Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Finding fraud: enforcement, detection, and recoveries after the ACA

  • Research article
  • Published:
International Journal of Health Economics and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Medicaid Fraud Control Units investigate and prosecute acts of financial fraud and patient abuse within the program. Prior to the expansion of Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), federal government MFCU expenditures totaled half a percent of Medicaid expenditures. Following the enrollment of 12 million adults into the Medicaid program under the ACA, expenditures for these units are now less than pre-ACA levels, as a share of program expenses. We use data for states’ fraud enforcement efforts in the period 2010–2018 and a difference-in-differences design that exploits states’ decision to expand Medicaid under the ACA. States that did expand Medicaid increased their fraud investigations, compared to states that did not expand. Further, civil recoveries and excluded individuals increased after the Medicaid expansion. We find evidence that increases in program scale, in terms of enrollment and utilization, reverted to the mean, facilitating the identification of outlier provider behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius.

  2. Total recoveries are available in the period 2006 to 2018.

  3. Our dataset does not include North Dakota, as this state does not operate an MFCU or provide information about Medicaid fraud enforcement, hence our panel dataset is composed by 50 states.

  4. The number of reported actions omit the number of incoming tips.

  5. The total amount of excluded individuals in the time frame of our sample was 39,582.

  6. Ten states carried out considerable expansions prior to 2014. In the robustness section we explore the sensitivity of our results to excluding these early expansion states.

  7. The treated states are the 33 states that expanded Medicaid after the ACA.

  8. “(1) An action taken against a practitioner’s clinical privileges or medical staff membership in a health care organization, (2) a licensure disciplinary action, (3) a Medicare/Medicaid Exclusion action, or (4) any other adjudicated action." NPDB website.

  9. A MMPR is “The format used by medical malpractice payers to report a medical malpractice payment made for the benefit of a physician, dentist, or other health care practitioner." A medical malpractice payment is "A monetary exchange as a result of a settlement or judgment of a written complaint or claim demanding payment based on a physician’s, dentist’s, or other licensed health care practitioner’s provision of or failure to provide health care services; and may include, but is not limited to, the filing of a cause of action, based on the law of tort, brought in any state or Federal Court or other adjudicative body." NPDB website.

References

  • Black, B. S., Hollingsworth, A., Nunes, L., & Simon, K. I. (2019). The effect of health insurance on mortality: Power analysis and what we can learn from the affordable care act coverage expansions. NBER working paper (w25568).

  • Buchmueller, T. C., Levinson, Z. M., Levy, H. G., & Wolfe, B. L. (2016). Effect of the affordable care act on racial and ethnic disparities in health insurance coverage. American Journal of Public Health, 106(8), 1416–1421.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger, L. R. (2021). Child support and the affordable care act’s medicaid expansions. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 40(1), 42–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway, B., & Sant’Anna, P. H. (2021). Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 200–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtemanche, C., Marton, J., Ukert, B., Yelowitz, A., & Zapata, D. (2017). Early impacts of the affordable care act on health insurance coverage in medicaid expansion and non-expansion states. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 36(1), 178–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Courtemanche, C., Marton, J., Ukert, B., Yelowitz, A., Zapata, D., & Fazlul, I. (2019). The three-year impact of the affordable care act on disparities in insurance coverage. Health Services Research, 54, 307–316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. (2016). Health care fraud investigations. Testimony Before the United States House of Representatives Committee on Ways and Means Subcommittee on Oversight, 1100, 4–66.

  • FBI. (2016). Health care fraud. service provider’s crimes caused patients’ deaths. Retrieved from https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/health-care-providers-crimes-caused-patients-deaths (Accessed January 4, 2021).

  • for Medicare Medicaid Services, C. (2021). Affordable care act program integrity provisions. (Accessed January 5, 2021).

  • Goodman-Bacon, A. (2021). Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. Journal of Econometrics.

  • Gooptu, A., Moriya, A. S., Simon, K. I., & Sommers, B. D. (2016). Medicaid expansion did not result in significant employment changes or job reductions in 2014. Health Affairs, 35(1), 111–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenlaw, S. A., Shapiro, D., & Taylor, T. et al. (2018). Principles of economics-2e: Openstax.

  • Gruber, J. (2003). Medicaid. In Means-tested transfer programs in the United States (pp. 15–78). University of Chicago Press.

  • Hayes, S. L., Riley, P., Radley, D. C., & McCarthy, D. (2017). Reducing racial and ethnic disparities in access to care: has the affordable care act made a difference. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund), 2017, 1–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, D. H., & McCarthy, I. (2020). Deterrence effects of antifraud and abuse enforcement in health care. Journal of Health Economics,75, 102405.

  • Kino, S., & Kawachi, I. (2018). The impact of aca medicaid expansion on socioeconomic inequality in health care services utilization. PLoS ONE, 13(12), e0209935.

  • Lipton, B. J., Decker, S. L., & Sommers, B. D. (2019). The affordable care act appears to have narrowed racial and ethnic disparities in insurance coverage and access to care among young adults. Medical Care Research and Review, 76(1), 32–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MACPAC. (2021). Overview of the affordable care act and medicaid. Retrieved from https://www.healthcare.gov/glossary/affordable-care-act/ (Accessed January 5, 2021).

  • Miller, R. L., Benjamin, D. K., & North, D. C. (2018). The economics of public issues. New York: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, L. (2009). Combating fraud in health care: An essential component of any cost containment strategy. Health Affairs, 28(5), 1351–1356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NHCAA. (2020). The challenge of health care fraud. Retrieved from https://www.nhcaa.org/resources/health-care-anti-fraud-resources/the-challenge-of-health-care-fraud.aspx (Accessed January 4, 2021).

  • Nicholas, L. H., Hanson, C., Segal, J. B., & Eisenberg, M. D. (2020). Association between treatment by fraud and abuse perpetrators and health outcomes among medicare beneficiaries. JAMA Internal Medicine, 180(1), 62–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • of Health, U. D., Services, H., et al. (n.d.). Health care fraud prevention and enforcement efforts result in record-breaking recoveries totaling nearly \$4.1 billion. february 14, 2012.

  • of Inspector General, H. O. (2021a). Medicaid fraud control units (mfcus). Retrieved from https://www.oig.hhs.gov/fraud/medicaid-fraud-control-units-mfcu/ (Accessed January 4, 2021).

  • of Inspector General, H. O. (2021b). General terms and conditions. Retrieved from https://www.oig.hhs.gov/fraud/medicaid-fraud-control-units-mfcu/terms-conditions.asp (Accessed January 4, 2021).

  • of Inspector General, H. O. (2021c). Exclusions program. Retrieved from https://www.oig.hhs.gov/exclusions/index.asp (Accessed January 4, 2021).

  • Pande, V., & Maas, W. (2013). Physician medicare fraud: Characteristics and consequences. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing.

  • Perez, V., & Nguyen, T. (2022). Blowing the whistle on malpractice: Fraud enforcement as patient harm reduction. Working Paper.

  • Paybarah, A. (2021). Virginia doctor gets 59 years for unneeded surgery and improper sterilizations. New York Times. Retrieved May 19, 2022, from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/18/us/javaid-perwaiz-hysterectomies-sentenced.html.

  • Perez, V., & Wing, C. (2019). Should we do more to police medicaid fraud? Evidence on the intended and unintended consequences of expanded enforcement. American Journal of Health Economics, 5(4), 481–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudowitz, R., Hinton, E., & Antonisse, L. (2018). Medicaid enrollment & spending growth: Fy 2018 & 2019. San Francisco: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. http://www.files.kff.org/attachment/IssueBrief-Medicaid-Enrollment-and-Spending-Growth-FY-2018-2019.

  • Simon, K., Soni, A., & Cawley, J. (2017). The impact of health insurance on preventive care and health behaviors: Evidence from the first two years of the aca medicaid expansions. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 36(2), 390–417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G., Kennedy, C., Knipper, S., O’Brien, J., & O’Keeffe, J. (2005). Using medicaid to support working age adults with serious mental illnesses in the community: A handbook. Sign, 1 (202.690), 7858.

  • Soni, A., Hendryx, M., & Simon, K. (2017). Medicaid expansion under the affordable care act and insurance coverage in rural and urban areas. The Journal of Rural Health, 33(2), 217–226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, L., & Abraham, S. (2021). Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 175–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victoria Perez.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Victoria Perez and Julio A. Ramos Pastrana have benefited from valuable comments received in ASHECON 2021. We thank Laura Wherry for very helpful comments. The usual disclaimer applies.

Appendix

Appendix

Simple DD

See Table 9.

Table 9 Investigations

Robustness to confounders

See Tables 10 and 11.

Table 10 Total investigations robustness
Table 11 Fraud investigations robustness

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perez, V., Ramos Pastrana, J.A. Finding fraud: enforcement, detection, and recoveries after the ACA. Int J Health Econ Manag. 23, 393–409 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-023-09357-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-023-09357-w

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation