Skip to main content
Log in

The role of Diaspora in university–industry relationships in globalised knowledge economy: the case of Palestine

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

University–industry (U–I) linkage is not a new concept. Although there are models for such linkage that have been tested or used, they may remain unsuitable in certain countries and communities. With the unique situation of the Palestinians, the existing models may fall short of meeting the specific needs and targets of establishing such a relationship. This paper aims at building a framework for stronger relationships between Palestinian universities and industries and entrepreneurial network of the Palestinian Diaspora based on a strong supporting platform of Science, Engineering, Technology & Innovation (SET&I). This would in turn strengthen the SET&I platform rendering it an enabled and enabling platform. Several interviews were conducted with people seen as experts and/or representatives in this field. University–industry collaboration, knowledge networks, Diaspora, researchers, investment, spin off, spill over, brain drain, Palestinian skilled immigrants and others are pieces of a puzzle. This puzzle can be put together in many ways. Looking through the eyes of Palestinian Diaspora entrepreneurs, U–I collaborations are a ready platform that could support their mobilization and movement towards challenge and socio-economic satisfaction in Palestine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Youtie and Shapira (2008) noted that there is a situation where the knowledge flow and technology transfer of the Universities have not had a great impact on their regional economies. This is often in the Universities in small communities (and also in some urban Universities) which lack the critical mass of Industry to absorb university research outputs.

References

  • ADB. (2007). Moving toward knowledge-based economies: Asian experiences. Manila: ASB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgstock, M., Burch, D., Forge, J., Laurent, J., & Lowe, I. (1998). Science, technology and society. UK: Cambride University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Daar, A. S., Dowdeswell, E., & Singer, P. (2003). Genome diplomacy: Canada’s crucial role. Policy Options, 24(8), 56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dade, C., & Unheim, P. (2007). Diasporas and private sector development: Impacts and opportunities. Ottawa: FOCAL-Canadians Foundations for the Americas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. S., & Schoemaker, P. J. (2000). A different game. In G. S. Day & P. J. Schomaker (Eds.), Wharton on managing emerging technologies (pp. 1–23). New Jesey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delicado, A. (2007). Mobility and development: The influx of scientists from developing countries to Portugal. Institute de Ciencias Sociais-Universidade de Lisboa. Retrieved on May, 2009. http://www.ics.ul.pt.

  • Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation: Technologies. Washington, DC: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdroff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National System and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frasquet, M., Calderón, H., & Cervera, A. (2012). University–industry collaboration from a relationship marketing perspective: An empirical analysis in a Spanish University. Higher Education, 64(1), 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadweh, E., & Bandak, I. (2006). Micro, small and medium enterprises in palestine: Current status and future outlook. The Institute for Community Partnership, Bethlehem University.

  • Halper, J. (2005). Paralysis over Palestine: Questions of strategy. Journal of Palestine Studies, 34(2), 55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juma, C. (2006). Reinventing African economies technological innovation and the sustainability transition. The John Pesek Colloquium on Sustainable Agriculture, pp. 4–45.

  • Juma, C., & Yee-Cheong, L. (2005a). Innovation: Applying knowledge in development (Millennium Project). London: UNDP.

  • Juma, C., & Yee-Cheong, L. (2005b). Reinventing global health: The role of science, technology, and innovation. Lancet, 365, 1105–1107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, F., & Suzuki, J. (2007). How Japanese companies have used scientific advances to restructure their businesses: The receiver-active national system of innovation. World Development, 35(6), 976–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuptsch, C., & Fong, P. E. (2006). Competing for global talent. International Institute for Labour Studies (IILS), 10.

  • Kuznetsov, Y., & Sabel, C. (2006a). Global mobility of talent from a perspective of new industrial policy open migration chains and Diaspora. UNU-WIDER, pp. 1–22.

  • Kuznetsov, Y., & Sabel, C. (2006b). International migration of talent, Diaspora networks, and development: Overview of main issues (pp. 3–19). Washington, DC: World Bank Institute.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lowell, B. L. (2001). Policy responses to the international mobility of skilled labour. Geneva: International Labour Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. New York: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. (2003). The changing social contract for science and the evolution of the University (pp. 7–29). UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited (EE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.-B. (2001). Network approach versus brain drain: Lessons from the Diaspora. International Migration, 39(5), 91–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MNE-Ministry of National Economy, visited on March, 2006: http://www.mne.gov.ps/DesktopDefault.aspx?tabindex=3&tabid=8&lng=1#Top.

  • MOEHE-Ministry of Education and Higher Education. (2005). Palestinian higher education statistics. Website, visited on March, 2007: http://www.mohe.gov.ps/ENG/stats/index.html.

  • Mowery, D., & Sampat, B. (2001). University patents and patent policy debates in the USA, 1925–1980. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 781–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCURA. (2006). Guiding principles for university–industry endeavors. USA: National Council of University Research Administrators (NCURA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2000). Science, technology and innovation in the new economy. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/publications/Pol_brief/.

  • OECD. (2004). OECD publications. Retrieved October 2007, from OECD Observer: www.oecd.org/publications/Pol_brief.

  • Oosterlinck, A. (2008). University/industry knowledge management: A university perspective. Accessed on June 6, 2009: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/11/8/2668232.pdf.

  • Saxenian, A. L. (1999). Silicon Valley’s new immigrant entrepreneurs. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. (2006). The new argonauts. Regional advantage in a global economy. Cambridge MA and London: Harvard University Press.

  • Séguin, B., State, L., Singer, P. A., & Daar, A. S. (2006). Scientific Diasporas as an option for brain drain: Re-circulating knowledge for development. International Journal of Biotechnology, 8(1/2), 78–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, N. M., & Menon, I. (1999). Chain migration through the social network: Experience of labour migrants in Kuwait. International Migration, 37, 361–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahin, M. H., & Alqadri, N. (2008). University-industry linkage, an underpinning force of the Diaspora in a globalised knowledge economy. INTED (ISBN: 978-84-612-0190-7). Valencia: International Association of Technology, Education and Development (IATED).

  • Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. A. (1986). The Palestinian Diaspora, 1948–1985. Journal of Palestine Studies, 15(3), 90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solimano, A. (2001). The evolution of world income inequality: Assessing the impact of globalization. Chile: United Nations Publications.

  • Solimano, A. (2006). The international mobility of talent and its impact on global development. UNU World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER). ISBN 92-9190-879-7.

  • UNDP. (2001). Making new technologies work for human development. Oxford: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S. (2002). Transnational networks and skilled labour migration. Ladenburger Diskurs “Migration” Gottlieb Daimler- und Karl Benz-Stiftung, pp. 2–15.

  • Youtie, J., & Shapira, P. (2008). Building an innovation hub. A case study of the transformation of university roles in regional technological and economic development. Research Policy, 37(8), 1180–1204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zweig, D. (2006). Learning to compete: China’s efforts to encourage a “reverse brain drain” (pp. 187–213). Geneva: International Labour Organization (ILO).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mervat H. N. Sharabati-Shahin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharabati-Shahin, M.H.N., Thiruchelvam, K. The role of Diaspora in university–industry relationships in globalised knowledge economy: the case of Palestine. High Educ 65, 613–629 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9566-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9566-8

Keywords

Navigation