Skip to main content
Log in

Seventh Graders’ Statistical Literacy: an Investigation on Bar and Line Graphs

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to investigate the statistical literacy of seventh grade students regarding the concepts of average and variation on bar and line graphs presented in alternative real-life contexts. To this end, the statistical literacy levels of the seventh grade students were initially determined. Subsequently, definitions, interpretations and evaluations generated by the students at varying levels of statistical literacy were examined in further depth. More specifically, a qualitative survey study was conducted with 164 seventh graders from two public middle schools in Ankara, Turkey. The data, collected by means of a-five-item instrument, were analyzed by utilizing the modified version of the six-hierarchical-level framework developed by Watson and Callingham (Statistics Education Research Journal, 2(2), 3–46, 2003). The findings revealed that most of the students’ statistical literacy levels were identified as either Level 3 or Level 4 in the framework with respect to the concept of average, and either Level 1 or Level 2 with respect to the concept of variation. Hence, it can be inferred that while many of the students could interpret average in the given contexts, they had difficulty in interpreting variation. Although definitions and evaluations related to both concepts were found difficult by seventh graders, the graphs, particularly bar graphs, which students were provided with, were observed to be helpful for students in their evaluation of variation. Additionally, students benefitted from some of the contexts they were provided while evaluating variation. Finally, the analysis revealed some discrepancies among students’ definitions and their interpretations or evaluations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  • Aoyama, K., & Stephens, M. (2003). Graph interpretation aspect of statistical literacy: A Japanese perspective. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(3), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Işıksal-Bostan, M., & Yemen-Karpuzcu, S. (2017). The role of definitions on classification of solids including (non)prototype examples: The case of cylinder and prism. In T. Dooley & G. Gueudet (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME10, February 1–5, 2017) (pp. 3320–3327). Dublin, Ireland: DCU Institute of Education and ERME.

  • Bright, G. W., & Friel, S. N. (1998). Graphical representations: Helping students interpret data. In S. P. Lajoie (Ed.), Reflections on statistics: Learning, teaching, and assessment in grades K–12 (pp. 63–88). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J. (2000). Understanding and representing the arithmetic averaging algorithm: An analysis and comparison of US and Chinese students' responses. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31(6), 839–855. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390050203342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callingham, R., & Watson, J. M. (2017). The development of statistical literacy at school. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16(1), 181–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capraro, M. M., Kulm, G., & Capraro, R. M. (2005). Middle grades: Misconceptions in statistics thinking. School Science and Mathematics, 105(4), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18156.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, L. D., & Watson, J. M. (2015). Statistical literacy in the elementary school: Opportunities for problem posing. In F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing: From research to effective practice (pp. 241–256). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_11.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, C., Kader, G., Mewborn, D., Moreno, J., Peck, R., Perry, M., & Scheaffer, R. (2005). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE) report: A pre-K–12 curriculum framework. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, I. (2002). Adult's statistical literacy: Meanings, components, responsibilities. International Statistical Review, 70(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2002.tb00336.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F. (1997). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A brief edition of thought and knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, H. (2010). The logic of qualitative survey research and its position in the field of social research methods. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-11.2.1450.

  • Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9822.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leavy, A., & O’Loughlin, N. (2006). Preservice teachers’ understanding of the mean: Moving beyond the arithmetic average. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(1), 53–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-006-9003-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mc Gatha, M., Cobb, P., & McClain, K. (2002). An analysis of students' initial statistical understanding: Developing a conjectured learning trajectory. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(3), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00133-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. L. (1993). Making the connection with language. The Arithmetic Teacher, 40(6), 311–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2018). Matematik dersi (İlkokul ve ortaokul 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar) öğretim programı [Primary and middle school mathematics curricula for grades 1, 2, 3,4, 5, 6, 7, and 8]. Ankara, Turkey: MEB.

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumsey, D. J. (2002). Statistical literacy as a goal for introductory statistics courses. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2002.11910678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., Doyle, P., Shandil, V., & Talakia’atu, S. (2011). Developing statistical literacy with year 9 students. Set: Research Information for Educational Research, 1, 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy, J. M. (2007). Research on statistics learning and reasoning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 957–1009). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaugnessy, J. M. (2003). The development of secondary students’ conceptions of variability (Annual report year 1. NSF Grant no. REC0207842). Portland, OR: Portland State University.

  • Shaugnessy, J. M., & Pfannkuch, M. (2002). How faithful is old faithful? Statistical thinking: A story of variation and prediction. The Mathematics Teacher, 95(4), 252–259. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20871007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. M. (1997). Assessing statistical thinking using the media. In I. Gal & J. B. Garfield (Eds.), The assessment challenge in statistics education (pp. 107–122). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.

  • Watson, J. M. (2006). Statistical literacy at school: Growth and goals. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. M., & Callingham, R. (2003). Statistical literacy: A complex hierarchical construct. Statistics Education Research Journal, 2(2), 3–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. M., Chick, H., & Callingham, R. (2014). Average: The juxtaposition of procedure and context. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(3), 477–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0113-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. M., & Kelly, B. A. (2005). The winds are variable: Student intuitions about variation. School Science and Mathematics, 105(5), 252–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18165.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. M., & Kelly, B. A. (2008). Sample, random and variation: The vocabulary of statistical literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(4), 741–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9083-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. M., & Moritz, J. B. (1998). The beginning of statistical inference: Comparing two data sets. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37(2), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003594832397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. M., & Moritz, J. B. (2000). The longitudinal development of understanding of average. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(1–2), 11–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL0202_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emine Çatman Aksoy.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 3 Modified version of the framework of Watson and Callingham (2003)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Çatman Aksoy, E., Işıksal Bostan, M. Seventh Graders’ Statistical Literacy: an Investigation on Bar and Line Graphs. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 19, 397–418 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10052-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10052-2

Keywords

Navigation