Skip to main content
Log in

Topos-Theoretic Extension of a Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

  • Published:
International Journal of Theoretical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with topos-theoretic truth-value valuations of quantum propositions. Concretely, a mathematical framework of a specific type of modal approach is extended to the topos theory, and further, structures of the obtained truth-value valuations are investigated. What is taken up is the modal approach based on a determinate lattice \({\mathfrak{D}}(e,R)\) , which is a sublattice of the lattice \({\mathfrak{L}}\) of all quantum propositions and is determined by a quantum state e and a preferred determinate observable R. Topos-theoretic extension is made in the functor category \(\mathbf{Sets}^{\mathcal{C}_{R}}\) of which base category \({\mathcal{C}_{R}}\) is determined by R. Each true atom, which determines truth values, true or false, of all propositions in \({\mathfrak{D}}(e,R)\) , generates also a multi-valued valuation function of which domain and range are \({\mathfrak{L}}\) and a Heyting algebra given by the subobject classifier in \(\mathbf{Sets}^{\mathcal{C}_{R}}\) , respectively. All true propositions in \({\mathfrak{D}}(e,R)\) are assigned the top element of the Heyting algebra by the valuation function. False propositions including the null proposition are, however, assigned values larger than the bottom element. This defect can be removed by use of a subobject semi-classifier. Furthermore, in order to treat all possible determinate observables in a unified framework, another valuations are constructed in the functor category \(\mathbf{Sets}^{\mathcal{C}}\) . Here, the base category \(\mathcal{C}\) includes all \({\mathcal{C}_{R}}\) ’s as subcategories. Although \(\mathbf{Sets}^{\mathcal{C}}\) has a structure apparently different from \(\mathbf{Sets}^{\mathcal{C}_{R}}\) , a subobject semi-classifier of \(\mathbf{Sets}^{\mathcal{C}}\) gives valuations completely equivalent to those in \(\mathbf{Sets}^{\mathcal{C}_{R}}\) ’s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kochen, S., Specker, E.P.: The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. J. Math. Mech. 17, 59–87 (1967)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. van Fraassen, B.: Quantum Mechanics: A Empiricist View. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bub, J.: Interpreting the Quantum World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Vermaas, P.: A Philosopher’s Understanding of Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Isham, C.J.: Topos theory and coherent histories. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 36, 785–814 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Isham, C.J., Butterfield, J.: A topos perspective on the Kochen-Specker theorem: I. Internal valuations. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 37, 2669–2733 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Butterfield, J., Isham, C.J.: A topos perspective on the Kochen-Specker theorem: II. Conceptual aspects, and classic analogues. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 837–859 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamilton, J., Butterfield, J., Isham, C.J.: A topos perspective on the Kochen-Specker theorem: III. Von Neumann algebras as the base category. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 39, 1413–1436 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Butterfield, J., Isham, C.J.: A topos perspective on the Kochen-Specker theorem: IV. Internal valuations. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 41, 613–639 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Isham, C.J.: A topos perspective on state-vector reduction. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 45, 1524–1551 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldblatt, R.: Topoi: The Categorical Analysis of Logic. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  12. MacLane, S., Moerdijk, I.: Sheaves in Geometry and Logic: A First Introduction to Topos Theory. Springer, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Döring, A., Isham, C.J.: A topos foundation for theoretical physics: I. Formal language for physics. quant-ph/0703060v1 (2007)

  14. Döring, A., Isham, C.J.: A topos foundation for theoretical physics: II. Daseinization and the liberation of quantum theory. quant-ph/0703062v1 (2007)

  15. Döring, A., Isham, C.J.: A topos foundation for theoretical physics: III. The representation of physical quantities with arrows \(\breve{\delta}^{o}(A):\underline{\Sigma}\to \underline{\mathbb{R}^{\succeq}}\) . quant-ph/0703060v1 (2007)

  16. Döring, A., Isham, C.J.: A topos foundation for theoretical physics: IV. Categories of systems. quant-ph/0703066v1 (2007)

  17. Lambek, J., Scott, P.J.: Introduction to Higher Order Categorical Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Bell, J.L.: Toposes and Local Set Theories. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Bub, J.: Quantum Mechanics without the Projection Postulate. Found. Phys. 22, 737–754 (1992)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Davey, B.A., Priestly, H.A.: Introduction to Lattices and Order. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kunji Nakayama.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nakayama, K. Topos-Theoretic Extension of a Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Int J Theor Phys 47, 2065–2094 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-008-9649-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-008-9649-6

Keywords

Navigation