Abstract
This paper is a review of the current status about the remaining problems that are found in the investigation of the Quaternary Argentine soils and loessic sediments, and the way that Mössbauer studies can assist in solving them. There are two main types of investigations that make use of the magnetic response of the samples to correlate them with information gathered by other methods. On the one hand, there is the stratigraphic and chronological research, which is of importance from the geological and paleontological points of view. On the other hand, the paleoclimatic records, of significance toward a possible model of the past climate, are also studied because of their close relation to the sediments history. However, there is not yet a model that can tell the difference between the modifications due to the climatic conditions at the time when the soils were buried from processes that occurred after burial. Some examples are given that show that Mössbauer studies can be applied with a certain degree of success when cross-checked with magnetic measurements toward understanding the processes that occurred in alluvial B (paleosols) and C horizons (loess) from the eastern part of Buenos Aires Province. Although the application of Mössbauer studies to hydromorphic processes in soils is not straightforward, there are cases in which Mössbauer spectroscopy, if applied properly and correlated with other techniques, is able to characterize the type of iron oxides existing in the materials and thus assist theories about its origin and history.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Orgeira M. J., Walther A. M., Vázquez C. A., Di Tommaso I., Alonso S., Sherwood G., Yuguan H. and Vilas J. F. A., J. S. Am. Earth. Sci. 11 (1998), 561.
Terminiello L., Bidegain J. C., Rico Y. and Mercader R. C., Hyperfine Interact. 136 (2001), 97.
Deng C., Zhu R., Verosub K. L., Singer M. J. and Vidic N. J., J. Geophys. Res. 109 (2004), 1103.
Heller F. and Evans M. E., Rev. Geophys. 33 (1995), 211.
Imbellone P. A. and Teruggi M. E., Quatern. Int. 17 (1993), 49.
Maher B. A., Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl. 137 (1998), 25.
Virina E. I., Faustov S. S. and Heller F., Phys. Chem. Earth A 25 (2000), 475.
Nabel P. E., Morrás H. J. M., Petersen N. and Zech W., J. S. Am. Earth Sci. 12 (1999), 311.
Ruocco M., Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl. 72 (1989), 105.
Muhs D. and Zárate M., Late Quaternary eolian records of the Americas and their paleoclimatic significance, In: V. Markgraf (ed.), Interhemispheric Climate Linkages, Academic, New York, 2000, p. 183.
Hernández M., Private communication (2001).
Teruggi M. E., J. Sedimentary Petrology 27 (1957), 322.
Larsson W., B. Geol. Inst. Univ. Upsala 26 (1937), 27.
Imbellone P. A. and Camilión M. C., Pedologie 38 (1988), 155.
Zárate M. A., Quaternary Sci. Rev. 22 (2003), 1987.
Morrás H. and Delaune M., Ciencia del Suelo 3 (1983) 140 and references therein.
Teruggi M. E. and Imbellone P. A., Ciencia del Suelo 5 (1987) 175 (in Spanish).
Soil Survey Staff, Keys to Soil Taxonomy, Soil Conservation Service, USDA, 1999.
Vandenberghe R. E., De Grave E., Landuydt C. and Bowen L. H., Hyperfine Interact. 53 (1990), 175.
Vandenberghe R. E., Hus J. J. and De Grave E., Hyperfine Interact. 117 (1998), 359.
Eyre J. K. and Dickson D. P. E., J.Geophys. Res. 100 (1995), 17995.
Vandenberghe R. E., De Grave E., Hus J. J. and Han J., Hyperfine Interact. 70 (1992), 977.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mercader, R.C., Sives, F.R., Imbellone, P.A. et al. Magnetic and Mössbauer Studies of Quaternary Argentine Loessic Soils and Paleosols. Hyperfine Interact 161, 43–53 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10751-005-9190-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10751-005-9190-4