Abstract
Professional development (PD) of teachers comprises a major challenge in many countries. The empirical relations between teaching–learning processes and student achievements occupy educators who construct teachers’ in-service training programs. Student achievements serve as a measure for testing improvements in learning. Many investigators view teachers’ content–didactic knowledge as influencing the quality of teaching and student achievements. Large-scale assessments (national and international evaluation frameworks) in the Israeli educational system offer teachers opportunities for improving their teaching–learning processes and student achievements. We developed a program for the PD of science teachers based on the curriculum and large-scale assessments. The model is long term and integrates theoretical and practical knowledge. The activities should be effective and cooperative and should use diverse teaching methods and integrate advanced technologies. This article presents considerations for the construction of the program, its goals, its performance, teachers’ reports on the components, and the contribution of the program’s components to their PD.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clewell, B. C., Campbell, P. B., Perlman, L. (2004). Review of evaluation studies of mathematics and science curricula and professional development models. Submitted to the GE Foundation. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102(2), 294–343.
Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2001). Learning policy: When state education reform works. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1998a). Teacher learning that supports student learning. Educational Leadership, 55(5), 6–11.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1998b). Teachers and teaching: Testing policy hypotheses from a National Commission Report. Educational Researcher, 27(1), 5–15.
Erickson, F. (1998). Qualitative research methods for science education. In B. J. Fraser, & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 1157–1173). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic.
Fullan, M. G. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., Youn, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945.
Glenn, J. (2000). Before it's too late. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
Guskey, T. R. (1998). The age of our accountability. Journal of Staff Development, 19(4), 36–44.
Guskey, T. R. (2003). What makes professional development effective. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(10), 748–750.
Hoban, G. F. (2002). Teacher learning and educational change: A systems thinking approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Hoban, G. (Ed.) (2005). The missing links in teacher education design—developing a multi-linked conceptual framework. Dordrecht: Springer.
Kennedy, M. M. (1998). Form and substance in in-service teacher's education (Research monograph no. 13). Madison, WI: National Institute for Science Education, University of Wisconsin.
Kennedy, M. M. (1999). Form and substance in mathematics and science professional development. NISE Brief, 3(2), 1–7. Madison, WI: National Institute for Science Education, University of Wisconsin.
Lin, H. S. (2008). The impact and implications of large-scale assessments on science education. Paper presented at Conference of Asian Science Education, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Madigan, K. (2001). Strategies for improving teacher quality. Washington, DC: American Board for Certification of Teacher Excellence.
Ministry of Education (2005). The education system in light of the GEMS—the central district. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education (In Hebrew).
National Research Council (NRC) (2003). Assessment in support of instruction and learning: Bridging the gap between large-scale and classroom assessment—Workshop report. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Science Board (NSB) (2008). Science and engineering indicators 2008 (volume 1, NSB 08-01; volume 2, NSB 08-01A). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Sanders, W. L., & Rivers, J. C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee.
Shulman, L. S. (1997). Communities of learners and communities of teachers. Monographs from the Mandel Institute (In Hebrew).
Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
TIMSS (1999). Retrieved March 12, 2009 from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss1999i/science_achievement_report.html.
TIMSS (2003). Retrieved March 12, 2009 from http://timss.bc.edu/timss2003i/scienceD.html.
Vannatta, R. A., & Fordham, N. (2004). Teacher dispositions as predictors of classroom technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(5), 253–272.
Viadero, D. (2005). Pressure builds for effective staff training. Education Week, 43(24), 1, 18–19, 21.
Wenglinsky, H. (2002). How schools matter: The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic performance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(2). Retrieved March 12, 2009, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n12/.
Wenzlaff, T. L., & Wieseman, K. C. (2004). Teachers need teachers to grow. Teacher Education Quarterly, 31(2), 113–125.
Zhan, S. X., & Robertson, G. (2009). The implementation of task-based approach in a professional learning community: Why, what and how language teachers change. Retrieved March 12, 2009 from http://ocs.sfu.ca/aare/index.php/AARE_2008/AARE/paper/view/411.
Zuzovsky, R. (2005). Teachers’ qualifications and their impact on student achievement: Findings from TIMSS 2003 data for Israel. Retrieved November 19, 2009 from http://www.ierinstitute.org/IERI_Monograph_Volume_02_Chapter_02.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klieger, A., Bar-Yossef, N. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE TEACHERS AS A REFLECTION OF LARGE-SCALE ASSESSMENT. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 9, 771–791 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9216-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9216-5