Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Teachers’ First-Year Experience with Chromebook Laptops and Their Attitudes Towards Technology Integration

  • Original research
  • Published:
Technology, Knowledge and Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because mobile technology has become so obvious in a child’s life, use of it for teaching and learning has become a necessity. This study investigates use of Chromebook laptops in 6–12 grade classrooms in relation to teachers’ experience. We employ a mixed method approach. First, we study how teachers’ years of teaching and numbers of technological tools they have are related to their comfort of teaching with Chromebook laptops, as well as their attitudes change towards technology after teaching with a Chromebook for a year. Second, to have more specific thoughts about teachers’ Chromebook experience, we conducted qualitative analyses to hear teachers’ voices. Of the 658 6–12 grade Mathematics and English teachers from 30 schools invited to be part of the study, 553 teachers completed the survey. We utilized Pearson Product correlation for the first question. A paired-sample t test was run to examine whether teachers’ attitudes towards technology use changed after teaching with Chromebooks for a year. For the qualitative part, we used a Phenomenological approach to analyze what teachers felt about their experience with Chromebooks. We found that teachers’ comfort of teaching is not significantly correlated with their years of experience. As expected, there was a statistically significant relationship between the number of technological tools they had and their comfort of teaching with technology. Teachers’ attitudes significantly decreased after teaching with Chromebooks for a year. Teachers complained about excessive blocking and lack of tech support, along with some suggestions including filtering and proper training, both for teachers and students that is for a smoother transition from traditional teaching to Chromebook-integrated teaching. Findings and implications are presented to help schools improve technology integration in the discussion and conclusion parts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkins, N. E., & Vasu, E. S. (2000). Measuring knowledge of technology usage and stages of concern about computing: A study of middle school teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 279–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M., Lipson, A., & Lerman, S. (2006). Wireless laptops as means for promoting active learning in large lecture halls. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 245–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baylor, A. L., & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? Computers & Education, 39(4), 395–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. J. (1994). How exemplary computer-using teachers differ from other teachers: Implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(3), 291–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beeland, W. D. (2002). Student engagement, visual learning and technology: Can interactive whiteboards help? In Annual conference of the association of information technology for teaching education, Trinity College, Dublin.

  • Cervantes, R., Warschauer, M., Nardi, B., & Sambasivan, N. (2011, May). Infrastructures for low-cost laptop use in Mexican schools. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 945–954). ACM.

  • Christensen, R. (2002). Effects of technology integration education on the attitudes of teachers and students. Journal of Research on technology in Education, 34(4), 411–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential phenomenological alternatives in psychology (pp. 48–71). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conole, G., De Laat, M., Dillon, T., & Darby, J. (2008). ‘Disruptive technologies’, ‘pedagogical innovation:’ What’s new? Findings from an in-depth study of students’ use and perception of technology. Computers & Education, 50(2), 511–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Sykes, G. (2003). Wanted: A national teacher supply policy for education: The right way to meet the highly qualified teacher challenge. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(3). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/vlln33/.

  • Dasdemir, İ., Cengiz, E., Uzoglu, M., & Bozdogan, A. E. (2012). Tablet Bilgisayarların Fen Ve Teknoloji Derslerinde Kullanılmasıyla İlgili Fen Ve Teknoloji Öğretmenlerinin Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(20), 495–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demb, A., Erickson, D., & Hawkins-Wilding, S. (2004). The laptop alternative: Student reactions and strategic implications. Computers & Education, 43(4), 383–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekmekci, A., Corkin, D., & Papakonstantinou, A. (2015). Technology using habits of mathematics teachers. Paper presented at the 2015 annual meeting of American Educational Research Association (AERA). Chicago, IL.

  • Ekmekci, A., & Gulacar, O. (2015). A case study for comparing the effectiveness of a computer simulation and a hands-on activity on learning electric circuits. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(4), 765–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., Addison, P., Lane, M., Ross, E., & Woods, D. (1999). Examining teacher beliefs about the role of technology in the elementary classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(1), 54–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eteokleous, N. (2008). Evaluating computer technology integration in a centralized school system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 669–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goktas, Y., Yildirim, S., & Yildirim, Z. (2009). Main barriers and possible enablers of ICTs integration into pre-service teacher education programs. Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houser, C., Thornton, P., & Kluge, D. (2002, December). Mobile learning: Cell phones and PDAs for education. In Computers in education, international conference (pp. 1149–1149). IEEE Computer Society.

  • Howard, G. S. (1980). Response-shift bias a problem in evaluating interventions with pre/post self-reports. Evaluation Review, 4(1), 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, R. H., & Lauricella, S. (2011). Unstructured vs. structured use of laptops in higher education. Journal of Information Technology Education, 10(1), 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klatt, J., & Taylor-Powell, E. (2005). Program development and evaluation. Using the retrospective post-then-pre design, quick tips #27. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Extension; 2 pp. Retrieved from http://www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/resources/pdf/Tipsheet27.pdf.

  • Kumar, P., & Kumar, A. (2003). Effect of a web-based project on preservice and inservice teachers’ attitudes toward computers and their technology skills. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 19(3), 87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, T. C., & Bengo, P. (2003). A comparison of three retrospective self-reporting methods of measuring change in instructional practice. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(1), 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., & Lee, J. (2014). Enhancing pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration through lesson planning practice. Computers & Education, 73, 121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2008). Teachers’ views on factors affecting effective integration of information technology in the classroom: Developmental scenery. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(2), 233–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q. (2007). Student and teacher views about technology: A tale of two cities. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(4), 377–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C. P., & Khine, M. S. (2006). Managing teachers’ barriers to ICT integration in Singapore schools. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14, 97–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, C. A., & Malouf, D. B. (1991). Teachers’ beliefs, plans, and decisions about computer-based instruction. The Journal of Special Education, 25(5), 44–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milbrath, Y. C. L., & Kinzie, M. B. (2000). Computer technology training for prospective teachers: Computer attitudes and perceived self-efficacy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 373–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’bannon, B. W., & Thomas, K. (2014). Teacher perceptions of using mobile phones in the classroom: Age matters! Computers & Education, 74, 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peña-López, I. (2010). From laptops to competences: Bridging the digital divide in education. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 7(1), 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, C. C., McGuigan, W. M., & Katzev, A. R. (2000). Measuring program outcomes: Using retrospective pretest methodology. American Journal of Evaluation, 21(3), 341–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockwell, S. K., & Kohn, H. (Summer 1989). Post-then-pre evaluation: Measuring behavior change more accurately. Journal of Extension, 27(2): http://www.joe.org/joe/1989summer/a5.html.

  • Rogers, P. L. (2000). Barriers to adopting emerging technologies in education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22(4), 455–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ropp, M. M. (1999). Exploring individual characteristics associated with learning to use computers in preservice teacher preparation. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(4), 402–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahin, A. (2008). The effects of teachers’ types, quantity, and quality of teacher questions students achievement. In G. Kulm (Ed.), Teacher knowledge and practice in middle grades mathematics (pp. 19–27). Rotterdam: Sense.

  • Sahin, A. (2015). The effects of quantity and quality of teachers’ probing and guiding questions on student performance. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 5(1), 95–113.

  • Schoepp, K. (2005). Barriers to technology integration in a technology-rich environment. Learning and teaching in higher education: Gulf perspectives, 2(1), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheingold, K., & Hadley, M. (1990). Accomplished teachers: Integrating computers into classroom practice. New York: Centre for Technology in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T., Lee, C. B., & Chai, C. S. (2008a). Understanding pre-service teachers’ computer attitudes: Applying and extending the technology acceptance model. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2), 128–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T., Su Luan, W., & Sing, C. C. (2008b). A cross-cultural examination of the intention to use technology between Singaporean and Malaysian pre-service teachers: An application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 265–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, B. (2008). Foundations of behavioral statistics: An insight-based approach. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A. D., Schmidt, D. A., & Davis, N. E. (2003). Technology collaboratives for simultaneous renewal in teacher education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trimmel, M., & Bachmann, J. (2004). Cognitive, social, motivational and health aspects of students in laptop classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 20, 151–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzoglu, M., & Bozdogan, A. E. (2012). An examination of preservice science teachers’ views related to use of tablet pcs in science and technology course in terms of different variables. Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 2(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannatta, R. A., & Fordham, N. (2004). Teacher dispositions as predictors of classroom technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 253–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, J. W., & Mehlinger, H. D. (1996). Information technology and teacher education. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 978–1029). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windschitl, M., & Sahl, K. (2002). Tracing teachers’ use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 165–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodrow, J. E. (1992). The influence of programming training on computer literacy and attitudes of preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25(2), 200–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yildirim, S. (2000). Effects of an educational computing course on preservice and inservice teachers: A discussion and analysis of attitudes and use. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(4), 479–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yildirim, S., & Kiraz, E. (1999). Obstacles to integrating online communication tools into preservice teacher education: A case study. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 15(3), 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf, M. O., & Balogun, M. R. (2011). Student-teachers’ competence and attitude towards information and communication technology: A case study in a Nigerian university. Contemporary Educational Technology, 2(1), 18–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y., Hueyshan, T., & Mishra, P. (2001). Technology: Teaching and learning: Whose computer is it? Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 44, 348–355.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

    Alpaslan Sahin

  2. Hitit University, Çorum, Turkey

    Namik Top

  3. Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey

    Erhan Delen

Authors
  1. Alpaslan Sahin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Namik Top
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Erhan Delen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alpaslan Sahin.

Appendix: Teacher Attitudes Towards Technology

Appendix: Teacher Attitudes Towards Technology

figure a
figure b

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sahin, A., Top, N. & Delen, E. Teachers’ First-Year Experience with Chromebook Laptops and Their Attitudes Towards Technology Integration. Tech Know Learn 21, 361–378 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-016-9277-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-016-9277-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation