Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Worker preferences, sorting and aggregate patterns of health insurance coverage

  • Published:
International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To assess the performance of the employment-based health insurance system, it is necessary to understand how well workers sort into jobs that offer their desired mix of cash wages relative to benefits. However, few studies directly measure the extent of sorting. We quantify the prevalence of mismatches between workers’ preferences and firms’ insurance offerings by considering two types of mismatch: (1) workers who appear to desire coverage through their employer, but work for firms that do not offer coverage, and; (2) workers who appear not to desire coverage through their employer, but work for firms that offer coverage. Most workers (79.6%) enjoy labor market matches that appear consistent with their preferences. The remaining 20.4% of workers appear to be mismatched. For most of these mismatches, the primary consequence is lower wages than would be earned if individuals were better matched in the labor market. However, a minority of the identified mismatches appear to be “involuntarily uninsured” workers who would gain insurance if they were to find a better match. Extrapolating from the analysis sample, these involuntarily uninsured workers and their uninsured dependents may represent up to one in six uninsured individuals in the United States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blumberg L.J., Nichols L.M. (2001). The health status of workers who decline employer-sponsored insurance. Health Affairs 20(6): 180–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, L. J., & Nichols, L. M. (2004). Why are so many americans uninsured?, In C. G. McLaughlin Health policy and the uninsured: setting the research agenda. Urban Institute Press.

  • Bundorf, M. K., & Pauly, M. V. (2002). Is insurance affordable for the uninsured?” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 9281, pp. 1–23.

  • Center for Studying Health System Change (2000). Community tracking household survey, 1996–27, and Followback Survey, 1997–28: (Computer File; Restricted Use Version]. 2nd ICPSR version. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change [producer]. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].

  • Chernew M., Frick K., McLaughlin C.G. (1997). “The demand for health insurance coverage by low-income workers: can reduced premiums achieve full coverage?. Health Services Research 32(4): 453–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernew, M. E., & Hirth, R. A. (2004). Modeling the causes and consequences of lack of health insurance coverage: Gaps in the literature. In: C. G. McLaughlin (ed.), Health policy and the uninsured: Setting the research agenda. Urban Institute Press.

  • Currie J., Madrian B.C. (1999). Health, health insurance and the labor market. In: Ashenfelter O., Card D.E. (eds). Handbook of Labor Economics Vol.3, Part 3. Elsevier Science Publishing Company, New York, pp. 3309–3390

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder, J., Levitt, L., O’Brien, E., & Rowland, D. (2001). Covering the low-income uninsured: the case for expanding public programs. Health Affairs, January/February, 27–29.

  • Farber H.S., Levy H. (2000). Recent trends in employer-sponsored health insurance coverage: Are bad jobs getting worse? Journal of Health Economics 19(1): 93–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman R., Dowd B., Leitz S., Blewett L.A. (1997). The effect of premiums on the small firm’s decision to offer health insurance. The Journal of Human Resources 32(4): 635–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glied S., Gould D. (2005). Variations in the impact of health coverage expansion proposals across states. Health Affairs, Web Exclusive W5:259–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein G., Pauly M.V. (1976). Group health insurance as a local public good. In: Rossett R. (eds). The role of health insurance in the health services sector. Neale Watson Academic Publications for the National Bureau of Economic Research, New York, pp. 73–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J., & Lettau, M. (2000). How elastic is the firm’s demand for health insurance? National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 8021.

  • Hadley J., Reschovsky J.D. (2002). Small firms demand for health insurance: The decision to offer insurance. Inquiry 39(2): 118–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley J., Reschovsky J.D. (2003). Health and the cost of nongroup insurance. Inquiry 40(3): 235–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Long S.H., Marquis S.M. (1993). Gaps in employer coverage: lack of supply or lack of demand? Health Affairs 12, 282–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin C.G., Zellers W.K. (1993). The shortcomings of voluntarism in the small-group insurance market. Health Affairs 11(2): 28–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monheit A.C., Vistnes J.P. (1999). Health insurance availability and the workplace: How important are worker preferences? The Journal of Human Resources 34(4): 770–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran J.R., Chernew M.E., Hirth R.A. (2001). Preference diversity and the breadth of employee health insurance options. Health Services Research 36(5): 911–935

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly M.V., Kunreuther H., Hirth R.A. (1995). Guaranteed renewability in insurance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 10(2): 143–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly M.V., Herring B. (1999). Pooling health insurance risks. AEI Press, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, M. V., & Herring, B. (2001). expanding insurance via tax credits: Trade-offs and Outcomes. Health affairs, January/February, 9–26.

  • Pauly M.V., Percy A. (2000). Cost and performance: A comparison of the individual and group health insurance markets. Journal of Health Policy, Politics and Law 25(1): 9–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott F.A., Berger M.C., Black D.A. (1989). Effects of the tax treatment of fringe benefits on labor market segmentation. Industrial & Labor Relations Review 42(2): 216–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheiner L. (1999). Health care costs, wages, and aging. Federal Reserve Board of Governors working paper, Washington D. C

    Google Scholar 

  • States Health Access Data Assistance Center (SHADAC), University of Minnesota (2004). Characteristics of the uninsured: A View from the States, prepared for the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard A. Hirth.

Additional information

This work was supported by a grant from the Economic Research Initiative on the Uninsured (ERIU) at the University of Michigan, funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hirth, R.A., Baughman, R.A., Chernew, M.E. et al. Worker preferences, sorting and aggregate patterns of health insurance coverage. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 6, 259–277 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-007-9007-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-007-9007-x

Keywords

Navigation