Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Four Horsemen of the Ecopocalypse: the Agricultural Ecology of the Great Leap Forward

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

China’s Great Leap Forward of 1958–60, an attempt to increase agricultural production through increased labor inputs, resulted in the greatest famine in world history from 1959 to 1961. Most histories emphasize the political mistakes of this period, which were disastrous. But to understand how the political mistakes led to the famine, here I concentrate on the ecosystem mismanagement that led to drastic drops in food production. To explain these effects, I use the concept of the “Four Horsemen of the Ecopocalypse:” over-emphasis on single variables, cross-scale mismatches, top-down panaceas, and ignorance of system feedbacks, all of which eliminated the resilience of agro-ecosystems to both internal contradictions and external disturbances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Ben Fitzhugh reminds me that I am not the first to use the “four horsemen” motif to describe ecosystem disasters; William Ruddiman (2005) uses this figure to describe the role of the original biblical horsemen—war, pestilence, famine, and death—in the probable decline of greenhouse gas emissions worldwide in the early Middle Ages.

  2. This article deals only with “China Proper,” the area mostly in the east and south of the People’s Republic, inhabited mostly by Han Chinese and possessing a millennia-long history of intensive agrarian cultivation centered around cereal grains. The Great Leap also affected the ecologies of pastoral areas in China’s north and northwest and of upland extensive agro-silvio-pastoralism in the southwest and south, but they are outside the scope of this analysis.

  3. The Great Leap, however, involved more than just a “high modernist” ambition to control and regulate the natural environment. The Chinese Communists had this sort of ambition, but they pursued it from the beginning of their regime in 1949 and continue to pursue it today. The Great Leap involved a paradoxical combination of this high modernist scientific control agenda with extreme voluntarism and reliance on folk wisdom, combined with extreme political radicalism. Mere high modernism was literally not the half of it—more like a third.

  4. Systems theorists have conventionally called these “negative feedback” in the sense that a stimulus provokes a response in the opposite (negative) direction from the original stimulus. However, “negative feedback” in our popular discourse has come to mean “adverse criticism,” so I adopt the term “balancing feedback” as more intuitive. Similarly, the systems term “positive feedback” does not mean “praise,” but rather a response in the same (positive) direction of the stimulus, leading to a vicious (or sometimes “virtuous”) circle. So I adopt Meadows’s corresponding term, “reinforcing feedback” (2008: 27–34).

  5. If the 25 billion m3 is accurate, the road would indeed stretch to the moon. If there were in fact 100 million people working, they would have had to move 250 m3 of earth each. From personal experience, I found it possible at age 70 to move 3–5 m3 of earth in a day (albeit for no more than two days in a row). If most workers were well under 70, and they worked 60 days apiece at this pace, I guess they could have done it. Or this may be one of the first instances of “rocket” statistics that culminated in reported grain yields of 10,000 jin per mu, as reported in 1958. See below.

  6. In earlier stages of collectivization, a small percentage of land was left to individual households to farm independently. In Chinese these were called ziliu di, or “land left to [families] themselves,” but the English-language literature on Chinese collective agriculture developed a conventional translation as “private plots.”

  7. Women’s work in collective settings—such as canteens or childcare centers—as opposed to housework, was awarded a few points, but not nearly as many as would be awarded for agricultural work (Brown 2017: 45–46).

  8. The terms shen geng深耕 and shen fan 深翻 are conventionally translated as “deep plowing.” However, it is clear from local accounts that a lot of this deep turning over (深翻) was done with shovels and hoes as well as plows, so it seems that “deep tilling” is a better translation, because one can turn the soil over with either a plow or a shovel.

  9. There is a parallel to the classical horsemen of the apocalypse here: war, famine, and pestilence lead to death, in the same way that maximizing single variables, cross-scale mismatches, and panacea solutions led to disruption of ecosystem feedbacks, which of course was the proximate cause of famine and death in the Great Leap.

References

  • Bannister, J. (1987). China’s Changing Population. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J. (1996). Hungry Ghosts: Mao’s Secret Famine. Henry Holt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramall, C. (2011). Agency and Famine in Sichuan Province, 1958-1962. China Quarterly 208: 990–2008.

  • Brown, M. J. (2017). Dutiful Help: Masking Rural Women’s Economic Contributions. In G. Santos, G. and Harrell, S. (eds.). Transforming Patriarchy: Chinese Families in the Twenty-First Century. University of Washington Press, Seattle, pp. 39–59.

  • Chan, A, Madsen, R., and Unger, J. (1984). Chen Village: The Recent History of a Peasant Community in Mao’s China. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.

  • Chen Jinlin 陈锦林 and Bao Jiaju 薄家驹, eds. (1993). 都江堰志 (Gazetteer of Dujiangyan). Chengdu Cizhu Chubanshe, Chengdu

  • Cohen, A.S. (2016). Creating an Empire: Local Political Change at Angamuco, Michoacán, Mexico. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.

  • Cumming, G. S., Cumming, D. H. M., and Redman, C. L. (2006). Scale Mismatches in Social-Ecological Systems: Causes, Consequences, and Solutions. Ecology and Society 11(1): 14: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art14/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dikötter, F. (2010). Mao’s Great Famine. Walker & Co.

  • Friedman, E., Pickowicz, P.G., and Selden, M. (1991). Chinese Village: Socialist State. Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling. C. S., and Gunderson, L. H. (2002). Resilience and Adaptive Cycles. In Gunderson, L.H. and Holling, C. S. (eds.), Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Island Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 25–62.

  • Holling, C. S. and Meffe, G.K (1996). Command and Control and the Pathology of Natural Resource Management. Conservation Biology 10 (2): 328–337.

  • Huang, Philip C.C. (1990). The Peasant Economy and Rural Development in the Yangzi Delta, 1350-1988. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang S-M. (1989). The Spiral Road: Change in a Chinese Village through the Eyes of a Communist Party Leader. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huobao Nongye Zhaoshang Wang. (2014). 红薯亩产量:红薯亩产多少斤 (Per-mu yield of sweet potatoes: How many jin does a mu of sweet potatoes yield). http://m.3456.tv/bk/13526.html

  • Jin Z. 金中桓. (2011). 双轮双铧犁前世今生 (The Rebirth of the Double-Wheeled, Double-Shared Plow. Wenzhou Daily, Sept 18. http://www.wzrb.com.cn/mobile_show.aspx?id=299816

  • Kueh, Y. Y. (1984). A Weather Index for Analysing Grain Yield Instability in China, 1952-81. The China Quarterly 97: 68–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kung, J. K-S., Wu, X., and Wu, Y. (2012). Inequality of Land Tenure and Revolutionary Outcome: An Economic Analysis of China’s Land Reform of 1946-1952. Explorations in Economic History 49: 482–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S. A. (1992). The Problem of Pattern and Scale in Ecology: The Robert H. MacArthur Award Lecture. Ecology 73 (6): 1943–1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Chunfeng 李春峰. (2010). “大跃进”的前奏:兴修农田水利建设运动 (Prelude to the “Great Leap Forward”: The Campaign to Build Agricultural Water Conservancy). Cangsang 2010 (1): 113–14.

  • MacFarquhar, R. (1974). The Origins of the Cultural Revolution 1: Contradictions among the People, 1956-1957. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, K. E. (2005). Marxist Maternalism, Memory, and the Mobilization of Women in the Great Leap Forward. China Review 5 (1): 83–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1875). Critique of the Gotha Program. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1875/gotha/ch01.htm

  • Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in Systems. Chelsea Green, White River, VT

  • Muscalino, M. (2019). Tianshui’s Three Treasures: Water and Soil Conservation in Wartime Noerthwest China. Journal Of Modern Chinese History 13 (1): 148–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, B. (2007). The Chinese Economy: Transitions and Growth. MIT Press, Cambridge.

  • Nongye Bu 中华人民共和国农业部(Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China). (2009). 新中国农业60年统计资料 (Statistics on Sixty Years of Agriculture in the New China. Zhongguo Nongye Chubanshe, Beijing.

  • Ostrom, Elinor, and Michael Cox. (2010). Moving Beyond Panaceas: a Multi-tiered Diagnostic Approach for Social-ecological Analysis. Environmental Conservation 37, 4: 451–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. H. (1974). Development of Agriculture. In M. Oksenberg (ed.), China’s Developmental Experience. Praeger, New York, pp. 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietz, D. A. (2015). The Yellow River: The Problem of Water in Modern China. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruf, Gregory A. (1998). Cadres and Kin: Making a Socialist Village in West China. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, James C. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • Shapiro, J. (2001). Mao’s War Against Nature: Politics and the Environment in Revolutionary China. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shen G. 沈果正. (1979). 都江堰的历史与“治水经” (The History of Dujiangyan and the “Classic of Water Control”). Journal of Sichuan University, Science Edition 1979 (4): 101–106.

  • Siu, H. F. (1989). Agents and Victims in South China: Accomplices in Rural Revolution.Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, G. W. (1964-65). Marketing and Social Structure in Rural China, parts 1-3. Journal of Asian Studies 24 (1): 3–43; 24 (2): 195–228; 24 (3): 363–99.

  • Smil, V. (1999). China’s Great Famine: 40 Years Later. British Medical Journal 319: 1619–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swamy, S., and Burki, S. J. (1970) Foodgrains Output in the People’s Republic of China, 1958-1965. The China Quarterly 41: 58–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., and Salt, D. (2006) Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World. Island Press, Washington. DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang R. 王瑞芳. (2008). 大跃进时期农田水利建设得失问题研究评述 (Critique of Research on the Question of Gains and Losses from Construction of Waterworks During the Great Leap Forward). Journal of Beijing University of Science and Technology, Social Science Edition 24 (4): 122–130.

  • Wu Z. 吴志军.(2006).试论1957年冬,1958年春农田水利建设运动 (Provisional Discussion of the Agricultural Waterworks Construction Campaign of Winter 1957 and Spring 1958). Beijing Party History 2006 (1): 12–15.

  • Yang J. 杨继绳.(2007). 墓碑: 中国六十年代大饥荒纪实 (Tombstone: A Factual Record of China’s Great Famine of the 60s). Hong Kong: Cosmos.

  • Zhang T. 张同乐and Guo Q. 郭琪, (2008). “大跃进”时期生态环境问题论析:以河北省为例 (Discussion and Analysis of Environmental and Ecological Questions from the time of the “Great Leap Forward.” ) Journal of Hebei Normal University, Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition (2): 143–149.

  • Zhong L. 钟霖湘.(2011).略论“大跃进”时期的深翻土地运动. 党史研究与教学 (History and Lessons from the Deep Plowing Campaign at the Time of the “Great Leap Forward”). Party History Research and Education 2011 (4): 14–20.

  • Zhu X. 朱显灵 and Hu H. 胡化凯. (2009). 双轮双铧犁与中国新式农具推广运动 (The Double-wheeled, double-shared plow and China’s Campaign to Disseminate New-style Agricultural Implements). History of Contemporary China 16 (3): 65–64.

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Ben Fitzhugh, Denise Glover, Jack Hayes, and two anonymous reviewers for incisive comments on drafts of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stevan Harrell.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no financial or other conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

The article is based entirely on written sources.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harrell, S. The Four Horsemen of the Ecopocalypse: the Agricultural Ecology of the Great Leap Forward. Hum Ecol 49, 7–18 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-020-00179-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-020-00179-9

Keywords

Navigation