Abstract
The aim of the current study was to investigate the statistical literacy of seventh grade students regarding the concepts of average and variation on bar and line graphs presented in alternative real-life contexts. To this end, the statistical literacy levels of the seventh grade students were initially determined. Subsequently, definitions, interpretations and evaluations generated by the students at varying levels of statistical literacy were examined in further depth. More specifically, a qualitative survey study was conducted with 164 seventh graders from two public middle schools in Ankara, Turkey. The data, collected by means of a-five-item instrument, were analyzed by utilizing the modified version of the six-hierarchical-level framework developed by Watson and Callingham (Statistics Education Research Journal, 2(2), 3–46, 2003). The findings revealed that most of the students’ statistical literacy levels were identified as either Level 3 or Level 4 in the framework with respect to the concept of average, and either Level 1 or Level 2 with respect to the concept of variation. Hence, it can be inferred that while many of the students could interpret average in the given contexts, they had difficulty in interpreting variation. Although definitions and evaluations related to both concepts were found difficult by seventh graders, the graphs, particularly bar graphs, which students were provided with, were observed to be helpful for students in their evaluation of variation. Additionally, students benefitted from some of the contexts they were provided while evaluating variation. Finally, the analysis revealed some discrepancies among students’ definitions and their interpretations or evaluations.
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
References
Aoyama, K., & Stephens, M. (2003). Graph interpretation aspect of statistical literacy: A Japanese perspective. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(3), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217380.
Işıksal-Bostan, M., & Yemen-Karpuzcu, S. (2017). The role of definitions on classification of solids including (non)prototype examples: The case of cylinder and prism. In T. Dooley & G. Gueudet (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME10, February 1–5, 2017) (pp. 3320–3327). Dublin, Ireland: DCU Institute of Education and ERME.
Bright, G. W., & Friel, S. N. (1998). Graphical representations: Helping students interpret data. In S. P. Lajoie (Ed.), Reflections on statistics: Learning, teaching, and assessment in grades K–12 (pp. 63–88). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cai, J. (2000). Understanding and representing the arithmetic averaging algorithm: An analysis and comparison of US and Chinese students' responses. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31(6), 839–855. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390050203342.
Callingham, R., & Watson, J. M. (2017). The development of statistical literacy at school. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16(1), 181–201.
Capraro, M. M., Kulm, G., & Capraro, R. M. (2005). Middle grades: Misconceptions in statistics thinking. School Science and Mathematics, 105(4), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18156.x.
English, L. D., & Watson, J. M. (2015). Statistical literacy in the elementary school: Opportunities for problem posing. In F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing: From research to effective practice (pp. 241–256). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_11.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Franklin, C., Kader, G., Mewborn, D., Moreno, J., Peck, R., Perry, M., & Scheaffer, R. (2005). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE) report: A pre-K–12 curriculum framework. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
Gal, I. (2002). Adult's statistical literacy: Meanings, components, responsibilities. International Statistical Review, 70(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2002.tb00336.x.
Halpern, D. F. (1997). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A brief edition of thought and knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Jansen, H. (2010). The logic of qualitative survey research and its position in the field of social research methods. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-11.2.1450.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9822.
Leavy, A., & O’Loughlin, N. (2006). Preservice teachers’ understanding of the mean: Moving beyond the arithmetic average. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(1), 53–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-006-9003-y.
Mc Gatha, M., Cobb, P., & McClain, K. (2002). An analysis of students' initial statistical understanding: Developing a conjectured learning trajectory. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(3), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00133-5.
Miller, D. L. (1993). Making the connection with language. The Arithmetic Teacher, 40(6), 311–316.
Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2018). Matematik dersi (İlkokul ve ortaokul 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar) öğretim programı [Primary and middle school mathematics curricula for grades 1, 2, 3,4, 5, 6, 7, and 8]. Ankara, Turkey: MEB.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The Council.
Rumsey, D. J. (2002). Statistical literacy as a goal for introductory statistics courses. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2002.11910678.
Sharma, S., Doyle, P., Shandil, V., & Talakia’atu, S. (2011). Developing statistical literacy with year 9 students. Set: Research Information for Educational Research, 1, 43–50.
Shaughnessy, J. M. (2007). Research on statistics learning and reasoning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 957–1009). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Shaugnessy, J. M. (2003). The development of secondary students’ conceptions of variability (Annual report year 1. NSF Grant no. REC0207842). Portland, OR: Portland State University.
Shaugnessy, J. M., & Pfannkuch, M. (2002). How faithful is old faithful? Statistical thinking: A story of variation and prediction. The Mathematics Teacher, 95(4), 252–259. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20871007.
Watson, J. M. (1997). Assessing statistical thinking using the media. In I. Gal & J. B. Garfield (Eds.), The assessment challenge in statistics education (pp. 107–122). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
Watson, J. M. (2006). Statistical literacy at school: Growth and goals. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Watson, J. M., & Callingham, R. (2003). Statistical literacy: A complex hierarchical construct. Statistics Education Research Journal, 2(2), 3–46.
Watson, J. M., Chick, H., & Callingham, R. (2014). Average: The juxtaposition of procedure and context. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(3), 477–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0113-4.
Watson, J. M., & Kelly, B. A. (2005). The winds are variable: Student intuitions about variation. School Science and Mathematics, 105(5), 252–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18165.x.
Watson, J. M., & Kelly, B. A. (2008). Sample, random and variation: The vocabulary of statistical literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(4), 741–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9083-x.
Watson, J. M., & Moritz, J. B. (1998). The beginning of statistical inference: Comparing two data sets. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37(2), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003594832397.
Watson, J. M., & Moritz, J. B. (2000). The longitudinal development of understanding of average. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(1–2), 11–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL0202_2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Çatman Aksoy, E., Işıksal Bostan, M. Seventh Graders’ Statistical Literacy: an Investigation on Bar and Line Graphs. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 19, 397–418 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10052-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10052-2