Abstract
While the causes of obesity have been widely discussed from various perspectives, studies that examine how the physical form of a neighborhood could causally affect obesity remain limited. This study combined individual-level longitudinal data from the Indonesian Family Life Survey and subdistrict-level land cover data to investigate whether a neighborhood’s physical form affects individuals’ obesity status. We controlled for individual and location fixed-effect to account for individuals’ sorting preferences and unobserved heterogeneity at the subdistrict level. Our results suggest that a sprawling neighborhood corresponds to a lower body mass index, particularly among males. We also show that consumption behavior can explain this mechanism.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- BMI:
-
Body mass index
- ESA CCI:
-
European space agency climate change initiative
- IFLS:
-
Indonesian family life survey
References
Adisasmito, W., Amir, V., Atin, A., Megraini, A., & Kusuma, D. (2020). Geographic and socioeconomic disparity in cardiovascular risk factors in Indonesia: Analysis of the Basic Health Research 2018. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1004. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09099-1
Agustina, R., Dartanto, T., Sitompul, R., Susiloretni, K. A., Achadi, E. L., Taher, A., Wirawan, F., & Sungkar, S. (2018). Review Universal health coverage in Indonesia : Concept, progress, and challenges. The Lancet, 393, 75–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31647-7
Aizawa, T. (2018). Regional disparity in the body mass index distribution of Indonesians: New evidence beyond the mean. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 54(1), 85–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2017.1406596
Aizawa, T., & Helble, M. (2017). Socioeconomic inequality in excessive body weight in Indonesia. Economics and Human Biology, 27, 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2017.09.005
Angel, S., Parent, J., & Civco, D. L. (2012). The fragmentation of urban landscapes : Global evidence of a key attribute of the spatial structure of cities. Environment and Urbanization, 24(1), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247811433536
Borrell, L. N., Graham, L., & Joseph, S. P. (2016). Associations of neighborhood safety and neighborhood support with overweight and obesity in US Children and adolescents. Ethnicity & Disease, 26(4), 469–476.
Brownstone, D., & Golob, T. F. (2009). The impact of residential density on vehicle usage and energy consumption. Journal of Urban Economics, 65, 91–98.
Burchfield, M., Overman, H. G., Puga, D., & Turner, M. A. (2006). Causes of sprawl: A portrait from space. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2), 587–633. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.587
Chooi, Y. C., Ding, C., & Magkos, F. (2019). The epidemiology of obesity. Metabolism Clinical and Experimental, 92, 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2018.09.005
Clogg, C., Petkova, E., & Haritou, A. (1995). Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. American Journal of Sociology., 100(5), 1261–1293.
Colozza, D., & Avendano, M. (2019). Social science & medicine urbanisation, dietary change and traditional food practices in Indonesia : A longitudinal analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 233(June), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.06.007
Dougkas, A., & Hobbs, D. (2019). The role of milk and dairy products in the development of obesity and cardiometabolic disease. In H. L. Meiselman (Ed.), Handbook of eating and drinking, interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 742–764). Springer Nature.
Dovey, K. (2014). Incremental Urbanism: The Emergence of Informal Settlements. In Emergent urbanism : urban planning & design in times of structural and systemic change (pp. 45–54).
Duncan, D. T., Johnson, R. M., Molnar, B. E., & Azrael, D. (2009). Association between neighborhood safety and overweight status among urban adolescents. BMC Public Health, 9, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-289
Duranton, G., & Puga, D. (2020). The economics of urban density. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(3), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.34.3.3
Duranton, G., & Turner, M. A. (2018). Urban form and driving: Evidence from US cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 108(October), 170–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2018.10.003
Egger, G., & Swinburn, B. (1997). An “ecological” approach to the obesity pandemic. BMJ (clinical Research Ed.), 315(7106), 477–480. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7106.477
Eid, J., Overman, H. G., Puga, D., & Turner, M. A. (2008). Fat city: Questioning the relationship between urban sprawl and obesity. Journal of Urban Economics, 63(2), 385–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2007.12.002
ESA. (2017). Land Cover CCI Product User Guide Version 2. Tech. Rep.
ESACCI. (2019). Digital land cover map.
Ewing, R., Brownson, R. C., & Berrigan, D. (2006). Relationship between urban sprawl and weight of United States Youth. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 31(6), 464–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2006.08.020
Ewing, R., Meakins, G., Hamidi, S., & Nelson, A. C. (2014). Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity, and morbidity—Update and refinement. Health and Place, 26, 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.12.008
Finkelstein, E. A., & Strombotne, K. L. (2010). The economics of obesity. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition., 91(5), 1520S-1524S. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2010.28701E
Garcia-López, M. À. (2019). Regional Science and Urban Economics All roads lead to Rome … and to sprawl ? Evidence from European cities. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 79, 103467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.103467
Garrido-Cumbrera, M., Gálvez Ruiz, D., Braçe, O., & López Lara, E. (2018). Exploring the association between urban sprawl and mental health. Journal of Transport and Health, 10, 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2018.06.006
Ghosh-Dastidar, M., Hunter, G., Collins, R. L., Zenk, S. N., Cummins, S., Beckman, R., Nugroho, A. K., Sloan, J. C., Wagner, L., & Dubowitz, T. (2017). Does opening a supermarket in a food desert change the food environment? Health and Place, 46(June), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.06.002
Hanandita, W., & Tampubolon, G. (2015). The double burden of malnutrition in Indonesia: Social determinants and geographical variations. SSM Population Health, 1, 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2015.10.002
Handy, S. (2005). Smart growth and the transportation-land use connection: What does the research tell us? International Regional Science Review, 28(2), 146–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017604273626
Henderson, J. V., & Turner, M. A. (2020). Urbanization in the developing world: Too early or too slow? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(3), 150–173. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.34.3.150
Hoque, M. E., Mannan, M., Long, K. Z., & Mamun, A. A. (2016). Economic burden of underweight and overweight among adults in the Asia-Pacific region: A systematic review. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 21(4), 458–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12679
Hou, J., & Chalana, M. (2017). Untangling the "Messy" Asian City. In Messy Urbanism (pp. 1–21). https://doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789888208333.003.0001
Indonesia Ministry of Health. (2019). Laporan Nasional Riskesdas 2019.
Kusno, A. (2019). Middling urbanism: The megacity and the kampung. Urban Geography. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2019.1688535
Lim, H. J., Xue, H., & Wang, Y. (2019). Global Trends in Obesity. In H. L. Meiselman (Ed.), Handbook of Eating and Drinking, Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 1217–1237
Malambo, P., Villiers, A. D., Lambert, E. V., Puoane, T., & Kengne, P. (2018). Associations of perceived neighbourhood safety from traffic and crime with overweight/obesity among South African adults of low- socioeconomic status. PLoS ONE, 13(10), 1–11.
Miles, R., Coutts, C., & Mohamadi, A. (2011). Neighborhood urban form, social environment, and depression. Journal of Urban Health, 89(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-011-9621-2
Mouratidis, K. (2019). Compact city, urban sprawl, and subjective well-being. Cities, 92(April), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.013
Mujahid, M. S., Roux, A. V. D., Shen, M., Gowda, D., Sanchez, B., Shea, S., Jacobs, D. R., Jr., & Jackson, S. A. (2008). Original contribution relation between neighborhood environments and obesity in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 167(11), 1349–1357. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn047
Nasir, S., & Rosenthal, D. (2009). The Lorong as a risk environment: Drug use and gangs among young men in the slums of Makassar. Indonesia. Contemporary Drug Problems, 36(1–2), 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/009145090903600110
Plantinga, A. J., & Bernell, S. (2005). A spatial economic analysis of urban land use and obesity. Journal of Regional Science, 45(3), 473–492.
Plantinga, A. J., & Bernell, S. (2007). Reduce Obesity ? The Role of Self-Selection in Explaining the Link between Weight and Urban Sprawl. Review of Agricultral Economics, 29(3), 557–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9353.2007.00370.x
Popkin, B. M., Kim, S., Rusev, E. R., Du, S., & Zizza, C. (2006). Measuring the full economic costs of diet, physical activity and obesity-related chronic diseases. Obesity Reviews, 7(3), 271–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00230.x
Rachmi, C. N., Li, M., & Baur, L. A. (2017). Overweight and obesity in Indonesia : Prevalence and risk factors d a literature review. Public Health, 147, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2017.02.002
Riantoro, B. D., Kristina, S. A., & Endarti, D. (2020). Estimating premature mortality cost of cancers attributable to obesity in Indonesia. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 20(1), 87–90.
Roemling, C., & Qaim, M. (2012). Obesity trends and determinants in Indonesia. Appetite, 58(3), 1005–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.02.053
Statistics of Indonesia. (2017). Administrative boundary map of Indonesia.
Stevenson, M., Thompson, J., de Sá, T. H., Ewing, R., Mohan, D., McClure, R., Roberts, I., Tiwari, G., Giles-Corti, B., Sun, X., Wallace, M., & Woodcock, J. (2016). Land use, transport, and population health: estimating the health benefits of compact cities. The Lancet, 388(10062), 2925–2935. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30067-8
Swinburn, B., Egger, G., & Raza, F. (1999). Dissecting obesogenic environments: the development and application of a framework for identifying and prioritizing environmental interventions for obesity. Preventive Medicine, 29(6), 563–570. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1999.0585
Tomiyama, A. J. (2019). Stress and obesity. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 703–718. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102936
Vaezghasemi, M., Razak, F., Ng, N., & Subramanian, S. V. (2016). Inter-individual inequality in BMI: An analysis of indonesian family life surveys (1993–2007). SSM Population Health, 2(February), 876–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.09.013
Vaughan, C. A., Cohen, D. A., Ghosh-Dastidar, M., Hunter, G. P., & Dubowitz, T. (2017). Where do food desert residents buy most of their junk food? Supermarkets. Public Health Nutrition, 20(14), 2608–2616. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136898001600269X
WHO. (2018). Noncommunicable diseases country profiles 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization.
WHO. (2020). Fact sheet: Obesity and overweight. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Wright, S. M., & Aronne, L. J. (2012). Causes of obesity. Abdominal Imaging, 37(5), 730–732.
Zhao, Z., & Kaestner, R. (2010). Effects of urban sprawl on obesity. Journal of Health Economics, 29(6), 779–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.07.006
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Variable definitions
Body mass index: Individual weight divided by height squared (kg/m2). Source: Indonesian Family Life Survey (2000, 2007, 2014).
Obesity status: Equal to 1 if the respondent is obese, and 0 otherwise. An individual is obese if the BMI is calculated at more than 27. Source: Indonesian Family Life Survey (2000, 2007, 2014).
Subdistrict sprawl index: Share of the undeveloped area around the urban settlement in a subdistrict area (%). This value is 0 for the least sprawling area and 100 for the most compact area. Processed from digital maps of land use in 2000, 2007, 2014 from the European Space Agency Climate Change Initiative (ESA-CCI). The digital map of administrative regions of Indonesia is the 2017 version. Source: (ESA-CCI, 2019; Statistics of Indonesia, 2017).
District sprawl index: Share of undeveloped area around the urban settlement in a district area (%). This value is 0 for the least sprawling area and 100 for the most compact area. Processed from digital maps of land use in 2000, 2007, 2014 from the ESA CCI and digital maps of administrative regions of Indonesia in 2017. Source: ESA CCI (2019); Statistics Indonesia (2017).
Physical activities dummy: Equal to 1 if the respondent performs respective physical activities (walking, or moderate/heavy activities) in the past week, or 0 otherwise. Source: Indonesian Family Life Survey (2000, 2007, 2014).
Consumption dummy: Equal to 1 if the respondent consumes respective items (vegetables, fast foods, soft drinks, and sweetened foods) in the past week, or 0 otherwise. Source: Indonesian Family Life Survey (2000, 2007, 2014).
Feeling of safety: Equal to 1 if the respondent feels safe (in general or during walking outside), or 0 otherwise. Source: Indonesian Family Life Survey (2000, 2007, 2014).
Number of household members: Number of individuals residing in the respondent’s residence, including the respondent. Source: Indonesian Family Life Survey (2000, 2007, 2014).
Age: Respondent’s age at the time of the census (year). Source: Indonesian Family Life Survey (2000, 2007, 2014).
Years of schooling: Duration of education that the respondent has received (in years). Source: Indonesian Family Life Survey (2000, 2007, 2014).
Marital status: Equal to 1 if the respondent is married, and 0 otherwise. Source: Indonesian Family Life Survey (2000, 2007, 2014).
Urban–rural dummy: Equal to 1 if the respondent is living in an urban area, and 0 otherwise. Source: Indonesian Family Life Survey (2000, 2007, 2014).
Gender dummy: Equal to 1 if the respondent is male, and 0 otherwise. Source: Indonesian Family Life Survey (2000, 2007, 2014).
Working status dummy: Equal to 1 if the respondent is working, and 0 otherwise. Source: Indonesian Family Life Survey (2000, 2007, 2014).
Appendix 2: Descriptive statistics
All | Relative to sprawl index | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
≤ Median | > Median | |||||
Mean | S.D | Mean | S.D | Mean | S.D | |
Dependent variables | ||||||
Body mass index (BMI) | 23.08 | 4.40 | 23.48 | 4.53 | 22.68 | 4.23 |
Obesity dummy (1 yes, 0 no) | 0.17 | 0.38 | 0.20 | 0.40 | 0.15 | 0.35 |
Walking dummy (1 yes, 0 no) | 0.77 | 0.42 | 0.76 | 0.43 | 0.79 | 0.41 |
Moderate/vigorous activities (1 yes, 0 no) | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.54 | 0.50 |
Vegetable consumption (1 yes, 0 no) | 0.92 | 0.27 | 0.91 | 0.28 | 0.93 | 0.26 |
Fast-food consumption (1 yes, 0 no) | 0.10 | 0.29 | 0.13 | 0.33 | 0.06 | 0.24 |
Soft drink consumption (1 yes, 0 no) | 0.16 | 0.37 | 0.18 | 0.38 | 0.14 | 0.34 |
Sweetened food consumption (1 yes, 0 no) | 0.48 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.50 | 0.45 | 0.50 |
Feeling of being safe (1 yes, 0 no) | 0.97 | 0.18 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 0.98 | 0.15 |
Walk alone (1 yes, 0 no) | 0.90 | 0.31 | 0.88 | 0.33 | 0.91 | 0.28 |
Independent variables | ||||||
Sprawl index | 62.70 | 33.33 | 34.38 | 23.64 | 91.02 | 7.71 |
Age | 43.40 | 14.80 | 42.75 | 14.45 | 44.06 | 15.11 |
Years of schooling | 7.61 | 4.71 | 8.45 | 4.70 | 6.77 | 4.56 |
Number of household members | 4.42 | 1.97 | 4.57 | 2.10 | 4.27 | 1.83 |
Marital status | 0.77 | 0.42 | 0.77 | 0.42 | 0.78 | 0.42 |
Sex (1 male, 0 female) | 0.46 | 0.50 | 0.46 | 0.50 | 0.46 | 0.50 |
Household income (in ln) | 10.88 | 5.63 | 10.91 | 5.90 | 10.85 | 5.35 |
Working status | 0.72 | 0.45 | 0.70 | 0.46 | 0.75 | 0.43 |
Observations | 37,882 | 18,941 | 18,941 |
Appendix 3: Detailed steps for urban sprawl index calculation and land classification
The sprawl index we used in this study was built using the digital land cover map provided by the ESA CCI. The ESA CCI site provides worldwide land-use maps with a spatial resolution of 300 × 300 m. To obtain national-level land cover data, the ESA CCI land cover raster map was clipped with a vector map of Indonesian administrative areas. We reclassified the land cover as urban settlement and undeveloped areas.
Steps to calculate the sprawl index are as follows:
-
1.
Reclassify the land cover categories into two classes: developed and undeveloped land.
-
2.
Calculate the percentage of cell categorized as developed land to the total cell in selected radius (1.5, 1.2, and 3.0-km).
-
3.
To obtain a radius of 1.5 km around the urban settlements, we used the menu to select the attributes "urban settlement" and "focal statistics" in the GIS software.
-
4.
Then, we calculated the percentages of developed and undeveloped areas. This percentage is the percentage around urban settlement cells.
-
5.
To obtain the sprawl index at the subdistrict level, the percentages of the undeveloped areas around all urban settlement cells in the same subdistrict are averaged. This process uses the zonal statistics feature.
Reclassification process for raw land use map data, West Java province.
Land classification on the digital ESA CCI map
Appendix 4: Association between urban sprawl, access to road infrastructure, electricity, minimarket, and permanent market
Appendix 5: Robustness and falsification test—likelihood of obesity
Dependent variable: obesity status | Long-panel | Dropping sample | Functional form | Sprawl index measurement | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2000–2014 (1) | No marriage status change (2) | Age outliers (3) | Age (20–60 years old) (4) | Quadratic (5) | Subdistrict | ||
1200 m (6) | 3000 m (7) | ||||||
Sprawl index | − 0.0012* | − 0.0010** | − 0.0010** | − 0.0012** | − 0.0033*** | − 0.0008* | − 0.0007* |
(0.0006) | (0.0005) | (0.0005) | (0.0005) | (0.0011) | (0.0005) | (0.0004) | |
(Sprawl index)2 | 0.0000** | ||||||
(0.0000) | |||||||
R-sq | 0.4604 | 0.5590 | 0.5498 | 0.5421 | 0.5527 | 0.5525 | 0.5525 |
Mean of dependent variable | 0.178 | 0.177 | 0.177 | 0.185 | 0.173 | 0.173 | 0.173 |
Observations | 17,684 | 31,567 | 36,654 | 30,227 | 37,882 | 37,882 | 37,882 |
Samples were limited to individuals above 18 years of age. Standard errors clustered at the subdistrict-year level are reported in parentheses. Control variables include age, age squared, years of schooling, marital status, working status, the number of household members, household income, urban–rural dummy, and island-year fixed effects. Column (1) used a sample of respondents that were interviewed in 2000 and 2014. Column (2) used a sample of those who never changed marital status. Column (3) removed 10% of the youngest and oldest respondents. Column (4) used a sample of those aged more than 20 years old in 2000. Column (5) assumed a quadratic relationship. Columns (6) and (7) used 1200- and 3000-m radii for sprawl index calculation, respectively.
*, **, and *** indicate statistical significance at the 10, 5, and 1% levels, respectively.
Appendix 6: The effects of sprawl on obesity, different clustering level
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Clustering at… level | ||||
District-year | Individual | |||
BMI | Obese | BMI | Obese | |
Sprawl index | − 0.0095* | − 0.0009** | − 0.0095*** | − 0.0009** |
(0.0050) | (0.0004) | (0.0035) | (0.0005) | |
R-sq | 0.7888 | 0.5526 | 0.7868 | 0.5483 |
Mean of dependent variable | 23.078 | 0.173 | 23.078 | 0.173 |
Observations | 37,882 | 37,882 | 37,882 | 37,882 |
Samples were limited to individuals above 18 years of age.Standard errors clustered at the district-year or individual level are reported in parentheses. Control variables include age, age squared, years of schooling, marital status, working status, the number of household members, household income, urban–rural dummy, and island-year fixed effects.
*, **, and *** indicate statistical significance at the 10, 5, and 1% levels, respectively.
Appendix 7: Effects of a sprawling neighborhood on obesity—urban and rural subsamples
Body mass index | Obesity status | |
---|---|---|
(1) | (2) | |
Panel A: Urban | ||
Sprawl index | − 0.0030 | − 0.0002 |
(0.0063) | (0.0007) | |
R2 | 0.7940 | 0.5487 |
Mean of dependent variable | 23.545 | 0.206 |
Observations | 18,186 | 18,186 |
Panel B: Rural | ||
Sprawl index | − 0.0083 | − 0.0011 |
(0.0063) | (0.0008) | |
R2 | 0.7809 | 0.5569 |
Mean of dependent variable | 22.638 | 0.142 |
Observations | 19,329 | 19,329 |
Samples were limited to individuals above 18 years of age. Standard errors clustered at the subdistrict-year level are reported in parentheses. Control variables include age, age squared, years of schooling, marital status, working status, the number of household members, household income, and island-year fixed effects.
*, **, and *** indicate statistical significance at the 10, 5, and 1% levels, respectively.
Appendix 8: Effect of a sprawling neighborhood on carbohydrate consumption
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spending on Carbohydrate per Capita | Uncooked Rice (kg) | Spending on Carbohydrate per Capita (log) | Uncooked Rice (log) | Proportion of Spending on Carbohydrate to Total Food Spending (%) | |
Sprawl | − 68.75 | 0.0101 | − 0.011 | − 0.000836 | − 0.000526 |
(45.28) | (0.0137) | (0.007) | (0.00334) | (0.00045) | |
R-sq | 0.208 | − 0.000791 | 0.217 | 0.223 | 0.23 |
Mean of dependent variable | 10,608.373 | 1.829 | 7.432 | 0.711 | 0.174 |
Observations | 37,812 | 21,378 | 37,812 | 21,378 | 37,682 |
Samples were limited to individuals above 18 years of age. Standard errors clustered at the subdistrict-year level are reported in parentheses. Control variables include age, age squared, years of schooling, marital status, working status, the number of household members, household income, urban–rural dummy, and island-year fixed effects.
*, **, and *** indicate statistical significance at the 10, 5, and 1% levels, respectively.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yunita, Yudhistira, M.H. & Kurniawan, Y.R. Does a sprawling neighborhood affect obesity? Evidence from Indonesia. Int J Health Econ Manag. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-024-09371-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-024-09371-6