Abstract
Observations of gravitational waves from compact binary mergers have enabled unique tests of general relativity in the dynamical and non-linear regimes. One of the most important such tests is constraints on the post-Newtonian (PN) corrections to the phase of the gravitational wave signal. The values of the PN coefficients can be calculated within standard general relativity, and these values are different in many alternate theories of gravity. It is clearly of great interest to constrain the deviations based on gravitational wave observations. In the majority of such tests which have been carried out, and which yield by far the most stringent constraints, it is common to vary these PN coefficients individually. While this might in principle be useful for detecting certain deviations from standard general relativity, it is a serious limitation. For example, we would expect alternate theories of gravity to generically have additional parameters. The corrections to the PN coefficients would be expected to depend on these additional non-GR parameters, whence, we expect that the various PN coefficients to be highly correlated. We present an alternate analysis here using data from the binary neutron star coalescence GW170817. Our analysis uses an appropriate linear combination of non-GR parameters that represent absolute deviations from the corresponding post-Newtonian inspiral coefficients in the TaylorF2 approximant phase. These combinations represent uncorrelated non-GR parameters which correspond to principal directions of their covariance matrix in the parameter subspace. Our results illustrate good agreement with GR. In particular, the integral non-GR phase is \(\Psi _{{\tiny int-non-GR}} = 0.0447\pm 25.3000\) and the deviation from GR percentile is \(p^{{\tiny Dev-GR}}_{n}=25.85\%\).
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The problem of binary motion in a gravitational system is one of the oldest in astronomy. Newton’s explanation of Kepler’s laws was a milestone of science. Relativistic corrections to Keplerian motion under Newton’s laws have been studied since the time of Einstein [1]. These corrections can be calculated within the post-Newtonian (PN) formalism as an expansion in the ratio v/c of the typical relative velocity v between the two components of the binary to the speed of light c. Low order corrections can be observed in the motion of binary pulsar systems where typical values of v/c are \(\mathcal {O}(10^{-4})\) [2]. The recent observations of coalescing compact binary systems (see e.g. [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]) have much higher values of \(v/c \sim \mathcal {O}(10^{-1})\). These observations therefore probe regimes where the gravitational field is strong and also dynamical.
The relation between the binary motion and the observed gravitational waves was first expounded by Peters and Mathews [10]. This work obtained the gravitational wave phase by calculating the Einstein quadrupole formula for underlying Keplerian motion. Whilst this analysis gives a very approximate fit for LIGO data [11] it has been known for a long time that more accurate fits require a large number of relativistic corrections [12]. Several different approaches have been able to model the expected signal for the inspiral and coalescence of compact objects with sufficient accuracy within standard general relativity. These include the Effective-one-body models (see e.g. [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]), the Phenomenological models (see e.g. [22,23,24,25,26,27,28]) and the surrogate models [29,30,31]. Some corrections have also been calculated in modified gravity theories [32, 33]. In this paper we restrict our attention to the binary neutron star merger GW170817 event [34]. For this event, the contribution of the merger to the signal-to-noise-ratio is not significant, whence the inspiral regime and standard PN methods dominate [35,36,37,38,39].
It has now become routine to use the observed gravitational wave observations to constrain relativistic corrections to binary motion [5, 40,41,42,43,44,45]. The TIGER framework [46] looks for a deviation from the calculated GR value by introducing a number of phenomenological deviation parameters that take the value zero in GR. In this approach the deviation parameters are assumed to be independent of the physical parameters of the binary, such as mass and spin.
These phenomenological non-GR parameters implicitly represent a certain class of GR alternatives. In different GR alternatives, these parameters may have different physical meanings. For instance, in phenomenological modifications of GR based on the massive graviton assumption, such that the effective Newtonian potential is of Yukawa type with a non-standard graviton dispersion relation, the non-GR parameter of 1PN order is proportional to the graviton’s mass squared [47]. In other alternative theories of gravity, radiative multipole moments differ from those of GR and their deviation from GR values contributes to every PN order phase term [48, 49]. In general, alternatives to GR may naturally depend on an additional set of parameters such that the non-GR parameters are in general functionally related. This motivates testing GR via the simultaneous variation of such non-GR parameters introduced as additional terms in the GW phase. In GR tests two types of variations were considered: each of these parameters was varied individually whilst keeping the others fixed, e.g. [5, 44, 45], or all the parameters were varied simultaneously [43, 50]. The results showed that simultaneous variation produced wide and non-informative posteriors on the value of each individual deviation parameter, closely consistent with the prior. Reported bounds on non-GR parameters obtained from the double pulsar J0737-3039 [51] were computed individually, one at a time [43]. This is because in binary pulsars the orbital period changes at essentially a constant rate and when the PN order is increased, the corresponding bounds quickly become rather loose and significantly less informative than those from GW’s binaries coalescence.
Whilst varying each one individually captures a generic deviation from GR if it is strong enough, a generic modified gravity theory is expected to differ from GR for several of the non-GR parameters at different PN orders. This also means that one cannot directly compare the results obtained on each parameter individually with a theoretical calculation in an alternate theory of gravity (note, however, that in some specific cases of alternative theories of gravity, one can make such a comparison by using perturbative approach, see, e.g., [52,53,54,55]). This aspect was also emphasised in the work [50], where the authors used the Fisher information matrix to estimate constraints on non-GR parameters and found that in the best case of multiband observations the deviations at orders below 3PN are less than \(1\%\). They reported the deviations of \(\sim 100\%\) and higher for simultaneous measurement of four and more deformation parameters in the case of ground-based observatories or LISA observations alone. In addition, the non-GR parameters are correlated with the PN coefficients and between themselves, which can be seen for example in Figure 7 of [43]. To remedy these limitations, the method of principal component analysis was proposed in [56]. A similar method, known as the singular value decomposition approach, was proposed in [57]. These methods are applied to the Fisher information matrix that estimates errors in the parameter values. However, Fisher-matrix-based estimates are not reliable at low SNRs (see, e.g. [12] and also [58]). This limits the measurability of the higher-order PN terms, as well as their non-GR contributions.
In this work, we allow the waveform phase to vary in additive non-GR parameters sector. Using our numerical results, we construct covariance matrix of these parameters whose diagonal elements represent their variance and off-diagonal terms represent their covariance that defines their pairwise correlation. Taking only the diagonal elements and ignoring the off-diagonal ones, as it was done in many works, results in ignoring the information about the parameters correlation. In a simple example of a two-dimensional Gaussian distribution, the principal directions of the concentration ellipse define new orthogonal variables whose variances are described optimally. Accordingly, such a transformation provides more accurate measurement of the leading order (uncorrelated) non-GR parameters (see Eqs. (7) and (8) below). A similar approach based on diagonalization of the non-GR parameters covariance matrix is given in the work [59], which appeared in the arXiv after submission of our paper.
2 Posterior distributions of the non-GR parameters
When the rate of change of frequency is small relative to the squared frequency, the expansion of a GW signal h(t) in the Fourier domain can be obtained from an expansion in the time domain using the Stationary Phase Approximation [12]. For the dominant frequency, the Fourier domain waveform can be written as
where \(\tilde{h}(f)\) is the Fourier transform of h(t) and
Here \(\Psi _{1}\equiv 0\) and the only non-zero logarithmic terms are \(\Psi ^{\ln }_{5}\) and \(\Psi ^{\ln }_{6}\). The expansion order n corresponds to (n/2)PN term. In this expansion the 2.5PN term becomes indistinguishable from the binary coalescence phase term \((-\phi _{c}-\pi /4)\) and the 4PN term is indistinguishable from the binary coalescence time term \(2\pi ft_{c}\). The gravitational wave amplitude A can also be expanded as a post-Newtonian series, but here we will keep only the terms at Newtonian order and hence \(A(f) \sim f^{-7/6}\). Factors of a reference frequency \(f_{{\tiny ref}}\) are included as in [56] to render the expansion coefficients explicitly dimensionless. In what follows, we shall take the “natural”reference frequency \(f_{{\tiny ref}}=1/(\pi M)\). This choice matches the expansion (2) of the TaylorF2 approximant form (see, e.g., [60]), which is also implemented in the LALSuite software package [61].Footnote 1
The physical parameters that enter our waveform are the binary masses \(m_1\) and \(m_2\), the orbit-aligned dimensionless spin components of the stars \(\chi _{z1}\) and \(\chi _{z2}\) (we consider high-spin priors), the dimensionless tidal deformability parameters \(\Lambda _1\) and \(\Lambda _2\), which already appear in the 5PN term (here we present the posterior of the dimensionless combined tidal deformability \(\tilde{\Lambda }\)), and the following set of non-GR parametersFootnote 2:
that represent the absolute deviations in their corresponding PN coefficients,
The work [62] criticises parametric tests of GR, which are not based on explicit non-GR waveform models, appealing to the fact that the fractional precision of non-GR parameters determination is not parametrisation-invariant. For a particular non-GR theory in mind, these parameters are functions of the theory parameters, whose values, given the corresponding waveform model, can be estimated. Although the physical interpretation of our parameters is not in direct one-to-one relationship with the PN expansion coefficients of TaylorF2, our parameters still set observational constraints, even on theories in which more than one PN coefficient differs from its GR value. This is the case in most modified theories of GR.
Our goal is to measure values of such deviations regardless of any specific non-GR theory and these values are “absolute”in the sense that the functions values do not depend on their variables choice. To obtain the posterior density distributions of these parameters we exploit the PyCBC inference package [63] where we had fixed the reported value [34] of the luminosity distance \(40^{+8}_{-14}\) Mpc. In our runs, we used uniform prior distributions and varied all the parameters simultaneously. The supplementary file [64] contains posteriors of the binary physical parameters, assuming that GR is correct, i.e. the values of (3) are set to zero, Fig. 1, one- and two-dimensional posteriors of all the parameters, Fig. 2, and posteriors of the non-GR parameters, Fig. 3. Our results show that the dimensionless combined tidal deformability \(\tilde{\Lambda }\) is correlated with other parameters, and in particular with \(\delta \Psi _{4}\) non-GR parameter. The non-GR parameters are strongly correlated, in particular \(\delta \Psi _{n}\) and \(\delta \Psi _{n+1}\), for \(n=1,2,3\). The off-diagonal (correlation) terms corresponding to these parameters in the \((5\times 5)\) covariance matrix \(\Sigma _{nm}\) (see the supplementary file [64]) make these parameters less accurately measured.Footnote 3 Moreover, because of the correlation, we cannot infer directly the accuracy of these parameters from their 1D posteriors. Thus, we are to define a related set of uncorrelated non-GR parameters.Footnote 4 In order to statistically isolate non-GR parameters from each other, we diagonalise their covariance matrix derived from the sample data arrays from the PyCBC inference package [63]. This approach does not rely on the high SNR values that are required for the Fisher information matrix estimate. We solve the eigenvalue-eigenvectors problem and derive the transformation matrix \(T_{nm}\), which diagonalises the covariance matrix (see the supplementary file [64]). Its transposed form \(T_{mn}\) relates the correlated and new uncorrelated non-GR parameters \(\delta \hat{\Psi }_{n}\):
These matrix elements \(T_{mn}\) will obviously depend on the detector noise spectrum and on the source parameters as well. The transformation matrix \(T_{mn}\) reads
The matrix acts on the column vector \([\delta {\Psi }_{0}\,\,\delta {\Psi }_{1}\,\,\delta {\Psi }_{2}\,\,\delta {\Psi }_{3}\,\,\delta {\Psi }_{4}]^{T}\) and produces the column vector \([\delta \hat{\Psi }_{0}\,\,\delta \hat{\Psi }_{1}\,\,\delta \hat{\Psi }_{2}\,\,\delta \hat{\Psi }_{3}\,\,\delta \hat{\Psi }_{4}]^{T}\), where the superscript “T”stands for the transpose. The eigenvalue-eigenvectors problem computations were performed using the Householder reduction followed by the QL algorithm. Details of these methods can be found in the book [65].
To illustrate the result of this transformation we present one- and two-dimensional posteriors of the non-GR parameters in Fig. 1. Posteriors of the binary parameters together with the uncorrelated non-GR parameters are presented in Fig. 4 in the supplementary file [64].
One can see that the new non-GR parameters are indeed almost uncorrelated. Moreover, the measured values of the new non-GR parameters are overall more constrained, as compared to the correlated ones. We can present our results in terms of the relative \(\delta {\psi }_{n}=\delta {\Psi }_{n}/\Psi _{n}\) values of the non-GR parameters considered in other works, e.g. [44, 59]. Accordingly, we compute the values of the relative correlated \(\delta {\psi }_{n}\) and uncorrelated \(\delta \hat{\psi }_{n}\) non-GR parameters (except for 0.5PN ones, which are taken to be identical to the absolute ones, for in GR 0.5PN term vanishes) as follows. First, we compute the relative correlated non-GR parameters by taking the values of the masses and spins (see Fig. 2 in [64]) and computing the first four PN terms (see, e.g. [60, 61]) and dividing by them the corresponding non-GR correlated parameters (see Fig. 2 in [64]),
Second, we compute the relative uncorrelated non-GR parameters by taking the sample data arrays of the masses, spins, and non-GR parameters from our PyCBC inference and constructing from them the arrays of the relative non-GR parameters. Then we proceed along the same steps as above and construct their covariance matrix, diagonalise it by means of the transformation matrix, and apply its transpose to the computed relative uncorrelated non-GR parameters. As a result, we derive
These results show that despite of simultaneous variations, our constraints are more stringent for the leading order non-GR parameters.
We note that the presence of the non-GR parameters in the waveform model does affect the values of the physical parameters corresponding to GR waveform model (for comparison see Fig. 1 in the supplementary file.) However, the 90% credible intervals of the “new”values of physical parameters and the “old”ones largely overlap.
3 Analysis of the results: Measures of deviations from GR
From the posteriors of the non-GR parameters one can immediately infer that the GR prediction, i.e. \(\delta \Psi _{n}=0\), \(n=0,...,4\) falls well within their 90% credible intervals. However, one may prefer to have additional quantitative estimates of GR validity. In this section, we measure deviations from GR based on our derived results.
3.1 Integral non-GR phase
According to our approach (2), (4), the waveform phase is an additive combination of the GR and non-GR components,
where
is the non-GR part of the waveform phase. It indicates the phase difference due to potential non-GR contribution and thus represents another, “effective”non-GR term. To measure this term it is reasonable to introduce is cumulative value given by the integral non-GR phase
The integral non-GR phase can be computed by using the estimated values of the non-GR parameters and the expression (10) above. Note that the non-GR part of the waveform phase is a vector in the non-GR parameter subspace spanned by the basis \(\{\delta \Psi _{n},\,n=0,...,4\}\) which is invariant under the transformation (5) of the uncorrelated non-GR parameters. To see that one should also diagonalise the corresponding frequency components \(\{(f/f_{{\tiny ref}})^{(n-5)/3},\, n=0,...,4\}\) by the transposed of the matrix (6). Accordingly, the quantity \(\Psi _{{\tiny int-non-GR}}\) is invariant as well.
We may also estimate uncertainty \(\sigma \) of the non-GR phase by using the propagation of errors approach. The variance of the function (10) is
Integrating this expression in the frequency range, we derive the variance of the non-GR phase
For our data we find
Thus, the GR prediction \(\Psi _{{\tiny int-non-GR}}=0\) falls well within (14).
3.2 Confidence regions and deviation from GR percentile
Here we present another ways to measure GR validity. First, we construct confidence regions whose boundary corresponds to the predicted by GR zero values of the non-GR parameters. This approach is based on the kernel density estimation (kde). For a 2D kde of each pair of the non-GR parameters we used the Python function scipy.stats.gaussian_kde from the SciPy library, that is implemented by PyCBC by the default. The confidence regions are shown in Fig. 1 and also in Fig. 3 in the supplementary file.
Second, we calculate the deviation from GR percentile \(p^{{\tiny Dev-GR}}_{n}\) in the following way. The PyCBC inference hdf file contains the posterior for original non-GR PN parameters. We extract the effective samples from the inference hdf file by using pycbc_inference_extract_samples command to get a new hdf file. From this new hdf file, we read the posterior for each original non-GR PN parameters \(\delta \Psi _n\)’s as an array using the standard reading hdf file command. In order to get array for each new non-GR parameter \(\delta \hat{\Psi }_{n}\), we use the expression (5). This gives us array for each new non-GR parameter \(\delta \hat{\Psi }_{n}\). To get the probability density \(p(\delta \hat{\Psi }_{n})\) we use the Python function scipy.stats.gaussian_kde.
The original non-GR PN parameters are correlated, but the new non-GR parameters are almost uncorrelated. Exploiting this fact, we construct the probability density P in 5 dimensions for the new non-GR parameters by multiplying the individual probability densities \(p(\delta \hat{\Psi }_{n})\)’s of the new non-GR parameters,
Next, we define the level hypersurface \(\Sigma :\,P=\text{ const }\) corresponding to GR prediction, i.e. to zero values of the new non-GR parameters,
Finally, to get the deviation from GR percentile, we integrate P over the domain \(D(\Sigma )\) enclosed by this hypersurface,
To get the value
of the deviation from GR percentile, we performed the integration numerically by using the Vegas package, which exploits the adaptive multidimensional Monte Carlo integration.
4 Conclusion
We have analysed deviations from GR with the example of the binary neutron star signal GW170817. A set of 5 non-GR parameters up to and including the 2PN order was introduced into the GW waveform in the TaylorF2 phase approximant. These parameters represent absolute deviations of the post-Newtonian coefficients from their GR values. By using the PyCBC package we computed their posterior density distributions for the simultaneous variation of all these non-GR parameters using uniform prior distributions. Next, diagonalizing their \((5\times 5)\) covariance matrix, we derived linear combinations of these parameters that represent a set of uncorrelated non-GR parameters. This approach allows the first study of each of the new non-GR parameters independently. Each of these uncorrelated parameters corresponds to a covariance matrix principal direction in the 5D subspace of the parameter space.
Our results provide more stringent constraints on GR than those presented in [5, 44, 45]. In comparison to the principal component analysis [56] or the singular value decomposition approach [57] applied to the Fisher matrix, our computations provide a more efficient technique that achieves more stringent constraints on parameters estimation. The reason is that diagonalization of the Fisher matrix followed by the parameters estimation run gives less stringent posteriors as compared to diagonalization of the covariance matrix constructed from the computed data. This is due to requirement of the high SNR value for a good Fisher information matrix estimate. A detailed analysis and comparison of both methods on other GW events may be more informative and requires additional investigation, which is beyond the scope of our paper.
Although the approach presented here, based on orthogonalisation of the covariance matrix, looks quite promising, one can also analyse a “hybrid method”, that combines both the principal component analysis of the Fisher matrix and the orthogonalisation of the covariance matrix constructed from the computed data. A more detailed study of this possibility is left for future work.
5 Supplementary information
Our manuscript has accompanying supplementary file [64].
Availability of data and materials
All data analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information file.
Notes
We have tested our method for different \(f_{{\tiny ref}}\) values and found that our results do not change within the statistical uncertainty.
Here we restricted the non-GR parameters up to the 2PN order. Measurements of the higher orders are less accurate and their posteriors do not converge well. We include point-particle PN terms from GR up to 4PN and tidal deformation terms up to 6PN.
We constructed the covariance matrix from the posterior sample data arrays of our PyCBC run by means of the NumPy method “cov”.
Ideally, we could construct a complete set of all 10 uncorrelated parameters. However, such parameters would represent a mixture of the physical binary parameters and the non-GR parameters and this would alter their original physical meaning. Thus, to avoid this situation, we keep the non-GR sector in the parameter space analytically (but not statistically) isolated from the GR sector.
References
Einstein, A., Infeld, L., Hoffmann, B.: The gravitational equations and the problem of motion. Ann. Math. 39(1), 65–100 (1938)
Wex, N.: Testing Relativistic Gravity with Radio Pulsars. 2 (2014)
Abbott, B.P., et al.: Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116(6), 061102 (2016)
Abbott, B.P., et al.: GWTC-1: a gravitational-wave transient catalog of compact binary mergers observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first and second observing runs. Phys. Rev. X 9(3), 031040 (2019)
Abbott, B.P. et al.: Binary Black Hole Mergers in the first Advanced LIGO Observing Run. Phys. Rev. X, 6(4):041015 (2016). [Erratum: Phys.Rev.X 8, 039903 (2018)]
Nitz, A.H., Capano, C., Nielsen, A.B., Reyes, S., White, R., Brown, D.A., Krishnan, B.: 1-OGC: the first open gravitational-wave catalog of binary mergers from analysis of public advanced LIGO data. Astrophys. J. 872(2), 195 (2019)
Nitz, A.H., Dent, T., Davies, G.S., Kumar, S., Capano, C.D., Harry, I., Mozzon, S., Nuttall, L., Lundgren, A., Tápai, M.: 2-OGC: Open Gravitational-wave Catalog of binary mergers from analysis of public Advanced LIGO and Virgo data. Astrophys. J. 891, 123 (2020)
Venumadhav, T., Zackay, B., Roulet, J., Dai, L., Zaldarriaga, M.: New binary black hole mergers in the second observing run of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo. Phys. Rev. D 101(8), 083030 (2020)
Zackay, B., Venumadhav, T., Dai, L., Roulet, J., Zaldarriaga, Matias: Highly spinning and aligned binary black hole merger in the Advanced LIGO first observing run. Phys. Rev. D. 100(2), 023007 (2019)
Peters, P.C., Mathews, J.: Gravitational radiation from point masses in a Keplerian orbit. Phys. Rev. 131, 435–439 (1963)
Abbott, B.P., et al.: The basic physics of the binary black hole merger GW150914. Annalen Phys. 529(1–2), 1600209 (2017)
Cutler, C., Flanagan, E.E.: Gravitational waves from merging compact binaries: how accurately can one extract the binary’s parameters from the inspiral wave form? Phys. Rev. D. 49, 2658–2697 (1994)
Buonanno, A., Damour, T.: Effective one-body approach to general relativistic two-body dynamics. Phys. Rev. D. 59, 084006 (1999)
Damour, T., Nagar, Alessandro: The effective-one-body approach to the general relativistic two body problem. Astrophys Black Holes 905, 273–312 (2016)
Ossokine, S. et al.: Multipolar Effective-One-Body Waveforms for Precessing Binary Black Holes: Construction and Validation. 4 (2020)
Bohé, A., et al.: Improved effective-one-body model of spinning, nonprecessing binary black holes for the era of gravitational-wave astrophysics with advanced detectors. Phys. Rev. D. 95(4), 044028 (2017)
Taracchini, A., et al.: Effective-one-body model for black-hole binaries with generic mass ratios and spins. Phys. Rev. D. 89(6), 061502 (2014)
Pan, Y., Buonanno, A., Taracchini, A., Kidder, L.E., Mroué, A.H., Pfeiffer, H.P., Scheel, M.A., Szilàgyi, B.: Inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms of spinning, precessing black-hole binaries in the effective-one-body formalism. Phys. Rev. D. 89(8), 084006 (2014)
Pan, Y., Buonanno, A., Boyle, M., Buchman, L.T., Kidder, L.E., Pfeiffer, H.P., Scheel, Mark A.: Inspiral-merger-ringdown multipolar waveforms of nonspinning black-hole binaries using the effective-one-body formalism. Phys. Rev. D. 84, 124052 (2011)
Nagar, A., et al.: Time-domain effective-one-body gravitational waveforms for coalescing compact binaries with nonprecessing spins, tides and self-spin effects. Phys. Rev. D. 98(10), 104052 (2018)
Damour, T., Nagar, A.: New effective-one-body description of coalescing nonprecessing spinning black-hole binaries. Phys. Rev. D. 90(4), 044018 (2014)
Ajith, P. et al.: A Template bank for gravitational waveforms from coalescing binary black holes. I. Non-spinning binaries. Phys. Rev. D, 77, 104017 (2008). [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 79, 129901 (2009)]
Khan, S., Ohme, F., Chatziioannou, K., Hannam, M.: Including higher order multipoles in gravitational-wave models for precessing binary black holes. Phys. Rev. D 101(2), 024056 (2020)
Khan, S., Chatziioannou, K., Hannam, M., Ohme, F.: Phenomenological model for the gravitational-wave signal from precessing binary black holes with two-spin effects. Phys. Rev. D 100(2), 024059 (2019)
London, L., Khan, S., Fauchon-Jones, E., García, C., Hannam, M., Husa, S., Jiménez-Forteza, X., Kalaghatgi, C., Ohme, F., Pannarale, F.: First higher-multipole model of gravitational waves from spinning and coalescing black-hole binaries. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120(16), 161102 (2018)
Khan, S., Husa, S., Hannam, M., Ohme, F., Pürrer, M., Forteza, X.J., Bohé, A.: Frequency-domain gravitational waves from nonprecessing black-hole binaries. II. A phenomenological model for the advanced detector era. Phys. Rev. D 93(4), 044007 (2016)
Husa,Sascha., Khan, S., Hannam, M., Pürrer, M., Ohme, F., Forteza, X.J., Bohé, A.: Frequency-domain gravitational waves from nonprecessing black-hole binaries. I. New numerical waveforms and anatomy of the signal. Phys. Rev. D, 93(4), 044006 (2016)
Santamaria, L., et al.: Matching post-Newtonian and numerical relativity waveforms: systematic errors and a new phenomenological model for non-precessing black hole binaries. Phys. Rev. D 82, 064016 (2010)
Field, S.E., Galley, C.R., Hesthaven, J.S., Kaye, J., Tiglio, M.: Fast prediction and evaluation of gravitational waveforms using surrogate models. Phys. Rev. X 4(3), 031006 (2014)
Blackman, J., Field, S.E., Scheel, M.A., Galley, C.R., Ott, C.D., Boyle, M., Kidder, L.E., Pfeiffer, H.P., Szilágyi, B.: Numerical relativity waveform surrogate model for generically precessing binary black hole mergers. Phys. Rev. D 96(2), 024058 (2017)
Varma, V., Field, S.E., Scheel, M.A., Blackman, J., Gerosa, D., Stein, L.C., Kidder, L.E., Pfeiffer, H.P.: Surrogate models for precessing binary black hole simulations with unequal masses. Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 033015 (2019)
Ohashi, A., Tagoshi, H., Sasaki, M.: PostNewtonian expansion of gravitational waves from a compact star orbiting a rotating black hole in Brans-Dicke theory: Circular orbit case. Prog. Theor. Phys. 96, 713–727 (1996)
Nielsen, A.B., Birnholtz, O.: Testing pseudo-complex general relativity with gravitational waves. Astron. Nachr. 339(4), 298–305 (2018)
Abbott, B.P., et al.: GW170817: observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(16), 161101 (2017)
Blanchet, L., Damour, T., Iyer, B.R., Will, C.M., Wiseman, A.G.: Gravitational radiation damping of compact binary systems to second postNewtonian order. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3515–3518 (1995)
Blanchet, L., Faye, G., Iyer, B. R., Joguet, B.: Gravitational wave inspiral of compact binary systems to 7/2 postNewtonian order. Phys. Rev. D, 65, 061501 (2002). [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 71, 129902 (2005)]
Blanchet, L., Damour, T., Esposito-Farese, G., Iyer, B.R.: Gravitational radiation from inspiralling compact binaries completed at the third post-Newtonian order. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 091101 (2004)
Blanchet, L., Faye, G., Iyer, B. R., Sinha, S.: The third post-Newtonian gravitational wave polarisations and associated spherical harmonic modes for inspiralling compact binaries in quasi-circular orbits. Class. Quant. Grav., 25, 165003 (2008). [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 29, 239501 (2012)]
Blanchet, Luc: Gravitational radiation from post-Newtonian sources and inspiralling compact binaries. Liv. Rev. Rel. 17, 2 (2014)
Arun, K.G., Iyer, B.R., Qusailah, M.S.S., Sathyaprakash, B.S.: Testing post-Newtonian theory with gravitational wave observations. Class. Quant. Grav., 23, L37–L43 (2006)
Arun,K. G., Iyer,Bala R., Qusailah,M. S. S., Sathyaprakash,B. S.: Probing the non-linear structure of general relativity with black hole binaries. Phys. Rev. D, 74, 024006 (2006)
Mishra,Chandra Kant., Arun,K. G., Iyer,Bala R., Sathyaprakash,B. S.: Parametrized tests of post-Newtonian theory using advanced LIGO and Einstein telescope. Phys. Rev. D, 82, 064010 (2010)
Abbott, B.P. et al.: Tests of general relativity with GW150914. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116(22), 221101 (2016). [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 129902 (2018)]
Abbott, B.P., et al.: Tests of General Relativity with GW170817. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123(1), 011102 (2019)
Abbott, B.P., et al.: Tests of General Relativity with the Binary Black Hole Signals from the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1. Phys. Rev. D 100(10), 104036 (2019)
Agathos, M., Pozzo, W.D., Li, T.G.F., Broeck, C.V.D., Veitch, J., Vitale, S.: TIGER: A data analysis pipeline for testing the strong-field dynamics of general relativity with gravitational wave signals from coalescing compact binaries. Phys. Rev. D, 89(8), 082001 (2014)
Will, C.M.: Bounding the mass of the graviton using gravitational wave observations of inspiralling compact binaries. Phys. Rev. D 57, 2061–2068 (1998)
Kastha, S., Gupta, A., Arun, K.G., Sathyaprakash, B.S., Broeck, C.V.D.: Testing the multipole structure of compact binaries using gravitational wave observations. Phys. Rev. D, 98(12), 124033 (2018)
Kastha, S., Gupta, A., Arun, K.G., Sathyaprakash, B.S., Broeck, C.V.D.: Testing the multipole structure and conservative dynamics of compact binaries using gravitational wave observations: the spinning case. Phys. Rev. D, 100(4), 044007 (2019)
Gupta, A., Datta, S., Kastha, S., Borhanian, S., Arun, K.G., Sathyaprakash, B.S.: Multiparameter tests of general relativity using multiband gravitational-wave observations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125(20), 201101 (2020)
Kramer, M., et al.: Tests of general relativity from timing the double pulsar. Science 314, 97–102 (2006)
Yunes, N., Pretorius, F.: Fundamental theoretical bias in gravitational wave astrophysics and the parameterized post-Einsteinian framework. Phys. Rev. D. 80, 122003 (2009)
Yunes, N., Yagi, K., Pretorius, F.: Theoretical physics implications of the binary black-hole mergers GW150914 and GW151226. Phys. Rev. D. 94(8), 084002 (2016)
Nair, R., Perkins, S., Silva, H.O., Yunes, N.: Fundamental Physics Implications for Higher-Curvature Theories from Binary Black Hole Signals in the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123(19), 191101 (2019)
Perkins, S.E., Nair, R., Silva, H.O., Yunes, N.: Improved gravitational-wave constraints on higher-order curvature theories of gravity. Phys. Rev. D. 104(2), 024060 (2021)
Ohme, F., Nielsen, A.B., Keppel, D., Lundgren, A.: Statistical and systematic errors for gravitational-wave inspiral signals: a principal component analysis. Phys. Rev. D. 88(4), 042002 (2013)
Pai, A., Arun, K.G.: Singular value decomposition in parametrised tests of post-Newtonian theory. Class. Quant. Grav. 30, 025011 (2013)
Vallisneri, M.: Use and abuse of the Fisher information matrix in the assessment of gravitational-wave parameter-estimation prospects. Phys. Rev. D 77, 042001 (2008)
Saleem, M., Datta, S., Arun, K.G., Sathyaprakash, B.S.: Parametrized tests of post-Newtonian theory using principal component analysis. Phys. Rev. D. 105(8), 084062 (2022)
Buonanno, A., Iyer, B., Ochsner, E., Pan, Y., Sathyaprakash, B.S.: Comparison of post-Newtonian templates for compact binary inspiral signals in gravitational-wave detectors. Phys. Rev. D. 80, 084043 (2009)
LIGO Scientific Collaboration. LIGO Algorithm Library - LALSuite. free software (GPL), (2018)
Chua, A.J.K., Vallisneri, M.: On parametric tests of relativity with false degrees of freedom. 6 (2020)
Biwer, C.M., Capano, C.D., De Soumi, Cabero, M., Brown, D.A., Nitz, A.H., Raymond, V.: PyCBC Inference: a Python-based parameter estimation toolkit for compact binary coalescence signals. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 131(996), 024503 (2019)
See Supplementary file SupplementaryFile.pdf
Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., Flannery, B.P.: Numerical recipes in FORTRAN: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)
AEI. The Atlas Computing Cluster. https://www.aei.mpg.de/24838/02_Computing_and_ATLAS (2017)
Acknowledgements
The computation of the work was run on the ATLAS computing cluster at AEI Hannover [66] funded by the Max Planck Society and the State of Niedersachsen, Germany. This research has made use of data, software and/or web tools obtained from the LIGO Open Science Center (https://losc.ligo.org), a service of LIGO Laboratory, the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration. LIGO is funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation. Virgo is funded by the French Centre National de Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), the Italian Istituto Nazionale della Fisica Nucleare (INFN) and the Dutch Nikhef, with contributions by Polish and Hungarian institutes. Finally, we would like to thank the anonymous referees for their useful comments and suggestions.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Not applicable
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Not applicable
Ethics approval
Not applicable
Consent to participate
Not applicable
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Code availability
Not applicable
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Shoom, A.A., Gupta, P.K., Krishnan, B. et al. Testing the post-Newtonian expansion with GW170817. Gen Relativ Gravit 55, 55 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-023-03100-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-023-03100-z