Abstract
In this analysis of the ethical dimensions of doctors’ participation in macroallocation we set out to understand the skills they use, how they are acquired, and how they influence performance of the role. Using the principles of grounded moral analysis, we conducted a semi-structured interview study with Australian doctors engaged in macroallocation. We found that they performed expertise as argument, bringing together phronetic and rhetorical skills founded on communication, strategic thinking, finance, and health data. They had made significant, purposeful efforts to gain skills for the role. Our findings challenge common assumptions about doctors’ preferences in argumentation, and reveal an unexpected commitment to practical reason. Using the ethics of Paul Ricoeur in our analysis enabled us to identify the moral meaning of doctors’ skills and learning. We concluded that Ricoeur’s ethics offers an empirically grounded matrix for ethical analysis of the doctor’s role in macroallocation that may help to establish norms for procedure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2014). Medical Workforce 2012. National health workforce series. Canberra: AIHW.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2016). Australia’s Medical Workforce 2015. Canberra.
Australian Medical Association. (2017). AMA code of ethics 2004. Editorially Revised 2006. Revised 2016. https://ama.com.au/sites/default/files/documents/AMA. Accessed April 22, 2017.
Belcher, H. (2014). Power, politics and health care. In J. Germov (Ed.), Second opinion: An introduction to health sociology (5th ed., pp. 356–379). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginnners. London: SAGE.
Brody, H. (2009). The future of bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bujak, J. (2008). Inside the physician mind: Finding common ground with doctors. Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press.
Campbell, D. M., Redman, S., Jorm, L., Cooke, M., Zwi, A. B., & Rychetnik, L. (2009). Increasing the use of evidence in health policy: Practice and views of policy makers and researchers. Australia and New Zealand Health Policy, 6(1), 21.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.
Croft, D., Jay, S. J., Meslin, E. M., Gaffney, M. M., & Odell, J. D. (2012). Perspective: Is it time for advocacy training in medical education? Academic Medicine, 87(9), 1165–1170. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31826232bc.
Daniels, N. (2016). Resource allocation and priority setting. In D. H. Barrett, L. H. Ortmann, A. Dawson, C. Saenz, A. Reis, & G. Bolan (Eds.), Public health ethics (1st ed.). New York: Springer.
Danis, M., Clancy, C. M., & Churchill, L. R. (2002). Introduction. In M. Danis, C. M. Clancy, & L. R. Churchill (Eds.), Ethical dimensions of health policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Danziger, M. (1995). Policy analysis postmodernized. Policy Studies Journal, 23(3), 435–450.
Dobson, S., Voyer, S., Hubinette, M., & Regehr, G. (2014). From the clinic to the community: The activities and abilities of effective health advocates. Academic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000588.
Dowie, J. (2007). Decision analysis: The ethical approach to most health decision making. In R. E. Ashcroft & I. Wiley (Eds.), Principles of health care ethics (pp. 577–583). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Duckett, S. J. (1984). Special issue: Health and health care in Australasia structural interests and Australian health policy. Social Science and Medicine, 18(11), 959–966. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(84)90266-1.
Dunn, M., Sheehan, M., Hope, T., & Parker, M. (2012). Toward methodological innovation in empirical ethics research. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 21(4), 466–480. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180112000242.
Earnest, M. A., Wong, S. L., & Federico, S. G. (2010). Perspective: Physician advocacy: What is it and how do we do it? Academic Medicine, 85(1), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c40d40.
Ebbesen, M., & Pedersen, B. D. (2007). Using empirical research to formulate normative ethical principles in biomedicine. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 10(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-006-9011-9.
Eckard, N., Janzon, M., & Levin, L. A. (2014). Use of cost-effectiveness data in priority setting decisions: Experiences from the national guidelines for heart diseases in Sweden. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 3(6), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2014.105.
Ehninger, D. (1970). Argument as method: Its nature, its limitations and its uses. Speech Monographs, 37(2), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637757009375654.
Emanuel, E. J. (2002). Foreword. In M. Danis, C. M. Clancy, & L. R. Churchill (Eds.), Ethical dimensions of health policy (pp. vii–xi). New York: Oxford University Press.
Fischer, F. (1998). Beyond empiricism: Policy inquiry in post positivist perspective. Policy Studies Journal, 26(1), 129–146.
Fischer, F. (2004). Professional expertise in a deliberative democracy. The Good Society, 13(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1353/gso.2004.0027.
Fischer, F. (2007). Deliberative policy analysis as practical reason: Integrating empirical and normative arguments. In F. Fischer, G. J. Miller, & M. S. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics & methods. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.
Fischer, F. (2009). Democracy and expertise: Reorienting policy inquiry. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Freidson, E. (2013). Professionalism: The third logic. Hoboken: Wiley.
Furnham, A., & Ofstein, A. (1997). Ethical ideology and the allocation of scarce medical resources. The British Journal of Medical Psychology, 70(1), 51–63.
Gottweis, H. (2007). Rhetoric in policy making: Between logos, ethos, and pathos. In F. Fischer, G. J. Miller, & M. S. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics & methods. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.
Greenhalgh, T., & Russell, J. (2009). Evidence-based policymaking: A critique. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 52(2), 304–318.
Haynes, A. S., Derrick, G. E., Redman, S., Hall, W. D., Gillespie, J. A., Chapman, S., et al. (2012). Identifying trustworthy experts: How do policymakers find and assess public health researchers worth consulting or collaborating with. PLoS ONE, 7(3), e32665.
Hoedemaekers, R., & Dekkers, W. (2003). Key concepts in health care priority setting. Health Care Analysis, 11(4), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:hcan.0000010060.43046.05.
Homan, M. S. (2004). Promoting community change: Making it happen in the real world (Vol. 3). Belmont, CA: Thomson/Brooks/Cole.
Huddle, T. S. (2011). Perspective: Medical professionalism and medical education should not involve commitments to political advocacy. Academic Medicine, 86(3), 378–383. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182086efe.
Huddle, T. S. (2013). The limits of social justice as an aspect of medical professionalism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 38(4), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jht024.
Huddle, T. S. (2014). Political activism is not mandated by medical professionalism. American Journal of Bioethics, 14(9), 51–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2014.935884.
Ives, J., & Draper, H. (2009). Appropriate methodologies for empirical bioethics: It’s all relative. Bioethics, 23(4), 249–258.
Kenny, A., & Duckett, S. (2004). A question of place: Medical power in rural Australia. Social Science and Medicine, 58(6), 1059–1073. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00278-8.
Kenny, N., & Joffres, C. (2008). An ethical analysis of international health priority-setting. Health Care Analysis, 16(2), 145–160.
Kilner, J. F. (2004). Healthcare resources, allocation of: I. Macroallocation. In S. G. Post (Ed.), Encyclopedia of bioethics (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1098–1107). New York: Macmillan Reference USA.
Kirby, J., & Simpson, C. (2007). An innovative, inclusive process for meso-level health policy development. HEC Forum, 19(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-007-9040-7.
Kirch, D. G., & Ast, C. (2017). What should guide health policy? A perspective beyond politics. Academic Medicine, 92, 1222–1224.
Klein, R., Day, P., & Redmayne, S. (1996). Managing scarcity: Priority setting and rationing in the National Health Service. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Light, D. W., & Hughes, D. (2001). Introduction: A sociological perspective on rationing: Power, rhetoric and situated practices. Sociology of Health & Illness, 23(5), 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.00265.
Majdik, Z. P., & Keith, W. M. (2011). Expertise as argument: Authority, democracy, and problem-solving. Argumentation, 25(3), 371.
Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, argument, and persuasion in the policy process. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Martin, D., Abelson, J., & Singer, P. (2002). Participation in health care priority-setting through the eyes of the participants. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 7(4), 222–229. https://doi.org/10.1258/135581902320432750.
McKie, J., Shrimpton, B., Hurworth, R., Bell, C., & Richardson, J. (2008). Who should be involved in health care decision making? A qualitative study. Health Care Analysis, 16(2), 114–126.
Mooney, G., & Houston, S. (2004). An alternative approach to resource allocation. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 3(1), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.2165/00148365-200403010-00006.
Oliver, K., Lorenc, T., & Innvær, S. (2014). New directions in evidence-based policy research: A critical analysis of the literature. Health Research Policy and Systems, 12(1), 34.
Pellegrino, E. D., & Thomasma, D. C. (1993). The virtues in medical practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1971). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation (P. Weaver & J. Wilkinson, Trans.). Notre Dame, London: University of Notre Dame Press.
Rich, A. (2004). Think tanks, public policy, and the politics of expertise (pp. 1–6). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ricœur, P. (1992). Oneself as another. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ricœur, P. (2000). The just. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ricœur, P. (2007). Reflections on the just. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Russell, J., Greenhalgh, T., Byrne, E., & McDonnell, J. (2008). Recognizing rhetoric in health care policy analysis. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. Journal of Health Services & Research Policy, 13(1), 40–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2007.006029.
Salloch, S., Wäscher, S., Vollmann, J., & Schildmann, J. (2015). The normative background of empirical-ethical research: First steps towards a transparent and reasoned approach in the selection of an ethical theory. BMC Medical Ethics, 16(1), 20.
Sanderson, I. (2009). Intelligent policy making for a complex world: Pragmatism, evidence and learning. Political Studies, 57(4), 699–719.
Scheunemann, L. P., & White, D. B. (2011). The ethics and reality of rationing in medicine. Chest, 140(6), 1625–1632. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.11-0622.
Smith, N., Mitton, C., Davidson, A., & Williams, I. (2014). A politics of priority setting: Ideas, interests and institutions in healthcare resource allocation. Public Policy and Administration, 29(4), 331–347.
Taylor, G. H. (2014). Ricœur and just institutions. Philosophy Today, 58(4), 571–589. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday201481136.
Thistlethwaite, J., & Spencer, J. (2008). Professionalism in medicine. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing.
Thorne, M. L. (2002). Colonizing the new world of NHS management: The shifting power of professionals. Health Services Management Research, 15(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1258/0951484021912798.
Throgmorton, J. A. (1991). The rhetorics of policy analysis. Policy Sciences, 24(2), 153–179.
Tilburt, J. C., & Brody, B. (2016). Doubly distributing special obligations: What professional practice can learn from parenting. Journal of Medical Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2015-103071.
Veatch, R. M. (1990). Physicians and cost containment: The ethical conflict. Jurimetrics, 30(4), 461–482.
Wild, C. (2005). Ethics of resource allocation: Instruments for rational decision making in support of a sustainable health care. Poiesis & Praxis, 3(4), 296–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-005-0008-x.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gallagher, S., Little, M. & Hooker, C. Evidence, Emotion and Eminence: A Qualitative and Evaluative Analysis of Doctors’ Skills in Macroallocation. Health Care Anal 27, 93–109 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-018-0356-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-018-0356-z