Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Optimizing stream bioassessment: habitat, season, and the impacts of land use on benthic macroinvertebrates

  • WATER BODIES IN EUROPE
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bioassessment of running waters should ideally be optimized to include sampling of the biota when and where they are most sensitive to anthropogenic disturbances, but direct comparisons of the responses of biota across habitats and seasons are lacking. We sampled benthic macroinvertebrates from nine boreal streams situated along an agricultural land use gradient in two seasons (spring and autumn) and two habitats (pools and riffles). Univariate (e.g., diversity) and multivariate (ordination scores) metrics, as well as biological traits, were used to assess changes in assemblage composition associated with agricultural land use. Abundances were generally higher in agricultural compared to forested streams, and in riffles compared to pools. Spring samples had lower mean abundances of several insect taxa (e.g., chironomid midges) compared to autumn samples, while abundances of non-insects (e.g., oligochaetes and Pisidium spp.) remained unchanged. Community turnover (correspondence analysis) had higher precision and sensitivity compared to diversity metrics, and samples from the spring and from riffles responded more to the land use gradient than those from autumn and pool habitats, respectively. The finding that catchment land use resulted in macrohabitat differences and, ultimately, differences in taxonomic composition between agricultural and forested streams and between pool and riffle habitats can be used to optimize future bioassessment based on macroinvertebrates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan, J. D., 2004. Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 35: 257–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allan, J. D., D. L. Erickson & J. Fay, 1997. The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scales. Freshwater Biology 37: 149–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angradi, T. R., 1999. Fine sediment and macroinvertebrate assemblages in Appalachian streams: a field experiment with biomonitoring applications. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18: 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonada, N., N. Prat, V. H. Resh & B. Statzner, 2006. Developments in aquatic insect biomonitoring: a comparative analysis of recent approaches. Annual Review of Entomology 51: 495–523.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boulton, A. J. & P. S. Lake, 1992. The macroinvertebrate assemblages in pools and riffles in two intermittent streams (Werribee and Lerderderg rivers Southern Central Victoria). Occasional Papers from the Museum of Victoria 5: 55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. V. & P. P. Brussock, 1991. Comparisons of benthic invertebrates between riffles and pools. Hydrobiologa 220: 99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chessman, B., S. Williams & C. Besley, 2007. Bioassessment of streams with macroinvertebrates: effect of sampled habitat and taxonomic resolution. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 26: 546–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R., 1993. Nonparametric multivariate analysis of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology 18: 117–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. T. & D. Hering, 2006. Errors and uncertainty in bioassessment methods – major results and conclusions from the STAR project and their application using STARBUGS. Hydrobiologia 566: 433–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R.T. 2012. Estimating confidence of European WFD ecological status class and WISER Bioassessment Uncertainty Guidance Software (WISERBUGS). Hydrobiologia. doi: 10.1007/s10750-012-1245-3.

  • Collen, P., E. J. Keay & B. R. S. Morrison, 2004. Processing of pine (Pinussylvestris) and birch (Betulapubescens) leaf material in a small river system in the northern Cairngorms, Scotland. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 8: 567–577.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, S. S. & S. A. Melo, 2008. Beta diversity in stream macroinvertebrate assemblages: among-site and among-microhabitat components. Hydrobiologia 598: 131–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, J. & R. K. Johnson, 2004. A multimetric macroinvertebrate index for detecting organic pollution of streams in southern Sweden. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 160: 487–513.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Delucchi, C. M. & B. L. Peckarsky, 1989. Life history patterns of insects in an intermittent and a permanent stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 8: 308–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolédec, S. & B. Statzner, 2010. Responses of freshwater biota to human disturbances: contribution of J-NABS to developments in ecological integrity assessments. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29: 286–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolédec, S., N. Phillips, M. Scarsbrook, R. H. Riley & C. R. Townsend, 2006. Comparison of structural and functional approaches to determining landuse effects on grassland stream invertebrate communities. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 25: 44–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franken, R. J. M., J. J. P. Gardeniers, J. A. J. Beijer & E. T. H. M. Peeters, 2008. Variation in stonefly (Nemoura cinerea Retzius) growth and development in response to hydraulic and substrate conditions. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27: 176–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friberg, N., J. Skriver, S. E. Larsen, M. L. Pedersen & A. Buffagni, 2010. Stream macroinvertebrate occurrence along gradients in organic pollution and eutrophication. Freshwater Biology 55: 1405–1419.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frissell, C. A., W. J. Liss, C. E. Warren & M. D. Hurley, 1986. A hierarchal framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Environmental Management 10: 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, Ø., D. A. T. Harper & P. D. Ryan, 2011. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4: 9 pp.

  • Harding, J. S., R. G. Young, J. W. Hayes, K. A. Shearer & J. D. Stark, 1999. Changes in agricultural intensity and river health along a river continuum. Freshwater Biology 42: 345–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halwas, K. L., M. Church & J. S. Richardson, 2005. Benthic assemblage variation among channel units in high-gradient streams on Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 24: 478–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, T. M., L. B. Marczak, J. S. Richardson & Y. Noboru, 2010. Transport and settlement of organic matter in small streams. Freshwater Biology 55: 436–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. B. N., D. D. Williams & N. E. Williams, 1976. Distribution of the benthos within the substratum of a Welsh mountain stream. Oikos 27: 307–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. A. & D. W. Wichern, 1988. Applied multivariate statistical analysis, 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. K. & D. Hering, 2009. Response of taxonomic groups in streams to gradients in resource and habitat characteristics. Journal of Applied Ecology 46: 175–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. K. & D. Hering, 2010. Spatial congruency of benthic diatom, invertebrate, macrophyte, and fish assemblages in European streams. Ecological Applications 20: 978–992.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keithan, E. D. & R. L. Lowe, 1985. Primary productivity and spatial structure of phytolithic growth in streams in the Great-Smoky-Mountains National Park, Tennessee. Hydrobiologia 123: 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linke, S., R. C. Bailey & J. Schwindt, 1999. Temporal variability of stream bioassessments using benthic macroinvertebrates. Freshwater Biology 42: 575–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, P. & M. P. Brooker, 1983. The macroinvertebrate faunas of riffles and pools. Water Research 17: 263–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lücke, D. & R. K. Johnson, 2009. Detection of ecological change in stream macroinvertebrate assemblages using single metric, multimetric or multivariate approaches. Ecological Indicators 9: 659–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, D. L., 1986. Benthic macroinvertebrate distributions in the riffle-pool communities of two east Texas streams. Hydrobiologia 135: 61–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKie, B. G. & B. Malmqvist, 2009. Assessing ecosystem functioning in streams affected by forest management: increased leaf decomposition occurs without changes to the composition of benthic assemblages. Freshwater Biology 10: 2086–2100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. F. & P. S. Giller, 2000. Seasonal dynamics of macroinvertebrate assemblages in the benthos and associated with detritus packs in two low-order streams with different riparian vegetation. Freshwater Biology 43: 617–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, M. & M. C. Thoms, 2007. Hierarchical patterns of physical-biological associations in river ecosystems. Geomorphology 89: 127–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff, N. L., 1997. Landscape filters and species traits: towards mechanistic understanding and prediction in stream ecology. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 6: 391–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, J. S. & J. J. Hudson, 1997. Primary production, bacterial production, and invertebrate biomass in pools and riffles in southern Ontario streams. Archiv Fur Hydrobiologie 139: 301–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, D. M. & V. H. Resh, 1993. Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. Chapman and Hall, New York. 488 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A. H., A. D. Rosemond, D. S. Leigh, M. J. Paul & J. B. Wallace, 2003. Habitat-specific responses of stream insects to land cover disturbance: biological consequences and monitoring implications. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 22: 292–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. JMP, 2009. In SAS Institute Inc. 2000. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

  • Schriever, C. A., M. H. Ball, C. Holmes, S. Maund & M. Liess, 2007. Agricultural intensity and landscape structure: influences on the macroinvertebrate assemblages of small streams in northern Germany. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 26: 346–357.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scullion, J., C. A. Parish & N. Morgan, 1982. Comparison of benthic macroinvertebrate fauna and substratum composition in riffles and pools in the impounded river Elan and the unregulated river Wye, Mid-Wales. Freshwater Biology 12: 579–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slobodchikoff, C. N. & J. E. Parrott, 1977. Seasonal diversity in aquatic insect communities in an all-year stream system. Hydrobiologia 52: 143–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stendera, S. & R. K. Johnson, 2008. Tracking recovery trends of boreal lakes: use of multiple indicators and habitats. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27: 529–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suren, A. M., 1991. Bryophytes as invertebrate habitat in 2 New Zealand alpine streams. Freshwater Biology 26: 399–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suren, A. M. & M. J. Winterbourn, 1991. Consumption of aquatic bryophytes by alpine stream invertebrates in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater research 25: 331–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak, C. J. F. & P. Šmilauer, 2002. CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). Ithaca, NY, USA (www.canoco.com): Microcomputer Power.

  • Townsend, C. R. & A. G. Hildrew, 1994. Species traits in relation to a habitat template for river systems. Freshwater Biology 31: 265–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, C. R., B. J. Downes, K. Peacock & C. J. Arbuckle, 2004. Scale and the detection of land-use effects on morphology, vegetation and macroinvertebrate communities of grassland streams. Freshwater Biology 49: 448–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, C. R., S. S. Uhlmann & C. D. Matthaei, 2008. Individual and combined responses of stream ecosystems to multiple stressors. Journal of Applied Ecology 45: 1810–1819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagenhoff, A., C. R. Townsend, N. Phillips & C. D. Matthaei, 2011. Subsidy-stress and multiple-stressor effects along gradients of deposited fine sediment and dissolved nutrients in a regional set of streams and rivers. Freshwater Biology 56: 1916–1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitledge, G. W. & C. F. Rabeni, 2000. Benthic community metabolism in three habitats in an Ozark stream. Hydrobiologia 437: 165–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilander, A., R. K. Johnson & W. Goedkoop, 2003. Riksinventering 2000. En synoptisk studie av vattenkemi och bottenfauna i svenska sjöar och vattendrag. Institutionen för Miljöanalys, Uppsala, Sweden.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden

    Peter E. Carlson, Richard K. Johnson & Brendan G. McKie

Authors
  1. Peter E. Carlson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard K. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Brendan G. McKie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter E. Carlson.

Additional information

Guest editors: C. K. Feld, A. Borja, L. Carvalho & D. Hering / Water bodies in Europe: integrative systems to assess ecological status and recovery

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlson, P.E., Johnson, R.K. & McKie, B.G. Optimizing stream bioassessment: habitat, season, and the impacts of land use on benthic macroinvertebrates. Hydrobiologia 704, 363–373 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1251-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1251-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation