Abstract
This study explores how master’s students perceive their research experiences and interpret the concept of research. Master’s education has been regarded as a steppingstone for doctoral study for several decades in many higher education systems; however, the meaning of ‘master’ has transformed academically and socially. Accordingly, the research requirement in many master’s programmes has become flexible or been replaced by other learning outcomes. This raises the question: what meanings do ‘thesis’ and ‘research’ have in the context of master’s education? In this study, we interviewed 73 master’s students from various universities and fields of study in Hong Kong to explore their perceptions of research. The thematic analysis showed that research was interpreted via multiple perspectives among the master’s students, such as learning outcomes, learning processes, and separate tasks. Three themes, namely eligibility, accountability, and agency, were identified as key elements of writing a thesis and understanding the research. The interpretations of research varied according to aspects of the students’ backgrounds, such as their academic discipline and work experience. Most importantly, research supervision was found to play a central role in shaping the students’ perceptions of research. This study suggests how research can be meaningfully integrated into today’s master’s education.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The raw/processed data required to reproduce the above findings cannot be shared at this time as the data also form part of an ongoing study.
References
Aarrevaara, T., Finkelstein, M., Jones, G., & Jung, J. (Eds.). (2021). Universities in the knowledge society: The nexus of national systems of innovation and higher education. Springer.
Aitken, G., Smith, K., Fawns, T., & Jones, D. (2022). Participatory alignment: A positive relationship between educators and students during online masters dissertation supervision. Teaching in Higher Education, 27(6), 772–786.
Åkerlind, G. S. (2008). Growing and developing as a university researcher. Higher Education, 55, 241–254.
Anderson, C., Day, K., & McLaughlin, P. (2006). Mastering the dissertation: Lecturers’ representations of the purposes and processes of master’s level dissertation supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 149–168.
Anderson, C., Day, K., & McLaughlin, P. (2008). Student perspectives on the dissertation process in a masters degree concerned with professional practice. Studies in Continuing Education, 30(1), 33–49.
Bamber, V., Choudhary, C. J., Hislop, J., & Lane, J. (2019). Postgraduate taught students and preparedness for Master’s level study: Polishing the facets of the Master’s diamond. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(2), 236–250.
Boud, D., & Costley, C. (2007). From project supervision to advising: New conceptions of the practice. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(2), 119–130.
Boud, D., & Hager, P. (2012). Re-thinking continuing professional development through changing metaphors and location in professional practices. Studies in Continuing Education, 34(1), 17–30.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Brew, A. (2001). Conceptions of research: A phenomenographic study. Studies in Higher Education, 26, 271–285.
Brew, A., & Mantai, L. (2017). Academics’ perceptions of the challenges and barriers to implementing research-based experiences for undergraduates. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(5), 551–568.
Cambridge Dictionary. (n.d.). Research. In dictionary.cambridge.org dictionary. Retrieved March 16, 2022, from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/research
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Sage.
Daymon, C., & Durkin, K. (2013). The impact of marketisation on postgraduate career preparedness in a high skills economy. Studies in Higher Education, 38(4), 595–612.
de Kleijn, R. A. M., Bronkhorst, L. H., Meijer, P. C., Pilot, A., & Brekelmans, B. (2016). Understanding the up, back, and forward-component in master’s dissertation supervision with adaptivity. Studies in Higher Education, 41(8), 1–17.
Demeritt, D. (2004). Research training and the end(s) of the Ph.D. Geoforum, 35, 655–660.
Drennan, J., & Clarke, M. (2009). Coursework master’s programmes: The student’s experience of research and research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 34(5), 483–500.
Education Bureau (2018). Generic level descriptors (2018 revised edition). Retrieved December 28, 2022, from https://www.hkqf.gov.hk/filemanager/en/content_13/The%20revised%20GLD%20and%20the%20Explanatory%20Notes_Eng_April_2018.pdf
Filippou, K., Kallo, J., & Mikkilä-Erdmann, M. (2017). Students’ views on thesis supervision in international master’s degree programmes in Finnish universities. Intercultural Education, 28(3), 334–352.
Garcia-Aracil, A., Monteiro, S., & Almeida, L. S. (2021). Students’ perceptions of their preparedness for transition to work after graduation. Active Learning in Higher Education, 22(1), 49–62.
Ginn, F. (2014). “Being like a researcher”: Supervising Masters dissertations in a neoliberalizing university. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 38(1), 106–118.
Graham, A., & Grant, B. (1997). Managing more postgraduate research students. Oxford Centre for Staff Development.
Grant, B. (2003). Mapping the pleasures and risks of supervision. Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 24(2), 175–190.
Hallett, F. (2010). The postgraduate student experience of study support: A phenomenographic analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 35(2), 225–238.
Hammond, L. (2021). The activity of student research: Using activity theory to conceptualise student research for Master’s programmes. Studies in Higher Education, 46(6), 1055–1067.
Hopwood, N. (2010). Doctoral experience and learning from a sociocultural perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 35(7), 829–843.
Illeris, K. (2002). The three dimensions of learning. Roskilde University Press.
Isopahkala-Bouret, U. (2015). ‘It’s considered a second class thing.’ The differences in status between traditional and newly established higher education credentials. Studies in Higher Education, 40(7), 1291–1306.
Jaquette, O. (2019). Do public universities replace state appropriations with Master’s students? The Review of Higher Education, 42(3), 1101–1144.
Jung, J. (2020). Master’s education in Hong Kong: Access and programme diversity. Higher Education Policy, 33(4), 711–734.
Jung, J. (2021). Learning experience and academic identity building by master’s students in Hong Kong. Studies in Higher Education, 46(4), 782–795.
Kiley, M., & Cumming, J. (2015). Enhanced learning pathways and support for coursework master’s students: Challenges and opportunities. Higher Education Research and Development, 34(1), 105–116.
Lei, S. A., & Chuang, N. K. (2009). Undergraduate research assistantship: A comparison of benefits and costs from faculty and students’ perspectives. Education, 130(2), 232–240.
Li, H., & Horta, H. (2022). Factors influencing PhD students’ intentions to pursue careers in the government and nonprofit sectors: Evidence from a global survey. Higher Education Research and Development, 41(6), 1946–1961.
Lo, W. Y. W. (2015). Revisiting the notion of Hong Kong as a regional education hub. Higher Education Policy, 28(1), 55–68.
Macfadyen, A., English, C., Kelleher, M., Coates, M., Cameron, C., & Gibson, V. (2019). ‘Am I doing it right?’ Conceptualising the practice of supervising master’s dissertation students. Higher Education Research and Development, 38(5), 985–1000.
Macfarlane, B. (2021). The spirit of research. Oxford Review of Education, 47(6), 737–751.
Macleod, G., Barnes, T., & Huttly, S. R. A. (2019). Teaching at Master’s level: Between a rock and a hard place. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(4), 493–509.
Marginson, S. (2023). Higher education as student self-formation. In S. Marginson, B. Cantwell, D. Platonova, & A. Smolentseva (Eds.), Assessing the contributions of higher education (pp. 61–87). Edward Elgar.
Monereo, C., & Liesa, E. (2022). Early career researchers’ identity positions based on research experiences. Higher Education Research and Development, 41(1), 193–210.
Monk, J., Foote, K. E., & Schlemper, M. B. (2012). Graduate education in U.S. geography: Students’ career aspirations and faculty perspectives. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(6), 1432–1449.
Pearson, M., & Brew, A. (2002). Research training and supervision development. Studies in Higher Education, 27(2), 135–150.
Pilcher, N. (2011). The UK postgraduate Masters dissertation: An ‘elusive chameleon’? Teaching in Higher Education, 16(1), 29–40.
Postiglione, G. A. (2013). Anchoring globalization in Hong Kong’s research universities: Network agents, institutional arrangements, and brain circulation. Studies in Higher Education, 38(3), 345–366.
QAA (Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education). (2014). The frameworks for higher education qualifications of UK degree-awarding bodies. Retrieved December 28, 2022, from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/quality-code/qualifications-frameworks.pdf?sfvrsn=170af781_14
Sen, A. (1985). Well-being, agency and freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984. The Journal of Philosophy, 82, 169–221.
Sin, C. (2012). Researching research in Master’s degree in Europe. European Educational Research Journal, 11(2), 290–301.
Sinkovics, R. R., Richardson, C., & Lew, Y. K. (2015). Enhancing student competency and employability in International Business through master’s dissertations. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 26(4), 293–317.
Stone, T., Bollard, K., & Harbor, J. M. (2009). Launching interdisciplinary programs as college signature areas: An example. Innovative Higher Education, 34(5), 321–329.
Todd, M., Bannister, P., & Clegg, S. (2004). Independent inquiry and the undergraduate dissertation: Perceptions and experiences of final year social science students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(3), 335–355.
UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2011). International standard classification of education (ISCED). UNESCO.
Yang, W., Li, Y., Zhou, W., & Li, H. (2020). Learning to design research: Students’ agency and experiences in a Master of Education Program in Hong Kong. ECNU Review of Education, 3(2), 291–309.
Zeng, L. M. (2021). How much does it differ? How much does it matter? The research experience of Mainland Chinese and Hong Kong students in a Hong Kong university. Studies in Higher Education, 46(3), 606–623.
Acknowledgements
We wish to offer our sincere thanks to the reviewers for their valuable and constructive comments and all of the research participants.
Funding
This work was supported by the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong under Early Career Scheme [Grant number: 27601518] (project entitled ‘106180012 Factors Involved in Master’s Degree Pursuit in Hong Kong’).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Jung, J., Li, X. & Lai, M. Concept of research among master’s students in Hong Kong. High Educ 87, 17–33 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00989-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00989-4