Skip to main content
Log in

“I expect to be engaged as an equal”: collegiality expectations of full-time, non-tenure-track faculty members

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nationally, non-tenure-track faculty (NTTF) represent the new majority. Efforts to move the full-time NTTF role from expendable labor to sustainable professional position have led to improvements in policy and working conditions at many institutions. Still, the profession broadly has just begun to grapple with the implications of this shifting labor market on aspects of the profession traditionally reserved for tenure system faculty, such as collegiality. In this qualitative study we use Bess’s (High Educ Handb Theory Res 8:1–36, 1992) framework of structure, culture, and behavior to analyze the collegial expectations of 38 full-time, NTTF members. Participant accounts point to a desire for parity despite differentiation, and highlight the fundamental contradictions of a professional virtue that requires the independence of faculty for it to be fully expressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldwin, R. G., & Chronister, J. L. (2001). Teaching without tenure. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, L. L. B., Agago, M. O., & Coombs, W. T. (1998). Effects of job-related stress on faculty intention to leave academia. Research in Higher Education, 39(1), 457–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bess, J. L. (1992). Collegiality: Toward a clarification of meaning and function. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 8, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bode, R. K. (1999). Mentoring and collegiality. In R. J. Menges & Associates (Eds.), Faculty in new jobs: A guide to settling in, becoming established, and building institutional rapport. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boice, R. (1992). The new faculty member: Supporting and fostering professional development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cipriano, R. E. (2011). Facilitating a collegial department in higher education: Strategies for success. San Fransciso, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, J. G., & Goldenberg, E. N. (2009). Off-track profs: Nontenured teachers in higher education. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gappa, J. M., & Leslie, D. W. (1993). The invisible faculty: Improving the status of part-timers in higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gappa, J. M., Austin, A. E., & Trice, A. G. (2005). Rethinking academic work and workplaces. Change, 37(6), 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, J. C., & Deupree, M. M. (2013). Here today, gone tomorrow: The increasingly contingent faculty workforce. Retrieved from TIAA-CREF Institute web site https://www.tiaa-crefinstitute.org/public/institute/research/advancing_higher_education/contingentfaculty0313.html.

  • Hollenshead, C., Waltman, J., August, L., Miller, J., Smith, G., & Bell, A. (2007). Making the best of both worlds: Findings from a national institution-level survey of non-tenure track faculty. Retrieved from the University of Michigan Center for the Education of Women. http://www.cew.umich.edu/sites/default/files/CEW%20Final%20Report%20PP34.pdf.

  • Kezar, A. (2012a). Embracing non-tenure-track faculty: Making change to support the new majority. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A. (2012b). Spanning the great divide between tenure-track and non-tenure-track faculty. Change, 44(6), 6–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A. (2013). Examining non-tenure track faculty perceptions of how departmental policies and practices shape their performance and ability to create student learning at four-year institutions. Research in Higher Education, 54(5), 571–598. doi:10.1007/s11162-013-9288-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A., & Maxey, D. (2015). Adapting by design: Creating faculty roles and defining faculty work to ensure an intentional future for colleges and universities. Retrieved from The Delphi Project web site http://www.uscrossier.org/pullias/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/DELPHI-PROJECT_ADAPTING-BY-DESIGN_2ED.pdf.

  • Kezar, A., & Sam, C. (2010). Non-tenure-track faculty in higher education. ASHE higher education report (Vol. 36, number 3). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  • Levin, J. S., & Shaker, G. G. (2011). The hybrid and dualistic identity of full-time non-tenure-track faculty. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(11), 1461–1484. doi:10.1177/0002764211409382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangiardi, J., & Pellegrino, E. (1992). Collegiality: What is it? Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 68, 292–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, J. D. (2008). Faculty governance and nontenure-track appointments. New Directions for Higher Education, 143, 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ott, M., & Cisneros, J. (2015). Understanding the changing faculty workforce in higher education: A comparison of full-time non-tenure track and tenure line experiences. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(90), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. E. (1986). The academic profession in transition: Toward a new social fiction. Teaching Sociology, 14(1), 12–23. doi:10.2307/1318295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. E., Sorcinelli, M. D., & Austin, A. E. (2000). Heeding new voices: Academic careers for a new generation (Vol. 7)., New pathways working paper series Washington, DC: American Association of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, L. (2009). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saldana, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorcinelli, M. D. & Austin, A. E. (1992). Developing new and junior faculty. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 48. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. G., & Bensimon, E. M. (1996). Promotion and tenure: Community and socialization in academe. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltman, J., Bergom, I., Hollenshead, C., Miller, J., & August, L. (2012). Factors contributing to job satisfaction and dissatisfaction among non-tenure-track faculty. The Journal of Higher Education, 83(3), 411–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathan F. Alleman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alleman, N.F., Haviland, D. “I expect to be engaged as an equal”: collegiality expectations of full-time, non-tenure-track faculty members. High Educ 74, 527–542 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0062-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0062-4

Keywords

Navigation