Abstract
Ranunculus species grouped in the section Batrachium (water crowfoots) indicate the most valuable fluvial habitat in Europe under the EU Habitats Directive, and recognition of their environmental preferences plays a crucial role in efficient conservation. Moreover, water crowfoots are used in various monitoring systems throughout Europe. The aim of this study was to identify the distribution patterns of two common water crowfoot species (Ranunculus fluitans, R. circinatus) and their hybrid (R. circinatus × R. fluitans) in relation to environmental variables in rivers. Various chemical and hydromorphological parameters were estimated for 54 river sites where 58 different Batrachium populations were recorded. Our study revealed the most distinct positive reaction of R. fluitans to rhithral conditions characterized by rapid currents and coarse substrate. R. circinatus × R. fluitans preferred larger channels, although this taxon also flourished in rhithral rivers. The preferences of R. circinatus were not so evident confirming its occurrence under a wide range of habitat conditions. The ecological reaction of the hybrid was compared with its parental species, revealing their ecological specificity, which is useful in designing appropriate conservation programmes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The water crowfoots, a monophyletic group of aquatic plants classified as the section Batrachium within the cosmopolitan, morphologically and ecologically diverse genus Ranunculus L. (hereafter Batrachium; Hörandl et al., 2005), are very valuable elements of aquatic flora, playing an important role in the fluvial systems, and their presence significantly supports stream biodiversity. These plants efficiently modify channel flow as well as nutrient and sediment dynamics, which subsequently creates habitats for other flora and fauna (Mony et al., 2006; Wiegleb et al., 2017; Koutecký et al., 2021). Batrachium riverine habitats were classified as important by the European Community (Council Directive 92/43/EEC, 1992, known as the Habitat Directive) and are protected in the UE as Water courses of plain to montane levels with the Ranunculion fluitantis and Callitricho-Batrachion vegetation (Code 3260) (Hatton-Ellis et al., 2003). Therefore, the precise identification of habitat requirements of this type of vegetation is essential for the conservation efficiency of valuable rivers in Europe. The ecology of Batrachium is blurred by complicated taxonomy and unclear species delimitation (Preston & Croft, 2001; Lansdown, 2009). Batrachium taxa express extreme phenotypic plasticity (e.g. Cook, 1966; Wiegleb & Herr, 1983; Webster, 1988) combined with allopolyploidization and autopolyploidization (e.g. Turała, 1970; Dahlgren, 1995), frequent hybridization (e.g. Cook, 1966; Lansdown, 2009; Zalewska-Gałosz et al., 2015) and the persistence of genetically independent, sterile lineages (Zander & Wiegleb, 1987; Lansdown, 2007).
Recently applied molecular tools provided new possibilities for Batrachium taxa identification (e.g. Telford et al., 2011; Bobrov et al., 2015; Zalewska-Gałosz et al., 2015; Prančl et al., 2018; Koutecký et al., 2021). Moreover, molecular studies shed a new light on the role of hybridization in Batrachium diversity. According to recent reports, approximately 15% of the studied samples from Central Europe represented different hybrid generations (Prančl et al., 2018; Koutecký et al., 2021). Some of the well-known species are confirmed to be allopolyploids, e.g. Ranunculus schmalhausenii Luferov, Ranunculus aquatilis L. (Bobrov et al., 2015; Zalewska-Gałosz et al., 2015; Koutecký et al., 2021) and have particular ecological preferences that differ essentially from those of the parental species. In this study, we turn our attention to the little known hybrid Ranunculus circinatus × Ranunculus fluitans and its ecological characterization, as well as ecological differences between the hybrid and the parental species.
Despite the reasonably detailed characteristics of the habitats with Batrachium vegetation themselves (e.g. due to protection under the Habitat Directive), the information available about individual species’ ecological requirements is rather general and often not recent (Cook, 1966; Haslam, 1987; Dawson & Szoszkiewicz, 1999; Mony et al., 2006). Moreover, some of the recently completed ecological studies are not convincing, since the taxonomy and identification have not been adequately clarified (Lansdown & Pankhurst, 2010; Steffen et al., 2014). In the whole group, both species R. circinatus and R. fluitans, as mentioned above, are unique and easy to identify. Even so, there is a need for more recent and detailed studies for running waters for both species. It has already been revealed that R. circinatus is frequent in standing waters and slow-flowing rivers but only rarely found in rivers with a fast current velocity. Communities with this species create an independent vegetation type, different to that of other Batrachium species (Wiegleb & Herr, 1985). A previous study showed that R. fluitans communities differ clearly from other Batrachium communities with Ranunculus peltatus Schrank and R. penicillatus complex in terms of botanical metrics, such as richness and evenness. However, it was not possible to identify clear relationships with most of the environmental parameters (Mony et al., 2006). Other works showed that R. fluitans was noted in fast-flowing rivers with a medium-coarse substrate and with the absence of fine sediment (Wiegleb & Herr, 1985; Garbe et al., 2016).
The requirements of individual Batrachium species concerning water quality have been described more often, as they are widely applied in ecological status assessment with nutrients. Moreover, Batrachium species as a stenotopic are used in various monitoring systems throughout Europe. In many of them, both R. fluitans and R. circinatus are specific indicators of mesotrophic (Haury et al., 2006; Szoszkiewicz et al., 2020) and eutrophic conditions (Willby et al., 2012). Therefore, as, for example, Schneider (2007) showed, R. circinatus prefers eutrophic lakes, while its ecological tolerance in rivers is much broader. Mony et al. (2006) concluded that Batrachium species, due to their occurrence in a broad range of nutrient levels, cannot be indicators of specific trophic conditions. A similar situation applies to any hybrid taxa, not only Batrachium, which are not included in most river assessment systems (Haury et al., 2006; Schneider, 2007; Willby et al., 2012; Szoszkiewicz et al., 2020).
Concerning other physical and chemical parameters, different Batrachium taxa can use bicarbonates in the photosynthetic process as compensation for CO2 deficiency (Iversen et al., 2019). As Bodner (1994) pointed out, this mechanism enables R. fluitans to carry out photosynthesis, e.g. under high pH and alkaline conditions, when, for hydrophytes that do not use bicarbonate, the photosynthetic rate can decrease to zero. Mony et al. (2006) also noted significantly high alkalinity (in connection with pH) in habitats with R. fluitans, revealing differences compared with other Ranunculus species. For R. circinatus × R. fluitans there are no current data on relationships with water quality parameters and other habitat conditions.
The aim of this study was to identify the geographical distribution and ecological patterns of two common water crowfoots (R. fluitans and R. circinatus) and their hybrid (R. circinatus × R. fluitans) in rivers to formulate appropriate measures for their conservation. In addition to traditional morphological identification, we used objective molecular markers that proved to be decisive in Batrachium determination (Bobrov et al., 2015; Zalewska-Gałosz et al., 2015). The potential application of the hybrid into river monitoring and assessment was considered. It was hypothesized that the examined Batrachium taxa developing in flowing waters would show different tolerances to hydromorphological and water quality elements.
Materials and methods
Study sites
The field survey was carried at 54 sites selected throughout Poland (Fig. 1) in rivers representing four eco-regions, namely lowland river types (central plains and eastern plains) and highland and mountain watercourses (central highlands). The sites with two taxa (four sites) were taken for analysis once as single sites and have not been subdivided into separate positions with one taxon. A list of the studied localities together with the data on molecularly studied taxa are presented in Table A2—Supplementary Material. Field surveys were carried out between 2014 and 2020 during the vegetative growth seasons, between mid-June and mid-September. Physicochemical studies were conducted during the summer period, in comparable hydrological conditions.
Macrophyte survey
The aquatic plants were surveyed along river reaches 100 m in length. Only river macrophytes growing in the water or at least rooted in the water were recorded. The presence of each species was scored along with their percentage cover using the following nine-grade scale: < 0.1%, 0.1 − 1%, 1 − 2.5%, 2.5 − 5%, 5 − 10%, 10 − 25%, 25 − 50%, 50 − 75% and > 75%. All species were identified on the basis of key morphological characters (Preston & Croft, 2001; Jäger et al., 2017; Wiegleb et al., 2017). Batrachium taxa, apart from traditional morphological identification, were additionally molecularly identified based on polymorphisms detected in the sequences obtained by direct sequencing of selected DNA regions (ITS, rpl32-trnL and psbE-petL) except some samples of R. circinatus, because morphological identification of this species is straightforward and unambiguous, even in a vegetative stage (Cook, 1966; Wiegleb et al., 2017). Morphological character values for molecularly identified R. circinatus × R. fluitans are based on measurements of 20 well-preserved specimens collected during the study.
Molecular identification of key taxa
Fresh leaves collected from each Batrachium taxon detected in the studied sites were sampled and stored in small plastic tubes filled with silica gel. To strengthen the analysis, the other Batrachium samples collected in different parts of Poland as part of a biosystematic study of the section Batrachium were also included in a molecular study. Since the aim of the present analysis was to identify molecular differences between R. circinatus, R. fluitans and their hybrid, the analysis was limited to Batrachium species with only exceptional inclusion of the other hybrids, which can blur the phylogenetic interpretations. Altogether, 77 Batrachium samples were molecularly identified. Detailed information about all specimens included in the analysis is summarized in Table A2—Supplementary Material (42 samples from the localities ecologically studied) and Table A3—Supplementary Material (35 additional samples from the other stations in Poland).
Between 10 and 18 mg of dried plant material was used for DNA isolation. The plant tissue was ground to a fine powder using an MM 400 (Retsch) mixer mill and 3-mm tungsten beads. Total genomic DNA was extracted using the Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen), following the manufacturer’s protocol. The nuclear ribosomal Internal Transcribed Spacer region (including ITS1, 5.8S and ITS2) was amplified and directly sequenced as described by Zalewska-Gałosz & Ronikier (2010, 2012). As evidenced previously (Telford et al., 2011; Bobrov et al., 2015; Zalewska-Gałosz et al., 2015), the ITS region can serve as a valuable marker for the identification of Batrachium taxa. Additionally, two non-coding plastid spacers (cpDNA), rpl32-trnL and psbE-petL, were investigated to detect potential differences in the haplotypes among taxa. Amplification of cpDNA regions as well as direct sequencing was performed as described by Zalewska-Gałosz et al. (2009, 2010). All polymorphic variants of the ITS and cpDNA sequences were submitted to GenBank (Tables A2, A3—Supplementary Material). The sequences were manually verified/adjusted using ChromasPro 2.1.8. software (https://technelysium.com.au). Sequence alignments were conducted manually using BIOEDIT 7.0.5., based on the sequences in the forward direction, and, if the sequences showed intraindividual polymorphisms, on the consensus sequences in both (forward and reverse) sequencing directions. Additive nucleotide polymorphisms were coded using IUPAC nucleotide ambiguity codes. Ambiguous regions of the ITS alignment and incomplete data at the beginning and end of the sequences were excluded from the analysis. Accessions that yielded identical ITS or cpDNA sequences were represented in the phylogenetic analyses by the single terminals. The ITS data were visualized as a phylogenetic network using SplitsTree5 v.5.0.0 alpha software. The NeighborNet method was used to obtain a distance matrix, in which the distances were computed with the Hamming Distances Ambig States algorithm, handling ambiguous states as Average States (Hamming, 1950). A splits network was obtained using The Splits Network Algorithm (Dress & Huson, 2004).
Bayesian analysis was performed in the program MrBayes 3.2.7 (Ronquist et al., 2012). MrBayes, like most maximum likelihood programs, treats gaps and missing characters as missing data. Therefore, as we considered gaps as phylogenetically informative in this study, this information was converted into a binary matrix using FastGap 1.2. The dataset was divided into three partitions: (1) rpl32-trnL, (2) psbE-petL and (3) binary-coded indels. Substitution models were estimated separately for each partition. For the first and second partitions, the MCMC (Markov Chain Monte Carlo) procedure was implemented. In this procedure, all parameter estimates are averaged across substitution models and weighted according to substitution models’ posterior probability. For the third partition, a simple F81 model dedicated to restriction sites and other binary data was implemented. Bayesian analysis was performed using two independent runs with four MCMC chains running for 105 generations. Trees were sampled after every 100th generation. The first 25% of trees were discarded as the burn-in phase, and the remaining trees were used for the construction of a 50% majority consensus tree. The consensus tree was graphically visualized in the program FigTree v.1.4.4 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk). In all phylogenetic analyses, Ranunculus sceleratus L. was used as an outgroup, with three sequences acquired from GenBank: MW430773 (ITS), KC842129 (rpl32-trnL) and KC842059 (psbE-petL)—trimmed to the required length prior to analyses.
Hydromorphological evaluation
The hydromorphological evaluation was conducted according to the River Habitat Survey (RHS) method (Raven et al., 1998). The RHS method, gathering data from 500-m stretches of rivers, delivers information on the river channel as well as on the 50-m buffer of each river valley studied. RHS data enabled calculation of two numerical metrics: Habitat Quality Assessment (HQA) and the Habitat Modification Score (HMS). High HQA values indicate an extensive presence of a number of natural river features and high landscape diversity along the river. A high HMS score indicates an extensive anthropogenic alteration, such as bank and channel resectioning, reinforcements and engineering construction. Both indices have values in the range of 0–100 and it is a result of the number of natural or anthropogenic elements of the river channel. Furthermore, the RHS protocol enabled calculation of the average grain size of the channel substrate (granulometry index) and the average flow type (flow index) using the formula of Jusik et al. (2015). Values of both indices are between 1- and 6 and are the ratio of the share of different substrate fractions or flows and numerical values assigned to each type of substrate and each flow type (the highest values for coarse-grained, fast-flowing channels). The basis and formula for calculating both indices were provided by Jusik et al. (2015).
Water quality
Water samples were collected from each survey site immediately prior to biological sampling. Water samples were taken in the middle of the stream below the surface. Analyses of the physical and chemical parameters of the water were measured on-site using portable equipment. An additional water sample was collected for laboratory analysis. Water samples were cooled and analysed in the laboratory within a 24-h period. A part of the sample was filtered using Sartorius Cellulose filters with nominal pore size of 0.45 µm. Overall, nine physical and chemical parameters were estimated (Table 1). Electrical conductivity and pH were measured with a digital potentiometer. The dissolved oxygen was measured with a digital oxygen meter and by the Winkler method. Alkalinity and total hardness were measured by the potentiometric method—alkalinity by titrating with sulfuric acid to an end point of pH 4.5 in the presence of methyl orange and total hardness by titrating with disodium edetate. Concentrations of phosphate (molybdenum blue method), nitrate nitrogen (cadmium reduction method) and ammonium nitrogen (Nessler’s method) were determined using a spectrophotometer.
Statistical analysis
The environmental dataset (physical, chemical and hydromorphological parameters) was initially explored with basic statistical analysis (range, mean, median, standard deviation) calculated for each Batrachium taxon. Differences between mean values were verified using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Factor analysis (FA) with varimax normalized rotation was used to reveal major directions of variability. The use of FA allowed for the extraction of uncorrelated variables that were used in further analyses. Statistica 13 was used for most of the analysis including the Kruskal–Wallis test and FA. Direct ordination analysis was carried out to determine the importance of environmental factors in the development of the studied water crowfoots and other macrophytes. Factors identified by FA were used as environmental variables. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) was applied (terBraak & Smilauer, 1998) along with a forward variable selection procedure. The statistical significance of the relationships between species data and environmental variables was evaluated using the Monte Carlo permutation test (499 permutations). CCA analysis were performed using CANOCO for Windows version 4.56.
Results
Morphological and molecular identification of Batrachium taxa
Comparison of morphological characters essential for identification of R. circinatus, R. fluitans and its hybrid is provided in Table 2. The description of characteristic features includes steam, leaves, petals and pits.
ITS network
The ITS alignment of Batrachium taxa sampled in this study was 573 bp long with 44 variable positions. The polymorphism detected comprised 43 substitutions (35 informative) and one, 1-bp long insertion specific for Ranunculus baudotii Godr. and R. fluitans. The polymorphic sites are summarized in the supporting information (Table A4—Supplementary Material).
The phylogenetic network showed quite a clear structure (Fig. 2). Taxa of which the sequences did not express intraindividual polymorphism are grouped into four clusters: (1) R. circinatus, Ranunculus trichophyllus Chaix ribotype r3; (2) R. fluitans, R. baudotii; (3) R. peltatus, R. trichophyllus ribotypes r1 and r2 and (4) R. trichophyllus ribotype r6. The rest of the taxa, the sequences of which display intraindividual polymorphism, fell into the clusters mentioned above if the ITS sequence polymorphism was additive between species forming the same group (e.g. R. baudotii × R. fluitans, Ranunculus kauffmannii Clerc) and formed their own groups, if the ITS sequence polymorphism was additive between taxa from different clusters. The later stage refers to R. circinatus × R. fluitans, R. fluitans × R. peltatus, R. aquatilis and R. peltatus × R. trichophyllus ribotype r6.
NeighborNet of the ITS sequences of the Batrachium group sampled in Poland, indicating the topology of the hybrid R. circinatus × R. fluitans, clearly intermediate between the parental species clusters: R. circinatus/R. trichophyllus ribotype 3 and R. fluitans/R. baudotii. The origins of the samples studied are given in Tables A1 and A2—Supplementary Material, and the details of the ribotypes are provided in Table A3—Supplementary Material. Ranunculus sceleratus is used as an outgroup
In the phylogenetic network, the putative hybrid R. circinatus × R. fluitans forms its own cluster exactly halfway between clusters 1 and 2. Such intermediate topology evidences its origin from a hybridization event between the species belonging to both clusters; however, certain identification of the parental taxa is hardly possible, because each of these clusters comprises more than one taxon. Taxa in both clusters differed from each other by a few single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the ITS sequences: R. circinatus differs from R. trichophyllus ribotype r3 by five positions of the alignment (48, 86, 103, 201 and 444) and R. baudotii from R. fluitans can also be distinguished by five positions (43, 48, 76, 192, 554) (Table A4—Supplementary Material). Therefore, following the result of NeighborNet analysis indicating the topology of the hybrid between two parentage groups—R. circinatus/R. trichophyllus r3 from one side and R. baudotii/R. fluitans from another (Fig. 2)—and based on the SNP analysis, R. baudotii can be excluded as one parent by five positions in the alignment, namely 43, 48, 76, 192 and 554, while the parentage of R. trichophyllus ribotype r3 is ruled out based on the following positions: 103, 201 and 444 (Table A4—Supplementary Material). Only two species—R. circinatus and R. fluitans—can be unambiguously identified as parents for the studied hybrid.
Phylogenetic tree
The Bayesian phylogenetic tree, built based on the concatenated alignment of two cpDNA regions, i.e. rpl32–trnL and psbE-petL, was 1085-bp long, and evidenced two well-supported clades (Fig. 3). The first clade was formed only by R. circinatus and the second comprised the remaining taxa. Within this second clade, two subgroups were resolved: one well supported, with R. trichophyllus ribotypes r1 and r2 and R. kauffmannii. The second polytomous, with the remaining sampled taxa. All studied samples representing the hybrid R. circinatus × R. fluitans were placed in the clade with R. fluitans, which demonstrates that this species served as a donor of cytoplasmic DNA for all the hybrid individuals. Variable positions of both parental taxa and its hybrid, encountered in cpDNA alignment, are shown in Table A5—Supplementary Material.
Phylogenetic tree inferred by Bayesian analysis of concatenated alignment of the rpl32-trnL and the psbE-petL spacers of the plastid DNA. Posterior probabilities are indicated on branches. Details on samples studied and the GB accession numbers are provided in Tables A1 and A2—Supplementary Material. Ranunculus sceleratus is used as an outgroup
Distribution of taxa
Based on the morphological (R. circinatus) and molecular analyses, it was possible to identify the geographical distribution of the analysed taxa. Within 54 localities (Fig. 1), 58 different Batrachium populations were recorded in total: 28 of R. circinatus, 17 of R. fluitans (1 joint site with R. circinatus) and 13 sites with the hybrid R. circinatus × R. fluitans (3 joint sites with R. circinatus). The distribution of both parental species was quite wide, covering a strip of sites across the country in the northern part. The presence of both species in southern Poland includes the central highlands (R. circinatus) and Sudetes (R. fluitans). Meanwhile, the hybrid was found in a much smaller range of longitude and latitude, limited to northern Poland.
Analysis of the environmental data
The comparison of the habitat conditions in three groups of rivers associated with a particular Batrachium taxa showed significant differences for some of the analysed environmental variables (Table A1—Supplementary Material). The largest differences were noted for reactive phosphorus concentrations, for which R. circinatus × R. fluitans showed the highest tolerance (mean and median values). A significant difference was also found for the width of the rivers. Ranunculus circinatus occurred in smaller watercourses compared to the other two taxa. The analysed sites also differed in terms of organic phosphorus and hydromorphological quality. For the remaining variables, results of univariate analysis were not significant.
The FA analysis of the environmental matrix (Table 3) distinguished five major factors explaining 60% of the total variance. The identified factors were associated with distinct elements of the fluvial environment. The first factor was associated with dissolved minerals, including soluble nutrients such as phosphates (P-soluble) and ammonium nitrogen (N-NH4), as well as alkalinity and conductivity. The second factor corresponded to rhithral conditions associated with coarse substrate and fast flows. The third factor was correlated with organic matter content indicated by organic P and N enrichment and BOD level. The fourth factor was positively related to the abundance of river natural features related to fluvial processes (HQA) and it was in opposition to HMS representing hydromorphological modifications. The fifth factor was related to channel dimensions (width and depth).
Ecological requirements of the studied macrophytes
The CCA determined the relative importance of environmental variables (FA-derived factors) in explaining the ecological preference of analysed macrophytes based on the sample of 54 river sites with Batrachium taxa (Table 4). Three environmental factors were revealed as influential for the development of the river vegetation: rhithral conditions, channel dimensions and hydromorphological quality, explaining 12%, 10% and 9% of variance, respectively (P = 0.002 in each case). The mineral pollution level, as well as the content of organic matter, was not found to be significant (P > 0.05). The variance explained was very low in both cases (4%).
The results of CCA with the three Batrachium taxa analysed together with other macrophytes (45 taxa with a minimum 15% frequency) are presented graphically as ordination diagrams in Fig. 4 (1st and 2nd axes) and Fig. 5 (1st and 3rd axes). The first two axes in the CCA ordination between studied Batrachium taxa and environmental factors (Fig. 4) explained 62.2% of species–environment relation variance, and when the third axis was considered (Fig. 5) the explained variance reached 81.5%.
CCA ordination diagram of macrophyte data and environmental factors—1st and 2nd axis. Only frequent macrophyte species were analysed (over 15% frequency). Vector meaning is provided in Table 2
CCA ordination diagram of macrophyte data and environmental factors—1st and 3rd axes. Only frequent macrophyte species were analysed (over 15% frequency). Vector meaning is provided in Table 2
The most distinct positive reaction to rhithral conditions was shown by R. fluitans, revealing the preferences of this taxon for rhithral rivers. The substrate of most of the rivers with R. fluitans was dominated by gravel pebbles or rivers with gravel and sand, and several sandy stretches were also found. Moreover, R. circinatus × R. fluitans also indicated preferences for rhithral rivers, although not as strong as those of R. fluitans. It was revealed that R. circinatus × R. fluitans prefers larger rivers, and this taxon was only found in lowland rivers with a distinctly lower share of pebbles in the bottom material. R. circinatus × R. fluitans also showed clear geographical patterns, occurring only in northern and north-western Poland. The preferences of R. circinatus were not so evident, and it occurred under a wide range of habitat conditions. This species occurred in rivers with various dominating substrates, significantly different in terms of flow types and water quality. CCA, however, revealed a dominant preference for smaller and slow-flowing channels impacted by organic content. The geographical distribution of R. circinatus was wide—from central to northern Poland.
Analyses based on the 1st and 3rd axes revealed the tolerance of R. fluitans to hydromorphological degradation (Fig. 5). The reaction of other taxa to this gradient was not evident. The analysis showed that the ecological tolerance of the three considered Batrachium taxa was quite distinct compared with that of other macrophyte species. These taxa showed clear preferences for environmental factors, especially R. fluitans and R. circinatus × R. fluitans. Also, there was a group of species located in the graph further away from the centre, indicating their stronger response to the abiotic factors of the river habitat.
Discussion
Ranunculus circinatus and R. fluitans are essentially morphologically different and their identification is straightforward (Wiegleb et al., 2017). Their hybrid, R. circinatus × R. fluitans, expresses some intermediate characters, e.g. character and shape of capillary leaves, the number of lamina divisions and the shape of nectar pits (see Table 2). Ranunculus circinatus × R. fluitans resembles R. baudotii or homophyllous individuals from R. penicillatus complex. Due to morphological variation, accurate morphological identification of the hybrid, especially in a vegetative stage, is hardly possible. Therefore, in this work, we applied an objective, molecular survey to identify the Batrachium taxa. Based on direct sequencing of selected DNA regions (ITS and cpDNA) the parentage of the studied hybrid was proved. Recently, due to molecular survey, some Batrachium taxa have been successfully molecularly characterized and general phylogenetic clades have been resolved (Bobrov et al., 2015; Zalewska-Gałosz et al., 2015; Koutecký et al., 2021). Molecular studies of the Batrachium taxa were enriched by flow cytometry (FCM) analysis of genome size, the results of which to a large extent were congruent with the molecular characteristics revealed by direct sequencing of the chosen DNA regions (Prančl et al., 2018; Koutecký et al., 2021). Our study, beside definite molecular identification of taxa, also revealed significant intraspecific genetic variation of R. trichophyllus (marked as ribotypes 1–3 and 6), not directly related to morphological characters, which has been reported before and indicated the existence of cryptic taxa under R. trichophyllus complex (Rott et al., 2004; Bobrov et al., 2015; Koutecký et al., 2021).
Parental species of this hybrid, namely R. circinatus and R. fluitans Lam., are widely distributed in Europe; however, their ranges differ in detail. Ranunculus circinatus occurs in most parts of meridional and boreal Europe eastwards to the Ural Mountains and Kazakhstan. It also occurs in the meridional regions of North Africa and West Asia, while R. fluitans is restricted to temperate and meridional regions of Europe, from Ireland to Belorussia (Wiegleb et al., 2017). Although R. circinatus and R. fluitans are widely distributed, and their ranges partly overlap, the hybrid R. circinatus × R. fluitans is recorded only sporadically. At first, the hybrid was mentioned from Germany (Vollrath & Kohler, 1972). It was also reported from the UK (Lansdown, 2009, 2015) and Poland (Nobis et al., 2016 and this study). Recently, the new station of R. circinatus × R. fluitans was documented from Bavaria (Koutecký et al., 2021). Our study in Poland showed the presence of the hybrid in 13 rivers in the northern part of Poland (Fig. 1).
It is possible that due to morphological similarities between R. circinatus × R. fluitans and different generations of R. fluitans and R. baudotii hybrids this taxon is more abundant in Europe but not recognized properly. The medium-sized, homophyllous macrophyte with rigid, submerged capillary leaves is recognized, depending on the treatment, as a species, subspecies or a variety of R. penicillatus (Dumort.) Bab. (e.g. Cook, 1966; Webster, 1988; Wiegleb et al., 2017). In the latest worldwide taxonomic account of Batrachium, the authors assumed that R. pseudofluitans is an alloploid taxon derived from the hybrid R. circinatus × R. fluitans (Wiegleb et al., 2017). The possibility cannot be excluded that this hybrid is more widespread than reported in the literature, and the ecological requirements of the hybrid and R. pseudofluitans are somewhat similar.
To identify the major factors influencing the distribution of the analysed water crowfoots, the habitat parameters were measured in localities of properly identified taxa. As outlined in the “Introduction” section, the identification of parental species is easy and straightforward, even when based on vegetative morphological characters, because of the presence of very distinctive features (Cook, 1966; Wiegleb et al., 2017). In some stages, however, it is more difficult to distinguish between the hybrid R. circinatus × R. fluitans and R. fluitans, or between one R. fluitans hybrid and another. Therefore, in this study, we applied molecular identification. As is clear from the obtained results (Fig. 2), both parental species R. circinatus and R. fluitans are unequivocally differentiated based on the unique ITS polymorphism, and their hybrid is characterized by the presence of an additive ITS polymorphism pattern of the parental species. Plastid DNA, unlike most nuclear chromosomes, is typically uniparentally inherited, and in the case of angiosperms, predominately within a maternal line (Zhang & Sodmergen, 2010). All hybrid plants of R. circinatus × R. fluitans from Poland inherited plastid DNA from R. fluitans, which is presumably its maternal parent.
Rivers, due to considerable diversification of ecological parameters, are suitable habitats for a number of different kinds of newly created macrophyte hybrids (e.g. Kaplan & Fehrer, 2011; Zalewska-Gałosz, 2011; Prančl et al., 2018). River currents facilitate clonal propagation, even of sterile individuals, which can spread vegetatively downstream and persist within the river system for a long time (e.g. Preston et al., 1998; Zalewska-Gałosz, 2010).
Three analysed water crowfoot species, especially R. circinatus and R. fluitans, were reported to be relatively widespread throughout Poland (Fig. 1) and worldwide (Wiegleb et al., 2017), showing a wide biogeographical gradient. Despite this fact, they cannot be considered as common species in Poland; the search for the location was based on almost 2,000 river sites collected in the database of the University of Life Sciences in Poznan, which indicates that they are relatively rare in Polish rivers. Differences in the presence of various Batrachium species were also described for different types of waters and different European countries (Wiegleb & Herr, 1985).
Among the distinguished hydromorphological factors, the extent of rhithral conditions was particularly important for the development of macrophytes; this factor was found to explain the greatest amount of species variability of the analysed macrophyte matrix. Rhithral habitats associated with fast-flowing and coarse-grained rivers are essential for the development of macrophytes representing many bryophytes (Hrivnák et al., 2010), benthic algae (Stevenson, 1996) and vascular rheophilic species (Wiegleb & Herr, 1985; Wiegleb et al., 2014, 2015). The R. fluitans reaction to this gradient was apparently positive, confirming previous findings of other authors (Wiegleb & Herr, 1985; Spink et al., 1997; Tremp, 2007). Analysis proved that R. fluitans is a rheophilic species (Spink et al., 1997; Tremp, 2007) developing even in distinct rhithral river sections (Wiegleb & Herr, 1985). The reaction of R. circinatus to this rhithral condition was negative, as this species has already been recognized as characteristic of slow-flowing or even standing waters (Wiegleb & Herr, 1985; Tremp, 2007; Lumbreras et al., 2011; Baattrup-Pedersen et al., 2015). Although the preferences of R. circinatus × R. fluitans have not been reported before, we observed preferences of this taxon for larger watercourses and also a positive reaction to rhithral conditions, but the reaction to this factor is weaker than that of R. fluitans.
A strong relationship has been demonstrated between the natural attributes of a river habitat and the development of macrophytes, including the studied taxa of Batrachium. This gradient was revealed by two principal hydromorphological multimetrics: HQA (indicating the abundance and diversity of natural features) and HMS (artificial modification extent). Therefore, this factor may represent a gradient between modified river sites and natural river stretches. The tolerance of R. fluitans for hydromorphological degradation was confirmed by Mony et al. (2006). We could observe its abundant development in moderately altered channels, whereas the preferences of other taxa for this factor were not evident.
The third hydromorphological factor analysed was related to channel dimensions, mainly channel width (FA eigenvalues 0.80), and also quite strongly to water depth (0.76, respectively). This environmental gradient strongly influenced macrophyte differentiation, but among the studied water crowfoots, the apparent reaction was demonstrated by R. circinatus × R. fluitans developing in larger rivers. In the analysed research stretches, this hybrid was also present in smaller streams, but all of them were estuary sections connected to large rivers. It can be assumed that, during the flood events of a large river, this taxon dispersed to these habitats. The other two water crowfoots were generally neutral to this gradient, although R. fluitans is generally recognized as associated with larger rivers (Spink et al., 1997). This preference of R. fluitans was also confirmed by the analysis of the differences, which indicated greater width of rivers with this taxon.
Analysis of the surveyed river sites overgrown by the studied water crowfoots proved that the influence of organic and mineral content on macrophyte differentiation is limited. It was previously known that both R. fluitans and R. circinatus are tolerant to water quality, developing in a broad range of nutrient levels, including mesotrophic as well as eutrophic conditions (Tremp & Kohler, 1995; Haury et al., 2006; Mony et al., 2006; Schneider, 2007; Tremp, 2007; Willby et al., 2012; Szoszkiewicz et al., 2020), and tolerant to variable alkalinity and pH (Bodner, 1994; Mony et al., 2006). Knowledge on R. circinatus × R. fluitans ecology has been scant so far, and we have revealed that, like its parental species, this hybrid is not sensitive to the chemical properties of water.
The morphological similarity of R. fluitans and R. circinatus × R. fluitans and complexity of diagnostic features cause problems with their accurate identification, and the use of molecular identification methods is required (Telford et al., 2011; Wiegleb et at., 2017). Such problems also concern other species of the section Batrachium, as well as their hybrids (Wiegleb & Herr, 1985; Telford et al., 2011; Lumbreras et al., 2014). Among water crowfoots found in Europe, only the clearly morphologically distinguished R. circinatus is not affected by this issue. Recently, Wiegleb et al. (2017) presented a key for morphological identification of almost 30 species which were verified using molecular methods. Our analysis, as well as those of other investigators (Wiegleb & Herr, 1985; Mony et al., 2006; Lumbreras et al., 2011), showed that various species have different habitat preferences and can grow in contrasting habitats. Moreover, the whole Batrachium group is the botanical determinant of habitat 3260, which occurs in a variety of abiotic conditions (rivers of plain to montane levels) (Council Directive 92/43/EEC). Based on our present findings, as well as those of previous research (Wiegleb & Herr, 1985; Mony et al., 2006; Lumbreras et al., 2011), we can state that the variety of abiotic characteristic of Habitat 3260 is related to the variety of occurring Batrachium species. Therefore, the differences in habitat characteristic of the analysed species indicate the need to adapt the conservation, preservation and restoration measures of water crowfoot habitats to particular species, and undertaking these measures for the entire group of water crowfoots as such (Pedersen et al., 2006) cannot always be sufficient.
The study results showed preferences of R. circinatus × R. fluitans for rhithral rivers, whereas its reaction to nutrients was not clear. Hence, we recommend considering the hybrid as an indicator of Habitat 3260 according to the EU Habitat Directive. As yet, the completed research is not sufficient to recognize the hybrid as a habitat status indicator for the purpose of the Water Framework Directive. However, more extensive hydrochemical research would allow us to more accurately define its preferences in terms of ecological quality. By demonstrating the relatively abundant presence of the hybrid, the value of conducting further ecological research has been confirmed.
Conclusions
This is the first attempt in the literature to prepare ecological profiles for Batrachium taxa molecularly identified on the basis of polymorphisms detected in the sequences obtained by direct sequencing of selected DNA regions (ITS, rpl32-trnL and psbE-petL). This kind of research increases the efficiency of water crowfoot conservation.
The preferences of R. circinatus × R. fluitans have not been reported before in the scientific literature. Our observations have shown that the preferences of this taxon are favourable to rhithral conditions, and the reaction to this factor is weaker than that of R. fluitans. It was also found that R. circinatus × R. fluitans develops well in large watercourses.
It was shown that genetically, morphologically and ecologically, R. fluitans and R. circinatus × R. fluitans are closer to each other than to R. circinatus. The revelation of many new localities of this hybrid in Poland using molecular markers may establish that R. circinatus × R. fluitans is more widely distributed through Europe than has been known to date.
Of key importance to conservation programmes for R. fluitans is the maintenance of rhithral habitats, while the presence of hydromorphological modifications that do not affect this type of flow dynamics and water pollution is definitely marginal. The development of conservation programmes dedicated specifically to R. circinatus or R. circinatus × R. fluitans is still unlikely, although the obtained results might provide various information on their efficient maintenance.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Baattrup-Pedersen, A., E. Göthe, S. E. Larsen, M. O’Hare, S. Birk, T. Riis & N. Friberg, 2015. Plant trait characteristics vary with size and eutrophication in European lowland streams. Journal of Applied Ecology 53(6): 1617–1628.
Bobrov, A. A., J. Zalewska-Gałosz, M. Jopek & E. A. Movergoz, 2015. Ranunculus schmalhausenii (section Batrachium, Ranunculaceae), a neglected water Crowfoot endemic to Fennoscandia – a case of rapid hybrid speciation in postglacial environment of North Europe. Phytotaxa 233: 101–138.
Bodner, M., 1994. Inorganic carbon source for photosynthesis in the aquatic macrophytes Potamogeton natans and Ranunculus fluitans. Aquatic Botany 48: 109–120.
Cook, C. D. K., 1966. A monographic study of Ranunculus subgenus Batrachium (DC.) A. Gray. Mitteilungender Botanischen Staatssammlung München 6: 47–237.
Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora.
Dahlgren, G., 1995. Differentiation patterns in Ranunculus subgenus Batrachium (Ranunculaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution Suppl 9: 305–317.
Dawson, F. H. & K. Szoszkiewicz, 1999. Relationships of some ecological factors with the associations of vegetation in British rivers. Hydrobiologia 415: 117–122.
Dress, A. W. M. & D. H. Huson, 2004. Constructing splits graphs. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics 1(3): 109–115.
Garbe, J., L. Beevers & G. Pender, 2016. The interaction of low flow conditions and spawning brown trout (Salmo trutta) habitat availability. Ecological Engineering 88: 53–63.
Hamming, R. W., 1950. Error detecting and error correcting codes. Bell System Technical Journal 29(2): 147–160.
Haslam, S. M., 1987. River Plants of Western Europe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge:
Haury, J., M. C. Peltre, M. Tremolières, J. Barbe, G. Thiebaut, I. Bernez, H. Daniel, P. Chatenet, S. Muller, A. Dutartre, C. Laplace-Treyture, A. Cazaubon & E. Lambert-Servien, 2006. A new method to assess water trophy and organic pollution. The macrophyte Biological Index for rivers (IBMR): its application to different types of river and pollution. Hydrobiologia 570: 153–158.
Hörandl, E., O. Paun, J. T. Johansson, C. Lehnebach, T. Armstrong, L. X. Chen & P. Lockhart, 2005. Phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary traits in Ranunculus s.l. (Ranunculaceae) inferred from ITS sequence analysis. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 36: 305–327.
Hrivnák, R., H. Oťaheľová, M. Valachovič, P. Paľove-Balang & A. Kubinská, 2010. Effect of environmental variables on the aquatic macrophyte composition pattern in streams: a case study from Slovakia. Fundamental and Applied Limnology Suppl 177(2): 115–124.
Iversen, L. L., A. Winkel, L. Baastrup-Spohr, A. B. Hinke, J. Alahuhta, A. Baattrup-Pedersen, S. Birk, P. Brodersen, P. A. Chambers, F. Ecke, T. Feldmann, D. Gebler, J. Heino, T. S. Jespersen, S. J. Moe, T. Riis, L. Sass, O. Vestergaard, S. C. Maberly, K. Sand-Jensen & O. Pedersen, 2019. Catchment properties and the photosynthetic trait composition of freshwater plant communities. Science 366: 878–881.
Jäger, E. J., F. Müller, C. Ritz, E. Welk, & K. Wesche (Eds.), 2017. Rothmaler - Exkursionsflora von Deutschland, Gefäßpflanzen: Atlasband, 13th edn, Springer Spektrum. https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783662497098.
Jusik, S., K. Szoszkiewicz, J. M. Kupiec, I. Lewin & A. Samecka-Cymerman, 2015. Development of comprehensive river typology based on macrophytes in the mountain-lowland gradient of different Central European ecoregions. Hydrobiologia 745: 241–262.
Kaplan, Z. & J. Fehrer, 2011. Erroneous identities of Potamogeton hybrids corrected by molecular analysis of plants from type clones. Taxon 60(3): 758–766.
Koutecký, P., J. Prančl, J. Košnar, E. Koutecká, J. Hanzlíčková, M. Lučanová, M. Nejedlá & Z. Kaplan, 2021. Waking up from a taxonomist’s nightmare: emerging structure of Ranunculus section Batrachium (Ranunculaceae) in central Europe based on molecular data and genome sizes. Botanical Journal of Linnean Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/botlinnean/boab063.
Lansdown, R. V., 2007. The Identity of Ranunculus Subgenus Batrachium in the River Itchen, Ardeola Environmental Services, Stroud:
Lansdown, R. V., 2009. A Field Guide to the Riverine Plants of Britain and Ireland. Including Selected Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, Lichens and Algae. Ardeola Environmental Services, Stroud: 335.
Lansdown, R. V., 2015. Ranunculus subgenus Batrachium (DC.) A. Gray. In Stace, C. A., C. D. Preston & D. A. Pearman (eds), Hybrid Flora of the British Isles BSBI, Bristol: 36–42.
Lansdown, R. V. & T. J. Pankhurst, 2010. Monitoring the Ranunculion habitat on the River Itchen: practical application and constraints. In Hurford, C., M. Schneider & I. Cowx (eds), Conservation Monitoring in Freshwater Habitats: A Practical Guide and Case Studies. Springer, Berlin.
Lumbreras, A., G. Navarro, C. Pardo & J. A. Molina, 2011. Aquatic Ranunculus communities in the northern hemisphere: a global review. Plant Biosystems 145(Suppl. 1): 118–122.
Lumbreras, A., J. A. Molina, A. Benavent, A. Marticorena & C. Pardo, 2014. Disentangling the taxonomy and ecology of South American Ranunculus subgen Batrachium. Aquatic Botany 114: 21–28.
Mony, C., J. F. Mony, G. Thiébaut & S. Muller, 2006. Floristic and ecological diversity of Ranunculus aquatic habitats in the sub-Atlantic range, implications for conservation. In Hawksworth, D. L. & A. T. Bull (eds), Marine, Freshwater, and Wetlands Biodiversity Conservation. Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 4. Springer, Dordrecht.
Nobis, M., A. Nowak, R. Piwowarczyk, A. L. Ebel, G. Király & M. Kushunina, 2016. Contribution to the flora of Asian and European countries: new national and regional vascular plant records, 5. Acta Botanica Gallica: Botany Letters 163(2): 159–174.
Pedersen, T. C. M., A. Baattrup-Pedersen & T. V. Madsen, 2006. Effects of stream restoration and management on plant communities in lowland streams. Freshwater Biology 51: 161–179.
Prančl, J., P. Koutecký, P. Travníček, V. Jarolímová, M. Lučanová, E. Koutecká & Z. Kaplan, 2018. Cytotype variation, cryptic diversity and hybridization in Ranunculus sect. Batrachium revealed by flow cytometry and chromosome numbers. Preslia 90: 195–223.
Preston, C. D. & J. M. Croft, 2001. Aquatic Plants in Britain and Ireland, BRILL Academic Publishers, Leiden:
Preston, C. D., P. M. Hollingsworth & R. J. Gornall, 1998. Potamogeton pectinatus L. × P. vaginatus Turcz. (P. ×bottnicus Hagstr.), a newly identified hybrid in the British Isles. Watsonia 22: 69–82.
Raven, P. J., N. T. H. Holmes, F. H. Dawson, P. J. A. Fox, M. Everard, I. R. Fozzard, & K. J. Rouen, 1998. River Habitat Quality the Physical Character of Rivers and Streams in the UK and Isle of Man. Environment Agency, Belfast; Environment and Heritage Service, Stirling.
Ronquist, F., M. Teslenko, P. van der Mark, D. Ayres, A. Darling, S. Höhna, B. Larget, L. Liu, M. A. Suchard & J. P. Huelsenbeck, 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542.
Rott, E., E. Gross & E. Schwienbacher, 2004. Small-scale heterogeneity of Ranunculus trichophyllus in Lake Tovel (microhabitat, morphology, phenolic compounds and molecular taxonomy). Studi Trent in idiScienze Naturali – Acta Biologica 81(Suppl. 2): 359–367.
Schneider, S., 2007. Macrophyte trophic indicator values from a European perspective. Limnologica 37(4): 281–289.
Spink, A. J., K. J. Murphy & D. F. Westlake, 1997. Distribution and environmental regulation of species of Ranunculus subgenus Batrachium in British rivers. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie 139(4): 509–525.
Steffen, K., C. Leuschner, U. Müller, G. Wiegleb & T. Becker, 2014. Relationships between macrophyte vegetation and physical and chemical conditions in northwest German running waters. Aquatic Botany 113: 46–55.
Stevenson, R. J., 1996. The stimulation and drag of current. In Stevenson, R. J., M. L. Bothwell & R. L. Lowe (eds), Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic Environments Academic, New York: 321–340.
Szoszkiewicz, K., S. Jusik, K. Pietruczuk & D. Gebler, 2020. The macrophyte index for rivers (MIR) as an advantageous approach to running water assessment in local geographical conditions. Water 12: 108.
Telford, A., M. O’Hare, S. Cravers & N. Holmes, 2011. Can genetic barcoding be used to identify aquatic Ranunculus L. subgenus Batrachium (DC.) A. Gray? A test using some species from the British Isles. Aquatic Botany 95: 65–70.
TerBraak, C. J. F. & P. Smilauer, 1998. CANOCO Reference Manual and User’s Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4), Microcomputer Power, Ithaca:
Tremp, H., 2007. Spatial and environmental effects on hydrophytic macrophyte occurrence in the Upper Rhine Floodplain (Germany). Hydrobiologia 586: 167–177.
Tremp, H. & A. Kohler, 1995. The usefulness of macrophyte monitoring-systems, exemplified on eutrophication and acidification of running waters. Acta Botanica Gallica 142: 541–550.
Turała, K., 1970. Cyto-taxonomical studies in Ranunculus fluitans Lam. and R. penicillatum (Dumort.) Bab. from Lower Silesia (Poland). Preliminary report. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica 13: 119–123.
Vollrath, H. & A. Kohler, 1972. Batrachium-Fundorte aus bayerischen Naturräumen. Berichte Der Bayerischen Botanischen Gesellschaft 43: 63–75.
Webster, S. D., 1988. Ranunculus penicillatus (Dumort.) Bab. in Great Britain and Ireland. Watsonia 17(1): 1–22 [available on internet at https://www.jstor.org/stable/25539567].
Wiegleb, G. & W. Herr, 1983. Taxonomie und Verbreitung von Ranunculus subgenus Batrachium in niedersächsischen Fließgewässern unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Ranunculus penicillatus Komplexes. Göttinger Floristische Rundbriefe 17(3–4): 101–150.
Wiegleb, G. & W. Herr, 1985. The occurrence of communities with species of Ranunculus subgenus Batrachium in central Europe – preliminary remarks. Vegetatio 59: 235–241.
Wiegleb, G., U. Bröring, M. Filetti, H. Brux & W. Herr, 2014. Long-term dynamics of macrophyte dominance and growth-form types in two north-west German lowland streams. Freshwater Biology 59(5): 1012–1025.
Wiegleb, G., W. Herr, B. Zander, U. Bröring, H. Brux & K. van de Weyer, 2015. Natural variation of macrophyte vegetation in lowland streams at the regional level. Limnologica 51: 53–62.
Wiegleb, G., A. A. Bobrov & J. Zalewska-Gałosz, 2017. A taxonomic account of Ranunculus section Batrachium (Ranunculaceae). Phytotaxa 319(1): 001–055.
Willby, N., J. A. Pitt & G. Phillips, 2012. The Ecological Classification of UK Rivers Using Aquatic Macrophytes; Science Report. Environment Agency, Bristol: 221.
Zalewska-Gałosz, J., 2010. Potamogeton × subrufus Hagstr: a neglected Potamogeton hybrid. Annales Botanici Fennici 47: 257–260.
Zalewska-Gałosz, J., 2011. Potamogeton × jutlandicus a binominal for the hybrid between P. lucens and P. praelongus (Potamogetonaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 29: 473–476.
Zalewska-Gałosz, J. & M. Ronikier, 2010. Are linear-leaved Potamogeton hybrids really so rare? Molecular evidence for multiple hybridizations between P. acutifolius and P. compressus in Central Europe. Nordic Journal of Botany 28: 257–261.
Zalewska-Gałosz, J. & M. Ronikier, 2012. Molecular evidence for two rare Potamogeton natans hybrids with reassessment of Potamogeton hybrid diversity in Poland. Aquatic Botany 103: 15–22.
Zalewska-Gałosz, J., M. Ronikier & Z. Kaplan, 2009. The first European record of Potamogeton × subobtusus identified using ITS and cpDNA sequence data. Preslia 81: 281–292.
Zalewska-Gałosz, J., M. Ronikier & Z. Kaplan, 2010. Discovery of a new, recurrently formed Potamogeton hybrid in Europe and Africa: molecular evidence and morphological comparison of different clones. Taxon 59: 559–566.
Zalewska-Gałosz, J., M. Jopek & T. Ilnicki, 2015. Hybridization in Batrachium group: controversial delimitation between heterophyllous R. penicillatum and the hybrid R. fluitans × R. peltatus. Aquatic Botany 120: 160–168.
Zander, B. & G. Wiegleb, 1987. Biosystematische Untersuchungen an Populationen von Ranunculus subgenus Batrachium in Nordwestdeutschland. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik 109(1): 81–130.
Zhang, Q. & Sodmergen, 2010. Why does biparental plastid inheritance revive in Angiosperms? Journal of Plant Research 123: 201–206.
Acknowledgements
We thank Joanna Chmist-Sikorska and Barbara Andrzejewska for field sampling and laboratory work. Morphology of the hybrid R. circinatus × R. fluitans was discussed with Gerhard Wiegleb. Krzysztof Achtenberg is acknowledged for kindly supporting us in the preparation of Fig. 1. The research was conducted under the Field-Work Permits: WPN-I.6400.25.2011.KA, WPN.6402.2.26.2011.DJB, WPN.6402.45.2011.MG and WOPN-OOP.6402.2.17.2011.WP.
Funding
The research was funded by Grants from the National Science Centre, Poland: UMO-2016/23/B/NZ9/03600. The open access publication was co-financed within the framework of Ministry of Science and Higher Education programme “Regional Initiative Excellence” in years 2019–2022, Project No. 005/RID/2018/19.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The concept of the paper was initiated by DG, JZG and KSz. DG and KSz have performed the field studies, Batrachium sampling and ecological analysis, as well as interpretation of the results and writing of the manuscript. JZG and MJ collected Batrachium samples, performed molecular analysis and took part in manuscript preparation. All co-authors have approved publication of this manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Handling Editor: Katya E. Kovalenko
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gebler, D., Zalewska-Gałosz, J., Jopek, M. et al. Molecular identification and habitat requirements of the hybrid Ranunculus circinatus × R. fluitans and its parental taxa R. circinatus and R. fluitans in running waters. Hydrobiologia 849, 2999–3014 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-04909-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-04909-6