Abstract
Martin Heidegger’s view of conformity comes in his description and understanding of Das Man or “the One”. There is controversy within Heidegger scholarship regarding the interpretation of Das Man as an existential mode. Most scholars interpret Das Man to mean the existential mode of inauthenticity and delineate the two modes of authenticity and inauthenticity in Heideggerian existentialism. Less popularly, scholars like Hubert Dreyfus and Michael Zimmerman interpret the positive and negative aspects of Das Man and suggest the third mode of indifference in Heidegger’s Being and Time. This paper follows Dreyfus’ understanding of Das Man to posit indifference as a third mode of being that is structurally similar to inauthenticity but motivationally different from it. It then uses this difference to categorize two forms of moral conformity in Hannah Arendt’s analysis of the difference between a morality of custom and a morality of conviction. The problematic of this paper concerns the distinction between these two forms of moral conformity and the moral status of people like Adolf Eichmann whose actions Arendt describes as the banality of evil. Usually seen as preservative of morality, Arendt shows how conformity may be a site for moral conflict.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
See Dostal (1982) for a methodological interpretation of Indifferenz in Heidegger’s Being and Time.
References
Arendt, H. (1964). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. Penguin Group.
Arendt, H. (2003). Responsibility and judgement. Schocken Books.
Badiou, A. (2001). Ethics: An essay on the understanding of evil (P. Hallward, Trans.). Verso
Benhabib, S. (2000). Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem. In D. V. Richard (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Hannah Arendt (pp. 65–85). Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). A social critique of the judgement of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Harvard University Press
Camus, A. (1982). The Stranger. Translated by Hamish Hamilton. Penguin Group.
Dostal, R. J. (1982). The problem of ‘Indifferenz’ in Sein and Zeit. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 43(1), 43–58
Dreyfus, H. (1964). Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time. Division I. MIT.
Dreyfus, H. (1995). Interpreting Heidegger on Das Man. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 38(4), 423–430.
Fried, G. (2006). Book Review: Lawrence J. Hatab, Ethics and Finitude Ethics and Finitude: Heideggerian Contributions to Moral Philosophy (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2000), 221pp. Continental Philosophy Review 38, 131–135.
Hatab, L. J. (1995). Ethics and Finitude: Heideggerian contributions to Moral Philosophy. International Philosophical Quarterly, 4(140), 403–417.
Hatab, L. J. (2000). Ethics and Finitude: Heideggerian contributions to Moral Philosophy. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Basil Blackwell Publisher Ltd.
Knowles, C. (2017). Das Man and everydayness: A new interpretation. In H. B. Schmid, & G. Thonhauser (Eds.), From conventionalism to social authenticity: Heidegger’s anyone and contemporary social theory (pp. 29–53). Springer
Kohn, J. (2003). Introduction. In J. Kohn (Ed.), Responsibility and judgement (pp. vii-xxx). Schocken Books
Koo, J. J. (2017). Heidegger’s underdeveloped conception of the undistinguishedness (Indifferenz) of everyday human existence. In S. H. Bernhard, & T. Gerhard (Eds.), From conventionalism to social authenticity: Heidegger’s anyone and contemporary social theory (pp. 53–78). Springer
Magid, O. (2015). Further ado concerning Dasein’s undifferentiated Mode: Distinguishing the indifferent inauthenticity of average everyday dasein from the possibility of genuine failure. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 46(3), 233–250.
Whitefield, S. J. (1981). Hannah Arendt and the banality of evil. The History Teacher, 14(4), 469–477.
Zigon, J. (2007). Moral Breakdown and the ethical demand: A theoretical framework for an anthropology of moralities. Anthropological Theory, 7(2), 131–150.
Zigon, J. (2024). How is it between us? Relational Ethics and Care for the World. Hau Books.
Zimmerman, M. (1981). Eclipse of the self: The development of Heidegger’s concept of authenticity. Ohio University Press
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Agarwala, A. Heidegger and Arendt on Conformity and Conformism. Hum Stud (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-024-09721-w
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-024-09721-w