Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Regional Integration and Household Resilience: Infrastructure Connectivity and Livelihood Diversity in the Southwestern Amazon

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Inter-Oceanic Highway is among the first wave of large infrastructure projects under the auspices of the Initiative for the Integration of Regional Infrastructure in South America, which proposes regional integration as a means of economic development. Such projects have reignited debates over infrastructure impacts, which in many ways center on the ramifications for natural resource management. We pursue an analysis of the implications of highway paving for local livelihoods by focusing on the effects of market connectivity on livelihood diversity. Given that infrastructure brings shocks to affected regions, we argue that livelihood diversity is usefully interpreted in terms of household resilience to such shocks. We draw on rural household surveys from the tri-national frontier where Bolivia, Brazil and Peru meet in the southwestern Amazon, where the Inter-Oceanic Highway has recently been paved. The findings show that households more connected to markets in terms of travel time and road paving have less diverse livelihoods. This confirms concerns about regional integration and rural household vulnerability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Our original intention was to visit two additional communities in Pando, but political violence in September 2008 rendered this unviable.

  2. Data collection in Acre was delayed by a year due to permitting requirements.

  3. This required conversions from various local measures of weight and involved extensive consultations with counterparts, community leaders and other key informants. Reported values constitute estimates of production, and are thus subject to errors. We mitigated such problems by using interviewers who often came from the communities visited, and were thus familiar with local production practices and units of measurement. Interviewers also asked respondents to figure production in more than one way, which permitted more accurate estimation.

  4. We assumed 250 kg/head of cattle, 50 kg/head for pigs, and 1 kg/head for chickens to calculate amounts produced.

  5. In our analysis of distributive diversity, we focus on production rather than income. We considered modeling income diversity since we have data on amounts sold. However, local price data vary in availability and quality among products and countries. In past analyses of livelihood diversity with production as well as income, findings did not vary greatly (Perz 2005). We therefore stay with analysis of livelihood diversity in terms of production.

  6. Timber extraction may be on-farm or on other lands such as concessions. We asked about amounts of timber extracted, but logging is often illegal and many respondents did not admit to timber harvesting, so we discount reported values.

  7. All values in Table 1 reflect weights applied to the observations to correct for differing sampling ratios we employed among communities.

  8. We also considered children ages 0–5 and 6–15 separately on the expectation that the younger age group involves consumers but the older group also engages in productive activities. Models did not indicate distinct effects of the two groups, so we combined them.

  9. Because we used different sampling ratios in communities of different sizes, we apply weights to the observations to offset the ratios and thereby ensure representativeness of households among communities, which implies weighted regressions.

  10. Castaña is a key exception, but our present analysis is broader than a single product.

References

  • Adger, W. N. (2000). Social and Ecological Resilience: Are They Related? Progress in Human Geography 24: 347–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16: 268–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, A. (1999). Capitals and Capabilities: A Framework for Analyzing Peasant Viability, Rural Livelihoods and Poverty. World Development 27: 2021–2044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, F., and Pleskovic, B. (2008). Rethinking Infrastructure for Development. World Bank, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer-Thomas, V. (2001). Regional Integration in Latin America and the Caribbean. Bulletin of Latin American Research 20(3): 360–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderón C., and Serven, L. (2004). The Effects of Infrastructure Development on Growth and Income Distribution. Central Bank of Chile, Working Paper No. 270.

  • CEPEI (Centro Peruano de Estudios Internacionales) (2002). La Integración Regional Entre Bolivia, Brasil y Peru. CEPEI, Lima.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, G., Voss, P. R., and Deller, S. C. (2006). Rethinking Highway Effects on Population Change. Public Works Management and Policy 11(1): 18–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, B. J., Pardey, P. J., and Roseboom, J. (1997). International Productivity Patterns: Accounting for Input Quality, Infrastructure, and Research. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79: 1064–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, C. (2001). Why Does South Africa Need a Spatial Policy? Population Migration, Infrastructure and Development. Journal of Contemporary African Studies 19: 111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demurger, S. (2001). Infrastructure and Economic Growth: An Explanation for Regional Disparities in China? Journal of Comparative Economics 29: 95–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dourojeanni, M. J., Barandiarán, A., and Dourojeanni, D. (2010). Amazonía Peruana en 2021. SPDA, Lima.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehringhaus, C. (2005). Post-Victory-Dilemmas: Land Use, Development, and Social Movement in Amazonian Extractive Reserve. PhD Dissertation, Yale University.

  • Ellis, F. (2000). Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, S., Hazell, P., and Haque, T. (2000). Targeting Public Investments by Agro-Ecological Zone to Achieve Growth and Poverty Alleviation Goals in Rural India. Food Policy 25: 411–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feder, G., Onchan, T., Chalamwong, Y., and Hongladarom, C. (1988). Land Policies and Farm Productivity in Thailand. Johns Hopkins University Press and World Bank, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. P., and Poston, D. L. (1975). The Division of Labor: Conceptualization and Related Measures. Social Forces 53: 468–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J., and Rozelle, S. (2003). Poverty and Access to Roads in Papua New Guinea. Economic Development and Cultural Change 52: 159–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A. (1995). Threats to Sustainability in African Agriculture: Searching for Appropriate Paradigms. Human Ecology 23(3): 291–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunasekera, K., Anderson, W., and Lakshmanan, T. R. (2008). Highway-Induced Development: Evidence from Sri Lanka. World Development 36: 2371–2389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L. H. (2000). Ecological Resilience – In Theory and Application. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31: 425–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggett, P., Cliff, A. D., and Frey, A. (1977). Locational Analysis in Human Geography. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haughton, D. M. A., and Mukerjee, S. (1995). The Economic Measurement and Determinants of Diversity. Social Indicators Research 36: 201–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IIRSA (Iniciativa para la Integracion del a Infraestructura Regional de America del Sur). (2008). URL available at www.iirsa.org. Accessed 20 January 2008.

  • Iniciativa MAP. (2008). URL available at www.map-amazonia.net. Accessed 20 January 2008.

  • Isard, W. (1956). Location and Space-Economy: A General Theory Relating to Industrial Location, Market Areas, Land Use, Trade, and Urban Structure. MIT/John Wiley, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, H. G. (2000). Access to Markets and the Benefits of Rural Roads. The Economic Journal 110: 713–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, L. J. (1984). Central Place Theory. Sage, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonel, M. (1992). Roads, Indians and the Environment in the Amazon: From Central Brazil to the Pacific Ocean. International Working Group for Indigenous Affairs, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, N. (2001). Development Sociology: Actor Perspectives. Routledge, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran, A. E. (1988). Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mahapa, S. M., and Mashiri, S. (2001). Social Exclusion and Rural Transport: Gender Aspects of a Road Improvement Project in Tshitwe, Northern Province. Development Southern Africa 18: 365–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, E., Perz, S. G., Schmink, M., and Nepstad, D. (2007). Participatory Stakeholder Workshops to Mitigate Impacts of Road Paving in the Southwestern Amazon. Conservation and Society 5: 382–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., and Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity Hotpots for Conservation Priorities. Nature 403: 853–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Netting, R. M. C. (1993). Smallholders, Householders. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pender, J., Jagger, P., Nkonya, E., and Sserunkuuma, D. (2004). Development Pathways and Land Management in Uganda. World Development 32: 767–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perz, S. G. (2005). The Effects of Household Asset Endowments on Agricultual Diversity Among Frontier Colonists in the Amazon. Agroforestry Forum 63: 263–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perz, S. G., Cabrera, L., Carvalho, L. A., Castillo, J., Chacacanta, R., Cossio, R., Franco Solano, Y., Hoelle, J., Perales, L. M., Puerta, I., Rojas Cespedes, D., Rojas Camacho, I., and Costa Silva, A. (2012). Regional Integration and Local Change: Road Paving, Community Connectivity and Social-Ecological Resilience in a Tri-National Frontier, Southwestern Amazonia. Regional Environmental Change doi:10.1007/s10113-011-0233-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R. (2001). Decentralization of Road Administration: Case Studies in Africa and Asia. Public Administration and Development 21: 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudel, T. K., and Richards, S. (1990). Urbanization, Roads, and Rural Population Change in the Ecuadorian Andes. Studies in Comparative International Development 25: 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmink, M., and Wood, C. H. (1992). Contested Frontiers in Amazonia. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shriar, A. J. (2009). Roads to Poverty: Exploring the Impacts of Economic Integration on Socioeconomic Conditions and Land Use in Northern Guatemala. Journal of Planning Education and Research 28: 456–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoian, D. (2000). Variations and Dynamics of Extractive Economies: The Rural–urban Nexus of Non-timber Forest Use in the Bolivian Amazon. PhD Dissertation, Freiburg University.

  • Straub, S. (2008). Infrastructure and Growth in Developing Countries: Recent Advances and Research Challenges. World Bank Policy Research, Washington, DC. Working Paper No. 4460.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trankell, I. B. (1999). On the Road in Laos: An Anthropological Study of Road Construction and Rural Communities. White Lotus Press, Bangkok.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, P., and den Haak, S. (2007). Troublesome Construction: IIRSA and Public-Private Partnerships in Road Infrastructure. CEDLA: Cuadernos del CEDLA.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen G. Perz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perz, S.G., Rosero, M., Leite, F.L. et al. Regional Integration and Household Resilience: Infrastructure Connectivity and Livelihood Diversity in the Southwestern Amazon. Hum Ecol 41, 497–511 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-013-9584-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-013-9584-x

Keywords

Navigation