Abstract
Discussions about experiential education abound in the Canadian higher education sector, as well as more broadly across the international landscape. In Canada, experiential learning opportunities are increasingly embedded within institutional mission statements, administrative priorities, and pedagogical frameworks. Despite its spread, research has tended to overlook faculty perspectives, including how they make sense of experiential education and its impact on their professional roles or disciplinary priorities. To shore up these gaps, this article reports the findings from in-depth semi-structured interviews (n = 47) with faculty members across eight disciplines from six universities. Drawing on international literature on experiential education and organizational sensemaking, the findings of this study reveal four sensemaking lenses that faculty use to make sense of experiential learning: the disciplinary lens, the institutional lens, the pedagogical lens, and the professional lens. Both collectively and individually, these lenses have implications for the successful institutionalization of experiential education, as they are the frames through which faculty form meaning and enact their responses. By distinguishing these lenses, this article reinforces sensemaking as a process of bricolage and that faculty draw on multiple lenses to understand organizational changes. The article concludes with recommendations for future research on faculty sensemaking.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For a classic review of tight and loose coupling, see Weick (1976).
This methodological approach follows other Canadian research on experiential education. For an empirical example, see Buzzelli and Allison (2017).
This was a methodological decision. Not all universities in Ontario offer the same programs. In order to ensure adequate representation of the three institutional categories, some concessions needed to be made. The trade-off here was that UG1 did have these programs, ensuring science-based disciplines were represented in the undergraduate category.
Tenured and tenure track refer to full-time faculty members who have been successful, or are working toward tenure review.
Sessional instructors refers to teaching staff who are not-tenured and non-permanent employees of the university.
Ceremonial change allows organizations to strategically couple administrative change to environmental developments, while buffering the technical core from environmental jolts or change-making stimuli (Meyer & Rowan, 1977).
Profession is here used in a general sense, to underscore the occupational logics that shape sensemaking. To be sure, the term “profession” has a storied conceptual past and may be interpreted in numerous ways. Keeping with the spirit of scholars like Friedson (2001), it is used here to demarcate the professional boundaries that shape the professoriate.
An enduring trend in the Canadian higher education labor market is the over-reliance on sessional instructors to teach a bulk of undergraduate courses (Rose, 2020). Some estimates suggest that one-in-three academics in Canada work on a contract-to-contract basis (Canadian Association of University Teachers, n.d.)
References
Alberta (2021). Alberta 2030: Building skills for Jobs. https://open.alberta.ca/dataset/2bd41938-8100-4987-996d-b73d888cdbdc/resource/f897376a-95a9-4fe0-bfa7-9900ab815cd8/download/ae-alberta-2030-building-skills-for-jobs-strategy-summary-2021-04.pdf
Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316059
Ashton, H. (2023). Cutting the STEM of future skills: Beyond the STEM vs art dichotomy in England. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 22(2), 148–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/14740222231156893.
Association for Experiential Education (n.d.). What is experiential education? https://www.aee.org/what-is-ee.
Brown, A. D. (2017). Identity work and organizational identification: Identity work and organizational identification. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(3), 296–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12152.
Brown, A. D., Colville, I., & Pye, A. (2015). Making sense of sensemaking in organization studies. Organization Studies, 36(2), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614559259
Burch, G. F., Giambatista, R., Batchelor, J. H., Burch, J. J., Hoover, J. D., & Heller, N. A. (2019). A meta-analysis of the relationship between experiential learning and learning outcomes. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 17(3), 239–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12188
Busteed, B. (2019). Why aren’t graduates rady for work? They’re the least working generation in U.S. history. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/brandonbusteed/2019/03/29/why-arent-graduates-ready-for-work-theyre-the-least-working-generation-in-us-history/?sh=1f16c7c15e58.
Buzzelli, M., & Allison, D. J. (2017). Proposed strategic mandates for Ontario universities: An organizational theory perspective. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 47(3), 22.
Canadian Association of University Teachers (n.d.). Precarious labour in our academic institutions. https://ourfuture.caut.ca/brief_precarity.
Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
Cristofaro, M. (2022). Organizational sensemaking: A systematic review and a co-evolutionary model. European Management Journal, 40(3), 393–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.07.003.
Degn, L. (2015). Sensemaking, sensegiving and strategic management in Danish higher education. Higher Education, 69(6), 901–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9812-3.
Degn, L. (2018). Academic sensemaking and behavioural responses – Exploring how academics perceive and respond to identity threats in times of turmoil. Studies in Higher Education, 43(2), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1168796
Dewey, J. (2015). Experience and education. Free.
Fine, G. A. (1979). Small groups and culture creation: The idioculture of Little League baseball teams. American Sociological Review, 44, 733–745. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094525.
Fine, G. A., & Hallett, T. (2014). Group cultures and the everyday life of organizations: Interaction orders and meso-analysis. Organization Studies, 35(12), 1773–1792. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614546153
Friedson, E. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. On the practice of knowledge. The University of Chicago.
Gabler, N., & Gormley, B. (2022). Lost opportunities: Measuring the unrealized value of skill vacancies in Canada. Conference Board of Canada, 20.
Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120604
Gismondi, M. (2021). Why universities are failing to prepare students for the job market. CBC News. https://www.cbc.ca/radio/ideas/why-universities-are-failing-to-prepare-students-for-the-job-market-1.6208196.
Gonzales, L. D. (2013). The Review of Higher Education, 36(2), 179–209. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2013.0000
Henkel, M. (2005). Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment. Higher Education, 49(1–2), 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-2919-1.
Kezar, A. (2013). Understanding sensemaking/sensegiving in transformational change processes from the bottom up. Higher Education, 65(6), 761–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9575-7.
Kezar, A., & Eckel, P. (2002). Examining the Institutional transformation process: The importance of sensemaking, interrelated strategies, and balance. Research in Higher Education, 43(3), 295–328. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014889001242
LaCroix, E. (forthcoming). An organizational perspective on experiential education in ontario higher education. Doctoral dissertation. University of Waterloo.
LaCroix, E. (2021). Organizational complexities of experiential education: Institutionalization and logic work in higher education. Journal of Experiential Education, 45(2), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/10538259211028987
LaCroix, E. (2024). Meso-foundations of experiential education in ontario universities: A content analysis of the province’s strategic mandate agreements. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 14–26. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.vi.190053
Maclean’s (2023). Maclean’s University rankings: The results of our annual evaluation of Canadian universities. Maclean’s. https://education.macleans.ca/rankings/.
Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.873177
Maitlis, S., & Sonenshein, S. (2010). Sensemaking in crisis and change: Inspiration and insights from Weick (1988). Journal of Management Studies, 47(3), 551–580.
Manitoba (2022). Manitoba government launches substantive, system-wide consultation process on the new post-secondary accountability framework. https://news.gov.mb.ca/news/index.html?item=54379.
Mantione, A. (2018). What’s in a name? Labour shortages, skills shortages, and skills Mismatches. 3. https://lmic-cimt.ca/publications-all/lmi-insights-report-no-3-whats-in-a-name-labour-shortages-skills-shortages-and-skills-mismatches/#:~:text=Labour%20shortages%20refer%20to%20a,suited%20to%20their%20current%20job.
Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
Moran, J. (2022). The humanities and the university: A brief history of the present crisis. The Critical Quarterly, 64(3), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/criq.12679
North, D. C. (2007). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.
Ontario (2021). College and university strategic mandate agreements. https://www.ontario.ca/page/all-college-and-university-strategic-mandate-agreements.
Pizarro Milian, R., Davies, S., & Zarifa, D. (2016). Barriers to differentiation: Applying organizational studies to Ontario Higher Education. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 46(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v46i1.186019
Powell, W., & Colyvas, J. (2008). Microfoundations of Institutional Theory. The SAGE handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.
Qualters, D. (2010). Making the most of Learning outside the Classroom. In D. Qualters, & C. Wehlburg (Eds.), Experiential Education: Making the most of Learning outside the Classroom (new directions for teaching and learning; no. 124) (pp. 95–99). Jossey-Bass.
Rheinhardt, A., & Gioia, D. (2021). Upside-down organizational change: sensemaking, sensegiving, and the new generation. In M. S. Poole & A. H. Van de Ven (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Change and Innovation (2nd ed., pp. 77–105). Oxford Handbooks.
Rose, D. (2020). A snapshot of precarious academic work in Canada. New Proposals: Journal of Marxism and Interdisciplinary Inquiry, 11(1), 7–17.
Rosenstein, A., Sweeney, C., & Gupta, R. (2012). Cross-disciplinary faculty perspectives on experiential learning. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 5(3), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v5i3.7090
Sandberg, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2015). Making sense of the sensemaking perspective: Its constituents, limitations, and opportunities for further development: MAKING SENSE OF SENSEMAKING PERSPECTIVE. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), S6–S32. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1937.
Smerek, R. E. (2013). Sensemaking and new college presidents: A conceptual study of the transition process. The Review of Higher Education, 36(3), 371–403. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2013.0028
Sutcliffe, K. (2018). Sensemaking. In M. Augier & D. J. Teece (Eds.), The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_371-1.
Taylor, J. R., & van Every, E. J. (2000). The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface. Erlbaum.
Teelken, C. (2012). Compliance or pragmatism: How do academics deal with managerialism in higher education? A comparative study in three countries. Studies in Higher Education, 37(3), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.511171.
Weber, K., & Glynn, M. A. (2006). Making sense with institutions: Context, thought and action in Karl Weick’s theory. Organization Studies, 27(11), 1639–1660. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606068343
Weick, K. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Schience Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391875.
Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Weick, K., Sutcliffe, K., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
Wheelahan, L., Moodie, G., & Doughney, J. (2022). Challenging the skills fetish. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 43(3), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2022.2045186.
Wilkinson, L. C., & Wilkinson, M. D. (2023). Value for money and the commodification of higher education: Front-line narratives. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(2), 406–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1819226.
Wurdinger, S., & Allison, P. (2017). Faculty perceptions and use of experiential learning in higher education. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 13(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/150
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to Dr. Janice Aurini, Dr. John McLevey, and Dr. Stephanie Howells for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this article. I am also grateful to my participants for their contributions to this research.
Funding
This project is supported by the Joseph-Armand Bombardier Canada Graduate Scholarships—Doctoral award, issued by Canada’s Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Ethics approval for this research is detailed in the manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
LaCroix, E. Making sense of experiential education in Canada: the four lenses of faculty sensemaking. High Educ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01238-6
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01238-6