Abstract
Using Harvey Sacks’s concept of membership categorization devices (MCDs), this article examines the help-search sequences in which Japanese rehabilitation team members use a set of categories to locate the availability of stroke family caregivers. Specifically, based on an analysis of audiovisual data from rehabilitation team conferences in Japan, the article illustrates the ways in which participants at the meetings: (1) evaluate the expectable behaviors of various category incumbents; (2) classify which category of person is proper to turn to for help; and (3) arrive at the conclusion that no one is available, and so the patient must be institutionalized. Analysis shows that participants routinely choose co-resident family members to fulfill the caregiver position. However, the position is not guaranteed unless the selected incumbent can satisfy additional criteria, especially physical strength and time availability. By exploring the ways in which participants use categories to negotiate discharge destinations, the article adds to Sacks’s analysis by illustrating methodical activities for deciding whether someone is unavailable to help. Moreover, it considers the applicability of Sacks’s notion of MCDs to Japanese data.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Activities of daily living refer to self-care tasks, such as eating, toileting, and dressing, which people routinely perform in their daily life.
Persons aged 40–64 years old may also qualify for LTCI if they are diagnosed as having one of 16 specific diseases (e.g., cerebrovascular disease) as defined by the MHLW.
Patients with mimamori (‘supervision’) require a caregiver to watch while they are performing activities of daily living because there might be some risks involved with their behavior. However, a caregiver does not need to use his or her hands to physically assist them. Instead, s/he can utilize verbal and gestural cues to instruct them.
The excerpt does not explain why the participants do not consider the patient’s mother to be a helper, but the patient’s mother is 90 years old and probably lacks the strength to help with transfers. Such background knowledge might be shared by the participants.
It should not be assumed that non-family members are always treated as improper. In the following excerpt, participants can and do choose a patient’s neighbors as the potential helper. However, the kinds of help offered by the neighbors seem to be limited, such as giving a ride (see lines 10–12).
Excerpt 5
.
Here, Sacks’s (1974) “consistency rule” could be extended. That is, when the speaker lists three candidate incumbents A, B, and C, and if A is treated as improper, this applies to B and C even though their capacities are not explicitly talked about.
References
Adelman, R. R., Tmanova, L., Delgado, D., Dion, S., & Lachs, M. S. (2014). Caregiver burden: A clinical review. JAMA, 311(10), 1052–1060.
Arminen, I. (2005). Institutional interaction: Studies of talk at work. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Bilmes, J. (1996). Problems and resources in analyzing Northern Thai conversation for English language readers. Journal of Pragmatics, 27, 171–188.
Bilmes, J. (2009). Kinship categories in a Northern Thai narrative. In G. Kasper & H. T. Nguyen (Eds.), Talk-in-interaction: Multilingual perspectives (pp. 29–56). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
Bilmes, J. (2011). Occasioned semantics: A systematic approach to meaning in talk. Human Studies, 34, 129–153.
Bilmes, J. (2015). The structure of meaning in talk: Explorations in category analysis. Volume 1: Co-categorization, contrast, and hierarchy. Internet document retrievable from http://www2.hawaii.edu/~bilmes.
Broadhurst, K. (2007). Parental help-seeking and the moral order. Notes for policy-makers and parenting practitioners on ‘the first port of call’ and ‘no one to turn to’. Sociological Research Online 12(6). http://www.cocresonline.org.uk/12/6/4.html.
Brown, N. (2003). Under one roof: The evolving story of three generation in Japan. In J. W. Traphagan & J. K. Knight (Eds.), Demographic change and the family in Japan’s aging society (pp. 53–71). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Button, G. (1990). On members’ time. Réseaux, 8(1), 161–182.
Campbell, J. C., & Campbell, R. (2003). Adapting to long-term-care insurance: Where to live? Social Science Japan, 27, 3–5.
Campbell, J. C., & Ikegami, N. (2000). Long-term care insurance comes to Japan. Health Affairs, 19, 26–39.
Donnan, G. A., Fisher, M., Macleod, M., & Davis, S. M. (2008). Stroke. The Lancet, 371(9624), 1612–1623.
Edwards, D. (2000). Extreme case formulations: Softners, investment, and doing nonliteral. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33(4), 347–373.
Haley, W., Allen, J. Y., Grant, J. S., Clay, O. J., Perkins, M., & Roth, D. L. (2009). Problems and benefits reported by stroke family caregivers: Results from a prospective epistemological study. Stroke, 40(6), 2129–2133.
Hauser, E. (2011). Generalization: A practice of situated categorization in talk. Human Studies, 34, 183–198.
Hayano, K. (2011). Claiming epistemic primacy: Yo-marked assessments in Japanese. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp. 58–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hayashi, M. (2008). Making a ‘noticing of departure’ in talk: Eh-prefaced turns in Japanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 2100–2129.
Hayashi, M. (2010). An overview of the question-response system in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2685–2702.
Hepburn, A., & Bolden, G. B. (2014). The conversation analytic approach to transcription. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 57–76). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299–345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hester, S., & Eglin, P. (1997). Membership categorization analysis: an introduction. In S. Hester & P. Eglin (Eds.), Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis (pp. 1–24). Washington D.C.: University Press of America.
Housley, W., & Fitzgerald, R. (2002). The reconsidered model of membership categorization. Qualitative Research, 2(1), 59–83.
Housley, W., & Fitzgerald, R. (2015). Introduction to membership categorization analysis. In W. Housley & R. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Advances in membership categorization analysis (pp. 1–21). London: Sage.
Hunt, M. (1991). The identification and provision of care for the terminally ill at home by ‘family’ members. Sociology of Health and Illness, 13(3), 375–395.
Imamura, A. E. (2009). Family structure. In Y. Sugimoto (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to modern Japanese culture (pp. 76–91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ito, I., Sato, H., Hamada, K., & Shindo, N. (2011). Rihabiriteeshon go no tenki to zaiin nissuu ni eikyoo wo ataeru shakaiteki youin no kentou [Social factors influenced the discharge destination and length of hospital stay of stroke patients after rehabilitation]. Japan Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 48(8), 561–565.
Iwasaki, S. (2013). Japanese (revised edition). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Campany.
Izumi, H. (2014). Local division of labor in rehabilitation team conferences. Human Studies, 37, 393–430.
Jefferson, G. (1979). A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 79–96). New York: Irvington.
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jenike, B. R. (2003). Parent care and shifting family obligations in urban Japan. In J. W. Traphagan & J. K. Knight (Eds.), Demographic change and the family in Japan’s aging society (pp. 177–201). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Kaifukuki Rehabilitation Ward Association. (2006). Kaifukuki rihabiriteeshon byoutou no genjou to kadai ni kansuru chousa houkoku [Comprehensive survey of the convalescent rehabilitation ward]. Kokuritsu Hoken Iryou Kagakuin, Shisetsu Kagakubu.
Koike, C. (2014). Food experiences and categorization in Japanese talk-in-interaction. In P. S. Szatrowski (Ed.), Language and food: Verbal and nonverbal experiences (pp. 159–183). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Lepper, G. (2000). Categories in text and talk: A practical introduction to categorization analysis. London: Sage.
Lerner, G. H., & Takagi, T. (1999). On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: A co-investigation of English and Japanese grammatical practices. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 49–75.
Long, S. O. (2008). Someone’s old, something’s new, someone’s borrowed, someone’s blue: Changing elder care at the turn of the 21st century. In A. K. Hashimoto & J. W. Traphagan (Eds.), Imagined families, lived families: Culture and kinship in contemporary Japan (pp. 137–157). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Long, S. O., Campbell, R., & Nishimura, C. (2009). Does it matter who cares? A comparison of daughters versus daughters-in-law in Japanese elder care. Social Science Japan Journal, 12(1), 1–21.
Maynard, D. W. (2003). Bad news, good news: Conversational order in everyday talk and clinical settings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McHoul, A., & Watson, D. R. (1984). Two axes for the analysis of ‘commonsense’ and ‘formal’ geographical knowledge in classroom talk. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 5(3), 282–302.
Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. (2013). Kokumin seikatsu kiso choosa [Comprehensive survey of living condition]. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/k-tyosa/k-tyosa13/dl/05.pdf.
Moerman, M. (1988). Talking culture: Ethnography and conversation analysis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Morimoto, T., Scheiner, A. S., & Asano, H. (2003). Caregiver burden and health-related quality of life among Japanese stroke caregivers. Age and Aging, 32, 218–223.
Paoletti, I. (2001). Membership categories and time appraisal in interviews with family caregivers of disabled elderly. Human Studies, 24, 293–325.
Pomerantz, A. M. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9, 219–229.
Sacks, H. (1967). The search for help: No one to turn to. In E. S. Schneidman (Ed.), Essays in self-destruction (pp. 203–223). New York: Science House Inc.
Sacks, H. (1972). An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 31–74). New York: Free Press.
Sacks, H. (1974). On the analyzability of stories by children. In R. Turner (Ed.), Ethnomethodology (pp. 216–232). Harmondsworth: Penguin Education.
Sakurai, H., Sugiura, Y., Sigiura, T., Iwata, K., Matsumoto, T., Kawamura, T., et al. (2011). Determinants of return to home after stroke: An analysis based on family’s views. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 23, 673–677.
Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 75–119). New York: Free Press.
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 462–482.
Silverman, D. (1998). Harvey Sacks: Social science and conversation analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sugiura, T., Sakurai, H., Sugiura, Y., Iwata, K., Kimura, K., Sakamoto, K., et al. (2013). Chou kourei nousocchuu kanja (85 sai ijou) no jitaku taiin ni hitsuyou na ADL no jouken no kentou [A study of ADL outcome factors of elderly stroke patients over 85]. Rigakuryouho Kagaku, 28(5), 623–626.
Sugiura, T., Sakurai, H., Sugiura, Y., Iwata, K., Kimura, K., Sakamoto, K., et al. (2014). Kaifukuki taiinji no idou shudan ga kurumaisu to natta nousocchuu kanja ni motomerareru jitaku fukki jouken: Kazoku no ikou wo fumaeta kentou [Outcomes necessary for wheelchair use stroke patients to be discharged from a recovery stage rehabilitation ward: An analysis based on families’ intentions]. Rigakuryouhou Kagaku, 29(5), 779–783.
Traphagan, J. W. (2003). Contesting coresidence: Women, in-laws, and health care in Rural Japan. In J. W. Traphagan & J. K. Knight (Eds.), Demographic change and the family in Japan’s aging society (pp. 203–226). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Uematsu, M., & Ikai, T. (2002). Nourei nousocchuu kanja ga jitaku taiin suru tame no jouken—Classification and regression trees (CART) ni yoru bunseki [The conditions for aged stroke patients in order to discharge to home: Analysis by classification and regression trees (CART)]. Japan Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 39, 396–402.
Watson, D. R. (1986). Doing the organizations work: an examination of a crisis intervention centre. In S. Fisher & A. D. Todd (Eds.), Medicine and institutional authority: Medicine, education, and law (pp. 91–120). Norwood: Ablex.
Acknowledgements
I am deeply indebted to Jack Bilmes for his excellent advice and useful comments on earlier manuscripts. My thanks also go to the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions. Albert Britt Robillard generously shared his social network with me, helping me connect to a Japanese rehabilitation hospital for conducting my fieldwork and data collection. Jack Bilmes and Pamela Runestad provided valuable editing assistance. An earlier version of this article was presented at the International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis Conference held at the University of Southern Denmark (4–7 August, 2015). I am thankful to the participants for their useful feedback. All errors are my own responsibility.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: List of Abbreviations Used in the Interlinear Gloss
Appendix: List of Abbreviations Used in the Interlinear Gloss
Adopted from Iwasaki (2013) and Hayashi (2010).
ACC | Accusative | NML | Nominalizer |
ASP | Aspect | NOM | Nominative |
AUX | Auxiliary | PAST | Past |
CAU | Causative suffix | PFX | Prefix |
CLS | Classifier | POL | Polite suffix |
COM | Comitative | POT | Potential suffix |
COND | Conditional form | PP | Pragmatic particle |
COP | Copula | PSS | Passive suffix |
DAT | Dative | PURP | Purposive |
EMPH | Emphasis marker | Q | Question marker |
FL | Filler | QT | Quotative particle |
GEN | Genitive | REP | Representative |
HON | Honorific | RP | Retrospective particle |
IMP | Imperative form | SE | Sentence extender |
INJ | Interjection | SOF | Softener |
INS | Instrumental | TE | TE form |
LOC | Locative | TL | Title |
NEG | Negative | TOP | Topic marking particle |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Izumi, H. Help-Search Practices in Rehabilitation Team Meetings: A Sacksian Analysis. Hum Stud 40, 439–468 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-017-9430-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-017-9430-z