic System for the Quantum Theory”. Int J Theor Phys 50, 1828–1830 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-011-0696-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-011-0696-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation