Skip to main content
Log in

Turbidity in the Thames Estuary: How turbid do we expect it to be?

  • Thames Estuary
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A previously derived method (the tidal length—mean spring tidal range, TL-MSTR diagram) is used to predict the estuarine turbidity maximum (ETM) concentration and the residence time of the Thames Estuary. The predicted and observed residence time is 2 months. The predicted, depth-averaged ETM is 2.5 g l−1 of suspended particulate matter (SPM) at spring tides, which is much higher than that observed from surface sampling (<0.5 g l−1) and that simulated by recent models (approx. 0.6 g l−1), but is consistent with spring-tide concentrations measured throughout the water column over a tidal cycle. The observed locations of the surface 1-isohaline and 5-isohaline exhibit strong relationships with the logarithm of freshwater runoff. The observed ETM exhibits statistically significant relationships both with tidal range and the logarithm of runoff, and is generally located between the Millennium Dome and the Woolwich Reach. The apparent over-prediction of SPM afforded by the TL-MSTR diagram is unsurprising considering the removal of fine sediment by dredging and the removal of fine-sediment storage areas by embanking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arundale, A. M. W., E. J. Darbyshire, S. J. Hunt, K. G. Schmitz & J. R. West, 1997. Turbidity maxima formation in four estuaries. In Burt, N., R. Parker & J. Watts (eds), Cohesive Sediments. Wiley, Chichester, UK: 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • ATT, 2009. Admiralty Tide Tables – 2001, Vol. 1, pp. 440 +(xliv).

  • Avoine, J., G. P. Allen, M. M. Nichols, J. C. Salomon & C. Larsonneur, 1981. Suspended sediment transport in the Seine estuary, France: effect of man-made modifications on estuary-shelf sedimentology. Marine Geology 40: 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BADC, 2010. British Atmospheric Data Centre. MIDAS Land Surface Stations data (1853-current), UK Meteorological Office. Available from: http://badc.nerc.ac.uk/view/badc.nerc.ac.uk.

  • Balls, P. W., 1994. Nutrient inputs to estuaries from nine Scottish East Coast rivers: influence of estuarine processes on inputs to the North Sea. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 39: 329–352.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baugh, J. V. & M. A. Littlewood, 2005. Development of a cohesive sediment transport model of the Thames Estuary. In Spaulding, M. (ed.) Estuarine and Coastal Modeling. Proceedings of the ninth International Conference in Charleston, South Carolina, October 31–September 2, 2005: 824–841. ASCE, 0-7844-0876-9, 2006: 864 pp.

  • Board, P. A., 1973. The fate of rubbish in the Thames Estuary. Marine Pollution Bulletin 4: 165–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, A. J., 1972. The tidal regime of the River Thames: long term trends and their possible causes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London A 272: 184–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, A. J. & S. J. Pinless, 1977. The response of an estuary to the closure of a mobile barrier: Richmond Barrier on the Upper Thames Estuary. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 5: 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, N. T., 1986. Field settling velocities of estuary muds. In Mehta, A. J. (ed.), Estuarine Cohesive Sediment Dynamics. Lecture Notes on Estuarine and Coastal Studies. Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 126–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capo, S., A. Sottolichio, I. Brenon, P. Castaing & L. Ferry, 2006. Morphology, hydrography and sediment dynamics in a mangrove estuary: The Konkoure Estuary, Guinea. Marine Geology 230: 199–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castaing, P. & G. P. Allen, 1981. Mechanisms controlling seaward escape of suspended sediment from the Gironde: a macrotidal estuary in France. Marine Geology 40: 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEFAS, 1998. Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science. CEFAS Lowestoft Laboratory, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 0HT, UK. Tel: 44 (0) 1502 562244; Fax 44 (0) 1502 513865.

  • Cloern, J. E., 1987. Turbidity as a control on phytoplankton biomass and productivity in estuaries. Continental Shelf Research 7: 1367–1381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. L., 1964. A morphogenic approach to world shore-lines. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie 8: 127–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobereiner, C. & J. McManus, 1983. Turbidity maximum migration and harbour siltation in the Tay estuary. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 40(Suppl. 1): 117–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DSIR, 1964. Effects of polluting discharges on the Thames Estuary; the reports of the Thames Survey Committee and the Water Pollution Research Laboratory. Department of Scientific & Industrial Research (DSIR), Water pollution research technical paper no. 11, Pub. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office (HMSO), London, UK, xxviii + 609 pp.

  • EA, 2010. Environment Agency for England and Wales: gauged flows at Kingston and Teddington, http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/hiflows/station.aspx?39001.

  • Gelfenbaum, G., 1983. Suspended sediment response to semidiurnal and fortnightly tidal variations in a mesotidal estuary: Columbia River, U.S.A. Marine Geology 52: 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabemann, I. & G. Krause, 1989. Transport processes of suspended matter derived from time series in a tidal estuary. Journal of Geophysical Research 94(C10): 14373–14379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, D. V. & M. Rattray Jr., 1965. Gravitational circulation in straits and estuaries. Journal of Marine Research 23: 104–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, M. O., 1975. Morphology of sand accumulations in estuaries. In Cronin, L. E. (ed.), Estuarine Research. Vol. 2, Geology and Engineering. Academic Press, New York: 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hydraulics Research Station, 1971. Thames flood prevention investigation field survey. HR Wallingford Report EX 542.

  • Inglis, C. C. & F. H. Allen, 1957. The Regimen of the Thames Estuary as affected by currents, salinities and river flow. Proceedings – Institution of Civil Engineers 7: 827–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • JNCC, 1993. An Inventory of UK Estuaries. Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC), Monkstone House, City Road, Peterborough PE1 1JY, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middelburg, J. J. & J. Nieuwenhuize, 2001. Nitrogen isotope tracing of dissolved inorganic nitrogen behaviour in tidal estuaries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 53: 385–391.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. B., J. R. West, A. M. W. Arundale, I. Guymer & J. S. Couperthwaite, 1998. Dynamics of the turbidity maxima in the upper Humber estuary system. Marine Pollution Bulletin 37: 190–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Monbet, Y., 1992. Control of phytoplankton biomass in estuaries: a comparative analysis of microtidal and macrotidal estuaries. Estuaries 15: 563–571.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, A. W., 1986. Removal of trace metals in the very low salinity region of the Tamar Estuary, England. The Science of the Total Environment 39: 297–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, M. M., 1993. Response of coastal plain estuaries to episodic events in the Chesapeake Bay region. In Mehta, A. J. (ed.), Nearshore and Estuarine Cohesive Sediment Transport. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, S. W., J. W. Ammerman, L. R. Atkinson, V. M. Berounsky, G. Billen, W. C. Boicourt, W. R. Boynton, T. M. Church, D. M. Ditoro, R. Elmgren, J. H. Garber, A. E. Giblin, R. A. Jahnke, N. J. P. Owens, M. E. Q. Pilson & S. P. Seitzinger, 1996. The fate of nitrogen and phosphorus at the land-sea margin of the North Atlantic Ocean. Biogeochemistry 35: l4l–l80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odd, N. V. M. & M. W. A. Owen, 1972. Two-layer model of mud transport in the Thames Estuary. Proceedings – Institution of Civil Engineers. Supplement (ix). Paper 7517 S: 175–205.

  • Orton, P. M. & G. C. Kineke, 2001. Comparing calculated and observed vertical suspended-sediment distributions from a Hudson river estuary turbidity maximum. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 52: 401–410.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, J. E., 1972. Sedimentation in the inner estuary of the Thames, and its relation to the regional subsidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London A 272: 115–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, P. J., Whitehead, P. G. & A. D. Berrie, 1984. Predicted effects of proposed changes in patterns of water abstraction on the ecosystems on the lower River Thames and its tidal estuary. Thames Water Authority, Final Report: 229 pp.

  • Rossiter, J. R. & G. W. Lennon, 1965. Computation of tidal conditions in the Thames Estuary by the initial value method. Paper No. 6855. Proceedings – Institution of Civil Engineers 31: 25–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz K. G., 1996. Turbidity Maxima in the Severn Estuary. Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham, UK.

  • Thames, 2010. Web site devoted to aspects of the Thames Estuary: www.the-river-thames-estuary.co.uk/thames.htm.

  • Thompson, K. R., 1982. The influence of local winds and the southern North Sea on the level of the River Thames. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 15: 605–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trimmer, M., D. B. Nedwell, D. B. Sivyer & S. J. Malcolm, 2000. Seasonal benthic organic matter mineralisation measured by oxygen uptake and denitrification along a transect of the inner and outer River Thames Estuary, UK. Marine Ecology Progress Series 197: 103–119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uncles, R. J., 2010. Physical properties and processes in the Bristol Channel and Severn Estuary. Marine Pollution Bulletin 61: 5–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uncles, R. J. & J. A. Stephens, 1989. Distributions of suspended sediment at high water in a macrotidal estuary. Journal of Geophysical Research 94(C10): 14395–14405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uncles, R. J. & J. A. Stephens, 1993. Nature of the turbidity maximum in the Tamar Estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 36: 413–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uncles, R. J., M. L. Barton & J. A. Stephens, 1994. Seasonal variability of fine-sediment concentrations in the turbidity maximum region of the Tamar Estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 38: 19–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uncles, R. J., M. L. Barton & J. A. Stephens, 1996. Seasonal variability of mobile mud deposits in the Tamar estuary. In Pattiaratchi, C. (ed.), Mixing in Estuaries and Coastal Seas. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC: 374–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uncles, R. J., A. E. Easton, M. L. Griffiths, C. Harris, R. J. M. Howland, R. S. King, A. W. Morris & D. H. Plummer, 1998. Seasonality of the turbidity maximum in the Humber-Ouse estuary. Marine Pollution Bulletin 37: 206–215.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uncles, R. J., J. A. Stephens & R. E. Smith, 2002. The dependence of estuarine turbidity on tidal intrusion length, tidal range and residence time. Continental Shelf Research 22: 1835–1856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uncles, R. J., P. E. Frickers & C. Harris, 2003. Dissolved nutrients in the Tweed Estuary, UK: inputs, distributions and effects of residence time. The Science of the Total Environment 314–316: 727–736.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vale, C. & B. Sundby, 1987. Suspended sediment fluctuations in the Tagus estuary on semi-diurnal and fortnightly time scales. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 25: 495–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolanski, E., B. King & D. Galloway, 1995. Dynamics of the turbidity maximum in the Fly River Estuary, Papua New Guinea. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 40: 321–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolanski, E., N. N. Huan, L. T. Dao, N. H. Nhan & N. N. Thuy, 1996. Fine-sediment dynamics in the Mekong River Estuary, Vietnam. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 43: 565–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to CEFAS for making the Thames survey data available to us. This study was undertaken as part of the PML’s Core Strategic Research Programme contribution to Ocean2025, which is supported by funding from the UK’s Natural Environment Research Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. J. Uncles.

Additional information

Guest editors: R. J. Uncles & S. B. Mitchell / The Thames Estuary and Estuaries of South East England

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uncles, R.J., Mitchell, S.B. Turbidity in the Thames Estuary: How turbid do we expect it to be?. Hydrobiologia 672, 91–103 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-011-0757-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-011-0757-6

Keywords

Navigation