References
Alvarez A, Amsler C, Orea L, Schmidt P (2006) Interpreting and testing the scaling property in models where inefficiency depends on firm characteristics. J Prod Anal 25:201–212
Battese GE, Coelli TJ (1995) A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Econ 20:325–332
Caudill SB, Ford JM (1993) Biases in frontier estimation due to heteroskedasticity. Econ Lett 41:17–20
Caudill SB, Ford JM, Gropper DM (1995) Frontier estimation and firm-specific inefficiency measures in the presence of heteroskedasticity. J Business Econ Stat 13:105–111
Huang CJ, Liu J-T (1994) Estimation of a non-neutral stochastic frontier production function. J Prod Anal 5:171–180
Kim M, Schmidt P (2008) Valid Tests of Whether Technical Inefficiency Depends on Firm Characteristics. Journal of Econometrics 144:409–427
Kumbhakar SC, Ghosh S, McGuckin JT (1991) A generalized production frontier approach for estimating determinants of inefficiency in U.S. dairy farms. J Business Econ Stat 9:279–286
Reifschneider D, Stevenson R (1991) Systematic departures from the frontier: a framework for the analysis of firm inefficiency. Int Econ Rev 32:715–723
Simar L, Wilson PW (2007) Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. J Econom 136:31–64
Wang H-J (2002) Heteroscedasticity and non-monotonic efficiency effects of a stochastic frontier model. J Prod Anal 18:241–253
Wang H-J, Schmidt P (2002) One-step and two-step estimation of the effects of exogenous variables on technical efficiency levels. J Prod Anal 18:129–144
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmidt, P. One-step and two-step estimation in SFA models. J Prod Anal 36, 201–203 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-011-0228-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-011-0228-0