Abstract
The aim of this paper is to propose a basic model to analyse processes of change in educational institutions taking into account both individual and contextual variables. It aims to identify the basic factors of change in order to contribute to reduce the dispersion of research projects, both from close subjects and one subject alone within human sciences, in order to make scientific accumulation easier and to guide social practice better. This proposal is based on Cryer and Elton’s (Studies in Higher Education, 1: 75–86, 1990) contributions, in this case applied to the learning processes of university students. They may account for static and dynamic aspects. To prove its coherence, it has been statistically compared with the data of a survey carried out among university students in Catalonia (Spain).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aracil, J., & Gordillo, F. (1997). Dinámica de sistemas. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Bernstein, B. (1971–1990). Class, codes and control. London: Routledge and Kegan.
Clariana, M. (1994). L’estudiant de secundària: què en sabem? Barcelona: Barcanova.
Cryer, P. (1987). Insights into participants’ reactions to new ideas in educational games, simulations and workshops: An application of catastrophe theory. Simulation/Games for Learning, 4, 172–181.
Cryer, P. (1988). Insights into participant’s behaviours in educational games, simulations and workshops: A catastrophe theory application to motivation. Simulation/Games for Learning, 3, 161–176.
Cryer, P., & Elton, L. (1990). Catastrophe theory: A unified model for educational change. Studies in Higher Education, 1, 75–86. doi:10.1080/03075079012331377601.
Elias, M. (2006). Els abandons a la universitat de Lletres de la UAB. Retrieved 25 July 2006, from the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Grup de Recerca Educació i Treball Web site: http://selene.uab.es/fxmiguel/GRET/.
Elster, J. (2002). Alquimias de la mente. La racionalidad y las emociones. Barcelona: Paidós & Roure.
Elton, L. (1988). Student motivation and achievement. Studies in Higher Education, 2, 215–221. doi:10.1080/03075078812331377886.
Elton, L. (1996). Strategies to enhance student motivation: A conceptual analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 1, 57–67. doi:10.1080/03075079612331381457.
Fernández Enguita, M. (1988). Yo no soy eso que tu te imaginas. Cuadernos de Pedagogía, 238, 35–38.
Heikkilä, A., & Lonka, K. (2006). Studying in higher education: students’ approaches to learning, self-regulation, and cognitive strategies. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 99–117.
Herzberg, F. (1969). Work and the nature of man. New York: World Publishing Company.
Latané, B., & Nowack, A. (1994). Attitudes as catastrophes: From dimensions to categories with increasing involvement. In R. Vallacer & A. Nowack (Eds.), Dynamical systems in social psychology. San Diego: Academic Press.
Lewin, K. (1959). La teoría del campo en la ciencia social. Barcelona: Paidós.
Martínez, I. M., & Salanova, M. (2002). Niveles de burnout y engagement en estudiantes universitarios. Relación con el desarrollo y el desempeño profesional. Revista de Educación, 330, 361–384.
Masjuan, J. M. (2004). Convergencia europea, reformas universitarias, actitudes y prácticas de los estudiantes. Educar, 33, 59–76.
Masjuan, J. M. (2005). Progresos en los aprendizajes, características de los estudios y motivaciones de los estudiantes. Papers, 76, 97–133.
Masjuan, J. M., Troiano, H., Vivas, J., & Zaldivar, M. (1996). La inserció profesional dels nous titulats universitaris. Cerdanyola: ICE de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Masjuan, J. M., Troiano, H., & Vivas, J. (2002). I després de la universitat, què? Cerdanyola: ICE de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Merton, R. K. (1964). Teoria y estructura sociales. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
McInnis, C. (2002). Signs of disengagement? Responding to the changing work and study patterns of full time undergraduates in Australian Universities. In J. Enders & O. Fulton (Eds.), Higher education in a globalising world (pp. 175–191). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Pinillos, J. L. (1991). La mente humana. Madrid: Temas de hoy.
Simon, H. A. (2006). Las ciencias de lo artificial. Granada: Comares S. L.
Thom, R. (1972). Stabilité structurelle et morphogènese. Paris: Ediscience.
Tesser, A., & Achee, J. (1994). Aggression, love, conformity, and other social psychological catastrophes. In R. Vallacer & A. Nowack (Eds.), Dynamical systems in social psychology. San Diego: Academic Press.
Troiano, H. (2005). Consistencia y orientación del perfil profesional, percepción del mercado laboral y reacciones previstas ante posibles dificultades de inserción. Papers, 76, 167–197.
Winn, S. (2002). Student motivation: A socio-economic perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 4, 445–457. doi:10.1080/0307507022000011552.
Woodcock, A., & Davis, M. (1994). Teoría de las catástrofes. Madrid: Cátedra.
Zeeman, E. C. (1977). Catastrophe theory: Selected papers, 1972–1977. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Professor Lewis Elton from the University College of London and Professor Gaspar Orriols from the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona for their worthy comments and suggestions. This piece of research belongs to the Plan Nacional de Investigación científica, desarrollo e investigación tecnológica (BSO2003-06395/CPSO) (National Scheme of Scientific Research, Development and Technological Research) and has been financed by the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (Ministry of Science and Education) and the FEDER.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Masjuan, J.M., Troiano, H. University students’ success: A psycho-sociological approach. High Educ 58, 15–28 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9178-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9178-5