Advertisement

Variable Relationships among Different Science Learners in Elementary Science-Methods Courses

  • Robert E. BleicherEmail author
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships among science content knowledge, understanding the Learning Cycle, and self-efficacy among preservice teachers. Preservice teachers enrolled in an elementary science-methods course were categorized as Fearful, Disinterested, Successful, or Enthusiastic science learners based on differing background characteristics in the variables of science interest, performance in science courses methods courses. Analysis revealed that the four categories increased differentially in their science content knowledge, understanding of the Learning Cycle, science teaching self-efficacy, and confidence to learn science. Fearful science learners demonstrated less increases in science content knowledge and understanding of the Learning Cycle than the other three categories. Disinterested science learners demonstrated fewer gains in science content knowledge than Enthusiastic science learners. Fearful science learners were less confident to learn science than other categories.

Key words

learning cycle preservice science teaching science content knowledge self-efficacy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

10763_2007_9121_MOESM1_ESM.doc (71 kb)
ESM 1 Science Content Knowledge Test (DOC 71.0 KB)
10763_2007_9121_MOESM2_ESM.doc (44 kb)
ESM 2 Modified STEBI-B, An Instrument for Measuring Science Teaching Self-Efficacy (DOC 44.5 KB)
10763_2007_9121_MOESM3_ESM.doc (24 kb)
ESM 3 Background Survey (DOC 24.0 KB)

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (2000). Self-efficacy: Foundation of agency. In: W. Perrig & A. Gorb (Eds.), Control of human behavior, mental processes, and consciousness (pp. 17–33). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Bleicher, R.E. (2004). Revisiting the STEBI-B: Measuring self-efficacy in preservice elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics Journal, 104, 383–391.Google Scholar
  4. Bleicher, R.E. & Lindgren, J. (2002). Building confidence in preservice elementary science teachers. In P. Rubba, W. DiBiase, & B. Crawford (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science (pp. 1593–1606). ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED (465602).Google Scholar
  5. Bleicher, R.E. & Lindgren, J. (2005). Success in learning science and preservice science teaching self-efficacy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16, 205–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Butts, D.P., Koballa, T.R. & Elliot, T.D. (1997). Does participating in an undergraduate elementary science methods course make a difference. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 9, 1–17.Google Scholar
  7. Bybee, R., Taylor, J.A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J.C., Westbrook, A. & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model, origins, effectiveness, and application. Retrieved from http://www.bscs.org/pdf/bscs5efullreport2006.pdf.
  8. Dansereau, D.F. (1995). Derived structural schemas and the transfer of knowledge. In: A. McKeough, J. Lupart & A. Marini (Eds.), Teaching for transfer: Fostering generalization in learning (pp. 93–121). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  9. Darling Hammond, L. & Lowenberg Ball, D. (1998). Teaching for high standards: What policymakers need to know and be able to. CPRE Publications, University of Pennsylvania, Graduate School of Education. (ERIC No. ED426491).Google Scholar
  10. DeJong, T. & Ferguson-Hessler, M.G.M. (1996). Types and quality of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  12. Donovan, M.S., Bransford, J.D. & Pellegrino, J.W. (1999).How people learn: Bridging research and practice (National Research Council). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  13. Enochs, L. & Riggs, I. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: a preservice elementary scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90, 694–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jarrett, O.S. (1999). Science interest and confidence among preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 11, 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Karplus, R. & Their, H.D. (1967). A new look at elementary school science. Chicago, IL: R and McNally.Google Scholar
  16. Lawrenz, F. (1986). Misconceptions of physical science concepts among elementary preservice elementary teacher education students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 205–222.Google Scholar
  17. Lawson, A.E. (2004). Preserving or intellectual history: The history and development of the learning cycle. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science. Nashville, TN, January.Google Scholar
  18. Lawson, A.E., Abraham, M.R. & Renner, J.W. (1989). A theory of instruction: Using the Learning Cycle to teach science concepts and thinking skills (Serial No. 1). Monograph of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching.Google Scholar
  19. Lindgren, J. & Bleicher, R.E. (2003). The learning cycle and preservice science teacher self-efficacy. In Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  20. Lindgren, J. & Bleicher, R.E. (2005). Learning the learning cycle: The differential effect on elementary preservice teachers. School Science and Mathematics Journal, 105, 61–72.Google Scholar
  21. Maloney, D.P. & Siegler, R.S. (1993). Conceptual competition in physics learning. International Journal of Science Education, 15, 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marek, E.A. & Cavallo, A.M.L. (1997). The Learning Cycle: Elementary school science and beyond (Revised ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  23. McDermott, L.C. & Shaffer, P.S. (1992). Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part I: Investigation for student understanding. American Journal of Physics, 60, 994–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Odom, A.L. & Settlage, J. (1996). Teachers’ understanding of the learning cycle as assessed with a two-tiered test. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 7, 123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Palmer, D.H. (2002). Factors contributing to attitude exchange amongst preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 86, 122–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Resnick, L.B. (1989). Knowing, learning, and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Schoon, K.J. & Boone, W.J. (1998). Self-efficacy and alternative conceptions of science of preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 82, 553–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Settlage, J. (2000). Understanding the learning cycle: Influences on abilities to embrace the approach by preservice elementary school teachers. Science Education, 84, 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.Google Scholar
  30. Tobin, K. & Tippins, D.J. (1993). Constructivism as a referent for teaching and learning. In: K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. Tosun, T. (2000). The impact of prior science course experience and achievement on the science teaching self efficacy of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 12, 21–31.Google Scholar
  32. Trundle, K.C., Atwood, R.K. & Christopher, J.E. (2002). Preservice elementay teachers’ conceptions of moon phases before and after instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 633–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Watters, J.J. & Ginns, I.S. (2000). Developing motivation to teach elementary science.: Effect of collaborative and authentic learning practice in preservice education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11, 301–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.California State University Channel IslandsCamarilloUSA

Personalised recommendations