Abstract
University–industry (U–I) linkage is not a new concept. Although there are models for such linkage that have been tested or used, they may remain unsuitable in certain countries and communities. With the unique situation of the Palestinians, the existing models may fall short of meeting the specific needs and targets of establishing such a relationship. This paper aims at building a framework for stronger relationships between Palestinian universities and industries and entrepreneurial network of the Palestinian Diaspora based on a strong supporting platform of Science, Engineering, Technology & Innovation (SET&I). This would in turn strengthen the SET&I platform rendering it an enabled and enabling platform. Several interviews were conducted with people seen as experts and/or representatives in this field. University–industry collaboration, knowledge networks, Diaspora, researchers, investment, spin off, spill over, brain drain, Palestinian skilled immigrants and others are pieces of a puzzle. This puzzle can be put together in many ways. Looking through the eyes of Palestinian Diaspora entrepreneurs, U–I collaborations are a ready platform that could support their mobilization and movement towards challenge and socio-economic satisfaction in Palestine.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Youtie and Shapira (2008) noted that there is a situation where the knowledge flow and technology transfer of the Universities have not had a great impact on their regional economies. This is often in the Universities in small communities (and also in some urban Universities) which lack the critical mass of Industry to absorb university research outputs.
References
ADB. (2007). Moving toward knowledge-based economies: Asian experiences. Manila: ASB.
Bridgstock, M., Burch, D., Forge, J., Laurent, J., & Lowe, I. (1998). Science, technology and society. UK: Cambride University Press.
Daar, A. S., Dowdeswell, E., & Singer, P. (2003). Genome diplomacy: Canada’s crucial role. Policy Options, 24(8), 56–61.
Dade, C., & Unheim, P. (2007). Diasporas and private sector development: Impacts and opportunities. Ottawa: FOCAL-Canadians Foundations for the Americas.
Day, G. S., & Schoemaker, P. J. (2000). A different game. In G. S. Day & P. J. Schomaker (Eds.), Wharton on managing emerging technologies (pp. 1–23). New Jesey: Wiley.
Delicado, A. (2007). Mobility and development: The influx of scientists from developing countries to Portugal. Institute de Ciencias Sociais-Universidade de Lisboa. Retrieved on May, 2009. http://www.ics.ul.pt.
Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation: Technologies. Washington, DC: Pinter.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdroff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National System and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123.
Frasquet, M., Calderón, H., & Cervera, A. (2012). University–industry collaboration from a relationship marketing perspective: An empirical analysis in a Spanish University. Higher Education, 64(1), 85–98.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. London: Sage.
Hadweh, E., & Bandak, I. (2006). Micro, small and medium enterprises in palestine: Current status and future outlook. The Institute for Community Partnership, Bethlehem University.
Halper, J. (2005). Paralysis over Palestine: Questions of strategy. Journal of Palestine Studies, 34(2), 55.
Juma, C. (2006). Reinventing African economies technological innovation and the sustainability transition. The John Pesek Colloquium on Sustainable Agriculture, pp. 4–45.
Juma, C., & Yee-Cheong, L. (2005a). Innovation: Applying knowledge in development (Millennium Project). London: UNDP.
Juma, C., & Yee-Cheong, L. (2005b). Reinventing global health: The role of science, technology, and innovation. Lancet, 365, 1105–1107.
Kodama, F., & Suzuki, J. (2007). How Japanese companies have used scientific advances to restructure their businesses: The receiver-active national system of innovation. World Development, 35(6), 976–990.
Kuptsch, C., & Fong, P. E. (2006). Competing for global talent. International Institute for Labour Studies (IILS), 10.
Kuznetsov, Y., & Sabel, C. (2006a). Global mobility of talent from a perspective of new industrial policy open migration chains and Diaspora. UNU-WIDER, pp. 1–22.
Kuznetsov, Y., & Sabel, C. (2006b). International migration of talent, Diaspora networks, and development: Overview of main issues (pp. 3–19). Washington, DC: World Bank Institute.
Lowell, B. L. (2001). Policy responses to the international mobility of skilled labour. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. New York: Pinter.
Martin, B. (2003). The changing social contract for science and the evolution of the University (pp. 7–29). UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited (EE).
Meyer, J.-B. (2001). Network approach versus brain drain: Lessons from the Diaspora. International Migration, 39(5), 91–110.
MNE-Ministry of National Economy, visited on March, 2006: http://www.mne.gov.ps/DesktopDefault.aspx?tabindex=3&tabid=8&lng=1#Top.
MOEHE-Ministry of Education and Higher Education. (2005). Palestinian higher education statistics. Website, visited on March, 2007: http://www.mohe.gov.ps/ENG/stats/index.html.
Mowery, D., & Sampat, B. (2001). University patents and patent policy debates in the USA, 1925–1980. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 781–814.
NCURA. (2006). Guiding principles for university–industry endeavors. USA: National Council of University Research Administrators (NCURA).
Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
OECD. (2000). Science, technology and innovation in the new economy. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/publications/Pol_brief/.
OECD. (2004). OECD publications. Retrieved October 2007, from OECD Observer: www.oecd.org/publications/Pol_brief.
Oosterlinck, A. (2008). University/industry knowledge management: A university perspective. Accessed on June 6, 2009: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/11/8/2668232.pdf.
Saxenian, A. L. (1999). Silicon Valley’s new immigrant entrepreneurs. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
Saxenian, A. (2006). The new argonauts. Regional advantage in a global economy. Cambridge MA and London: Harvard University Press.
Séguin, B., State, L., Singer, P. A., & Daar, A. S. (2006). Scientific Diasporas as an option for brain drain: Re-circulating knowledge for development. International Journal of Biotechnology, 8(1/2), 78–90.
Shah, N. M., & Menon, I. (1999). Chain migration through the social network: Experience of labour migrants in Kuwait. International Migration, 37, 361–380.
Shahin, M. H., & Alqadri, N. (2008). University-industry linkage, an underpinning force of the Diaspora in a globalised knowledge economy. INTED (ISBN: 978-84-612-0190-7). Valencia: International Association of Technology, Education and Development (IATED).
Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Smith, P. A. (1986). The Palestinian Diaspora, 1948–1985. Journal of Palestine Studies, 15(3), 90.
Solimano, A. (2001). The evolution of world income inequality: Assessing the impact of globalization. Chile: United Nations Publications.
Solimano, A. (2006). The international mobility of talent and its impact on global development. UNU World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER). ISBN 92-9190-879-7.
UNDP. (2001). Making new technologies work for human development. Oxford: UNDP.
Vertovec, S. (2002). Transnational networks and skilled labour migration. Ladenburger Diskurs “Migration” Gottlieb Daimler- und Karl Benz-Stiftung, pp. 2–15.
Youtie, J., & Shapira, P. (2008). Building an innovation hub. A case study of the transformation of university roles in regional technological and economic development. Research Policy, 37(8), 1180–1204.
Zweig, D. (2006). Learning to compete: China’s efforts to encourage a “reverse brain drain” (pp. 187–213). Geneva: International Labour Organization (ILO).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharabati-Shahin, M.H.N., Thiruchelvam, K. The role of Diaspora in university–industry relationships in globalised knowledge economy: the case of Palestine. High Educ 65, 613–629 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9566-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9566-8