Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A study on healthcare supply chain management efficiency: using bootstrap data envelopment analysis

  • Published:
Health Care Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aims of this study are to analyze the efficiency of players comprising the healthcare supply chain comparatively, and to investigate the relationship between these different types of efficiency, eventually seeking the way to optimize a healthcare supply chain. To achieve the aims, the players comprising a healthcare supply chain are classified either into manufacturers, distributors, wholesalers and retailers based on industry, or into the healthcare system and the non-healthcare system based on the system. The subjects are medical institutions comprising a healthcare supply chain. They have been selected as “The Healthcare Supply Chain Top 25” by Gartner for 5 years in a row from 2012 to 2016. The bootstrap data envelopment analysis (DEA) and correlation analysis are used. The results are as follows. Players with relatively high competitive efficiency (wholesalers and retailers) can achieve high managerial efficiency even if they pay relatively less attention to supply chain efficiency while players with low competitive efficiency (manufacturers and distributors) should focus on supply chain efficiency to maintain managerial efficiency. In the healthcare system, no significant correlation was observed between managerial efficiency, supply chain efficiency and competitive efficiency. However, the analysis showed that there was a significant positive correlation between the managerial efficiency and the competitive efficiency in the non-healthcare system. This study expands the field of the healthcare supply chain management efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arbietman D, Lirov E, Lirov R, Lirov Y (2001) E-commerce for healthcare supply procurement. J Healthc Inf Manag 15(1):61–72

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rivard-Royer H, Landry S, Beaulieu M (2002) Hybrid stockless: a case study: lessons for health-care supply chain integration. Int J Oper Prod Man 22(4):412–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shah R, Goldstein SM, Unger BT, Henry TD (2008) Explaining anomalous high performance in a health care supply chain. Decision Sci 39(4):759–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Uthayakumar R, Priyan S (2013) Pharmaceutical supply chain and inventory management strategies: optimization for a pharmaceutical company and a hospital. Oper Res Health Care 2(3):52–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kumar A, Ozdamar L, Ning Zhang C (2008) Supply chain redesign in the healthcare industry of Singapore. Supply Chain Manag 13(2):95–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lillrank P, Groop J, Venesmaa J (2011) Processes, episodes and events in health service supply chains. Supply Chain Manag 16(3):194–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ozcan YA (1998) Physician benchmarking: measuring variation in practice behavior in treatment of otitis media. Health Care Manag Sc 1(1):5–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Haavik S (2000) Building a demand-driven, vendor-managed supply chain. Hlthc Financ Manag 54(2):56

    Google Scholar 

  9. Storey J, Emberson C, Godsell J, Harrison A (2006) Supply chain management: theory, practice and future challenges. Int J Oper Prod Man 26(7):754–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McKone-Sweet KE, Hamilton P, Willis SB (2005) The ailing healthcare supply chain: a prescription for change. J Supply Chain Manag 41(1):4–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schneller ES, Smeltzer LR, Burns LR (2006) Strategic management of the health care supply chain. Jossy-Bass

    Google Scholar 

  12. Haszlinna Mustaffa N, Potter A (2009) Healthcare supply chain management in Malaysia: a case study. Supply Chain Manag 14(3):234–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kwon IWG, Kim SH, Martin DG (2016) Healthcare supply chain management; strategic areas for quality and financial improvement. Technol Forecast Soc 113:422–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Meijboom B, Schmidt-Bakx S, Westert G (2011) Supply chain management practices for improving patient-oriented care. Supply Chain Manag 16(3):166–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Parker J, DeLay D (2008) The future of the healthcare supply chain: suppliers wield considerable power, but healthcare organizations can benefit from virtual centralization of the supply chain. Healthc Financ Manag 62(4):66–70

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dobrzykowski D, Deilami VS, Hong P, Kim SC (2014) A structured analysis of operations and supply chain management research in healthcare (1982-2011). Int J Prod Econ 147:514–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Niziolek L, Chiam TC, Yih Y (2012) A simulation-based study of distribution strategies for pharmaceutical supply chains. IIE Trans on Hlthc Syst Engineer 2(3):181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pacheco RR, Fernandes E (2003) Managerial efficiency of Brazilian airports. Transport Res A-Pol 37(8):667–680

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shyu J, Chiang T (2012) Measuring the true managerial efficiency of bank branches in Taiwan: a three-stage DEA analysis. Expert Syst Appl 39(13):11494–11502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liang L, Yang F, Cook WD, Zhu J (2006) DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation. Ann Oper Res 145(1):35–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Brandenburg M (2016) Supply chain efficiency, value creation and the economic crisis - an empirical assessment of the European automotive industry 2002-2010. Int J Prod Econ 171:321–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Xin W (2006) The analysis of competitive efficiency of banking industry in China. J Financ Res 12:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  23. Uppal RK (2010) Indian banking: emerging issues and enhancing competitive efficiency. IUP. J Bus Strateg 7(1):71–82

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ozgen H, Ozcan YA (2004) Longitudinal analysis of efficiency in multiple output dialysis markets. Health Care Manag Sc 7(4):253–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Langabeer JR, Ozcan YA (2009) The economics of cancer care: longitudinal changes in provider efficiency. Health Care Manag Sc 12(2):192–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kohl S, Schoenfelder J, Fügener A, Brunner JO (2018) The use of data envelopment analysis (DEA) in healthcare with a focus on hospitals. Health Care Manag Sc Forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-018-9436-8

  27. Fong AJ, Smith M, Langeman A (2016) Efficiency improvement in the operating room. J Surg Res 204(2):371–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Walker DM (2018) Does participation in health information exchange improve hospital efficiency? Health Care Manag Sc 21(3):426–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Narci HÖ, Ozcan YA, Şahin í, Tarcan M, Narci M (2015) An examination of competition and efficiency for hospital industry in Turkey. Health Care Manag Sc 18(4):407–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Roark DC (2005) Managing the healthcare supply chain. Nurs Manag 36(2):36–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Landry S, Beaulieu M (2010) Achieving lean healthcare by combining the two-bin kanban replenishment system with RFID technology. Int J Health Manag and Inf 1(1):85–98

    Google Scholar 

  32. Habidin NF, Shazali NA, Ali N, Khaidir NA, Jamaludin NH (2014) Exploring lean healthcare practice and supply chain innovation for Malaysian healthcare industry. Int J Bus Excel 7(3):394–410

  33. Du J, Wang J, Chen Y, Chou SY, Zhu J (2014) Incorporating health outcomes in Pennsylvania hospital efficiency: an additive super-efficiency DEA approach. Ann Oper Res 221(1):161–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Xin JY, Yeung ACL, Cheng TCE (2010) First to market: is technological innovation in new product development profitable in health care industries? Int J Prod Econ 127:129–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Biørn E, Hagen TP, Iversen T, Magnussen J (2003) The effect of activity-based financing on hospital efficiency: a panel data analysis of DEA efficiency scores 1992-2000. Health Care Manag Sc 6(4):271–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. O’Neill L, Rauner M, Heidenberger K, Kraus M (2008) A cross-national comparison and taxonomy of DEA-based hospital efficiency studies. Socio Econ Plan Sci 42(3):158–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nayar P, Ozcan YA (2008) Data envelopment analysis comparison of hospital efficiency and quality. J Med Syst 32(3):193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ferrier GD, Trivitt JS (2013) Incorporating quality into the measurement of hospital efficiency: a double DEA approach. J Prod Anal 40(3):337–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Harrison JP, Coppola MN, Wakefield M (2004) Efficiency of federal hospitals in the United States. J Med Syst 28(5):411–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ellinger A, Shin H, Magnus Northington W, Adams FG, Hofman D, O’Marah K (2012) The influence of supply chain management competency on customer satisfaction and shareholder value. Supply Chain Manag 17(3):249–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sarangdhar V (2012) What can we learn from Asia Pacific’s supply chain leaders? MHD Supply Chain 42(5):66–67

    Google Scholar 

  42. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hollingsworth B, Dawson PJ, Maniadakis N (1999) Efficiency measurement of health care: a review of non-parametric methods and applications. Health Care Manag Sc 2(3):161–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Simar L, Wilson PW (1998) Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: how to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Manag Sci 44(1):49–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 30(9):1078–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Bastos JT, Shen Y, Hermans E, Brijs T, Wets G, Ferraz ACP (2014) Bootstrapping DEA scores for traffic fatality risk assessment in Brazil. In decision making and soft computing: proceedings of the 11th international FLINS conference (pp. 107–112)

  47. Hall P (1986) On the number of bootstrap simulations required to construct a confidence interval. Ann Stat 14(4):1453–1462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Dyson RG, Allen R, Camanho AS, Podinovski VV, Sarrico CS, Shale EA (2001) Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. Eur J Oper Res 132(2):245–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Nyhan RC, Martin LL (1999) Assessing the performance of municipal police service using data envelopment analysis: an exploratory study. State Local Gov Rev 31(1):18–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Boussofiane A, Dyson RG, Thanassoulis E (1991) Applied data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 52(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Shah N (2004) Pharmaceutical supply chains: key issues and strategies for optimization. Comput Chem Eng 28(6–7):929–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Aronsson H, Abrahamsson M, Spens K (2011) Developing lean and agile health care supply chains. Supply Chain Manag 16(3):176–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Incheon National University, 199, Academy-ro, Incheon, 22012, Republic of Korea

    Changhee Kim

  2. Sunchon National University, 255, Jungang-ro, Suncheon-si, Jeollanam-do, 57922, Republic of Korea

    Hyun Jung Kim

Authors
  1. Changhee Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hyun Jung Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyun Jung Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, C., Kim, H.J. A study on healthcare supply chain management efficiency: using bootstrap data envelopment analysis. Health Care Manag Sci 22, 534–548 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-019-09471-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-019-09471-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation