Abstract
In this paper, we describe empirical research on the recording of primary school and preschool student teacher conceptions of the concept of distant force interactions in different contexts related to the school curriculum for this subject. For this objective to be achieved, we undertook ten semi-structured interviews with student teachers. Based on the findings from these interviews, we developed a written ten-item questionnaire that was distributed to 264 first-year student teachers at three Greek universities. The main findings of our research are that a significant number of students: (i) experience difficulty in recognizing the interactions in different contexts, and even in different cases within the same context; (ii) place the arrow representing the force on the body that exerts it and not on that which accepts it; and (iii) hold the alternative view that the larger the body interacting, the greater the force it exerts. Based on the above results, as well as in the ways in which they seem to be related, we developed hypotheses, potentially able to lead to the construction of a teaching–learning sequence, which focuses on the comprehension of force as the measure of a unified concept of interaction between two entities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bao, L., Hogg, K. & Zollman, D. (2002). Model analysis of fine structures of student models: an example with Newton’s third law. American Journal of Physics, 70(7), 765–778.
Brown, D. (1989). Students’ concept of force: the importance of understanding Newton’s third law. Physics Education, 24(1), 353–358.
Bryce, T. & MacMillan, K. (2005). Encouraging conceptual change: the use of bridging analogies in the teaching of action–reaction forces and the ‘at rest’ condition in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 737–763.
diSessa, A.A. (1980). Momentum flow as an alternative perspective in elementary mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 48, 365–369.
diSessa, A.A., Gillespie, M.N. & Esterly, B.J. (2004). Coherence versus fragmentation in the development of the concept of force. Cognitive Science, 28(6), 843–900.
Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P. & Wood–Robinson, V. (1998). Making sense of the secondary Science, 280–285. Typothito, Athens (Greek translation).
Duit, R. & Treagust, D. (1998). Learning in science—From behaviourism towards social constructivism and beyond. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 3–26). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Galili, I. (2001). Weight versus gravitational force: historical and educational perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 23(10), 1073–1093.
Gamble, R. (1989). Force. Physics Education, 24, 79–82.
Grimellini–Tomasini, N., Pecori–Balandi, B., Pacca, J.L.A. & Villani, A. (1993). Understanding conservation laws in mechanics: students’ conceptual change in learning about collisions. Science Education, 77(2), 169–189.
Hennessy, S., Wilshart, J., Whitelock, D., Deaney, R., Brawn, R., Velle, L., McFarlane, A., Ruthven, K. & Winterbottom, M. (2007). Pedagogical approaches for technology-integrated science teaching. Computers & Education, 48, 137–152.
Heywood, D. & Parker, J. (2001). Describing the cognitive landscape in learning and teaching about forces. International Journal of Science Education, 23(11), 1177–1199.
Ioannides, C. & Vosniadou, S. (2002). The changing meanings of force. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 2(1), 5–62.
Jimoyiannis, A. & Komis, V. (2003). Investigating Greek students’ ideas about forces and motion. Research in Science Education, 33(3), 375–392.
Kolokotronis, D. & Solomonidou, C. (2003). A step-by-step design and development of an integrated educational software to deal with students’ empirical ideas about mechanical interaction. Education and Information Technologies, 8, 229–244.
Kruger, C., Summers, M. & Palacio, D. (1990a). An investigation of some English primary British teachers’ understanding of the concepts force and gravity. British Educational Research Journal, 16(4), 383–397.
Kruger, C., Summers, M. & Palacio, D. (1990b). Adding forces—a target for primary science INSET. British Journal of In-Service Education, 16(1), 45–52.
Meheut, M. & Psillos, D. (2004). Teaching–learning sequences: aims and tools for science education research. International Journal of Science Education, 26(5), 515–652. (special issue).
Ministry of Education. (2004). A cross thematic curriculum framework for compulsory education. http://www.pi-schools.gr/programs/depps/index_eng.
Montanero, M., Perez, A.L. & Suero, M.I. (1995). A survey of students’ understanding of colliding bodies. Physics Education, 30, 277–283.
Montanero, M., Suero, M.I., Perez, A.L. & Pardo, P.J. (2002). Implicit theories of static interactions between two bodies. Physics Education, 37(4), 318–323.
Palmer, H.D. (2001). Investigating the relationship between students’ multiple conceptions of action and reaction in cases of static equilibrium. Research in Science & Technological Education, 19(2), 193–204.
Parker, J. & Heywood, D. (2000). Exploring the relationship between subject knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge in primary teachers’ learning about forces. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 89–111.
Savinainen, A. & Scott, P. (2002). Using the force concept inventory to monitor student learning and to plan teaching. Physics Education, 31(1), 53–58.
Savinainen, A., Scott, P. & Viiri, J. (2005). Using a bridging representation and social interactions to foster conceptual change: designing and evaluating an instructional sequence for Newton’s third law. Science Education, 89, 175–195.
Stavy, R., Tamir, P. & Tirosh, D. (2002). Intuitive rules: The case of “More A-more B”. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 217–231). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Summers, M. (1992). Improving primary school teachers’ understanding of science concepts - theory into practice. International Journal of Science Education, 14(1), 25–40.
Terry, C., Jones, G. & Hurford, W. (1985). Children’s conceptual understanding of forces and equilibrium. Physics Education, 20, 162–165.
Thijs, G. (1992). Evaluation of an introductory course on “Force” considering students’ preconceptions. Science Education, 76(2), 155–174.
Thijs, G. & Bosch, G. (1995). Cognitive effects of science experiments focusing on students’ preconceptions of force: a comparison of demonstrations and small-group practicals. International Journal of Science Education, 7(3), 311–323.
Trumper, R. (1996). A cross-college age study about physics students’ conceptions of force in pre-service training for high school teachers. Physics Education, 31, 227–236.
Watts, M. (1982). Gravity - don’t take it for granted!. Physics Education, 17, 116–121.
Watts, D. & Zylberszajn, A. (1981). A survey of some children’s ideas about force. Physics Education, 16, 360–365.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kariotoglou, P., Spyrtou, A. & Tselfes, V. HOW STUDENT TEACHERS UNDERSTAND DISTANCE FORCE INTERACTIONS IN DIFFERENT CONTEXTS. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 7, 851–873 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-008-9147-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-008-9147-6