Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

International student flows for university education and the bilateral market integration of Australia

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study at a foreign university can be an important way of developing international human capital. We investigate factors affecting international student flows for higher education and their consequences for bilateral market integration in Australia. Estimation results demonstrate that income, cost competitiveness, migration network effects and other education pathways increase the demand for tertiary education. Our results show that university study, inter alia, is an important determinant of bilateral trade between Australia and the student’s home country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Australian Department of Education (2014) reports that 36% of the students who completed ELICOS in 2012 moved eventually to higher education. The corresponding figure for SCHOOL was 38%. Of the international students entering higher education in Australia in 2013, only 10% had previously completed a VET course. These figures reflect quite diverse patterns for students from different sources, however.

  2. An additional hypothesis that we would like to have included relates to the perceived quality of Australian universities relative to their competitors. To test such a hypothesis at this aggregated level requires an index of the relative quality of national university systems. Existing rankings (see Table 1 for example) relate to individual institutions not university systems, and indices based on these rankings produced mixed results in our estimations. Fortunately, their inclusion or exclusion in the regressions had little impact on the other coefficient estimates. It seems unlikely that perceptions of the relative quality of the Australian university system would have changed much over our sample period in any case.

  3. Estimates based on commencements are similar and are also available.

  4. We exclude the data before 2002 because significant changes in the methodology used for International Enrolments Data caused a break in the time series in that year. Likewise in 2011, the Australian Government implemented significant policy changes following a review of student visa requirements and procedures. A student’s nationality is based on citizenship. Overseas students on Australian-funded scholarships or sponsorships or students undertaking study while holding a tourist or other temporary entry visas are excluded, as are New Zealand students as they do not require a student visa to study in Australia.

  5. From the Australian Bureau of Statistics, US Bureau of Labor Statistics and UK Office of National Statistics, respectively

  6. The corresponding increase in UK costs measured in £UK is 58%.

  7. The limited time dimension of our sample precludes us from testing for lag length, etc., so in this dimension, at least our results should be viewed as preliminary.

  8. The GMM, one of the most widely used methods of estimation, provides a solution to endogeneity problems (Wooldridge 2010).

  9. Zheng (2014) finds GDP per capita is negative and significant for non-OECD source countries and positive and significant for OECD source countries, consistent with our estimated non-linear relationship.

  10. 2SLS estimation shows qualitatively similar results. The instruments are correlated with the instrumented variable (as confirmed in Table 3) but are uncorrelated with the dependent variables in Table 4. Statistics of pairwise Pearson correlations between the selected instruments and the dependent variable in Eq. (2) are less than 1% (not reported).

  11. The robustness of the instrumental variable estimations was checked by re-estimated using different sets of instruments. Similar results were obtained (available on request).

References

  • Agarwal, V. B., & Winkler, D. R. (1985). Foreign demand for United States higher education: a study of developing countries in the Eastern Hemisphere. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33(3), 623–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. (2006). Venture capital in emerging economies: networks and institutional change. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(2), 299–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, S. Z. and Buchanan, F. R.. (2015). Motivation factors in students decision to study at international branch campuses in Malaysia, Studies in Higher Education, forthcoming.

  • Ahmad, S. Z. and Hussain, M. (2015). An investigation of the factors determining student destination choice for higher education in the United Arab Emirates, Studies in Higher Education, forthcoming.

  • Aleksynska, M. and Peri, G., (2012). Isolating the network effect of immigrants on trade IZA Discussion Paper No. 6941.

  • Anderson, J. E., & van Wincoop, E. (2004). Trade costs. Journal of Economic Literature, 42, 691–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Department of Education (2014). Study pathways of international students in Australia, Research Paper 2014/01.

  • Beine, M., Docquier, F., & Ozden, C. (2015). Dissecting network externalities in international migration. Journal of Demographic Economics, 81, 379–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beine, M., Noel, R. and Ragot, L. (2011). The determinants of international mobility of students. Working Paper, University of Luxemburg.

  • Bessey, D. (2012). International student migration to Germany. Empirical Economics, 42, 345–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, B. S., Luca, G., & Lee, J. J. (2009). Exploring the orientations of international students in Mexico: differences by region of origin. Higher Education, 57, 335–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro, P., & Heckman, J. J. (2002). The evidence on credit constraints in post-secondary schooling. Economic Journal, 112, 989–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudaha, R., Chang, L., and Kono, Y. (2013). International student mobility trends 2013: towards responsive recruitment strategies, Research Report #4, World Education Service (www.wes.org/RAS).

  • Disdier, A.-C., & Head, K. (2008). The puzzling persistence of the distance effect on bilateral trade. Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(1), 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher, A., and Poutvaara, P. (2005). Student flows and migration: an empirical analysis, IZA Discussion Paper #1612.

  • Gong, X., & Huybers, T. (2015). Chinese students and higher education destinations: findings from a choice experiment. Australian Journal of Education, 59(2), 196–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, C. R., Mesanza, R. B., & Mariel, P. (2011). The antecedents of international student mobility flows: an empirical study on the Erasmus programme. Higher Education, 62(4), 413–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keane, M. (2002). Financial aid, borrowing constraints and college attendance: evidence from structural estimates. American Economic Review, 92, 293–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. H., & Tan, J. P. (1984). The international flow of third level lesser developed country students to developed countries: determinants and implications. Higher Education, 13(6), 687–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., & Bray, M. (2007). Cross-border flows of students for higher education: push-pull factors and motivations of mainland Chinese students in Hong Kong and Macau. Higher Education, 53, 791–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y., Mavondo, F. T. and Qui, I. L. (2009). Factors influencing the choice of overseas study by undergraduate and postgraduate Chinese students. Monash University.

  • Mazzarol, T., & Soutar, G. N. (2002). ‘Push-pull’ factors influencing international student destination choice. International Journal of Educational Management, 16(2), 82–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, M. (1992). Higher education in a world market: an historical look at the global context of international study. Higher Education, 24(4), 465–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo, V. (2007). Research on the flow of international students to UK universities. Journal of Research in International Education, 6(3), 287–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, C. 2011, Do migrants really foster trade? The trade-migration nexus, a panel approach 1960-2000. GEP Research Paper 11/10.

  • Pedro, E., & Franco, M. (2016). The importance of networks in the transnational mobility of higher education students; attraction and satisfaction of foreign mobility students at a public university. Studies in Higher Education, 41(9), 1627–1655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, R., & Neumayer, E. (2014). Geographies of educational mobilities: exploring the uneven flows of international students. The Geographical Journal, 180(3), 246–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyvis, D., & Chapman, A. (2007). Why university students choose an international education: a case study of Malaysia. International Journal of Educational Development, 27(2), 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, J. (2001). Business and social networks in international trade. Journal of Economic Literature, 39, 1177–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. (2007). The foreign services and foreign trade: embassies as export promotion. The World Economy, 30, 22–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanka, T., Quintal, V., & Taylor, R. (2006). Factors influencing international students’ choice on an education destination—a correspondence analysis. Journal of Marketing and Higher Education, 15(2), 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soo, K. T., & Elliott, C. (2010). Does price matter? Overseas students in UK higher education. Economics of Education Review, 29, 553–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, H. (2013). An empirical study on the determinants of international student mobility: a global perspective. Higher Education, 66, 105–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, P. (2014). Antecedents to international student inflows to UK higher education: a comparative analysis. Journal of Business Research, 67(20), 136–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the valuable comments from the three anonymous reviewers and the editor (Hugo Horta) and the three referees from ANZIBA2015: Peter Verhoeven, Adrian Cheung, Y.S. Choi and Ian Austin. We also thank the seminar participants at the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, Seoul, in 2013 and the participants at the Australia-New Zealand International Business Association (ANZIBA) 2015 conference at Melbourne Business School in 2015 and Global Conference on Business, Economics and Management, Rome, in 2015. The usual disclaimer applies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byung S. Min.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 8 Calculated annual cost of studying abroad for international students (US$000 pa)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Min, B.S., Falvey, R. International student flows for university education and the bilateral market integration of Australia. High Educ 75, 871–889 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0175-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0175-4

Keywords

Navigation