Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE TEACHERS AS A REFLECTION OF LARGE-SCALE ASSESSMENT

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Professional development (PD) of teachers comprises a major challenge in many countries. The empirical relations between teaching–learning processes and student achievements occupy educators who construct teachers’ in-service training programs. Student achievements serve as a measure for testing improvements in learning. Many investigators view teachers’ content–didactic knowledge as influencing the quality of teaching and student achievements. Large-scale assessments (national and international evaluation frameworks) in the Israeli educational system offer teachers opportunities for improving their teaching–learning processes and student achievements. We developed a program for the PD of science teachers based on the curriculum and large-scale assessments. The model is long term and integrates theoretical and practical knowledge. The activities should be effective and cooperative and should use diverse teaching methods and integrate advanced technologies. This article presents considerations for the construction of the program, its goals, its performance, teachers’ reports on the components, and the contribution of the program’s components to their PD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Clewell, B. C., Campbell, P. B., Perlman, L. (2004). Review of evaluation studies of mathematics and science curricula and professional development models. Submitted to the GE Foundation. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102(2), 294–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2001). Learning policy: When state education reform works. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1998a). Teacher learning that supports student learning. Educational Leadership, 55(5), 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1998b). Teachers and teaching: Testing policy hypotheses from a National Commission Report. Educational Researcher, 27(1), 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (1998). Qualitative research methods for science education. In B. J. Fraser, & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 1157–1173). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. G. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., Youn, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, J. (2000). Before it's too late. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (1998). The age of our accountability. Journal of Staff Development, 19(4), 36–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (2003). What makes professional development effective. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(10), 748–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoban, G. F. (2002). Teacher learning and educational change: A systems thinking approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoban, G. (Ed.) (2005). The missing links in teacher education design—developing a multi-linked conceptual framework. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. M. (1998). Form and substance in in-service teacher's education (Research monograph no. 13). Madison, WI: National Institute for Science Education, University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. M. (1999). Form and substance in mathematics and science professional development. NISE Brief, 3(2), 1–7. Madison, WI: National Institute for Science Education, University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H. S. (2008). The impact and implications of large-scale assessments on science education. Paper presented at Conference of Asian Science Education, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

  • Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madigan, K. (2001). Strategies for improving teacher quality. Washington, DC: American Board for Certification of Teacher Excellence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (2005). The education system in light of the GEMS—the central district. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education (In Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC) (2003). Assessment in support of instruction and learning: Bridging the gap between large-scale and classroom assessment—Workshop report. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Board (NSB) (2008). Science and engineering indicators 2008 (volume 1, NSB 08-01; volume 2, NSB 08-01A). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, W. L., & Rivers, J. C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1997). Communities of learners and communities of teachers. Monographs from the Mandel Institute (In Hebrew).

  • Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • TIMSS (1999). Retrieved March 12, 2009 from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss1999i/science_achievement_report.html.

  • TIMSS (2003). Retrieved March 12, 2009 from http://timss.bc.edu/timss2003i/scienceD.html.

  • Vannatta, R. A., & Fordham, N. (2004). Teacher dispositions as predictors of classroom technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(5), 253–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viadero, D. (2005). Pressure builds for effective staff training. Education Week, 43(24), 1, 18–19, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenglinsky, H. (2002). How schools matter: The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic performance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(2). Retrieved March 12, 2009, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n12/.

  • Wenzlaff, T. L., & Wieseman, K. C. (2004). Teachers need teachers to grow. Teacher Education Quarterly, 31(2), 113–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhan, S. X., & Robertson, G. (2009). The implementation of task-based approach in a professional learning community: Why, what and how language teachers change. Retrieved March 12, 2009 from http://ocs.sfu.ca/aare/index.php/AARE_2008/AARE/paper/view/411.

  • Zuzovsky, R. (2005). Teachers’ qualifications and their impact on student achievement: Findings from TIMSS 2003 data for Israel. Retrieved November 19, 2009 from http://www.ierinstitute.org/IERI_Monograph_Volume_02_Chapter_02.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aviva Klieger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klieger, A., Bar-Yossef, N. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE TEACHERS AS A REFLECTION OF LARGE-SCALE ASSESSMENT. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 9, 771–791 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9216-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9216-5

Key words

Navigation