Abstract
To assess the performance of the employment-based health insurance system, it is necessary to understand how well workers sort into jobs that offer their desired mix of cash wages relative to benefits. However, few studies directly measure the extent of sorting. We quantify the prevalence of mismatches between workers’ preferences and firms’ insurance offerings by considering two types of mismatch: (1) workers who appear to desire coverage through their employer, but work for firms that do not offer coverage, and; (2) workers who appear not to desire coverage through their employer, but work for firms that offer coverage. Most workers (79.6%) enjoy labor market matches that appear consistent with their preferences. The remaining 20.4% of workers appear to be mismatched. For most of these mismatches, the primary consequence is lower wages than would be earned if individuals were better matched in the labor market. However, a minority of the identified mismatches appear to be “involuntarily uninsured” workers who would gain insurance if they were to find a better match. Extrapolating from the analysis sample, these involuntarily uninsured workers and their uninsured dependents may represent up to one in six uninsured individuals in the United States.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blumberg L.J., Nichols L.M. (2001). The health status of workers who decline employer-sponsored insurance. Health Affairs 20(6): 180–182
Blumberg, L. J., & Nichols, L. M. (2004). Why are so many americans uninsured?, In C. G. McLaughlin Health policy and the uninsured: setting the research agenda. Urban Institute Press.
Bundorf, M. K., & Pauly, M. V. (2002). Is insurance affordable for the uninsured?” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 9281, pp. 1–23.
Center for Studying Health System Change (2000). Community tracking household survey, 1996–27, and Followback Survey, 1997–28: (Computer File; Restricted Use Version]. 2nd ICPSR version. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change [producer]. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
Chernew M., Frick K., McLaughlin C.G. (1997). “The demand for health insurance coverage by low-income workers: can reduced premiums achieve full coverage?. Health Services Research 32(4): 453–470
Chernew, M. E., & Hirth, R. A. (2004). Modeling the causes and consequences of lack of health insurance coverage: Gaps in the literature. In: C. G. McLaughlin (ed.), Health policy and the uninsured: Setting the research agenda. Urban Institute Press.
Currie J., Madrian B.C. (1999). Health, health insurance and the labor market. In: Ashenfelter O., Card D.E. (eds). Handbook of Labor Economics Vol.3, Part 3. Elsevier Science Publishing Company, New York, pp. 3309–3390
Feder, J., Levitt, L., O’Brien, E., & Rowland, D. (2001). Covering the low-income uninsured: the case for expanding public programs. Health Affairs, January/February, 27–29.
Farber H.S., Levy H. (2000). Recent trends in employer-sponsored health insurance coverage: Are bad jobs getting worse? Journal of Health Economics 19(1): 93–219
Feldman R., Dowd B., Leitz S., Blewett L.A. (1997). The effect of premiums on the small firm’s decision to offer health insurance. The Journal of Human Resources 32(4): 635–259
Glied S., Gould D. (2005). Variations in the impact of health coverage expansion proposals across states. Health Affairs, Web Exclusive W5:259–271
Goldstein G., Pauly M.V. (1976). Group health insurance as a local public good. In: Rossett R. (eds). The role of health insurance in the health services sector. Neale Watson Academic Publications for the National Bureau of Economic Research, New York, pp. 73–110
Gruber, J., & Lettau, M. (2000). How elastic is the firm’s demand for health insurance? National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 8021.
Hadley J., Reschovsky J.D. (2002). Small firms demand for health insurance: The decision to offer insurance. Inquiry 39(2): 118–238
Hadley J., Reschovsky J.D. (2003). Health and the cost of nongroup insurance. Inquiry 40(3): 235–253
Long S.H., Marquis S.M. (1993). Gaps in employer coverage: lack of supply or lack of demand? Health Affairs 12, 282–294
McLaughlin C.G., Zellers W.K. (1993). The shortcomings of voluntarism in the small-group insurance market. Health Affairs 11(2): 28–40
Monheit A.C., Vistnes J.P. (1999). Health insurance availability and the workplace: How important are worker preferences? The Journal of Human Resources 34(4): 770–785
Moran J.R., Chernew M.E., Hirth R.A. (2001). Preference diversity and the breadth of employee health insurance options. Health Services Research 36(5): 911–935
Pauly M.V., Kunreuther H., Hirth R.A. (1995). Guaranteed renewability in insurance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 10(2): 143–156
Pauly M.V., Herring B. (1999). Pooling health insurance risks. AEI Press, Washington D.C.
Pauly, M. V., & Herring, B. (2001). expanding insurance via tax credits: Trade-offs and Outcomes. Health affairs, January/February, 9–26.
Pauly M.V., Percy A. (2000). Cost and performance: A comparison of the individual and group health insurance markets. Journal of Health Policy, Politics and Law 25(1): 9–26
Scott F.A., Berger M.C., Black D.A. (1989). Effects of the tax treatment of fringe benefits on labor market segmentation. Industrial & Labor Relations Review 42(2): 216–229
Sheiner L. (1999). Health care costs, wages, and aging. Federal Reserve Board of Governors working paper, Washington D. C
States Health Access Data Assistance Center (SHADAC), University of Minnesota (2004). Characteristics of the uninsured: A View from the States, prepared for the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by a grant from the Economic Research Initiative on the Uninsured (ERIU) at the University of Michigan, funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hirth, R.A., Baughman, R.A., Chernew, M.E. et al. Worker preferences, sorting and aggregate patterns of health insurance coverage. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 6, 259–277 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-007-9007-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-007-9007-x