Skip to main content
Log in

Performance Tests of Gas Characterization Methods for Predicting Freeze-out in LNG Production

  • Published:
International Journal of Thermophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The formation and deposition of solids in plant equipment is a perennial risk to the cryogenic processing of natural gas. While several tools are available to predict the temperatures at which heavy hydrocarbon solids (HHC) will form, the accuracy of the gas mixture’s compositional characterization can significantly impact the reliability of those predictions. A complete characterization of the mixture is the most desirable scenario but is challenging and expensive to obtain. More typically, C6 hydrocarbons and heavier compounds are lumped into pseudocomponents based on their boiling point to represent the HHC composition of the mixture. Recently, Miethe et al. (Hydrocarb Process, 2015) detailed a new approach based on splitting each pseudocomponent further according to its paraffinic, isoparaffinic, naphthenic and aromatic (PINA) composition. An associated defined component is used to represent each of these sub-fractions to improve the melting temperature prediction accuracy. However, this “Lump + PINAAPI” approach has not been validated for mixtures that contain HHCs beyond C10. This work compares freeze-out predictions based on a complete compositional characterization of a gas mixture with HHCs up to C14 with results obtained using (1) the new Lump + PINAAPI approach and (2) several other freeze-out prediction methods described in the literature. For two gas samples, the fully characterized mixtures were predicted to have melting temperatures of 263.2 K (14.1 °F) and 260.1 K (8.5 °F), respectively. At the same time, the Lump + PINAAPI predictions were 153.4 K (− 183.6 °F) and 157.4 K (− 176.3 °F), respectively. The large discrepancy between melting temperature predictions highlights the need to either (1) obtain full characterization of natural gas mixture compositions where possible, and/or (2) to develop an improved set of correlations pseudocomponent correlations for predicting freeze-out in natural gas mixtures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. A.J. Kidnay, W.R. Parrish, Fundamentals of Natural Gas Processing (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. C. Baker, A. Siahvashi, J. Oakley, T. Hughes, D. Rowland, S. Huang, E.F. May, Advanced predictions of solidification in cryogenic natural gas and LNG processing. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 137, 22–33 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. C.L. Yaws, C. Gabbula, Yaws’ Handbook of Thermodynamic and Physical Properties of Chemical Compounds (Knovel, New York, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Chen, C.M. Ott, Lean gas. LNG Industry, (2013)

  5. W. Ransbarger, A fresh look at LNG process efficiency. LNG Industry, (2007)

  6. I. Miethe, G. Lauermann, B. Jungfer, Improve the calculation of solids precipitation in gas compositions, Hydrocarb. Process., no. May/June, (2015)

  7. M.R. Riazi, T.E. Daubert, Prediction of molecular-type analysis of petroleum fractions and coal liquids. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process. Des. Dev. 25, 1009–1015 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1021/i200035a027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Antoine, Vapor pressure: a new relationship between pressure and temperature. C. R. Acad. Sci. 107, 681–685 (1888)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aspen Properties V12, AspenTech, Bedford, MA, USA, (2021)

  10. PURE38 Databank, Aspen Properties

  11. AIChE DIPPR® data compilation project, Aspen Properties

  12. B.E. Poling, J.M. Prausnitz, J.P. O’connell, Properties of Gases and Liquids (McGraw-Hill Education, New York, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. KBC Advanced Technologies, Infochem Multiflash 7.0. Walton-on-Thames, England, https://www.kbc.global/software/advanced-thermodynamics/ (2018)

  14. D.L. Morgan, R. Kobayashi, Triple point corresponding states in long-chain n-alkanes. Fluid Ph. Equilibria 63, 317–327 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. K. Won, Thermodynamics for solid solution-liquid-vapor equilibria: wax phase formation from heavy hydrocarbon mixtures. Fluid Ph. Equilibria 30, 265–279 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. T. Brown, V. Niesen, D. Erickson, The effects of light ends and high pressure on paraffin formation, in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, (OnePetro, 1994)

  17. C. Lira-Galeana, A. Firoozabadi, J.M. Prausnitz, Thermodynamics of wax precipitation in petroleum mixtures. AIChE J. 42, 239–248 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. ThermoFAST 2.0. (2022) Fluid Science and Resources, The University of Western Australia, https://www.fsr.ecm.uwa.edu.au/software/. [Online]. Available: https://www.fsr.ecm.uwa.edu.au/software/thermofast/

  19. M.R. Riazi, T.A. Al-Sahhaf, Physical properties of n-alkanes and n-alkylhydrocarbons: application to petroleum mixtures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 34, 4145–4148 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00038a062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. K.S. Pedersen, K.S. Pedersen, P.L. Christensen, J.A. Shaikh, P.L. Christensen, Phase Behavior of Petroleum Reservoir Fluids (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank David J. Zhu, Peter E. Falloon, and Xiong Xiao for upgrading ThermoFAST Software to enable the freeze-out calculation methods tested by this work. Special thanks to David J. Zhu for his assistance in editing this paper. We thank the Future Energy Exports Cooperative Research Centre for providing access to the free ThermoFAST software package developed by the Fluid Science Research group at the University of Western Australia. This is FEnEx CRC Document 2022/RP1.CM1.3.2-FNX-001.

Funding

This work received no direct funding. EFM is partially funded by the Future Energy Exports CRC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HAA conducted the research, supervised by NAE-E, TMA-F and EFM. HAA and EFM wrote the main manuscript text. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hassan A. Attalla or Eric F. May.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors have no competing interests as defined by Springer, or other interests that might be perceived to influence the results and/or discussion reported in this paper.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: 45 Discrete Compounds Added to ThermoFAST to Enable Full Method Freeze-out Calculations

Appendix: 45 Discrete Compounds Added to ThermoFAST to Enable Full Method Freeze-out Calculations

See Table 8.

Table 8 Parameters for the 45 discrete compounds added to ThermoFAST to enable Full method freeze-out calculations

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Attalla, H.A., El-Emam, N.A., Aboul-Fotouh, T.M. et al. Performance Tests of Gas Characterization Methods for Predicting Freeze-out in LNG Production. Int J Thermophys 44, 25 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-022-03127-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-022-03127-5

Keywords

Navigation