Skip to main content
Log in

Cost and technical efficiency of physician practices: a stochastic frontier approach using panel data

  • Published:
Health Care Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is the first study to use stochastic frontier analysis to estimate both the technical and cost efficiency of physician practices. The analysis is based on panel data from 3,126 physician practices for the years 2006 through 2008. We specified the technical and cost frontiers as translog function, using the one-step approach of Battese and Coelli to detect factors that influence the efficiency of general practitioners and specialists. Variables that were not analyzed previously in this context (e.g., the degree of practice specialization) and a range of control variables such as a patients’ case-mix were included in the estimation. Our results suggest that it is important to investigate both technical and cost efficiency, as results may depend on the type of efficiency analyzed. For example, the technical efficiency of group practices was significantly higher than that of solo practices, whereas the results for cost efficiency differed. This may be due to indivisibilities in expensive technical equipment, which can lead to different types of health care services being provided by different practice types (i.e., with group practices using more expensive inputs, leading to higher costs per case despite these practices being technically more efficient). Other practice characteristics such as participation in disease management programs show the same impact throughout both cost and technical efficiency: participation in disease management programs led to an increase in both, technical and cost efficiency, and may also have had positive effects on the quality of care. Future studies should take quality-related issues into account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Statistical Office of Germany (2013) Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes

  2. Biørn E, Hagen TP, Iversen T, Magnussen J (2003) The effect of activity-based financing on hospital efficiency: a panel data analysis of DEA efficiency scores 1992–2000. Health Care Manag Sci 6(4):271–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kjerstad E (2003) Prospective funding of general hospitals in Norway—incentives for higher production? Int J Health Care Finance Econ 3(4):231–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schreyögg J, Tiemann O, Busse R (2006) Cost accounting to determine prices: how well do prices reflect costs in the German DRG-system? Health Care Manag Sci 9(3):269–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shleifer A (1985) A theory of yardstick competition. RAND J Econ 16(3):319–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. DeFelice LC, Bradford WD (1997) Relative inefficiencies in production between solo and group practice physicians. Health Econ 6(5):455–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Staat M (2011) Estimating the efficiency of general practitioners controlling for case mix and outlier effects. Empir Econ 40(2):321–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Battese GE, Coelli TJ (1995) A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empir Econ 20(2):325–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Reinhardt U (1972) A production function for physician services. Rev Econ Stat 54(1):55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kimbell LJ, Lorant JH (1977) Physician productivity and returns to scale. Health Serv Res 12(4):367

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thurston NK, Libby AM (2002) A production function for physician services revisited. Rev Econ Stat 84(1):184–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Diewert WE (1971) An application of the Shephard duality theorem: a generalized Leontief production function. J Polit Econ 79(3):481–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Frech IHET, Ginsburg PB (1974) Optimal scale in medical practice: a survivor analysis. J Bus 47(1):23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Marder WD, Zuckerman S (1985) Competition and medical groups: a survivor analysis. J Health Econ 4(2):167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Andes S, Metzger LM, Kralewski J, Gans D (2002) Measuring efficiency of physician practices using data envelopment analysis. Managed Care (Langhorne, Pa) 11(11):48

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chilingerian JA, David Sherman H (1996) Benchmarking physician practice patterns with DEA: a multi-stage approach for cost containment. Ann Oper Res 67(1):83–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chilingerian JA, David Sherman H (1997) DEA and primary care physician report cards: deriving preferred practice cones from managed care service concepts and operating strategies. Ann Oper Res 73:35–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gaynor M, Pauly MV (1990) Compensation and productive efficiency in partnerships: evidence from medical groups practice. J Polit Econ 98(3):544–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Giuffrida A (1999) Productivity and efficiency changes in primary care: a Malmquist index approach. Health Care Manag Sci 2(1):11–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Staat M (2003) The efficiency of treatment strategies of general practitioners. Eur J Health Econ 4(3):232–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wagner JM, Shimshak DG, Novak MA (2003) Advances in physician profiling: the use of DEA. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 37(2):141–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chilingerian JA (1995) Evaluating physician efficiency in hospitals: a multivariate analysis of best practices. Eur J Oper Res 80(3):548–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ozcan Y, Jiang H, Pai C (2000) Do primary care physicians or specialists provide more efficient care? Health services management research: an official journal of the Association of University Programs in Health Administration/HSMC. AUPHA 13(2):90

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ozcan YA (1998) Physician benchmarking: measuring variation in practice behavior in treatment of otitis media. Health Care Manag Sci 1(1):5–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pai CW, Ozcan YA, Jiang HJ (2000) Regional variation in physician practice pattern: an examination of technical and cost efficiency for treating sinusitis. J Med Syst 24(2):103–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Newhouse JP (1994) Frontier estimation: how useful a tool for health economics? J Health Econ 13(3):317–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jacobs R (2001) Alternative methods to examine hospital efficiency: data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis. Health Care Manag Sci 4(2):103–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Simar L, Wilson PW (2007) Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. J Econom 136(1):31–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Blank JL, Valdmanis VG (2010) Environmental factors and productivity on Dutch hospitals: a semi-parametric approach. Health Care Manag Sci 13(1):27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jacobs R, Smith PC, Street A (2006) Measuring efficiency in health care: analytic techniques and health policy. Cambridge Univ Pr

  31. Skinner J (1994) What do stochastic frontier cost functions tell us about inefficiency? J Health Econ 13(3):323–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Olsen KR, Gyrd-Hansen D, Sørensen TH, Kristensen T, Vedsted P, Street A (2013) Organisational determinants of production and efficiency in general practice: a population-based study. Eur J Health Econ 14(2):267–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Besstremyannaya G (2011) Managerial performance and cost efficiency of Japanese local public hospitals: a latent class stochastic frontier model. Health Econ 20(S1):19–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Blank JL, Eggink E (2004) The decomposition of cost efficiency: an empirical application of the shadow cost function model to Dutch general hospitals. Health Care Manag Sci 7(2):79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Herr A (2008) Cost and technical efficiency of German hospitals: does ownership matter? Health Econ 17(9):1057–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Herr A, Schmitz H, Augurzky B (2011) Profit efficiency and ownership of German hospitals. Health Econ 20(6):660–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Li T, Rosenman R (2001) Cost inefficiency in Washington hospitals: a stochastic frontier approach using panel data. Health Care Manag Sci 4(2):73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rosko MD (2001) Cost efficiency of US hospitals: a stochastic frontier approach. Health Econ 10(6):539–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Street A, Jacobs R (2002) Relative performance evaluation of the English acute hospital sector. Appl Econ 34(9):1109–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zuckerman S, Hadley J, Iezzoni L (1994) Measuring hospital efficiency with frontier cost functions. J Health Econ 13(3):255–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rosenman R, Friesner D (2004) Scope and scale inefficiencies in physician practices. Health Econ 13(11):1091–1116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Schmidt P, Sickles RC (1984) Production frontiers and panel data. J Bus Econ Stat 2(4):367–374

    Google Scholar 

  43. Aigner D, Lovell C, Schmidt P (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J Econom 6(1):21–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Meeusen W, van Den Broeck J (1977) Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. Int Econ Rev 18(2):435–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kumbhakar SC, Ghosh S, McGuckin JT (1991) A generalized production frontier approach for estimating determinants of inefficiency in US dairy farms. J Bus Econ Stat 9(3):279–286

    Google Scholar 

  46. Huang CJ, Liu JT (1994) Estimation of a non-neutral stochastic frontier production function. J Prod Anal 5(2):171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Schmidt P (2011) One-step and two-step estimation in SFA models. J Prod Anal 36(2):201–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Shephard RW (1953) Cost and production functions. DTIC Document

  49. Escarce JJ, Pauly MV (1998) Physician opportunity costs in physician practice cost functions. J Health Econ 17(2):129–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Gunning TS, Sickles RC (2011) A multi-product cost function for physician private practices. J Prod Anal 35(2):119–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Pope GC, Burge RT (1995) The marginal practice cost of physicians’ services. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 29(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Staiger DO, Stock JH (1997) Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65(3):557–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Dayhoff DA, Cromwell J (1993) Measuring differences and similarities in hospital caseloads: a conceptual and empirical analysis. Health Serv Res 28(3):292

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zwanziger J, Melnick GA, Simonson L (1996) Differentiation and specialization in the California hospital industry 1983 to 1988. Med Care 34(4):361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Busse R (2004) Disease management programs in Germany’s statutory health insurance system. Health Aff 23(3):56–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Tzelepis D, Tsekouras K, Skuras D, Dimara E (2006) The effects of ISO 9001 on firms’ productive efficiency. Int J Oper Prod Manag 26(10):1146–1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Yeung G, Mok V (2008) ISO 9000 certification and technical efficiency of foreign-financed manufacturing firms in southern China: A stochastic frontier approach. J Econ Stud 35(5):385–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Newhouse JP (1973) The economics of group practice. J Hum Resour 8(1):37–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Auquier AA (1980) Sizes of firms, exporting behavior, and the structure of French industry. J Indust Econ 29(2):203–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. You JI (1995) Small firms in economic theory. Camb J Econ 19(3):441–462

    Google Scholar 

  61. Sharma DS (2005) The association between ISO 9000 certification and financial performance. Int J Account 40(2):151–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Corbett CJ, Montes-Sancho MJ, Kirsch DA (2005) The financial impact of ISO 9000 certification in the United States: An empirical analysis. Manag Sci 51(7):1046–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Romley JA, Jena AB, Goldman DP (2011) Hospital spending and inpatient mortality: evidence from California an observational study. Ann Intern Med 154(3):160–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Schreyögg J, Stargardt T (2010) The trade-off between costs and outcomes: the case of acute myocardial infarction. Health Serv Res 45(6p1):1585–1601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Stargardt T, Schreyögg J, Kondofersky I (2013) Measuring the relationship between costs and outcomes: the example of acute myocardial infarction in German hospitals. Health Econ. doi:10.1002/hec.2941

  66. Stukel TA, Fisher ES, Alter DA, Guttmann A, Ko DT, Fung K, Wodchis WP, Baxter NN, Earle CC, Lee DS (2012) Association of hospital spending intensity with mortality and readmission rates in Ontario hospitals. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc 307(10):1037–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a research grant of the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) in Germany (Grant number: 01FL10055). The sponsor had no role in the study design, collection and analysis of data, the writing of the report or the submission of the paper for publication. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonas Schreyögg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heimeshoff, M., Schreyögg, J. & Kwietniewski, L. Cost and technical efficiency of physician practices: a stochastic frontier approach using panel data. Health Care Manag Sci 17, 150–161 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-013-9260-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-013-9260-0

Keywords

MSC classification

Navigation