Abstract
In this study, the genetic variation of 18 Brassica rapa subsp. rapa genotypes grown in Malatya was determined using the inter simple sequence repeat - polymerase chain reaciton (ISSR-PCR). Using nine ISSR primers, a total of 73 bands were obtained and the polymorphism rate was 91.78%. The mean polymorphism information content value was determined as 0.3319. The mean gene diversity (H) value was determined as 0.4276. The mean major allele frequency value was determined as 0.6531. Similarity index values were determined to be between 0.0928 and 1.0924. The unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) dendrogram consisted of two groups. Principal component analysis analysis and UPGMA dendrogram were compatible. In addition, the groups in the phylogenetic trees were partially compatible with geographical distribution. Our results suggest that ISSR-PCR analysis is a suitable approach for breeding Brassica rapa subsp. rapa genotypes and developing different cultivars.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The Brassicaceae family, also known as Cruciferae, encompasses approximately 350 genera and nearly 3.500 species, with Brassica standing out as the most crucial genus among these (Nawaz et al. 2018). Within this family, Brassica includes economically significant plants. The members of Brassica genus include very rich carbohydrates, lipids, proteins, vitamins, minerals and phytochemical components all of which hold medicinal value. Turnip, scientifically known as Brassica rapa subsp. rapa, stands out as a globally significant leaf and root crop (Paul et al. 2019). Brassica rapa (2n:20) plays a significant role as both an essential oil and vegetable crop across various regions worldwide. Its seeds are extracted for oil, while its leaves, flowers, stems, and roots are utilized as vegetables (Zhao et al. 2005). This species thrives especially in colder regions and can be stored for an extended period after the harvest (Fernandes et al. 2007). While young turnip roots are commonly enjoyed in salads in their raw form, areal parts have distinctive bitter taste and typically prepared by cooking (Francisco et al. 2009). In the Malatya region, this plant is known as Çelem and its roots are used as food. However, the leaves and roots of turnip are also a good forage plant that increases milk yield in cattle. In Anatolia, turnip is produced as a third product after wheat and barley and can yield a good quality silage product (Geren 2002; Parlak-Özaslan and Sevimay 2005). Turnip, which we considered locally within the scope of this study, is consumed at the table and differs morphologically and phenotypically from the species used as a forage crop. While the tuber diameter of the turnip genotypes used in this research varies ranged from 4 to 10 cm, the tuber length was flattened and ranged from 1 to 2.5 cm. The reason locally grown turnips are morphologically different from forage turnips is that these genotypes have this flatter form. All parts of forage turnips, especially the tuber parts, are used in animal nutrition. The tuber diameters of forage turnips are between 4 and 9 cm and the tuber lengths are between 9 and 18 cm (Ayan et al. 2006, Türk et al. 2009). In addition to the widespread cultivation of forage turnip, the existence and diversity of new table genotypes contribute to biodiversity. To facilitate the optimal utilization of genetic resources, it is crucial to understand genetic diversity at both morphological and molecular levels (Kumar et al. 2016). Molecular marker techniques are useful tools for genetic diversity analyses (Wu et al. 2012). A molecular marker is a gene or DNA sequence whose specific location on a chromosome is known and is linked to a particular gene or trait. In recent years, there has been a significant surge of interest in molecular markers, uncovering polymorphisms at the DNA level (Al-Samarai and Al-Kazaz 2015). Microsatellites, also known as simple sequence repeats (SSRs), are genomic regions composed of short DNA motifs repeated consecutively. Inter simple sequence repeats (ISSRs) are DNA segments bordered at both ends by these microsatellite sequences (Ng and Tan 2015). There are plenty of publications in the literature about examining the genetic diversity of Brassica rapa genotypes grown in different regions, e.g. Zhao et al. (2005) detected genetic diversity between different B. rapa genotypes using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers; while for same purpose Das et al. (1999), Fujimoto and Yamagishi (1996), Pino Del Carpio et al. (2011), Takuno et al. (2007) and Zhao et al. (2005) used AFLP and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers; Snowdon and Friedt (2004) and Ofori et al. (2008) used SSR markers. In this study, we aimed to use ISSR markers for characterizing and detecting polymorphisms among 18 Brassica rapa subsp. rapa genotypes grown in the Malatya province of Türkiye and determined the genetic variation among genotypes.
Material and methods
Plant materials
In the screening conducted in 2022 throughout Malatya, it was determined that Brassica rapa subsp. rapa plants are exclusively cultivated in the Pütürge district. The plants grown in this region are sent to other parts of the province. The seeds of 18 genotypes (eight Standart (Us), (B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B6, B7 and B8), four Gündeğer Pütürge (B9, B10, B11 and B12), four Karşıyaka Pütürge (B13, B14, B15 and B16), one Centre (B17), and one Şahit (B18)), collected from the villagers in the Karşıyaka region between November 2021 and January 2022, were planted under greenhouse conditions in April 2023 and the seeds were germinated. For germinating the seeds, a 1:3 perlite + peat mixture was prepared and the seeds were planted in germination vials. The prepared vials were placed in a plastic greenhouse with an approximate temperature of 20 ± 2 °C. Leaf samples were coded and taken into transparent bags for analysis (DNA) from the turnip seeds that produced real leaves. The leaves of the turnip genotypes taken were stored at − 80 °C for analysis. The collected leaf samples were prepared for genomic DNA isolation (Gene Mark commercial kit) in the plant biotechnology laboratory.
PCR amplifications and ISSR-PCR analysis
We used nine ISSR primers for PCR. PCR components and PCR protocol are shown in Table 1. ISSR-PCR results were visualized by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis. Gel images of PCR results with UBC-807 primer are shown in Fig. 1. Each ISSR gel image was evaluated individually for the presence (indicated as “1”) or absence (indicated as “0”) of amplified fragments, and missing data were imputed by assigning (“9”). Genetic similarity values between genotypes were analyzed using NTSYS-pc package version 2.10. The genetic similarity coefficient was calculated using the NEI72 method (Rohlf 2000). At the same time, a similarity matrix was created using UPGMA cluster analysis and NEI72 coefficient and groups were determined by dendrogram. PCA analysis was performed using JMP Statistical Software. Additionally, major allele frequency, Nei's H and PIC values were calculated using the PowerMarker software package version 3.25 (Liu and Muse 2005).
Results and discussion
Molecular markers are independent of environmental influences and can be easily determined in all tissues (Thakur et al. 2017). These markers reveal inter-varietal genomic variability by determining genetic variation and linkage maps (Demirel 2020), also powerful tools for plant systematics and plant breeding (Takahashi et al. 2016). The ISSR molecular marker technique was identified by Zietkiewicz et al. (1994) and this technique has been used in phylogenetic analysis, molecular characterization and genetic variation of many plant genotypes (Svetleva et al. 2006; Oğraş et al. 2017; Pınar et al. 2021; El-Esawi et al. 2022). In this study, a total of 73 bands were obtained using nine ISSR primers. Of these 67 were polymorphic and six were monomorphic. The polymorphism rate was approximately 91.78%. The lowest “PIC” value was detected in the UBC-873 primer as 0.1710, and the highest “PIC” value was detected in the UBC-834 primer as 0.3750. The mean “PIC” value was determined as 0.3319. While the lowest “H” value was found as 0.1888 in the UBC-873 primer, the highest “H” value was determined as 0.4999 in the UBC-834 primer. The mean “H” value was determined as 0.4276. Also, the lowest “major allele frequency” value was detected in the UBC-834 primer as 0.5054, and the highest “major allele frequency” value was detected in the UBC-873 primer as 0.8944. The mean “major allele frequency” value was determined as 0.6531 (Table 2). Similarity index values were determined to be between 0.0928 and 1.0924 (Table 3). The UPGMA dendrogram consist of two groups (Fig. 2). Group A was divided into two subgroups. Subgroup A, consists of Standart Us (B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B6, B7 and B8) genotypes. In subgroup B Gündeğer Pütürge and Karşıyaka Pütürge (B9, B13, B14, B15, B10, B11 and B12) genotypes emerged together. Group B consists of Karşıyaka Pütürge, Centre, and Şahit (B16, B17 and B18) genotypes. The UPGMA dendrogram was partially compatible with the distribution of genotypes in the regions where they were collected. Based on PCA analyses, the graphic results and eigen values obtained on the two-dimensional plane are given in Fig. 3. The first four eigen values explained 65% (eigen > 1) of the total variance in the population. As a result of the analysis, the 18 genotypes were reduced to two dimensions. There are 10 genotypes in the first dimension and eight genotypes in the second dimension. The clustering in the two-dimensional graph obtained as a result of the PCA analysis was partially compatible with the UPGMA dendrogram results. The genetic relationship of eleven Brassica rapa var. rapa genotypes from Erzurum province of Türkiye was determined using RAPD-PCR by Yildirim et al. (2010). They obtained an average of 90.4% polymorphism from 32 RAPD primers and revealed that the RAPD technique would be useful in genotyping Brassica rapa var. rapa genotypes. Talebi et al (2010) studied 47 Brassica rapa genotypes from all canola and mustard producing countries worldwide to create a gene plasma collection and obtained 99 polymorphic bands from 12 primers in the ISSR-PCR analysis. Their results revealed that these can be used to make informed decisions about the selection of genotypes to cross for developing populations or to facilitate the identification of different parents to cross in hybrid combinations in order to maximize heterosis. Using the SSR technique, Soengas et al (2011) determined the genetic diversity of 80 Brassica rapa subsp. rapa populations collected in northwestern Spain and northern Portugal. They obtained a total of 83 different alleles from eighteen SSR primers and determined the polymorphic information content to be between 0.28 and 0.80. SSR research revealed that new information on the genetic diversity and genetic structure of the Brassica rapa subsp. rapa population will be useful for its use and management.
Conclusion
In this study, 91.73% polymorphism, 0.4276 average “H”, 0.3319 average “PIC” and 0.6531 average major allele frequency were determined using nine ISSR primers. In the past, the ISSR, RAPD, and SSR techniques for detecting the genetic diversity of Brassica rapa genotypes, cultivar development and diagnosis have all proven to be suitable. In our study, the ISSR-PCR technique was revealed as a suitable marker for breeding, genetic variations and phylogenetic relationship of Brassica rapa subsp. rapa genotypes and the development of different cultivars.
References
Al-Samarai FR, Al-Kazaz AA (2015) Molecular markers: an introduction and applications. Eur J Mol Biotechnol 9(3):118–130. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejmb.2015.9.118
Ayan İ, Aşçı Ö, Başaran U, Mut H (2006) Bazı Yem şalgamı (Brassica rapa L.) çeşitlerinin verim özellikleri. Anadolu Tarım Bilim Derg 21(3):310–313. https://doi.org/10.7161/Anajas.2006.21.3.310-313
Das S, Rajagopal J, Bhatia S, Srivastava PS, Lakshmikumaran M (1999) Assessment of genetic variation within Brassica campestris cultivars using amplified fragment length polymorphism and random amplification of polymorphic DNA markers. J Biosciences 24:433–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02942653
Demirel F (2020) Bazı siyez buğdaylarının ISSR markörleri ile karakterizasyonu. J Agric 3(2):33–39. https://doi.org/10.46876/ja.809882
El-Esawi MA, Elashtokhy MM, Shamseldin SA, El-Ballat EM, Zayed EM, Heikal YM (2022) Analysis of genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes using phenological, molecular and DNA barcoding markers. Genes 14(1):34. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14010034
Fernandes F, Valentão P, Sousa C, Pereira JA, Seabra RM, Andrade PB (2007) Chemical and antioxidative assessment of dietary turnip (Brassica rapa var. rapa L.). Food Chem 105(3):1003–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.063
Francisco M, Moreno DA, Cartea ME, Ferreres F, Garcia-Viguera C, Velasco P (2009) Simultaneous identification of glucosinolates and phenolic compounds in a representative collection of vegetable Brassica rapa. J Chromatogr A 1216(38):6611–6619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2009.07.055
Fujimoto T, Yamagishi H (1996) Investigation on the phylogenetic relationship between ‘Sugukina’ and turnip by RAPD analysis. J Japan Soc Hort Sci 65:609–614. https://doi.org/10.2503/jjshs.65.609
Geren H (2002) Yem şalgamı yetiştiriciliği. Çiftçi broşürü: 21. Available from URL: http://www.tuam.ege.edu.tr/brosur/yemsalgam.html. 20 March 2006
Kumar H, Anubha MKV, Lal JP (2016) Morphological and molecular characterization of Brassica rapa ssp yellow sarson mutants. J Oilseed Brassica 1(1):1–6
Liu K, Muse S (2005) PowerMarker: An integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics 21(9):2128–2129
Nawaz H, Shad MA, Muzaffar S (2018) Phytochemical composition and antioxidant potential of Brassica. Brassica Germplasm-Charact, Breed Util 1:7–26
Ng WL, Tan SG (2015) Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers: are we doing it right. ASM Sci J 9(1):30–39
Ofori A, Becker HC, Kopisch-Obuch FJ (2008) Effect of crop improvement on genetic diversity in oilseed Brassica rapa (turnip-rape) cultivars, detected by SSR markers. J Appl Genet 49:207–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03195615
Oğraş T, Baştanlar EK, Metin ÖK, Kandemir I, Özçelik H (2017) Assessment of genetic diversity of rose genotypes using ISSR markers. Turk J Bot 41(4):347–355. https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-1608-32
Parlak Özaslan A, Sevimay CS (2005) Effect of seeding after barley and wheat harvest on yield components of forage turnip (Brassica rapa L.) cultivars. Ankara Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Tarım Bilimleri Der 11(3):299–302. https://doi.org/10.1501/Tarimbil_0000000582
Paul S, Geng CA, Yang TH, Yang YP, Chen JJ (2019) Phytochemical and health-beneficial progress of turnip (Brassica rapa). J Food Sci 84(1):19–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14417
Pinar H, Yahya HN, Erċışlı S, Coskun OF, Yaman M, Turgunbaev K, Uzun A (2021) Molecular characterization of barberry genotypes from Turkey and Kyrgyzstan. Erwerbs-Obstbau 63:403–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-021-00599-x
Pino Del Carpio D, Basnet RK, De Vos RC, Maliepaard C, Paulo MJ, Bonnema G (2011) Comparative methods for association studies: a case study on metabolite variation in a Brassica rapa core collection. PloS one 6(5):e19624. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019624
Rohlf FJ (2000) NTSYS-PC numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 2.1. Exeter Software, Applied Biostatics Inc, New York
Snowdon RJ, Friedt W (2004) Molecular markers in Brassica oilseed breeding: current status and future possibilities. Plant Breeding 123:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2003.00968.x
Soengas P, Cartea ME, Francisco M, Lema M, Velasco P (2011) Genetic structure and diversity of a collection of Brassica rapa subsp. rapa L. revealed by simple sequence repeat markers. J Agric Sci 149(5):617–624. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185961100013X
Svetleva D, Pereira G, Carlier J, Cabrita L, Leitão J, Genchev D (2006) Molecular characterization of Phaseolus vulgaris L. genotypes included in Bulgarian collection by ISSR and AFLP™ analyses. Sci Hortic 109(3):198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2006.04.001
Takahashi Y, Yokoi S, Takahata Y (2016) Genetic divergence of turnip (Brassica rapa L. em. Metzg. subsp. rapa) inferred from simple sequence repeats in chloroplast and nuclear genomes and morphology. Genet Resour Crop Evol 63:869–879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-015-0290-y
Takuno S, Kawahara T, Ohnishi O (2007) Phylogenetic relationships among cultivated types of Brassica rapa L. em. Metzg. as revealed by AFLP analysis. Genet Resour Crop Evol 54:279–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-005-4260-7
Talebi R, Haghnazari A, Tabatabaei I (2010) Assessment of genetic variation within international collection of Brassica rapa genotypes using inter simple sequence repeat DNA markers. Biharean Biol 4(2):145–151
Thakur AK, Singh KH, Singh L, Nanjundan J, Khan YJ, Singh D (2017) Patterns of subspecies genetic diversity among oilseed Brassica rapa as revealed by agro-morphological traits and SSR markers. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 26:282–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-016-0390-6
Türk M, Albayrak S, Balabanlı C, Yüksel O (2009) Effects of fertilization on root and leaf yields and quality of forage turnip (Brassica rapa L.). J Food Agric Environ 7(3&4):339–342
Wu W, Zhou B, Luo D, Han H et al (2012) Development of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers that are polymorphic between cultivars in Brassica rapa subsp. rapa. Afr J Biotechnol 11:2654–2660. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.3307
Yildirim E, Yildirim N, Ercisli S, Agar G, Karlidag H (2010) Genetic relationships among turnip (Brassica rapa var. rapa) genotypes. Genet Mol Res 9(2):987–993
Zhao J, Wang X, Deng B, Lou P, Wu J, Sun R, Xu Z, Vromans J, Koornneef M, Bonnema G (2005) Genetic relationships within Brassica rapa as inferred from AFLP fingerprints. Theor Appl Genet 110:1301–1314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-005-1967-y
Zietjiewicz EA, Rafalski D, Labuda D (1994) Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics 20:176–183. https://doi.org/10.1006/geno.1994.1151
Funding
Open access funding provided by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK). The authors have not disclosed any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
RK and ZTM: collected plant specimens. Molecular and data analyses were done by ES, MEÇ and ZTM and ES. The manuscript was drafted by RK, ES, ZTM and reviewed by all of the authors before submission. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Küçük, R., Sevindik, E., Çayır, M.E. et al. Genetic variation among Brassica rapa subsp. rapa genotypes growing in Malatya/Türkiye. Genet Resour Crop Evol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-024-01943-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-024-01943-2