Skip to main content
Log in

Student-focused approaches to teaching in relation to context and teacher characteristics

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to gain more insight into the relationship between teachers’ approaches to teaching on the one hand, and the characteristics of context and teacher demographics on the other. Data were collected from 50 teaching staff at the University of Antwerp and from three sources: a Dutch translation of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory (ATI), information given by the participants, and information obtained through the personnel department of the university. Only the conceptual change/student-focused scale of the ATI had good reliability and was used for further analysis. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed no relationship between teachers’ approaches to teaching and the context variables of expert level of students, teaching discipline and the number of students in the classroom. Neither was a relationship found between the teachers’ conceptual change/student-focused approach and the teacher characteristics of gender, academic status, teaching experience, age and intention to participate in teacher training. Several interpretations of these data and perspectives for further research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university (second edition). Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biglan, A. (1973). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 204–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G. (1992). Improving the quality of student learning. Bristol: Technical and Educational Services Ltd.

  • Gibbs, G., & Coffey, M. (2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5, 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. J. (2003). Using SPSS for windows and macintosh. Analyzing and understanding data (third edition). New Jersey: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D., & Gow, L. (1994). Orientations to teaching and their effect on the quality of student learning. Journal of Higher Education, 65, 58–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keselman, H. J., Huberty, C. J., Lix, L. M., Olejnik, S., Cribbie, R., Donahue, B., Kowalchuk, R. K., Lowman, L. L., Petoskey, M. D., Keselman, J. C., & Levin, J. R. (1998). Statistical practices of educational researchers: An analysis of their ANOVA, MANOVA, and ANCOVA analyses. Review of Educational Research, 68, 350–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, C., & Saleh, A. (1998). Teaching nine to five: A study of the teaching styles of male and female professors. A paper presented at the Women in Educational Leadership Annual Conference, October 11–12, 1998.

  • Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Trigwell, K., Nevgi, A., & Ashwin, P. (2006). How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 285–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lueddeke, G. R. (2003). Professionalizing teaching practice in higher education: A study of disciplinary variation and ‘teaching scholarship’. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 213–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E., Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Ramsden, P. (2003). Variation in the experience of leadership of teaching in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 247–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning – I: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevgi, A., Postareff, L., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2004). The effect of discipline on motivational and self-efficacy beliefs and on approaches to teaching of Finnish and English university teachers. A paper presented at the EARLI SIG Higher Education Conference, June 18–21, 2004.

  • Nichols, J., & Miller, R. (1994). Cooperative learning and student motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Nevgi, A. (in press). The effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education. Teaching and Teacher Education.

  • Prosser, M., & Millar, R. (1989). The ‘how’ and ‘what’ of learning physics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 4, 513–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M., Ramsden, P., Trigwell, K., & Martin, E. (2003). Dissonance in experience of teaching and its relation to the quality of student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching. The experience in higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1997). Relations between perceptions of the teaching environment and approaches to teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teaching in higher education. London: Routledge.

  • Singer, E. (1996). Espoused teaching paradigms of college faculty. Research in Higher Education, 37, 659–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991). Relating approaches to study and the quality of learning outcomes at the course level. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 265–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996). Congruence between intention and strategy in science teachers’ approach to teaching. Higher Education, 32, 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (2004). Development and use of the approaches to teaching inventory. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 409–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., Ramsden, P., & Martin, E. (1998). Improving student learning through a focus on the teaching context. In G. Gibbs (Ed.), Improving student learning. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Development.

  • Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37, 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Rossum, E. J., & Schenk, S. M. (1984). The relationship between learning conception, study strategy and outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 73–83.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ann Stes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stes, A., Gijbels, D. & Van Petegem, P. Student-focused approaches to teaching in relation to context and teacher characteristics. High Educ 55, 255–267 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9053-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9053-9

Keywords

Navigation