Abstract
Reading comprehension is an important skill throughout all stages of education. However, Portuguese pupils still demonstrate difficulties in understanding what they read. In addition to cognitive and psychological factors, it is important to understand how this skill is addressed in textbooks. Here, we examined how reading comprehension is targeted in Portuguese and Science textbooks in Grades 4 and 6. Regarding Portuguese textbooks, we found a higher focus on orality than on reading comprehension in Grade 4 and a more distributed focus regarding literacy-related skills in Grade 6. In both grades, most of the questions related to reading comprehension involved retrieval of factual information using open questions. This pattern was also observed for Science textbooks. These findings seem crucial to shed light on the articulation between the educational system, subjects’ curriculum and educational actors, which is critical to effectively develop pupils’ reading comprehension skills.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaron, P. G., Joshi, R. M., Gooden, R., Bentum, & K. E. . (2008). Diagnosis and treatment of reading disabilities based on the component model of reading: An alternative to the discrepancy model of LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219407310838.
Babbitt, P. (2002). Scaffolding: strategies for improving reading comprehension skills. New Jersey: Person Prentice Hall.
Beerwinkle, A. L., Wijekumar, K., Walpole, S., & Aguis, R. (2018). An analysis of the ecological components within a text structure intervention. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 31, 2041–2064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9870-5.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An Interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
Buescu, H., Morais, J., Rocha, M. R., & Magalhães, V. M. (2015). Programa e metas curriculares de Português do ensino básico [Portuguese curriculum and goals of basic education]. Lisboa: Direção-Geral da Educação.
Carreti, B., Motta, E., & Re, A. M. (2014). Oral and written expression in children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414528539.
Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Clarke, P. J., Truelove, E., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2014). Developing reading comprehension. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
da Educação, M. (2007). Educação e formação em Portugal [Education and formation in Portugal]. Lisboa: Ministério da Educação.
da Educação, M. (2018). Aprendizagens essenciais: Articulação com o perfil dos alunos [Essential learnings: Articulation with students profile]. Lisboa: Ministério da Educação.
Davey, B. (1988). Factors affecting the difficulty of reading comprehension items for successful and unsuccessful readers. The Journal of Experimental Education, 56, 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1988.10806468.
Duke, N. K. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quartely, 35, 202–244. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.35.2.1.
Ferlazzo, L., & Sypnieski, K. (2018). Strategy 10: Reading comprehension: The ELL teacher’s toolbox: Hundreds of practical ideas to support your students. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Gabinete de Avaliação Educacional. (2010). Provas de aferição 1 Ciclo - Língua Portuguesa - Relatório nacional de 2010 [Benchmarking tests 1st Cycle – Portuguese – National report 2010] Cycle – Portuguese – National report 2010]. Lisboa: Ministério da Educação.
Gabinete de Avaliação Educacional. (2010b). Provas de aferição 2º Ciclo - Língua Portuguesa - Relatório nacional de 2010. [Benchmarking tests 2nd Cycle – Portuguese – National report 2010]. Lisboa: Ministério da Educação.
Gabinete de Avaliação Educacional. (2010c). Relatório: Um olhar sobre os resultados dos exames nacionais. [Report: A look at the results of national exams]. Lisboa: Ministério da Educação.
Gabinete de Avaliação Educacional. (2011a). Provas de aferição 1 Ciclo - Língua Portuguesa - Relatório nacional de 2011 [Benchmarking tests 1st Cycle – Portuguese – National report 2011] Cycle – Portuguese – National report 2011]. Lisboa: Ministério da Educação.
Gabinete de Avaliação Educacional. (2011b). Provas de aferição 2 Ciclo - Língua Portuguesa - Relatório nacional de 2011 [Benchmarking tests 2nd Cycle – Portuguese – National report 2011] Cycle – Portuguese – National report 2011]. Lisboa: Ministério da Educação.
Gabinete de Avaliação Educacional. (2012). Provas de aferição 1º Ciclo - Língua Portuguesa - Relatório nacional de 2012. [Benchmarking tests 1st Cycle – Portuguese – National report 2012]. Lisboa: Ministério da Educação.
Ghaith, G. M. (2018). English as a second/foreign language reading comprehension: A framework for curriculum and instruction. TESL Reporter, 50, 1–17.
Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401799.
Instituto de Avaliação Educativa. (2017a). Provas finais de ciclo - Ensino básico - 1º CEB, Relatório nacional: 2013–2015. [Final cycle exams — Basic education — 1st BCE. National report: 2013–2015]. Lisboa: Ministério da Educação.
Instituto de Avaliação Educativa. (2017b). Resultados globais PIRLS 2016 e ePIRLS 2016 – Portugal. Literacia de leitura & literacia de leitura online. [PIRLS 2016 e ePIRLS 2016 Global Results – Portugal. Reading literacy and online reading literacy]. Lisboa: Instituto de Avaliação Educativa
Instituto de Avaliação Educativa. (2018). Literacia de leitura. Finalidades e processo de compreensão. Resultados dos alunos portugueses no PIRLS e ePIRLS 2016. [Reading literacy. Purposes and understanding process. Results of portuguese students at PIRLS and ePIRLS 2016]. Lisboa: Instituto de Avaliação Educativa.
Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D. P., & Liberman, A. M. (1989). The alphabetic principle and learning to read. In D. P. Shankweiler & I. Y. Liberman (Eds.), Phonology and Reading Disability: Solving the Reading Puzzle (pp. 1–33). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
McNamara, D. S. (2009). The importance of teaching reading strategies. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 35(2), 34–38.
Ribeiro, I., Cadime, I., Freitas, T., & Viana, F. L. (2016). Beyond word recognition, fluency and vocabulary: The influence of reasoning on reading comprehension. Australian Journal of Psychology, 68, 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12095.
Roe, B. D., & Smith, S. H. (2012). Teaching Reading in Today’s Elementary Schools. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Rupp, A. A., Ferne, T., & Choi, H. (2006). How assessing reading comprehension with multiple-choice questions shapes the construct: A cognitive processing perspective. Language Testing, 23, 441–474. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532206lt337oa.
Seymour, P., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in european orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603321661859.
Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A., Groff, C., & Lake, C. (2008). Effective reading programs for middle and high schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quartely, 43, 290–322. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.43.3.4.
Sucena, A., Castro, S. L., & Seymour, P. (2009). Developmental dyslexia in an orthography of intermediate depth: The case of european portuguese. Reading and Writing: An Interdisiplinary Journal, 22, 791–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9156-4.
Wijekumar, K., Meyer, B. J. F., & Lei, P. (2012). Large-scale randomized control trial with 4th graders using intelligent tutoring of the structure strategy to improve nonfiction reading comprehension. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60, 986–1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9263-4.
Wijekumar, K., Meyer, B. J. F., & Lei, P. (2017). Web-based text structure strategy instruction improves seventh graders’ content area reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 741–760. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000168.
Xu, Z., Wijekumar, K., Ramirez, G., Hu, X., & Irey, R. (2019). The effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems on K-12 students’ reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12758.
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by grants from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology through grants UID/PSI/00050/2013 and PD/BD/135428/2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Grade | Subject | Textbook | Complete reference |
---|---|---|---|
4 | Portuguese | A | Melo, P. and M. Costa. 2013. A Grande Aventura. Português—4º Ano. [The Great Adventure. Portuguese – Grade 4]. Lisboa: Texto Editores |
B | Lima, E., N. Barrigão, N. Pedroso and V. Rocha. 2015. Alfa. Português 4. [Alfa. Portuguese 4]. Porto: Porto Editora | ||
Science | E | Pires, P. and H. Gonçalves. 2013. A Grande Aventura. Estudo do Meio—4º Ano. [The Great Adventure. Science – Grade 4]. Lisboa: Texto Editores | |
F | Lima, E., N. Barrigão, N. Pedroso and V. Rocha. 2015. Alfa. Estudo do Meio 4. [Alfa. Science 4]. Porto: Porto Editora | ||
6 | Portuguese | C | Silva, P., S. Rente and E. Cardoso. 2012. Dito e Feito. Português—6º Ano. [Said and Done. Portuguese – Grade 6]. Porto: Porto Editora |
D | Almeida. A. and L. Coelho. 2017. Palavras 6. Português – 6º ano [Words 6. Portuguese – Grade 6]. Porto: Areal Editores | ||
Science | G | Lopes, A., D. Brandão, J. Mendes and S. Vaz. 2017. 100% Vida. Ciências Naturais—6º Ano (Vol. 1–2). [100% Life. Science – Grade 6]. Lisboa: Texto Editores | |
H | Sales, A., I. Portugal, I. and J. Amorim. 2011. Clube da Terra. Ciências da Natureza—6º Ano. [Earth Club. Science – Grade 6]. Lisboa: Texto Editores |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cordeiro, C., Nunes, A., Castro, S.L. et al. Teaching Reading Comprehension in Portuguese Primary and Middle Schools. Tech Know Learn 26, 339–354 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09486-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09486-y