Skip to main content
Log in

Decomposing differences in acute myocardial infarction fatality in Italian regions

  • Published:
Health Care Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper develops a general method for evaluating geographical differences in the outcome of acute myocardial infarction patients, by looking at the process of disease occurrence from infarction to hospitalization and possible death or recovery. The method is applied to regional data in Italy, where the long history of geographical diversities in economical, social and cultural fields is reflected in health care. Specific features of AMI, such as high fatality and fast course of the disease, make it a suitable tracer condition to investigate into the differences of regional health systems during the acute phase of hospitalization. The paper combines administrative and official statistics by region and offers a tool providing suggestions to policy-makers where further eventual investigations are needed around the care pathway and also what possible actions might be undertaken to improve the outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ISTAT—Conti Economici Regionali 2005—Statistiche in breve, in www.istat.it/salastampa/comunicati/non_calendario/20071004_00/testointegrale20071004.pdf

  2. Ricciardi G (2003) Perche’ un osservatorio sulla salute? In: Rapporto Osservasalute 2003. Vita e Pensiero, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  3. Istat (2002) Cause di morte. Anno 1999. Annuari ISTAT, Roma

  4. Istat (2004) Cause di morte. Anno 2000. Annuari ISTAT, Roma

  5. Huff NC, Gray D (2001) Coronary heart disease inequalities: deaths and socio-economic environment in Nottingham, England. Health Place 7:57–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mahonen M, Salomaa V, Keskimaki I, Moltchanov V (2000) The feasibility of routine mortality and morbidity register data linkage to study the occurrence of acute coronary heart disease events in Finland. European J Epidemiology 16:701–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shewhart WA (1980) Economic control of quality of manufactured product. D. Van Nostrand Company, New York, 1931—reprinted by ASQ Quality Press

  8. Carey RG (2003) Improving healthcare with control charts. ASQ Quality Press, Milwaukee

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shahian DM, Williamson WA, Svensson LG, Restuccia JD, D’Agostino RS (1996) Application of statistical quality control to cardiac surgery. Annals of Thoracis Surgery 62:1351–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mohammed MA, Cheng KK, Rouse A, Marshall T (2001) Bristol, Shipman, and clinical governance: Shewhart’s forgotten lessons. The Lancet 357:463–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tunstall-Pedoe H, Kuulasmaa K, Mahonen M, Tolonen H, Ruokokoski E, Amouyel P (1999) Contribution of trends in survival and coronary y-event rates to changes in coronary heart disease mortality: 10-year results from 37 WHO MONICA Project populations. The Lancet 353:1547–1557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yusuf S, Flather M, Pogue J, Hunt D, Varigos J, Piegas L, Avezum A, Anderson J, Keltai M, Budaj A, Fox K, Ceremuzynski L (1998) Variations between countries in invasive cardiac procedures and outcomes in patients with suspected unstable angina or myocardial infarction without initial ST elevation. The Lancet 352:507–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fox KAA, Cokkinos DV, Deckers J, Keil U, Maggioni A, Steg G (2000) The ENACT study: a pan-European survey of acute coronary syndromes. European Heart J 21:1440–1449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fox KAA (2000) An introduction to the global registry of acute coronary events: GRACE. European Heart J 2:F21–F24

    Google Scholar 

  15. EUROCISS project 2003, in europa.eu.int/comm/health/ph_projects/2000/monitoring/fp_monitoring_2000_frep_10_en.pdf

  16. Giampaoli S, Vanuzzo D, Gruppo di Ricerca dell’Osservatorio Epidemiologico Cardiovascolare (1999) I fattori di rischio cardiovascolare in Italia: una lettura in riferimento al Piano Sanitario Nazionale 1998–2000. Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia 29:1463–1471

    Google Scholar 

  17. Giampaoli S, Panico S, Palmieri L, Magrini N, Ferrario M, Pede S, Vannuzzo D (2001) L’identificazione degli individui ad elevato rischio coronario nella popolazione Italiana: indicazioni dall’Osservatorio Epidemiologico Cardiovascolare. Italian Heart J 2:1098–1106

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ferrario M, Cesana G, Vanuzzo D, Pilotto L, Sega R, Chiodini P, Giampaoli S (2001) Surveillance of ischaemic heart disease: results from the Italian MONICA populations. Int J Epidemiol 30:S23–S29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Giampaoli S, Palmieri L, Capocaccia R, Pilotto L, Vanuzzo D (2001) Estimating population-based incidence and prevalence of major coronary events. Int J Epidemiol 30:S5–S10

    Google Scholar 

  20. Giampaoli S, Vannuzzo D (eds) (2003) Italian atlas of cardiovascular diseases. Italian Heart J 4:9S–121S

  21. Giampaoli S, Vannuzzo D, Ferrario M, Vancheri F, Cesana G (2004) The national register of coronary and cerebrovascular events. Italian Heart J 5:22S–37S

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lilford R, Mohammed MA, Spiegelhalter D, Thomson R (2004) Use and misuse of process and outcome data in managing performance of acute medical care: avoiding institutional stigma. The Lancet 363:1147–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pimenta L, Bassan R, Potsch A, Soares JF, Manes Albanesi Filho F (2001) Is female sex an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction? Archives of Brazilian Cardiology 77:44–50

    Google Scholar 

  24. Toffler GH, Stone PH, Muller JE, Willich SN, Davis VG, Poole K et al (1987) Effects of gender and race on prognosis after myocardial infarction: adverse prognosis for women, particularly black women. J Amer Collection Cardiology 9:473–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Greenland P, Reicher-Reiss H, Goldbourt U, Behar S (1991) In-hospital and 1-year mortality in 1,524 women after myocardial infarction. Comparison with 4,315 men. Circulation 83:484–491

    Google Scholar 

  26. Iezzoni LI (1997) Assessing quality using administrative data. Annals of Internal Medicine 127:666–674

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Simona Giampaoli for a very useful discussion about the Italian situation and Tom Marshall for suggestions regarding the statistical process control method. Silvia Bruzzone of ISTAT and Lucia Lispi of the Ministry of Health kindly provided the data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Gigli.

Appendix

Appendix

Let i r , h r , f r be the attack, hospitalization and in-hospital fatality rates in region r, as defined in Eq. 1. Let F r be the number of in-hospital deaths and N r the population of region r. Equation 3 provides a decomposition of the in-hospital deaths in terms of the above mentioned rates. The standardized number of deaths by infarction in the hospitals of region r (\(\bar{F}_r\)) is then obtained by substituting the regional rates with the corresponding Italian averages (\(\bar i, \bar h, \bar f\)). Thus, it is possible to compare the regional outcomes in terms of the deviation of in-hospital deaths in region r from the corresponding standardized value:

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} {{F_{r} - \overline{F} _{r} } \hfill} & {{ = N_{r} \times {\left( {i_{r} \times h_{r} \times f_{r} - \overline{i} \times \overline{h} \times \overline{f} } \right)}} \hfill} \\ {{} \hfill} & {{ = N_{r} \times {\left\{ {{\left( {\overline{i} + \Delta i_{r} } \right)} \times {\left( {\overline{h} + \Delta h_{r} } \right)} \times {\left( {\overline{f} + \Delta f_{r} } \right)} - \left. {\overline{i} \times \overline{h} \times \overline{f} } \right)} \right\}},} \hfill} \\ \end{array} $$
(4)

where

$$i_{r} = \overline{i} + \Delta i_{r} ;\,h_{r} = \overline{h} + \Delta h_{r} ;\,f_{r} = \overline{f} + \Delta f$$

After developing the products in Eq. 4, the deviation of the regional in-hospital deaths from the corresponding standardized value decomposes into a series of first-, second- and third-order deviations:

$$F_{r} - \overline{F} _{r} = N_{r} \times {\left\{ {\Delta I + \Delta H + \Delta F + \Delta ^{2} IH + \Delta ^{2} IF + \Delta ^{2} HF + \Delta ^{3} IHF} \right\}},$$

where

$$\Delta I = \overline{h} \times \overline{f} \times \Delta i_{r} ;\,\Delta H = \overline{i} \times \overline{f} \times \Delta h_{r} ;\,\Delta F = \overline{i} \times \overline{h} \times \Delta f_{r} ;\,\Delta ^{2} IH = \overline{f} \times \Delta i_{r} \times \Delta h_{r} ;\,\Delta ^{2} IF = \overline{h} \times \Delta i_{r} \times \Delta f_{r} ;\,\Delta ^{2} HF = \overline{i} \times \Delta h_{r} \times \Delta f_{r} ;\,\Delta ^{3} IHF = \Delta i_{r} \times \Delta h_{r} \times \Delta f_{r} .$$

The first-order deviation ΔH can be interpreted as the deviation referring to hospitalization of the in-hospital deaths from the standardized counterpart, when the regional attack and in-hospital fatality rates are supposed equal to the Italian rates; similarly for the other two first-order deviations.

Furthermore

$$\begin{aligned} & \% \Delta I = \frac{{\Delta I}}{{\overline{F} _{r} }} \times 100 = \frac{{\Delta i_{r} }}{{\overline{i} }} \times 100 \\ & \% \Delta H = \frac{{\Delta H}}{{\overline{F} _{r} }} \times 100 = \frac{{\Delta h_{r} }}{{\overline{h} }} \times 100 \\ & \% \Delta F = \frac{{\Delta F}}{{\overline{F} _{r} }} \times 100 = \frac{{\Delta f_{r} }}{{\overline{f} }} \times 100 \\ \end{aligned} $$

denote the % contribution of each deviation and are used to build the three bars of Fig. 3a and b. Deviations of second and third order are negligible and are not considered in the analysis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Francisci, S., Gigli, A., Gesano, G. et al. Decomposing differences in acute myocardial infarction fatality in Italian regions. Health Care Manage Sci 11, 111–120 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-007-9051-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-007-9051-6

Keywords

Navigation