Abstract
This paper directs attention to important changes in the role and funding of elite private universities in the USA. At the center of these changes is the private endowment—an institution that has for much of its history been a pivotal element of innovation and autonomy, but which is recently tilting towards the production and reproduction of oligarchic institutional conditions. In the context of an explosion of wealth inequality in winner-take-all markets where elite higher education serves to provide coveted access to rare positional goods, the in perpetuity endowment—as currently configured—allows a small group of globally leading institutions to become rentiers who can support themselves nearly exclusively through the returns on their endowed capital. With that, a century-old dynamic of innovation and change of American higher education is at risk of collapsing. Where the elite private universities used to act as the head of Riesman’s snake-like procession, pulling the majority of American universities along in a process of isomorphic emulation, the emerging gulf between a handful of academic rentiers and the rest of the academic body (including many world-renowned, but not super-rich universities) threatens to cut that head off from the body, leaving the majority of the remaining institutions scrambling for survival at the mercy of the dictates of academic capitalism. We review policy options capable of taming the run-away endowment and place the issue in the larger context of the tension between Madisonian and Jeffersonian democratic imperatives.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Armstrong, E. A., & Hamilton, L. T. (2013). Paying for the party: how college maintains inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Baldwin, R. G., & Baker, V. L. (2009). The case of the disappearing liberal arts college. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2009/07/09/baldwin
Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York, NY: Zone Books.
Calhoun, C. (2006). The university and the public good. Thesis Eleven, 84(1), 7–43.
Carey, K. (2015). How to raise a university’s profile: pricing and packaging. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/08/education/edlife/how-to-raise-a-universitys-profile-pricing-and-packaging.html?_r=0
Chait, R. (2002). The “academic revolution” revisited. In S. G. Brint (Ed.), The future of the city of intellect: the changing American university (pp. 293–320). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Clark, B. R. (1970). The distinctive college. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Cole, J. R. (2009). The great American university: its rise to preeminence, its indispensable national role, and why it must be protected (1st ed.). New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
Cullman, L. B., & Madoff, R. (2016). The undermining of American charity. The New York Review of Books. Retrieved from http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2016/07/14/the-undermining-of-american-charity/
De Tocqueville, A. (1968). Democracy in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Elster, J., Offe, C., & Preuss, U. K. (1998). Institutional design in post-communist societies: rebuilding the ship at sea. Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press
Fleischer, V. (2015). Stop universities from hoarding money. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/19/opinion/stop-universities-from-hoarding-money.html
Frank, R. H. (2001). Higher education: the ultimate winner-take-all market? In: Forum futures: Exploring the future of higher education. Forum Strategy Series, 3, (pp. 3–12). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Frank, R. H. (2005). Positional externalities cause large and preventable welfare losses. Am Econ Rev, 95(2), 137–141.
Frank, R. H., & Cook, P. J. (1996). The winner-take-all society: why the few at the top get so much more than the rest of us. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Gilens, M., & Page, B. I. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12(3), 564–581.
Ginsberg, B. (2011). The fall of the faculty: the rise of the all-administrative university and why it matters. Oxford, UK; New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
Golden, D. (2007). The price of admission: how America’s ruling class buys its way into elite colleges--and who gets left outside the gates (1st ed.). New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.
Gumport, P. J. (2000). Academic restructuring: organizational change and institutional imperatives. High Educ, 39(1), 67–91.
Hansmann, H. (1990). Why do universities have endowments? J Leg Stud, 19(1), 3–42.
Hirsch, F. (1976). Social limits to growth. London: Routledge.
Jefferson, T. (1825). Letter to William Branch Giles, December 26, 1825. Jefferson Writings.
Karl, B. D., & Katz, S. N. (1981). The American private philanthropic foundation and the public sphere 1890-1930. Minerva, 19(2), 236–270.
Karpf, D. (2012). The move on effect: the unexpected transformation of American political advocacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Klor de Alva, J., & Schneider, M. S. (2015). Rich schools, poor students: tapping large university endowments to improve student outcomes. Nexus Research and Policy Center.
Krugman, P. (2011. Rule by rentiers. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/10/opinion/10krugman.html
Mac, R. (2013. Stanford billionaire benefactor John Arrillaga makes record-breaking gift to university. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/ryanmac/2013/07/01/stanford-billionaire-benefactor-john-arrillaga-makes-record-breaking-gift-to-university/#770c9ea579de
Marginson, S. (2004). Competition and markets in higher education: a “glonacal” analysis. Policy Futures in Education, 2(2), 175.
Marginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. High Educ, 52(1), 1–39.
Mettler, S. (2014). Degrees of inequality: how the politics of higher education sabotaged the American dream. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Meyer, H.-D. (2012). Institutional design for collective action: tweaking the rules of the game for the common good. Comp Sociol, 11(1), 64–87.
Meyer, H.-D. (2017). The Design of the University: German, American, and ‘World Class.’ New York: Routledge.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 340–363.
Meyer, H.-D., & Rowan, B. (Eds.). (2006). The new institutionalism in education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Meyer, H.-D., St. John, E. P., & Chankseliani, M. (2013). Fairness in access to higher education in a global perspective reconciling excellence, efficiency, and justice. Rotterdam, NL; Boston, MA, USA: Sense Publishers.
Neckel, S. (2013). ‘Refeudalisierung’--Systematik und aktualität eines begriffs der Habermas’ schen gesellschaftsanalyse. Leviathan, 41(1), 39–56.
Newfield, C. (2011). Unmaking the public university: the forty-year assault on the middle class. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2012). Not for profit: why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Priest, D. M., & St. John, E. P. (Eds.). (2006). Privatization and public universities. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Randel, D. M. (2003). The myth of the academic community. In J. Rodin & S. P. Steinberg (Eds.), Public discourse in America: conversation and community in the twenty-first century (pp. 227–231). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Reich, R. (2014. Why government spends more per pupil at elite private universities than at public universities. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-reich/government-spending-higher-education_b_5980342.html
Sachs, J. D. (2016. The age of impunity. Boston Globe. Retrieved from https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2016/05/12/the-age-impunity/LHBxamqFENCs3W6lvWnCIJ/story.html
Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2009). Academic capitalism and the new economy: markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Slaughter, S., Thomas, S. L., Johnson, D. R., & Barringer, S. N. (2014). Institutional conflict of interest: the role of interlocking directorates in the scientific relationships between universities and the corporate sector. J High Educ, 85(1), 1–35.
St. John, E. P., & Parsons, M. D. (2005). Public funding of higher education: changing contexts and new rationales. In Baltimore, MD. London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2015). The great divide. Unequal societies and what we can do about them. New York: Norton.
Syre, S. (2015). $400 million gift to Harvard highlights higher ed wealth gap. Boston globe. Retrieved from https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2015/06/08/million-gift-harvard-highlights-higher-wealth-gap/9K1JAbXY66SqlYMrggoAbM/story.html
Thelin, J. R. (2011). A history of American higher education. Boston, MA; London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Thelin, J. R., & Trollinger, R. W. (2010). “Forever is a long time”: reconsidering universities’ perpetual endowment policies in the twenty-first century. History of Intellectual Culture, 9(1), 1–17.
Thelin, J. R., & Trollinger, R. (2014). Philanthropy and American higher education. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Veblen, T. (1962). The higher learning in America. New York, NY: Cosimo Classics.
Vermeule, A. (2007). Mechanisms of democracy: Institutional design writ small. Oxford, UK; New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
Weissmann, J. (2015). Is it time to tax Harvard’s endowment? Slate. Retrieved from http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2015/09/harvard_yale_stanford_endowments_is_it_time_to_tax_them.html
Will, M. (2015). “Huge explosion of wealth” drives record $37.5-billion in gifts to colleges. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Huge-Explosion-of-Wealth-/151403/
Winston, G. C. (1999). Subsidies, hierarchy, and peers: the awkward economics of higher education. J Econ Perspect, 13(1), 13–36.
Winters, J. A. (2011). Oligarchy. Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meyer, HD., Zhou, K. Autonomy or oligarchy? The changing effects of university endowments in winner-take-all markets. High Educ 73, 833–851 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0109-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0109-1