Abstract
Understanding fluid flows in planetary cores and subsurface oceans, as well as their signatures in available observational data (gravity, magnetism, rotation, etc.), is a tremendous interdisciplinary challenge. In particular, it requires understanding the fundamental fluid dynamics involving turbulence and rotation at typical scales well beyond our daytoday experience. To do so, laboratory experiments are fully complementary to numerical simulations, especially in systematically exploring extreme flow regimes for long duration. In this review article, we present some illustrative examples where experimental approaches, complemented by theoretical and numerical studies, have been key for a better understanding of planetary interior flows driven by some type of mechanical forcing. We successively address the dynamics of flows driven by precession, by libration, by differential rotation, and by boundary topography.

Laboratory experiments are used to investigate the rotational dynamics of planetary internal fluid layers, including cores and subsurface oceans.

Various types of waves, instabilities, and turbulence are quantitatively described.

Consequences regarding magnetic field generation and kinetic energy dissipation are addressed.
1 Introduction
Numerous planetary bodies have or had a global, internal fluid layer, such as a liquid ironrich core in the deep interior of terrestrial planets and moons, or a salty water ocean below the solid surface of icy satellites. Understanding the flows taking place in these spherical shell envelopes remains a tremendous interdisciplinary challenge, despite more than one century of intense research. Beyond the challenge in fundamental fluid dynamics to understand these complex motions involving turbulence, rotation, and buoyancy effects at typical spatial and temporal scales well beyond our daytoday experience, a global knowledge of the involved processes is fundamental to a better understanding of the global dynamics of planets. Indeed, turbulent flows in cores and oceans significantly influence the planets thermal and orbital evolution, because of heat advection, viscous dissipation, and coupling with the overlying/underlying solid shells. Also, motions in conducting fluids are the main mechanism for generating planetary magnetic fields (Larmor 1919), a possible ingredient for planetary habitability. Generally speaking, and even though the deeper interior dynamics is not directly observable, gravity data, magnetic field, and the rotation state of a planet are influenced by ongoing flows and hence offer indirect clues for their understanding.
The main obstacle to quantitative modeling and understanding of planetary hidden flows stands in the extreme character of the involved physical dimensionless parameters, which translates to highly turbulent regimes implying an extremely wide range of time and length scales. For instance, the relative importance of viscous and Coriolis forces is measured by the Ekman number
where \(\nu\) is the fluid viscosity, \(\varOmega\) the planet rotation rate, and R the typical depth of the considered fluid layer. Another relevant dimensionless parameter is the Rossby number which compares the flow nonlinearity and the Coriolis force
where U is the typical largescale velocity of the flow. As will be seen below, Ro is also often considered as a dimensionless measure of the amplitude of the flow source. The ratio of the Rossby and Ekman numbers defines the Reynolds number
which schematically measures the turbulence intensity of the flow. Earth’s core, for instance, is a very turbulent, fast rotator with \(Ek \simeq 10^{15}\) and \(Re \simeq 10^8\), whose nonlinear dynamics is strongly constrained by rotation as shown by \(Ro \simeq 10^{7}\). Those values are clearly out of reach of all our available investigation tools in the laboratory. Direct numerical simulations performed with the present day, most powerful, computational methods reach \(Ek \simeq 10^{7}\) and \(Re \simeq 5 \times 10^3\) (Schaeffer et al. 2017), but a single computational run takes months for a few turnover times. Standard numerical simulations remain more than one order of magnitude below those record numbers. Some numerical tricks allow for a larger exploration of the parameter space, for instance by parameterizing the smallest scales of the dynamics (i.e., the socalled large eddy simulations (Aubert et al. 2017), well known in engineering sciences), or by considering relevant asymptotic developments (e.g., the quasigeostrophic limit \(Ro \rightarrow 0\), see Calkins et al. 2015; Guervilly et al. 2019); but those approximated models always require solid validations and careful interpretation.
As a result, most relevant studies of planetary fluid dynamics rely on the general principle of dynamical similitude and scaling laws, sustained by asymptotic theory: Because it is impossible to reproduce in a model the exact parameters of a planetary flow, the effort is focused on reaching the same dynamical regime, with the correct hierarchy of forces, i.e., \(Ek \ll 1\), \(Re \gg 1\), and \(Ro \ll 1\). A systematic exploration of the parameter space then allows deriving scaling laws that are extrapolated toward planetary scales and challenged against available data (e.g., Christensen et al. 2009). In this approach, laboratory experiments are particularly useful. Indeed, a now reasonably affordable experimental setup in water, with \(\varOmega\) equal to 1 rotation per second, \(R=0.5\) m and a typical velocity \(U=0.1\) m/s, gives \(Ek \simeq 6\times 10^{7}\), \(Re \simeq 6\times 10^4\) and \(Ro \simeq 3\times 10^{2}\), which is still far from planetary values, but nevertheless closer than standard simulations, and more turbulent. Besides, once they are settled, experiments allow for the systematic exploration of a large parameter space, using long data acquisition. In addition to various types of probes and sensors locally measuring the pressure, temperature, magnetic field, etc., at a high acquisition rate (e.g., Zimmerman et al. 2014), nonintrusive techniques like laser Doppler anemometry (LDA, e.g., Noir et al. 2012), ultrasonic Doppler velocimetry (UDV, e.g., Noir et al. 2001), and particle image velocimetry (PIV, e.g., Le Reun et al. 2019) are now commonly available, giving detailed access to the velocity along a line and in a chosen plane, respectively. The main drawback of the experimental approach stands in the limitations of accessible geometries and physics. In particular, spherical geometries with radial gravity are accessible only partially using the centrifugal gravity (Busse and Carrigan 1976) or in complex, microgravity setups (Zaussinger et al. 2018); and to date, only few dynamo experiments have been successful, and always in constrained flows (Stieglitz and Müller 2001; Gailitis et al. 2001) or with specific boundary conditions (Berhanu et al. 2010). For successfully tackling planetary flow regimes and their consequences, both numerical and experimental approaches are thus fully complementary.
The present article reviews four selected configurations where experimental studies have significantly contributed to understanding key aspects of planetary interior flows. We successively address below the dynamics driven by precession (Sect. 2), by libration (Sect. 3), by differential rotation (Sect. 4), and by boundary topography (Sect. 5), in planetary relevant contexts. All these flows differ by their source of forcing, but they all take place in a rapidly rotating environment and accordingly share some generic physical ingredients. First, accounting for the small values of the Ekman number, viscous effects are mainly concentrated into thin layers close to the rigid boundaries called Ekman layers, whose thickness scales like \(\sqrt{\nu /\varOmega } = R Ek^{1/2}\). Additional thin viscous layers can also appear in the bulk of the fluid to connect differentially rotating domains (Stewartson 1966): they are then called Stewartson layers. But the bulk of the fluid can to a large extent be considered as inviscid. Second, rotating flows carry a specific type of transverse waves sustained by the Coriolis force. These socalled inertial waves have a peculiar dispersion relation where their wave vector makes an angle \(\theta\) with the rotation axis that depends only on their frequency \(\omega\): \(\cos (\theta )={\omega }/{2\varOmega }\). As a result, their frequency is bounded by \(\omega  \le 2\varOmega\) (Greenspan 1968). Inertial wave reflections at rigid boundaries conserve the angle \(\theta\). If the reflected wave is parallel to the solid wall, the energy is completely absorbed in the Ekman boundary layer leading to an increased thickness, often referred to as an eruption and an enhanced Ekman pumping. In closed containers, the reflections result in a discrete set of closed trajectories, attractors or inertial modes, that might be resonantly excited. And third generic behavior shared by all rotating flows: In the lowfrequency limit, the dynamics is dominated by the geostrophic force balance between the Coriolis acceleration and the pressure gradient, leading to flow structures elongated in the direction parallel to the rotation axis. These quasigeostrophic flows are omnipresent in geophysical contexts in the form of cylindrical shear, isolated Taylor columns, and Rossby waves, as observed in rapidly rotating experiments and numerical simulations.
These three main generic features of rotating flows form the basis for their surprising and rich dynamics, which will be now illustrated through our four representative examples.
2 Flows Driven by Precession
By the term precession, we designate a motion analogous to the one of a gyroscope: It rotates rapidly along its spin axis, while the spin axis itself slowly rotates—precesses—around the precession axis (see Fig. 1). For planets and moons, the gyroscopic torque balances torques arising from the tidal forces exerted by their main orbital partners acting on their nonspherically symmetric solid mantle. On Earth today, the lunisolar gravitational torque produces a precession of its spin axis with a period of about 26,000 years around the normal to the ecliptic plane with an apex angle of \(\alpha =23.5^\circ\). In addition to this angle \(\alpha\), precession is characterized by the dimensionless Poincaré number Po, which measures the ratio of the rotation period to the precession period \(Po=T_s/T_p\), or \(Po=\varOmega _p/\varOmega _s\) using the precession rate \(\varOmega _p\) and the spin rate \(\varOmega _s\). \(\alpha\) and Po are specific parameters to precession forcing, but they can be used to define a Rossby number characteristic of the forcing amplitude as \(Ro = Po \sin {\alpha }\). For the Earth, \(Po \simeq 10^{7}\) and \(Ro \simeq 4\times 10^{8}\), we thus expect the flow to be strongly influenced by the rotation.
To understand the fundamental physics of a fluid gyroscope, let us first consider the case of an inviscid fluid in a spherical shell. In such a case, the liquid decouples from the boundaries and remains in a steady rotation while the surrounding shell precesses. Reintroducing the viscosity, still in a spherical cavity, the viscous stress at the solid–liquid interface will communicate the precessional motion of the shell to the liquid. This causes the spin axis of the fluid to also precess at the same rate but with a different axis: The gyroscopic torque is balanced by the viscous torque. Hence, the rotation axis of the fluid appears tilted compared to the one of the solids. The viscous coupling torque is proportional to \({Ek}^{1/2}\), a dimensionless measure of the strength of viscous forces typically of order \(10^{7}\) for planets [see definition of the Ekman number in (1)]. Departure from a purely spherical boundary will induce an additional pressure (also called topographic) torque that will reinforce the coupling between the fluid and the solid, further reducing the tilt. For planets, the nonsphericity is due primarily to planetary rapid rotation resulting in an oblate spheroidal shape—a sphere flattened at the poles. For Earth, the polar flattening \(\eta =(ac)/a\), with a and c the equatorial and polar radii, respectively, is on the order of 1/300 at the surface and \(\sim 1/400\) at the core–mantle boundary (CMB), but these values can vary significantly for different celestial objects in the solar system ranging from 1/10 for Saturn to 1/900 for the Moon. The pressure torque resulting from the deformed CMB acting on the fluid core is proportional to the polar flattening \(\eta\) (Noir et al. 2003). In planetary settings where \(1/10 \le \eta \le 1/900\), the pressure torque is thus expected to largely dominate the viscous laminar torque.
Gravitational coupling with an orbital companion can further distort the spheroidal shape into a triaxial ellipsoid. This is most pronounced for tidally locked celestial objects, i.e., objects that always show the same face to their orbital partner, for example the Earth’s Moon. The pressure torque in this case depends on a combination of the equatorial and polar ellipticities, yet still dominating the laminar viscous torque in planetary cores.
It is thus legitimate to first consider the inviscid response of a fluid spheroidal cavity as in the pioneer work of Poincaré, Sloudsky, and Hough at the end of the nineteenth century, assuming a quasisolid body rotation response (Poincaré 1910; Sloudsky 1895; Hough 1895). Later, Busse (1968) reintroduced the viscous torque deriving the first complete and selfconsistent predictive model of the fluid rotational response. A fundamental outcome from these studies is the existence of an abrupt increase in the tilt of the core rotation axis as the precessional rate approaches the frequency of the socalled Poincaré mode, also referred to as the spinover mode, or the free core nutation (FCN) by astronomers. FCN is actually the simplest inertial mode of the fluid core, resembling a solid body rotation around an equatorial axis (see detail in, e.g., Le Bars et al. 2015). Its frequency depends essentially on the polar ellipticity. For precession periods much larger than the FCN, the core is strongly coupled with the mantle, e.g., on Earth the tilt of the core rotation axis with respect to that of the mantle is of the order of \(10^{6}\) degree. Conversely for precession periods much shorter than the FCN, the core decouples from the mantle, leading to large differential rotation, as for the Earth’s Moon for which the 18.6 yrs period precession decouples the lunar core from the lunar mantle with a tilt of the order of \(1.5^\circ\) (Cébron et al. 2019).
When large enough, the differential motion between the fluid and the solid shell can lead to turbulent flows providing an efficient mechanism to dissipate energy and possibly sustain electrical currents. Those effects can leave observable signatures such as a selfgenerated magnetic field or influence the planet’s orbital dynamics (Tilgner 2005; Lin et al. 2016; Reddy et al. 2018; Cébron et al. 2019). Understanding these phenomenons is key to probing planetary interiors with remote observations, yet these turbulent flows are out of reach of numerical investigations and we must turn to experiments to investigate them in connection with theoretical investigations.
There are not many precession experiments, arguably because they are difficult to perform. In order to reach low Ekman numbers that are relevant for geophysical applications (\(Ek=10^{15}\) in the Earth’s core), rapid rotation is required in laboratory experiments. In order to enforce precession, the setup uses two independent motors, one mounted on top of the other. A typical setup is presented in Fig. 1, and Table 1 lists the characteristics of the main precession setups. For comparison, Earth’s core values and the parameter range accessible by numerical simulations are also given. Interestingly, any rotating cavity around a fixed axis is subject to the 24 hours rotation of the Earth, which plays the role of the precession turntable. Although very small, this effect has been observed in dedicated experiments (Vanyo and Dunn 2000; Boisson et al. 2012; Triana et al. 2012).
The pioneering precession experiments in spheroidal containers were performed by Willem Malkus in 1968 (Malkus 1968). He proposed that turbulent driven motions could power the geodynamo. He observed that laminar flow yields turbulence even at low precession rates (see also Fig. 2). In addition, he reported intense axisymmetric internal jets or shear layers, some of which were explained by Busse the same year (Busse 1968) as the result of nonlinear interactions in the boundary layer. These experimental results supported the possibility of turbulent motion driven by precession, opening the possibility for precession to power a dynamo in a liquid core. This pioneering work has been subject to controversy on the basis of erroneous energetic arguments (see the relevant discussion and correct argumentation in Kerswell 1996). Although we now know that Earth’s precession is too weak at present to drive the geodynamo, precession has been put forward as a plausible mechanism to power the past lunar dynamo (Dwyer et al. 2011).
This first discovery prompted other experiments in spheroids or spheres. In particular, Vanyo et al. in a series of welldesigned experiments (Vanyo and Likins 1971; Vanyo 1973; Vanyo et al. 1995) illustrated a rich variety of flows occurring in a precessing spheroid. The extrapolation to geophysical objects attempted in some of these papers (Vanyo et al. 1995; Vanyo and Dunn 2000) is, however, erroneous. These experiments have later been interpreted in terms of laminar theoretical flow (Pais and Le Mouël 2001), and one particular pattern matches an important instability (see below) which was evidenced later (Lin et al. 2015). The various experiments by Vanyo et al. also showed that under certain circumstances energy dissipation in precessing cavities can be orders of magnitude larger than that predicted from a simple model of laminar viscous friction in the Ekman boundary layer, supporting the idea of dissipation enhanced by turbulence in precessing fluid cavities. Later, Goto et al. (2014) performed precession experiments in both a sphere and a spheroid at various Poincaré and Ekman numbers, with a fixed \(90^\circ\) angle between \(\varOmega _p\) and \(\varOmega _s\). They highlight an optimal precession rate \(Po=0.1\) to generate turbulence. In the range of parameters investigated in their study, the transition to turbulence in the spheroid happens at much larger Po than in the sphere. However, the resulting turbulence intensity and patterns are very similar in both the sphere and the spheroid and do not depend much on Ek. The reason turbulence may appear at larger Po in the spheroid is that, for a given Po, the weak viscous torque does not couple the liquid and the shell efficiently, leading to large differential rotation \(d\omega\) in the sphere, which is prone to instabilities both in the boundary layer and in the bulk (see below). Conversely, the action of the pressure torque in the spheroid is more efficient at aligning the fluid and mantle rotation vectors, generating smaller differential rotation and thus more stable flows. The differential rotation between the Earth’s core and mantle is too small to reach the turbulent regimes reported by Vanyo and Goto, but recent numerical simulations and astronomical observations suggest that it is likely the case in the lunar core (Yoder 1981; Lin et al. 2015; Cébron et al. 2019).
Theoretical progress, experiments with improved measurements, and the increase in performance of numerical simulations in the last 10 years, shed light on the nature of the instabilities witnessed by Malkus, Vanyo, and Noir and helped to provide scaling laws for the onset of the different regimes. One can distinguish essentially three instability mechanisms: parametric instabilities in nonspherical cavities (Kerswell 1993), sheardriven bulk parametric instabilities (CSI) (Lin et al. 2015; Nobili et al. 2021), and boundary layer turbulence (Sous et al. 2013; Cébron et al. 2019).
The first mechanism results from the periodic shear and elliptical distortion of the circular streamlines of the solid body rotation in nonspherical containers, which resonantly couple two inertial waves. The onset of the most unstable mode was first derived by Kerswell (1993), who estimated that the critical value for the normalized differential rotation \(d\omega\) between core and mantle is given by
It is thought to be the instability mechanism underlying the observations of Malkus (1968) and Goto et al. (2014) with large polar flattening \(\eta = 0.1\). For real planets, the polar flattening is much smaller (see Table 1) and the critical values are therefore much larger. For example, for Earth, the differential rotation is estimated to be \(d\omega \sim 10^{7},\) while the critical value for the onset of the instability is \(d\omega _c\sim 3 \times 10^{5}\). The parametric instabilities are therefore unlikely to play any role on Earth today.
The sheardriven bulk parametric instabilities are due to oblique shear layers coupling with two free inertial modes. These conical shear layers are spawned from the socalled critical latitudes at \(\pm 30^\circ\) where the flux from the Ekman boundary layer increases from \(Ek^{1/2}\) to \(Ek^{1/5}\) over a latitudinal extent proportional to \(Ek^{1/5}\) (Stewartson and Roberts 1963). These local velocity and pressure perturbations propagate throughout the fluid interior as trains of inertial waves in the form of oscillating conical shear layers, forming an angle of \(30^\circ\) with the rotation axis. Noir et al. (2001) confirmed experimentally and numerically the theoretical scaling of Stewartson and Roberts (1963) which allowed Lin et al. (2015) to derive the onset conditions using heuristic arguments: \(d\omega _c\propto Ek^{3/10}\). This scaling law is in good agreement with the transition observed by Goto et al. (2014) and Horimoto et al. (2020) in precession experiments in a sphere. Scaled to Earth’s core, conical shear layers have flow velocities of the order of \(10^{6}\)m/s over a width of 20 km, 100 times smaller than the velocity at the top of the core deduced from the secular variation of the geomagnetic field. They are also stable because the actual differential rotation \(d\omega \sim 10^{7}\) is two orders of magnitude smaller than the one required for instabilities. In contrast, for the lunar core, \(d\omega \sim 10^{3}\) and \(10^{5}<d\omega _c< 10^{4}\) depending on the core size, suggesting that this mechanism could drive bulk instabilities (Lin et al. 2015).
The third and last mechanism, the shear boundary layer instability, has yet to be investigated experimentally in a precessing cavity. The theoretical onset condition is given by \(d\omega _c \sim 50 Ek^{1/2}\) and, for emergence of a turbulent saturation, by \(d\omega _c \sim 150 Ek^{1/2}\) for steady boundary layer [see (Cébron et al. 2019) and Sect. 5] and \(d\omega _c \sim 500 Ek^{1/2}\) when oscillatory (Buffett 2021).
Comparing them with the threshold for the parametric instability (4), it seems difficult to disentangle these two sources of instability when the polar flattening is of the order \(\eta \sim 1/150{}1/50\), which is the case for the setups of Vanyo et al. (1995), Vanyo and Dunn (2000), and Noir et al. (2001) (see Table 1). The turbulence onset estimate for the Earth’s core yields \(d\omega _c \sim 50 \times 10^{7}\), a value closer, but still larger, than the present day estimate \(d\omega \sim 10^{7}\).
Spheroidal cavities exhibit hysteresis cycles of turbulence with respect to the precession rate Po near the resonance with the FCN. As first evidenced by Malkus (1968) and more recently by Nobili et al. (2021), it is closely related to the hysteresis of the differential rotation well known theoretically in spheroids (Cébron 2015). Starting from a laminar regime at low Po the differential rotation jumps to a much larger value (decoupled core–mantle) as the precession rate approaches the FCN frequency, leading to turbulent flows. Starting from the turbulent regime and decreasing the precession rate, the differential rotation can remain large even for \(\varOmega _p<\varOmega _{FCN}\) and turbulence can be maintained. This has geophysical implications when a planet evolves from an early stage of largeamplitude orbital forcing to a more quiet epoch, which may have been the case for the lunar core (Cébron et al. 2019).
Extrapolation from laboratory settings to planetary cores requires assuming that experiments operate in the same asymptotic regime as planetary cores, which has yet to be proven. In fact, some recent studies (Le Reun et al. 2019; Lemasquerier et al. 2017) in the related case of libration (see Sect. 3) suggest that the dynamics observed in experiments at moderate Ekman numbers may be in a different regime than planetary cores. Furthermore, most experiments are performed in a range of Ekman numbers where onsets of all three types of instabilities described above are similar, so that several instabilities may be present at the same time and interact with each other (see, e.g., Nobili et al. 2021). One may thus wish to turn to numerical simulations of precession to obtain more definitive answers. While simulations start to become competitive with experiments in spherical geometry (see Table 1), the experimentally accessible range of parameters remains out of reach to numerics for spheroidal or ellipsoidal geometry.
These last comments call for a new generation of experiments operating at Ekman numbers \(E\le 10^{8}\). While it may look like a modest step, it means experiments of typically 3 m size rotating at 3 Hz. A rotating spherical Couette of such a size leads to much richer dynamics, as will be described in Sect. 4. Comparable size precessing experiments are even more challenging due to the extreme gyroscopic torque involved (\(>10^6\) Nm). Such an ambitious experiment is currently under construction at the Helmholtz–Zentrum in Dresden, the socalled Dresdyn experiment (Giesecke et al. 2018), with the aim to investigate precessiondriven dynamo processes (see targeted parameters in Table 1). Expected to operate in the coming years, it may bring forth new physical insights on the hydrodynamical regimes sketched above.
3 Flows Driven by Libration
Longitudinal librations are periodic oscillations of a planet spin rate. We refer here to real, physical librations of a nonaxisymmetric body due to gravitational interactions with its closest neighbors; they should not be mixed up with the socalled optical librations, which are just of observational origin (see, e.g., discussion in Noir et al. 2012). Numerous bodies of the Solar System undergo continuous, forced longitudinal librations including Mercury, the Earth’s Moon, the four Galilean satellites, etc. Libration can also be transiently excited or reinforced following a meteorite impact (Wieczorek and Le Feuvre 2009). Precisely measuring a planet’s forced libration provides constraints on its interior structure. For instance, a libration amplitude larger than predicted by models considering a fully solid planet is a clear signature for the existence of a liquid layer that decouples the interior from the shell. The libration amplitudes strongly suggest that at least part of Mercury’s core is still liquid (Margot et al. 2007) and that Europa has a liquid ocean underneath its thick ice shell (Van Hoolst et al. 2008). Most celestial mechanics models only account for the viscous torque that arises between the rotating fluid and the librating solid boundaries through laminar, or even turbulent, Ekman boundary layers (Yoder 1981). But beyond this, libration also excites bulk flows, similarly to other types of small harmonic forcing (precession, tides, etc., see, e.g., Le Bars et al. 2015). These flows have been suggested as possible sources for present dynamo action on Io (Kerswell and Malkus 1998) and for the past dynamo on the Moon (Le Bars et al. 2011), where the classical convective dynamo model fails to explain the observations. They also constitute a source of viscous dissipation and might significantly participate in the heat budget and orbital evolution of, for example, Enceladus (Wilson and Kerswell 2018; Rekier et al. 2019).
Laboratory experiments have contributed to deciphering and characterizing the variety of librationdriven flows. In such experiments, a hollow container, filled most of time with water, is set in rapid rotation by a first motor; librations are generated either by modulating the spin rate of this first motor through time, or more efficiently by a second onboard motor that oscillates the outer and/or inner boundary of the container (see, e.g., Fig. 3). Studies are then performed by systematically changing the global rotation rate quantified nondimensionally by the Ekman number, and/or the libration amplitude quantified by the Rossby number, and/or the ratio between the libration frequency and the spin rate. Axisymmetric as well as nonaxisymmetric containers have been considered. Metrology includes local pressure measurements (Aldridge and Toomre 1969), Kalliroscope visualizations (Noir et al. 2009; Koch et al. 2013; Lemasquerier et al. 2017), as well as nonintrusive velocimetry by LDA (Noir et al. 2012) and PIV (Sauret et al. 2010; Koch et al. 2013; Grannan et al. 2014; Hoff et al. 2016; Kozlov and Subbotin 2017; Lemasquerier et al. 2017; Le Reun et al. 2019). Main parameters of these various experimental setups are listed in Table 2.
Focusing here on the spherical and ellipsoidal geometries relevant for planets, the first experimental study dates back to 1969, when Aldridge and Toomre (1969) used libration forcing to systematically assess the direct resonance of axisymmetric, inertial modes in a rotating sphere. Very schematically, librating an axisymmetric container filled with fluid in solid body rotation a priori only affects its Ekman layer, while its interior remains in solid body rotation. However, for any given libration frequency within the domain of existence of inertial modes (i.e., between 0 and 2 in dimensionless form, see Sect. 1), the Ekman layer exhibits a singularity at a critical angle, and this eruption excites an inertial mode with the same frequency within the bulk (Le Bars et al. 2015). This mechanism somehow generalizes the excitation of conical shear layers at \(30^\circ\) in precessing flows (see Sect. 2). The efficiency of this resonance mechanism has been challenged in the limit of small Ekman and Rossby numbers (Zhang et al. 2013); it was, however, clearly observed in Aldridge and Toomre (1969). Aldridge’s work was then extended to spherical shells by Koch et al. (2013), Hoff et al. (2016), and Lemasquerier et al. (2017), who reported more intense inertial mode resonances due to energy focusing toward wave attractors. Those studies also systematically reported the emergence of a prograde zonal jet within the Stewartson layer along the tangent cylinder (see Fig. 4 left). As for the wellknown Stokes drift associated with surface water waves, the formation of a steady, geostrophic flow from an oscillatory forcing is due to nonlinear interactions, in those cases of the oscillating flow within the Ekman layer due to the libration of the inner core. Even more interesting for dynamo and dissipation applications, the Stewartson layer jet becomes unstable at sufficiently large forcing amplitude, generating bulk filling turbulence from centrifugal and shear instabilities as well as through nonlinear inertial wave interactions (Hoff et al. 2016).
Beyond this Stewartson layer jet, the emergence of steady zonal flows in librating systems has been studied in great detail. Even away from any resonance, a global flow takes shape systematically over the whole bulk because of nonlinear interactions of the libration base flow within the Ekman layer, as first shown theoretically by Busse (2010) and validated experimentally by Sauret et al. (2010) in the spherical geometry. Zonal flows also exist in more complex geometries like ellipsoids (Noir et al. 2012). With a free, floating, solid inner core and a librating outer shell, zonal flows induce inner core differential rotation by viscous coupling (Kozlov and Subbotin 2017). Additionally, strong, localized zonal jets might superimpose on this global zonal flow when inertial waves are excited, due to their nonlinear selfinteractions within the Ekman layer around their reflection points (Calkins et al. 2010), as already described for precession in Sect. 2 and Fig. 2. Torques associated with those zonal flows and their consequences for the celestial motions of the planets remain to be investigated.
The librating flow in the Ekman layers includes successive spinup and spindown phases through time: Hence, no matter whether you consider the inner or outer boundary, it is always at some point prone to centrifugal instability. This mechanism has been studied by Noir et al. (2009) who showed, for increasing Rossby number, the destabilization of the laminar outer Ekman layer in a librating sphere, first by the emergence of longitudinal rolls, then by the settling of boundary turbulence. Numerous planets fall in one of those two regimes, including our Moon. The relevance of those boundary flows for planets where Ekman layers are very thin might be questioned. The interest is actually twofold: First, destabilization of the otherwise laminar Ekman layer might explain anomalous strong dissipation and associated faster than expected orbital evolution. This might for instance account for the rapid Moon recession measured presently by Lunar Laser Ranging (Williams et al. 2001). Second, turbulent motions in the boundary layer might excite inertial waves in the bulk that propagate and invade the whole interior, as shown in axisymmetric numerical simulations by Sauret et al. (2013): Firstorder consequences like dynamo (Moffatt 1970) and increased dissipation associated with bulk wave turbulence (Le Reun et al. 2019) might be expected from these extended flows. This could be the focus of future studies.
Intense wave dynamics in the bulk of planetary cores has been studied in the more readily applicable context of a librating ellipsoidal container: There, libration can excite a socalled parametric instability, similar to the first instability mechanism for precession described in Sect. 2. The basic mechanism for instability is a resonance between two inertial modes of the system and the libration base flow in the bulk induced by topographic coupling. This resonance requires that the difference between the frequencies of the two inertial modes equals the libration frequency. Acknowledging that inertial modes have frequencies between plus and minus twice the spin rate \(\varOmega\) (see Sect. 1), resonances are possible for libration frequencies up to \(4\varOmega\); selection of effectively emerging resonances then depends on the combined effects of the specific shape of the container and of the amplitude of viscous dissipation quantified by the Ekman number. The main interest for planetary applications follows from the underlying mechanism: The generated flow is due to an instability, meaning that the associated energy grows exponentially in time until it saturates at a given value; and the generated flow is related to a resonance, meaning that the saturation amplitude can be much larger than the excitation. Small amplitude, libration forcing (Ro, defined here as the product of the libration amplitude times the equatorial ellipticity, is typically of order \(10^{4}\) or less in planets and moons, see Table 2 and Noir et al. 2012; Cébron et al. 2012; Lemasquerier et al. 2017) allows the flow to draw energy from the huge reservoir available from the rotation of the planet. This energy can then be used to sustain the inertial modes which are the building blocks of this process. This socalled librationdriven instability was first observed indirectly in experiments, through LDA measurements of significantly increased zonal flows for selected libration frequency ranges in a librating ellipsoid (Noir et al. 2012). Using the same setup, Grannan et al. (2014), followed by Lemasquerier et al. (2017) in the ellipsoidal shell, then performed systematic exploration of the parameter space and quantified various possible resonances in the expected range of libration frequency, Rossby number, and Ekman number. After the documented exponential growth, the flow at saturation was described as a superposition of columnar zonal flows and tridimensional wavy patterns due to inertial waves (see, e.g., Fig. 4 right), with either cycles of growth and collapse or saturation around a mean chaotic state.
In fact, the flow layout at saturation of this instability is a complex, open question that echoes the broader, longstanding issue of rotating turbulence (Godeferd and Moisy 2015). There are (at least) two different models for turbulence in rotating fluids. In the first model called quasigeostrophic turbulence, energy progressively concentrates in quasi2D flows aligned with the rotation axis, like the zonal jet described above. The quasi2D dynamics then leads to the formation of large columnar structures by inverse cascade (Godeferd and Moisy 2015). This quasigeostrophic turbulence is for instance characteristic of rapidly rotating convective regimes relevant for planetary convective cores (Guervilly et al. 2019). In the second model called inertial wave turbulence, energy transfers are due to successive triadic interactions where, somehow similarly to the process of parametric resonance already described for the onset of both precession and libration instabilities, each given inertial mode excites nonlinearly two additional, resonant ones: Motions then remain fully tridimensional, made of a superposition of weakly nonlinearly interacting inertial modes. Most experiments of rotating turbulence where energy is injected by grids, jets, flaps, etc., exhibit geostrophic saturation (Godeferd and Moisy 2015). But in the special case of libration, where energy is injected predominantly in inertial modes, it was recently demonstrated experimentally using a dedicated, large installation (see Fig. 3) that the saturation depends on the forcing amplitude: Classical quasigeostrophic turbulence settles at relatively large Rossby numbers, while wave turbulence settles in the planetary relevant limit of small Rossby numbers (Le Reun et al. 2019). This conclusion completely changes our view of nonconvecting cores and implies that our classical estimates for dissipation and dynamo capacity were mostly based on quasigeostrophic, convectivelike flows (Le Bars et al. 2011; Wu and Roberts 2013; Reddy et al. 2018), should be reexamined.
Clearly, the study of librationdriven flows and their consequences still has a future ahead. In particular, the question remains open to demonstrate whether or not inertial wave turbulence is capable of generating a largescale planetary magnetic field, following the promising theoretical model of Moffatt (1970). Also, combining libration forcing with buoyancy effects, including either convectively unstable or stably stratified configurations, is both experimentally challenging and of great relevance for planetary applications.
4 Spherical Couette Flows
The spherical Couette system consists of two concentric differentially rotating spheres, the space in between filled with a fluid (Fig. 5a). This is the spherical equivalent of the wellstudied Taylor–Couette system with two concentric cylinders. Interiors of compact astrophysical objects such as planets and stars have geometries similar to the spherical Couette configuration. The Sun’s convective zone, the Earth’s core, and the interior of the giant planets are prime examples. It is probably the simplest laboratory model to study the influence of both rotation and shear on fluid dynamics, which are two ubiquitous phenomenons found in geophysical and astrophysical objects. For instance, in planets like Jupiter or Saturn the differential rotation manifests as alternating zonal winds in the atmosphere. The Sun, similarly, exhibits a convective zone where the equatorial regions rotate faster than the polar regions. It is important to note, however, that the aim of the various spherical Couette experiments in existence is to understand the basic and fundamental questions posed by rotating flow phenomena, rather than serving as accurate replicas of the abovementioned astrophysical objects. Furthermore, the spherical Couette system was also considered as a viable candidate for experimental dynamo action in a geophysically relevant geometry, in contrast to thermal convection which cannot produce vigorous enough flows in the laboratory.
In the geophysical context where the influence of rotation is crucial, dynamicists are interested in the case where the outer container is rapidly rotating. As with many rotating systems, spherical Couette flow is then studied from a frame of reference rotating with the outer container. The fluid in the spherical Couette system is driven viscously via the differential rotation due to the inner sphere, which may rotate faster, slower, or in opposite direction to the rotation of the outer container. Instabilities arise depending on the amount and direction of the differential rotation. There are three basic parameters—the aspect (radius) ratio (\(r_i/R\)) determining the size of the inner sphere relative to the outer one, the outer boundary rotation (\(\varOmega\)) expressed nondimensionally by the Ekman number (see definition 1), and the differential rotation between the two spheres. The latter is usually expressed as a ratio to the outer boundary rotation rate (\(\varDelta \varOmega /\varOmega\), equivalent here to a Rossby number, see definition 2), with positive differential rotation referring to the case where the inner sphere rotates faster while negative referring to the case where the inner sphere rotates slower than or in the opposite direction to the outer sphere.
As a classical fluid mechanical system, the spherical Couette system has been studied since the 1950s using analytical methods (Proudman 1956; Bratukhin 1961; Stewartson 1966; Starchenko 1997; Kleeorin et al. 1997), experiments (Sorokin et al. 1966; Munson and Menguturk 1975; Belyaev et al. 1978; Yavorskaya and Belyaev 1986; Egbers and Rath 1995; Hollerbach et al. 2004) as well as numerical computations (Hollerbach et al. 2004; Munson and Joseph 1971a, b; Hollerbach 1994, 2000; Hollerbach and Skinner 2001; Hollerbach 2001, 2003; Hollerbach et al. 2006; Hollerbach 2009). In more recent years, a new generation of hydrodynamic, dynamo, and magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) experiments are using this setup, aimed at studying flows, instabilities, and turbulence in the outer core of the Earth (Sisan et al. 2004; Kelley et al. 2007, 2010; Zimmerman et al. 2011; Triana 2011; Rieutord et al. 2012; Zimmerman et al. 2014; Nataf et al. 2006; Schmitt et al. 2008; Brito et al. 2011; Schmitt et al. 2013; Tigrine et al. 2019; Kasprzyk et al. 2017; Garcia et al. 2019, 2020, 2020; Koch et al. 2013; Hoff et al. 2016; Hoff and Harlander 2019), a list of which is provided in Table 3. Their focus is on “widegap” aspect ratios close to that of the Earth’s outer core (\(r_i/R = 0.35\)).
These have been complemented as well as supplemented by advanced numerical studies (Rieutord et al. 2012; Tigrine et al. 2019; Matsui et al. 2011; Wicht 2014; Barik et al. 2018; Kaplan et al. 2018). Most experimental studies take place at low Ekman numbers, typically \(Ek < 10^{4}\) with the 3meter experiment (discussed below) reaching values of \(Ek\sim 10^{8}\). The large range of time and length scales excited by turbulence at these parameters makes direct numerical simulations (DNS) of unstable flows difficult. Thus, studies at high Ekman numbers are typically done using numerical methods, while studies at very low Ekman numbers are only possible using experiments. In between, there is a narrow range of \(10^{5}< Ek < 10^{4}\), where both experiments and DNS overlap (e.g., Barik et al. 2018). Thus, the spherical Couette system provides a framework where numerical and experimental studies can come together to study fundamental flows and instabilities applicable to interiors of spherical compact astrophysical objects.
Here, we will discuss recent insights into the system obtained from the aforementioned experimental and numerical studies. We begin our survey, which is not meant to be exhaustive, by presenting results dealing with purely hydrodynamical phenomena.
4.1 Hydrodynamic Experiments and Instabilities
The general class of hydrodynamic instabilities in the spherical Couette system is first determined by the radius ratio. When the gap between the two spheres is narrow (\(r_i/R \ge \approx 0.7\)), instabilities in the spherical Couette flow are similar in form to Taylor vortices near the equator, as found in the classical cylindrical Taylor–Couette flow (Egbers and Rath 1995; Soward and Bassom 2016). They are due to a centrifugal instability characterized by the Rayleigh criterion (Rayleigh 1917). However, for the more geophysically relevant wide gap, which we would discuss here, the primary linear instabilities are fundamentally different than Taylor vortices, instead forming drifting waves due to a shear instability (Egbers and Rath 1995; Hollerbach et al. 2004; Hollerbach 2003; Wicht 2014). In addition, as described in introduction (Sect. 1), the overall rotation of the system (except for \(\varOmega =0\)) greatly modifies the flow, generally at the larger length scales. Typical modifications for rapidly rotating flows include largescale waves, zonal flows, and rotationally modified boundary layers (Ekman layers). We now take a brief survey of different experiments and briefly discuss their results.
We first discuss the University of Maryland’s 60cmdiameter liquid sodium experiment (Kelley et al. 2007). Although the working fluid in this device was liquid sodium, which is an electrical conductor, and magnetic fields were used for diagnostics, the instabilities that appeared were purely hydrodynamic in origin: Both imposed and induced magnetic fields were indeed too weak to influence the flow. With a 60cm outer sphere diameter and aspect ratio of \(r_i/R=0.35\), this experiment could attain \(Ek \sim 10^{7}\). Two external Helmholtz coils provided an axial magnetic field parallel to the rotation axis. The flow of liquid sodium led to induced magnetic fields which were measured using arrays of Hall probes. The number and location of Hall probes allowed detecting flow structures corresponding to spherical harmonics up to degree \(l=4\). For \({{\varDelta }{\varOmega }/{\varOmega }}< 0\), the magnetic Hall probes revealed oscillatory flow patterns typical of global inertial modes (see Sect. 1). The experimentally observed states were observed to be similar to the analytical inertial eigenmodes of a full sphere in uniform rotation (Fig. 6) (Zhang et al. 2001).
The same phenomena were observed in the 3meter experiment also at the University of Maryland. Before being used for MHD and dynamo experiments, the 3meter experiment used water as the working fluid. Essentially a scaledup version of the 60cm device, the 3meter device is to date the largest spherical Couette facility in the world. For the water experiments, the flow diagnostics consisted of ultrasound Doppler velocimetry, torque measurements, wall shear stress hot film, and pressure measurements. As shown, for example, in Rieutord et al. (2012), inertial modes appeared in the 3meter experiment at the same differential rotation parameters as in the 60cm device. A few additional modes were observed which allowed a better characterization of the full set. The flow exhibits a diversity of different rotating turbulent states in addition to the inertial mode states, determined by differential rotation (Rossby number) alone.
The Cottbus spherical Couette experiment (Koch et al. 2013), with a 24cm diameter outer sphere and \(r_i/R = 1/3\), provided important insight into the behavior of the system at \(Ek\sim 10^{5}\), higher than in the Maryland experiments (Hoff et al. 2016; Hoff and Harlander 2019). The device employs a transparent silicone oil seeded with spherical hollow glass particles as tracers for particle image velocimetry measurements. For small absolute values of the Rossby number, the flow is axisymmetric and resembles the inviscid analytical solution by Proudman (1956) (the situation is different for high Ekman numbers (Bratukhin 1961; Wicht 2014) but that is beyond the scope of the present text). Outside the tangent cylinder (TC), the fluid stays in solid body rotation with the outer boundary, while inside the TC, the fluid rotates at half the differential rotation rate (\(\varDelta \varOmega /2\)). This leads to the formation of a nested Stewartson shear layer (Stewartson 1966) where instabilities at smaller Ekman numbers take place. When the counterrotation in increased so that the negative Rossby number decreases below a critical value, this experiment found a primary instability with an azimuthal wave number \(m=1\). Further increasing the magnitude of differential rotation increased the flow transitions to secondary instabilities and ultimately toward turbulence (Fig. 7). This experiment also found an onset of inertial modes, similar to the ones observed in the Maryland experiments. The phenomena at \({{\varDelta }{\varOmega }/{\varOmega }} < 0\) were reproduced by a detailed numerical study (Barik et al. 2018), which provided more insight into the excitation of inertial modes but also led to new questions. A wide ranging study of the different instability regimes as revealed by numerical experiments can be found in Wicht (2014).
It turns out that for moderately high outer boundary rotation (\(3\times 10^{5}< E < 10^{3}\)), the nature of the primary instability depends on the sign of the differential rotation, with high wavenumber instabilities occurring for positive differential rotation (\({{\varDelta }{\varOmega }/{\varOmega }}>0\)), while a wavenumber \(m=1\) instability occurring for negative values (\({{\varDelta }{\varOmega }/{\varOmega }}<0\)). The reason for this dichotomy remains an open question (Hollerbach 2003; Hoff and Harlander 2019). The \(m=1\) mode seems rather special. At lower Ekman numbers, it onsets as a secondary instability, shortly after the primary instability (Wicht 2014; Barik et al. 2018). The mode has also been observed at the extremely low Ekman numbers of the 3meter experiment (Rieutord et al. 2012) and only for \({{\varDelta }{\varOmega }/{\varOmega }} < 0\). More negative differential rotation beyond the onset of the \(m=1\) mode leads to the onset of equatorially antisymmetric inertial modes which lead to a spontaneous symmetry breaking of the flow. The origin of these modes leads to open questions about their onset for only negative differential rotation and the breaking of symmetry over a wide range of Ekman numbers from \(10^{4}\) (Hoff et al. 2016; Wicht 2014; Barik et al. 2018) to \(10^{8}\) (Kelley et al. 2007, 2010; Rieutord et al. 2012; Matsui et al. 2011), against an otherwise strong geostrophic constraint which, as explained in the introduction (Sect. 1), imposes quasiinvariance of the flow along the axis of rotation for lowfrequency forcing. Further open questions include the selection of modes that onset and the accompanying triadic resonances (Hoff et al. 2016; Barik et al. 2018) that follow specific rules with respect to wavenumbers and azimuthal drift frequencies, as already discussed above for precession (Sect. 2) and libration (Sect. 3) forcings. A further increase in driving toward even more negative differential rotation values leads to inertial modes without triads and featureless turbulence which have their own unique properties.
As briefly mentioned above, \({{\varDelta }{\varOmega }/{\varOmega }}<0\) phenomena are very different compared to the \({{\varDelta }{\varOmega }/{\varOmega }}>0\) case. For instance, the 3meter water experiments revealed a bistable turbulent state where the system switched over long periods of time between a hightorque state and a lowtorque state (Zimmerman et al. 2011) as measured by a torque sensor on the inner sphere shaft. These transitions occurred over the range \(1.7<{{\varDelta }{\varOmega }/{\varOmega }}<2.5\). The relative time spent in each of the low and hightorque states varied smoothly across that \({{\varDelta }{\varOmega }/{\varOmega }}\) range. The switching between these two states, for a fixed \({{\varDelta }{\varOmega }/{\varOmega }}\), is a remarkable example of how planetary (rotating) flows may have multiple apparently statistically steady states. The switching in this case appears probabilistic, but with a specific probability of each state at a given \({{\varDelta }{\varOmega }/{\varOmega }}\). The transitions resemble outward outbursts of angular momentum. In the lowtorque state, the fluid inside the tangent cylinder spins faster than the fluid outside, as if “detached” from it. During the sudden transition to the hightorque state, the velocity gradient across the TC is reduced. Sudden angular momentum outbursts, conceptually similar to the one described, occur also in astrophysical objects, e.g., the socalled Bephenomenon where an almost critically spinning, type Be star ejects material that suddenly acquired too much angular momentum (Neiner and Mathis 2013). These outbursts might have a common origin with the ones observed in the 3meter experiment. To date, both are still awaiting a satisfactory explanation.
4.2 Hydromagnetic Experiments
The application of a background magnetic field introduces further complications in the spherical Couette flow of conducting fluids. The typical magnetic field configurations used in experiments are an axisymmetric axial field (Kelley et al. 2007; Garcia et al. 2019) or an axisymmetric dipolar field (Schmitt et al. 2008). As mentioned before, weak magnetic fields can be used for flow diagnostics, e.g., Kelley et al. (2007, 2010). When the hydrodynamic flow is axisymmetric, as the strength of the magnetic field increases, the Stewartson free shear layer gradually transitions to a magnetic free shear layer called a “Shercliff” layer (Hollerbach 1994; Kleeorin et al. 1997; Wei and Hollerbach 2008) and Ferraro’s isorotation law (Ferraro 1937) gradually replaces the Taylor–Proudman constraint. The exact form of the axisymmetric flow and Shercliff layer now additionally depends on the magnetic field topology and boundary conditions (conducting/insulating) on the two boundaries, and Lorentz forces may give rise to strong jets (Starchenko 1997; Dormy et al. 1998; Hollerbach 2000, 2001; Soward and Dormy 2010). Two new dimensionless numbers now become important. The first is the Hartmann number, \(\mathrm {Ha}=B_0 r_i\sqrt{\sigma /\rho \nu }\) which describes the nondimensional strength of the applied magnetic field \(B_0\), where \(\sigma\) and \(\rho\) are, respectively, the fluid electrical conductivity and density. The boundary layers gradually transform from Ekman layers into Ekman–Hartmann layers (Hollerbach 1994) whose thickness is eventually determined by \(\mathrm {Ha}\). The second is the magnetic Prandtl number, \(\mathrm {Pm}=\mu _0\nu \sigma\), nondimensionally describing the fluid viscosity relative to the electrical resistivity \(1/\sigma\). It is a material property with typical values of \(\mathrm {Pm} < 10^{5}\) for liquid metals.
A background magnetic field can also affect nonaxisymmetric instabilities. Progressively increasing the field strength, it initially suppresses existing hydrodynamic instabilities and subsequently leads to new magnetic instabilities (Hollerbach and Skinner 2001; Hollerbach 2009; Gissinger et al. 2011). A review of these can be found in Rüdiger et al. (2013). Magnetic fields can also affect inertial modes in the system and give rise to magnetoCoriolis modes (Schmitt et al. 2013). We survey below the hydromagnetic spherical Couette experiments with the setups shown in Fig. 8, except the 60 cm which has already been discussed above.
The first experiment we discuss is the 30cm experiment from Maryland with an aspect ratio of 0.35 and liquid sodium as the working fluid with Hall probes used for diagnostics (Sisan et al. 2004). A coaxial magnetic field is applied using a pair of electromagnets, but unlike the 60cm, the field is strong enough to cause the onset of magnetic instabilities. The experimental observations had some similarity to the magnetorotational instability (MRI), used to explain angular momentum transport in accretion disks (Balbus and Hawley 1998). Simulations later showed that these observations were likely to be magnetic instabilities of the Shercliff layers (Gissinger et al. 2011). Recent numerical work with magnetic Couette flow has indeed found evidence of MRI (Meduri et al. 2019), but under conditions that would have been inaccessible by the 30cm experiment.
After the initial water experiments discussed in Sect. 4.1, the 3meter experiment at Maryland was commissioned to use liquid sodium as the working fluid for conducting MHD experiments with the aim of obtaining selfconsistent dynamo action. A magnetic field was applied using a single currentcarrying coil around the equator of the outer sphere. Under weak magnetic field, the flow was still primarily hydrodynamic. The bistable torque state already observed in water experiments (Sect. 4.1) was observed in the induced magnetic field as well, with the low (high)torque state leading to a high (low) \(\varOmega\)effect—stretching of magnetic field lines by zonal flow to create strong azimuthal magnetic fields. At high magnetic field strengths, there was a reduction in zonal field amplification by the \(\varOmega\)effect and short bursts of magnetic field appeared in the same sense as the applied field (Zimmerman et al. 2014). These short bursts might indicate a state close to the onset of dynamo action (Raynaud and Dormy 2013). Although numerical simulations have shown that spherical Couette flow can potentially drive and sustain selfconsistent dynamos (Guervilly and Cardin 2010; Cao et al. 2012), none have been observed in experiments yet. While the 3meter system has not shown selfsustaining dynamo action, substantial amplification of the imposed background field by almost one order of magnitude has been observed (Zimmerman et al. 2014).
The Derviche Tourneur sodium (DTS) experiment at ISTerre, Grenoble, France, has a diameter of 42 cm, aspect ratio of 0.35, and also uses liquid sodium as a working fluid. The background magnetic field is an axial dipole, being produced using permanent magnets encased in the inner sphere. The experiment is designed to operate in the magnetostrophic regime where the pressure gradient, the Coriolis acceleration, and the Lorentz force balance each other—a state expected in the outer core of the Earth. Flow diagnostics in the past were carried out using voltage probes, ultrasonic Doppler velocimetry, and giant magnetoresistance (GMR) sensors. Details can be found in Nataf et al. (2006), Schmitt et al. (2008), Brito et al. (2011), Schmitt et al. (2013). The setup was recently upgraded to the new DTS\(\varOmega\) which has embedded electronic hardware rotating with the outer sphere, capable of recording more than 200 data channels at up to 10 kHz (Tigrine et al. 2019). The experiments with DTS found evidence of superrotating jets, but the observed flow speeds showed a departure from numerical predictions (Nataf et al. 2006; Dormy et al. 1998). The experiments also observed the presence of magnetoCoriolis modes which are oscillatory modes similar to inertial modes, but the Lorentz force participates as a restoring force as well (Schmitt et al. 2008, 2013). More recently, numerical and experimental studies of DTS\(\varOmega\) revealed different dynamic states based on inner sphere rotation rate—from a quasigeostrophic base flow to largescale structures on top of a turbulent background (Kaplan et al. 2018). The setup was also used to study torsional Alfvén waves thought to be present in the Earth’s outer core (Tigrine et al. 2019).
The HEDGEHOG experiment (Hydromagnetic Experiment with Differentially Gyrating sphEres HOlding GaInSn) is a magnetized spherical Couette experiment built recently at the HelmholtzZentrum DresdenRossendorf (HZDR) in Germany (Kasprzyk et al. 2017). This is a device in some ways similar to the 30cm experiment, but instead of liquid sodium, HEDGEHOG uses GaInSn, an eutectic liquid metal alloy as the working fluid. The outer, 18cmdiameter sphere is stationary, and the inner sphere can be 6 cm or 9 cm in diameter. The device is immersed in a homogeneous magnetic field provided by two external electromagnet coils. The flows explored by HEDGEHOG are quasilaminar, and the applied magnetic field is relatively weak. Depending on the Hartmann number, different instabilities appear as successive Hopf bifurcations featuring a specific type of waves called quasiperiodic modulated rotating waves (MRW) (Garcia et al. 2021). These are expected on theoretical grounds given the symmetry characteristics of the spherical Couette system (Crawford and Knobloch 1991). Numerical simulations show that these quasiperiodic states may contain up to three and even four fundamental frequencies before transitioning to chaos. This is nothing less than a manifestation of the Newhouse–Ruelle–Takens (NRT) transition to chaos scenario (Garcia et al. 2020). Grouptheoretical considerations such as these might prove relevant and useful in the analysis of other experiments and perhaps for the Earth’s interior as well.
When thermal effects are included, the shear due to spherical Couette system can have interesting effects on convective flow. Both flows together can lead to the formation of asymmetric convection cells. The linear stability space for the system is then bounded by two unstable regimes—one due to convection and another due to shear flow instabilities. Lastly, the heat transport efficiency (given by the Nusselt number) increases with differential rotation. More discussion on this problem can be found in Travnikov and Egbers (2020).
In conclusion, the spherical Couette system provides a relatively simple system to study a plethora of hydrodynamic and magnetohydrodynamic instabilities and phenomena that can occur in rotating spherical shells. This not only makes it yet another “Drosophila” of fluid dynamics alongside Taylor–Couette flow and Rayleigh–Bénard convection (van Gils et al. 2012), but one whose geometry is closer to the interiors of astrophysical objects, including the Earth. The 3meter liquid sodium experiment is, as of this writing, being modified to include baffles on the inner sphere. These baffles have been designed in such a way that they enhance substantially the angular momentum communicated to the fluid by the inner sphere, thus generating a more pronounced \(\varOmega\)effect. Hopefully, this will increase the chances to obtain dynamo action. There are also plenty of opportunities for progress using hydrodynamic experiments and numerical simulations, particularly related to the nature of the bistability phenomenon and its peculiar angular momentum characteristics, of which we understand very little. The recently discovered Rossby waves in the Sun (Löptien et al. 2018) constitute yet another potential application area for the spherical Couette system.
5 Effects of Boundary Topography
Boundary topography in planetary liquid layers, including cores and subsurface oceans, exists on different length scales (see also Dehant 2022). First at the largest scales, we have already seen in Sects. 2 and 3 that planets have an ellipsoidal shape, resulting from their polar flattening superimposed to their mostly equatorial tidal distortions. Then, mesoscale topography may also develop at the core–mantle boundary (CMB) of a planet or at the top and bottom of a subsurface ocean. On Earth, CMB topography is mostly controlled by the dynamics of the Earth’s mantle, where it is assumed that uprising material and plumes drag the CMB upward into the mantle, while cold and dense material would deflect the CMB toward the core (Deschamps et al. 2018). Based on seismological observations and/or geodynamical considerations, several different models for the CMB topography have been proposed, with topography on various length scales but mostly confined to amplitudes smaller than 10 km (Morelli and Dziewonski 1987; Soldati et al. 2012; Sze and van der Hilst 2003; Tanaka 2010). Finally, it has been proposed that physical and chemical alteration of the crystalline mantle in direct contact with the hot core fluid may result in roughness at the top of the core. This would be confined to length scales as small as tens of centimeters to meters, i.e., on the order of the thickness of the viscous boundary layer (Narteau et al. 2001).
The wide range of topography wave length and amplitude gives rise to various physical interaction mechanisms between the solid and liquid layer, potentially leading to exchange of angular momentum and energy dissipation, that may be reflected in the rotational parameters of the planet. While largescale topography, such as polar flattening or tidal deformations, essentially affects the structure, frequency, and global stability of inertial modes, smaller scales are expected to have a more local effect that might propagate into the bulk in the form of inertial waves and Rossby waves.
Investigating the effects of topography on the dynamics of fluid planetary cores requires three key ingredients: (1) strong background rotation, (2) a nonspherical surface, and (3) a mechanism to drive fluid motions. It is especially the second of these requirements that makes such studies challenging, even for the most advanced numerical solvers at present. While efficient spectral methods can be used in spheres and spherical shells to approach the parameters of rapidly rotating regimes, they fail at resolving more complex geometries for which one has to rely on computationally more expensive (e.g., finite element) simulations. However, the latter are not well suited to approach the low Ekman number regimes characteristic of planetary settings.
In contrast, laboratory experiments are well suited to investigate the effects of topography on planetary core dynamics as they allow to investigate a wide range of topography while still achieving comparable or smaller Ekman numbers than modern numerical methods. A typical experimental setup consists of a container of the desired shape, usually filled with water as working fluid, which is mounted on a turntable to mimic the planetary rotation. Largescale topography studies are performed in spheroids or ellipsoids (see Figs. 3 and 4), while meso and smallscale topographies are more easily implemented in a cylindrical geometry. Main characteristics of the various setups described in this section are listed in Table 4. It should be noted that in all the aforementioned experiments, the amplitude of the topography is highly exaggerated with respect to planetary cores, to compensate for the increased influence of dissipation (i.e., larger Ekman numbers in experiments). For example, the typical oblateness of a spheroid in experiments is on the order of 1/10, one to two orders of magnitude larger than in planetary settings. Geophysically relevant flow can be generated by introducing a temperature gradient to mimic convection (Westerburg and Busse 2003), or by mechanical forcings.
The largestscale deformations of planets are long known, and their influence on the fluid flows in planetary cores has been the subject of theoretical considerations since the end of the nineteenth century (Hough 1895; Sloudsky 1895; Poincaré 1910). Beyond the already discussed flows driven by precession and libration (see Sects. 2 and 3), nutations and latitudinal librations of the mantle also generate flows through coupling with largescale topography. As for precession (see Sect. 2), they force the liquid core to rotate along a tilted axis, which can be decomposed in an order one axial rotation and a small rotation along an equatorial axis. The latter is referred to as the spinover mode, the simplest (linear in the spatial coordinates) inertial mode of a rotating fluid cavity. The eigenfrequency of this mode is determined by the geometry of the cavity: For a sphere, the mode has the same frequency as the rotation, whereas in an oblate spheroid its eigenfrequency is smaller, and in a prolate spheroid it is larger than the rotation frequency. All of the aforementioned mechanical forcings will excite this mode, potentially leading to a resonance when the forcing frequency is equal to the eigenfrequency of the mode. Detecting this resonance thus becomes a way to probe the firstorder departure from an ideal, purely spherical CMB.
An example of the pseudoresonance occurring in a librating ellipsoid has been reported in Charles (2018), who experimentally investigated the flows driven by libration in latitude. The experiment consists of an ellipsoidal container characterized by its three semiaxes of length \(a\ne b \ne c\), which is mounted on a turntable. The ellipsoidal container is harmonically oscillating around a second axis, which is inclined by \(90^\circ\) with respect to the rotation axis (Fig. 9a). Spatially resolved flow measurements, along several chords inside the fluid, are performed with ultrasonic Doppler velocimetry (UDV), and the positioning of the measurement profiles allows a timeresolved determination of all three components of the spinover mode. It can be shown that no inviscid spinover mode can be excited in an ellipsoid which is axisymmetric along the libration axis (Vantieghem et al. 2015). In a triaxial ellipsoid, however, a spinover mode can grow with any orientation of the container. Following Vantieghem et al. (2015), a theoretical prediction of the three components of the spinover mode is derived as a function of the ellipticity and oscillation frequency, and a comparison with the experimental UDV data yields a very good agreement (see Fig. 9b), thus validating the theoretical model of the spinover mode in a triaxial ellipsoid.
The effect of mesoscale topography has been widely studied in atmospheric and oceanic contexts with a clear emphasis on stratified fluids, but only few studies so far have considered mesoscale topography with a focus on planetary core dynamics, most of which are either theoretical or numerical. Using a quasigeostrophic approximation, Calkins et al. (2012) investigated numerically the interplay between a meridional ridge and thermally driven core convection. They report the excitation of thermal Rossby waves with a wavelength scaling as \(Ro^{1/2}\), demonstrating that topography can transfer energy from largescale zonal flows to smallscale flow structures. Such waves have also been reported in theoretical works (e.g., Bell and Soward 1996; Herrmann and Busse 1998) and in experiments by Westerburg and Busse (2003). The latter investigated the effects of sinusoidalshaped endwalls on the thermal convection in a rotating cylindrical annulus. Their experimental apparatus is a modified version of the one described in detail by Jaletzky and Busse (2000). Convection is driven in a rapidly rotating cylindrical annulus, filled with either nitrogen or water, by applying a temperature gradient between the cool inner and warm outer cylinder wall. The rotation rate is chosen in such a way that centrifugal forces dominate over gravity. To detect the thermal Rossby waves, thermistors are attached to the inner wall of the cavity. A comparison between theoretical and/or numerical predictions yields a semiquantitative agreement, and it is concluded that thermal Rossby waves may significantly influence the core convection close to the tangent cylinder.
Motivated by the challenge to better characterize the transport of energy and angular momentum from the topography to the fluid flow, Burmann and Noir (2018) carried out a study of the spinup of a rapidly rotating fluid with bottom topography. The experimental setup consists of a rotating straight circular cylinder with a chessboard like arrangement of rectangular blocks at the bottom (Fig. 10a). Small differential fluid motions with respect to the topography are created by an abrupt small increase in the rotation rate, the socalled spinup (Greenspan and Howard 1963). The resulting flow is diagnosed in three horizontal planes using twodimensional particle image velocimetry. Using the decay rate of the kinetic energy as a proxy for the coupling between the fluid and the container, it is found that topography enhances the exchange of angular momentum and energy dissipation (Fig. 10b), an effect that is maximized for a specific horizontal length scale of the blocks. The authors show that shortly after the abrupt change of rotation, nonlinear interacting inertial waves fill the cylindrical volume carrying momentum away from the bottom topography, eventually forming columnar structures with a horizontal length scale commensurate with the length scale of the bottom topography. To translate these results to a geophysical context, further studies are required in particular at lower Ekman number.
To conclude, we note that there remains the need for more, especially experimental, work to obtain a deeper understanding of topographic effects in planetary cores. While there is a good understanding from the numerous work on the largescale deformations (spheroids and ellipsoids) under various forcing, the sparse literature on medium and smallscale topography should motivate for further research in this direction. Such studies should include a more realistic representation of the CMB topography as well as a focus on smallestscale topography, which has been overlooked by experimentalists with a focus on planetary core dynamics.
6 Conclusions
The dynamics of planetary interiors is intrinsically an interdisciplinary research area. We are convinced that it should also be tackled by a collaborative, multimethod approach. Indeed, it is obviously out of reach for any model, even with the most powerful presentday supercomputers, to include simultaneously all the physics and timescales involved in, for example, a core flow history since its formation. The classical approach decomposes the global problem into welldefined restricted models addressing specific points: A systematic exploration of the parameter space, coupled with an indepth understanding of the underlying physics, then allows deriving generic scaling laws that are extrapolated toward planetary scales and challenged against available data. Against this backdrop, this review article is aimed at illustrating the value of laboratory experiments, that allow in particular to reach the most demanding regimes for long data acquisition. The drawbacks are of course the difficulty in data acquisition, as well as the limitations of accessible geometries and physics compared to simulations: e.g., physical properties of conducting fluids available in the laboratory still render the realization of experimental dynamos extremely challenging. Laboratory experiments have resulted in significant progress on understanding the turbulent dynamics in rotating systems of relevance to planetary flows. And as demonstrated by the few examples here, adequately combining the advantages of simulations with dedicated experiments will allow us to keep progressing in our understanding of planetary interiors and to take the most of the increasing flux of data and knowledge from observational missions, on Earth, in our solar system and beyond.
Beyond these general thoughts, we conclude this review by listing, in our view, the three main upcoming challenges for experimental planetary fluid dynamics. As briefly discussed in Sect. 3 in the context of libration forcing, the state of turbulence in planetary relevant regimes remains controversial. Up to now, following the many studies of convection in fast rotating spherical shells, the efforts of the community have mainly focused on characterizing strong, geostrophic turbulence (Schaeffer et al. 2017). But it might turn out that the relevant regime is actually weak, wave turbulence (Le Reun et al. 2019). Our representation of flow scales and organization, hence our understanding of their repercussion on planetary dynamics including dissipation and magnetic field generation, would then have to be fully refounded. This discussion is not restricted to libration forcing: It is actually relevant for any rotating flow, excited by any type of mechanical forcing. The competition between the two different turbulent regimes might explain some of the open questions persisting in precession (Sect. 2) as well as in spherical Couette flows (Sect. 4). The second challenge for experimental studies will be to combine the various types of forcings. Indeed, while we have up to now made great progress in understanding each type of mechanical forcing independently, it turns out that several, if not all, take place simultaneously in real planets. The question also remains to understand how they couple with buoyancy effects. For instance, the Earth’s core is both convecting and precessing, with a CMB topography at both small and large scales; its inner core may also rotate differentially. The Moon’s liquid core has been stably stratified for a long time and has been simultaneously shaken by both precession and libration with greater amplitudes in the past; its boundaries also exhibit topography at both small and large scales. The question remains to understand whether simultaneous buoyancy and/or mechanical forcings will simply superimpose their effects, will cancel each other, or will lead to new, interesting nonlinear couplings. This has only been studied in few studies in cylindrical geometry up to now (Lavorel and Le Bars 2010; Guimbard et al. 2010). Finally, the third great experimental challenge we would like to highlight here is to obtain, at last, a fluid dynamo in the laboratory. Indeed, the three successful experimental dynamos obtained up to now were always very constrained, either in the flow organization (Gailitis et al. 2001; Stieglitz and Müller 2001) or in their boundary conditions (Berhanu et al. 2010). Two dedicated largescale setups are presently in construction in Dresden (Giesecke et al. 2018), or under amelioration for the 3meter liquid sodium experiment in Maryland, to finally reach the dynamo threshold in fully turbulent flows. Exciting results are to be expected in the near future.
References
Aldridge KD, Toomre A (1969) Axisymmetric inertial oscillations of a fluid in a rotating spherical container. J Fluid Mech 37(2):307
Aubert J, Gastine T, Fournier A (2017) Spherical convective dynamos in the rapidly rotating asymptotic regime. J Fluid Mech 813:558
Balbus SA, Hawley JF (1998) Instability, turbulence, and enhanced transport in accretion disks. Rev Mod Phys 70(1):1
Barik A, Triana SA, Hoff M, Wicht J (2018) Triadic resonances in the widegap spherical Couette system. J Fluid Mech 843:211
Bell PI, Soward AM (1996) The influence of surface topography on rotating convection. J Fluid Mech 313:147
Belyaev YN, Monakhov AA, Yavorskaya IM (1978) Stability of spherical Couette flow in thick layers when the inner sphere revolves. Fluid Dyn 13(2):162
Berhanu M, Verhille G, Boisson J, Gallet B, Gissinger C, Fauve S, Mordant N, Pétrélis F, Bourgoin M, Odier P et al (2010) Dynamo regimes and transitions in the VKS experiment. Eur Phys J B 77(4):459
Boisson J, Cébron D, Moisy F, Cortet PP (2012) Earth rotation prevents exact solidbody rotation of fluids in the laboratory. EPL (Europhys Lett) 98(5):59002
Bratukhin I (1961) On the evaluation of the critical Reynolds number for the flow of fluid between two rotating spherical surfaces. J Appl Math Mech 25(5):1286
Brito D, Alboussière T, Cardin P, Gagnière N, Jault D, La Rizza P, Masson JP, Nataf HC, Schmitt D (2011) Zonal shear and superrotation in a magnetized spherical Couetteflow experiment. Phys Rev E 83(6):066310
Buffett BA (2021) Conditions for turbulent Ekman layers in precessionally driven flow. Geophys J Int 226(1):56
Burmann F, Noir J (2018) Effects of bottom topography on the spinup in a cylinder. Phys Fluids 30(10):106601
Busse FH (1968) Steady fluid flow in a precessing spheroidal shell. J Fluid Mech 33(04):739. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112068001655
Busse F (2010) Mean zonal flows generated by librations of a rotating spherical cavity. J Fluid Mech 650:505
Busse F, Carrigan C (1976) Laboratory simulation of thermal convection in rotating planets and stars. Science 191(4222):81
Calkins MA, Noir J, Eldredge JD, Aurnou JM (2012) The effects of boundary topography on convection in Earth’s core. Geophys J Int 189(2):799
Calkins MA, Noir J, Eldredge JD, Aurnou JM (2010) Axisymmetric simulations of librationdriven fluid dynamics in a spherical shell geometry. Phys Fluids 22(8):086602
Calkins MA, Julien K, Tobias SM, Aurnou JM (2015) A multiscale dynamo model driven by quasigeostrophic convection. J Fluid Mech 780:143
Cao H, Russell CT, Wicht J, Christensen UR, Dougherty MK (2012) Saturn’s high degree magnetic moments: Evidence for a unique planetary dynamo. Icarus 221(1):388
Cébron D (2015) Bistable flows in precessing spheroids. Fluid Dyn Res 47(2):025504
Cébron D, Le Bars M, Meunier P (2010) Tiltover mode in a precessing triaxial ellipsoid. Phys Fluids 22(11):116601
Cébron D, Le Bars M, Moutou C, Le Gal P (2012) Elliptical instability in terrestrial planets and moons. Astron Astrophys 539:A78
Cébron D, Laguerre R, Noir J, Schaeffer N (2019) Precessing spherical shells: flows, dissipation, dynamo and the lunar core. Geophys J Int 219(Supplement_1):S34. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz037
Charles Y (2018) Flows driven by librations in latitude in triaxial ellipsoids. Ph.D. thesis, ETH Zurich
Christensen UR, Holzwarth V, Reiners A (2009) Energy flux determines magnetic field strength of planets and stars. Nature 457(7226):167
Crawford JD, Knobloch E (1991) Symmetry and symmetrybreaking bifurcations in fluid dynamics. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 23(1):341
Dehant V, Campuzano SA, De Santis A, van Westrenen W (2022) Structure, materials and processes in the Earth’s core and mantle. Surv Geophys. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1071202109684y
Deschamps F, Rogister Y, Tackley PJ (2018) Constraints on coremantle boundary topography from models of thermal and thermochemical convection. Geophys J Int 212(1):164
Dormy E, Cardin P, Jault D (1998) MHD flow in a slightly differentially rotating spherical shell, with conducting inner core, in a dipolar magnetic field. Earth Planet Sci Lett 160(1–2):15
Dwyer C, Stevenson D, Nimmo F (2011) A longlived lunar dynamo driven by continuous mechanical stirring. Nature 479(7372):212
Egbers C, Rath H (1995) The existence of Taylor vortices and widegap instabilities in spherical Couette flow. Acta Mech 111(3–4):125
Ferraro VCA (1937) The nonuniform rotation of the sun and its magnetic field. Mon Not R Astron Soc 97:458
Gailitis A, Lielausis O, Platacis E, Dement’ev S, Cifersons A, Gerbeth G, Gundrum T, Stefani F, Christen M, Will G (2001) Magnetic field saturation in the Riga dynamo experiment. Phys Rev Lett 86(14):3024
Garcia F, Seilmayer M, Giesecke A, Stefani F (2019) Modulated rotating waves in the magnetised spherical Couette system. J NonLinear Sci 29(6):2735
Garcia F, Seilmayer M, Giesecke A, Stefani F (2020) Chaotic wave dynamics in weakly magnetized spherical Couette flows. Chaos Interdiscip J Nonlinear Sci 30(4):043116
Garcia F, Giesecke A, Stefani F (2021) Modulated rotating waves and triadic resonances in spherical fluid systems: the case of magnetized spherical Couette flow. Phys Fluids 33(4):044105
Garcia F, Seilmayer M, Giesecke A, Stefani F (2020) Chaotic wave dynamics in weakly magnetized spherical Couette flows. arXiv eprints arXiv:2007.03422
Giesecke A, Vogt T, Gundrum T, Stefani F (2018) Nonlinear large scale flow in a precessing cylinder and its ability to drive dynamo action. Phys Rev Lett 120:024502. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.024502
Gissinger C, Ji H, Goodman J (2011) Instabilities in magnetized spherical Couette flow. Phys Rev E 84:026308
Godeferd FS, Moisy F (2015) Structure and dynamics of rotating turbulence: a review of recent experimental and numerical results. Appl Mech Rev 67(3)
Goto S, Matsunaga A, Fujiwara M, Nishioka M, Kida S, Yamato M, Tsuda S (2014) Turbulence driven by precession in spherical and slightly elongated spheroidal cavities. Phys Fluids 26(5):055107. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4874695
Grannan A, Le Bars M, Cébron D, Aurnou J (2014) Experimental study of globalscale turbulence in a librating ellipsoid. Phys Fluids 26(12):126601
Greenspan HP (1968) The theory of rotating fluids. Cambridge University Press, London
Greenspan H, Howard L (1963) On a timedependent motion of a rotating fluid. J Fluid Mech 17(3):385
Guervilly C, Cardin P (2010) Numerical simulations of dynamos generated in spherical Couette flows. Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 104:221
Guervilly C, Cardin P, Schaeffer N (2019) Turbulent convective length scale in planetary cores. Nature 570(7761):368
Guimbard D, Le Dizès S, Le Bars M, Le Gal P, Leblanc S (2010) Elliptic instability of a stratified fluid in a rotating cylinder. J Fluid Mech 660:240
Herrmann J, Busse F (1998) Stationary and time dependent convection in the rotating cylindrical annulus with modulated height. Phys Fluids 10(7):1611
Hoff M, Harlander U (2019) Stewartsonlayer instability in a widegap spherical Couette experiment: Rossby number dependence. J Fluid Mech 878:522
Hoff M, Harlander U, Triana SA (2016) Study of turbulence and interacting inertial modes in a differentially rotating spherical shell experiment. Phys Rev Fluids 1:043701
Hoff M, Harlander U, Egbers C (2016) Experimental survey of linear and nonlinear inertial waves and wave instabilities in a spherical shell. J Fluid Mech 789:589
Hollerbach R (2001) Superand counterrotating jets and vortices in strongly magnetic spherical Couette flow. In: Dynamo and dynamics, a mathematical challenge (Springer, 2001), pp 189–197
Hollerbach R (1994) Magnetohydrodynamic Ekman and Stewartson layers in a rotating spherical shell. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Eng Sci 444(1921):333
Hollerbach R (2000) Magnetohydrodynamic flows in spherical shells. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 295–316
Hollerbach R (2003) Instabilities of the Stewartson layer Part 1. The dependence on the sign of \(Ro\). J Fluid Mech 492:289
Hollerbach R (2009) Nonaxisymmetric instabilities in magnetic spherical Couette flow. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Eng Sci 465(2107):2003
Hollerbach R, Skinner S (2001) Instabilities of magnetically induced shear layers and jets. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Eng Sci 457(2008):785
Hollerbach R, Futterer B, More T, Egbers C (2004) Instabilities of the Stewartson layer Part 2. Supercritical mode transitions. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn 18(2):197
Hollerbach R, Junk M, Egbers C (2006) Nonaxisymmetric instabilities in basic state spherical Couette flow. Fluid Dyn Res 38(4):257
Horimoto Y, Katayama A, Goto S (2020) Conical sheardriven parametric instability of steady flow in precessing spheroids. Phys Rev Fluids 5:063901. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.5.063901
Hough SS (1895) The oscillations of a rotating ellipsoidal shell containing fluid. Proc R Soc Lond 57(340–346):299
Jaletzky M, Busse F (2000) New patterns of centrifugally driven thermal convection. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97(10):5060
Kaplan EJ, Nataf HC, Schaeffer N (2018) Dynamic domains of the Derviche Tourneur sodium experiment: simulations of a spherical magnetized Couette flow. Phys Rev Fluids 3(3):034608
Kasprzyk C, Kaplan E, Seilmayer M, Stefani F (2017) Transitions in a magnetized quasilaminar spherical Couette flow. Magnetohydrodynamics 53(2):393
Kelley DH (2009) Rotating, hydromagnetic laboratory experiment modelling planetary cores. Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland, College Park
Kelley DH, Triana SA, Zimmerman DS, Tilgner A, Lathrop DP (2007) Inertial waves driven by differential rotation in a planetary geometry. Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 101(5–6):469
Kelley DH, Triana SA, Zimmerman DS, Lathrop DP (2010) Selection of inertial modes in spherical Couette flow. Phys Rev E 81:026311
Kerswell RR, Malkus WV (1998) Tidal instability as the source for Io’s magnetic signature. Geophys Res Lett 25(5):603
Kerswell R (1993) The instability of precessing flow. Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 72(1–4):107
Kerswell R (1996) Upper bounds on the energy dissipation in turbulent precession. J Fluid Mech 321:335
Kleeorin N, Rogachevskii I, Ruzmaikin A, Soward A, Starchenko S (1997) Axisymmetric flow between differentially rotating spheres in a dipole magnetic field. J Fluid Mech 344:213
Koch S, Harlander U, Egbers C, Hollerbach R (2013) Inertial waves in a spherical shell induced by librations of the inner sphere: experimental and numerical results. Fluid Dyn Res 45(3):035504
Komoda K, Goto S (2019) Threedimensional flow structures of turbulence in precessing spheroids. Phys Rev Fluids 4(1):014603. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.4.014603
Kozlov V, Subbotin S (2017) Librations induced zonal flow and differential rotation of free inner core in rotating spherical cavity. Phys Fluids 29(9):096601
Larmor J (1919) How could a rotating body such as the Sun become a magnet, Rep. Brit. Adv. Sci. pp. 159–160
Lavorel G, Le Bars M (2010) Experimental study of the interaction between convective and elliptical instabilities. Phys Fluids 22(11):114101
Le Bars M, Wieczorek MA, Karatekin Ö, Cébron D, Laneuville M (2011) An impactdriven dynamo for the early Moon. Nature 479(7372):215
Le Bars M, Cébron D, Le Gal P (2015) Flows driven by libration, precession, and tides. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 47:163
Le Reun T, Favier B, Le Bars M (2019) Experimental study of the nonlinear saturation of the elliptical instability: inertial wave turbulence versus geostrophic turbulence. J Fluid Mech 879:296
Lemasquerier D, Grannan A, Vidal J, Cébron D, Favier B, Le Bars M, Aurnou J (2017) Librationdriven flows in ellipsoidal shells. J Geophys Res Planets 122(9):1926. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JE005340
Lin Y, Marti P, Noir J (2015) Sheardriven parametric instability in a precessing sphere. Phys Fluids (1994present) 27(4):046601
Lin Y, Marti P, Noir J, Jackson A (2016) Precessiondriven dynamos in a full sphere and the role of large scale cyclonic vortices. Phys Fluids 28(6):066601
Löptien B, Gizon L, Birch AC, Schou J, Proxauf B, Duvall TL, Bogart RS, Christensen UR (2018) Globalscale equatorial Rossby waves as an essential component of solar internal dynamics. Nat Astron 2(7):568
Malkus W (1968) Precession of the Earth as the cause of geomagnetism: experiments lend support to the proposal that precessional torques drive the Earth’s dynamo. Science 160(3825):259. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.160.3825.259
Margot JL, Peale S, Jurgens R, Slade M, Holin I (2007) Large longitude libration of Mercury reveals a molten core. Science 316(5825):710
Matsui H, Adams M, Kelley D, Triana S, Zimmerman D, Buffett B, Lathrop D (2011) Numerical and experimental investigation of sheardriven inertial oscillations in an Earthlike geometry. Phys Earth Planet Inter 188(3–4):194. Proceedings of the 12th symposium of SEDI
Meduri DG, Lignières F, Jouve L (2019) Nonaxisymmetric magnetorotational instability in spherical Couette flow. Phys Rev E 100(1):013110. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.100.013110
Moffatt H (1970) Dynamo action associated with random inertial waves in a rotating conducting fluid. J Fluid Mech 44(4):705
Morelli A, Dziewonski AM (1987) Topography of the coremantle boundary and lateral homogeneity of the liquid core. Nature 325(6106):678
Munson BR, Joseph DD (1971) Viscous incompressible flow between concentric rotating spheres. Part 1. Basic flow. J Fluid Mech 49:289
Munson BR, Joseph DD (1971) Viscous incompressible flow between concentric rotating spheres. Part 2. Hydrodynamic stability. J Fluid Mech 49:305
Munson BR, Menguturk M (1975) Viscous incompressible flow between concentric rotating spheres. Part 3. Linear stability and experiments. J Fluid Mech 69:705
Narteau C, Le Mouël J, Poirier J, Sepúlveda E, Shnirman M (2001) On a smallscale roughness of the coremantle boundary. Earth Planet Sci Lett 191(1–2):49
Nataf HC, Alboussière T, Brito D, Cardin P, Gagnière N, Jault D, Masson JP, Schmitt D (2006) Experimental study of superrotation in a magnetostrophic spherical Couette flow. Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 100(4):281. https://doi.org/10.1080/03091920600718426
Neiner C, Mathis S (2013) Making a Be star: the role of rotation and pulsations. Proc Int Astron Union 9(S301):465
Nobili C, Meunier P, Favier B, Le Bars M (2021) Hysteresis and instabilities in a spheroid in precession near the resonance with the tiltover mode. J Fluid Mech 909
Noir J, Brito D, Aldridge K, Cardin P (2001) Experimental evidence of inertial waves in a precessing spheroidal cavity. Geophys Res Lett 28(19):3785. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL012956
Noir J, Cardin P, Jault D, Masson JP (2003) Experimental evidence of nonlinear resonance effects between retrograde precession and the tiltover mode within a spheroid. Geophys J Int 154(2):407
Noir J, Hemmerlin F, Wicht J, Baca S, Aurnou J (2009) An experimental and numerical study of librationally driven flow in planetary cores and subsurface oceans. Phys Earth Planet Inter 173(1–2):141
Noir J, Cébron D, Le Bars M, Sauret A, Aurnou J (2012) Experimental study of librationdriven zonal flows in nonaxisymmetric containers. Phys Earth Planet Inter 204:1
Pais M, Le Mouël J (2001) Precessioninduced flows in liquidfilled containers and in the Earth’s core. Geophys J Int 144(3):539. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365246x.2001.01367.x
Poincaré H (1910) Sur la précession des corps déformables. Bulletin Astronomique, Serie I 27:321
Proudman I (1956) The almostrigid rotation of viscous fluid between concentric spheres. J Fluid Mech 1:505
Rayleigh L (1917) On the Dynamics of Revolving Fluids. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A 93:148
Raynaud R, Dormy E (2013) Intermittency in spherical Couette dynamos. Phys Rev E 87(3):033011. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.033011
Reddy KS, Favier B, Le Bars M (2018) Turbulent kinematic dynamos in ellipsoids driven by mechanical forcing. Geophys Res Lett 45(4):1741
Rekier J, Trinh A, Triana SA, Dehant V (2019) Internal energy dissipation in Enceladus’s subsurface ocean from tides and libration and the role of inertial waves. J Geophys Res Planets 124(8):2198
Rieutord M, Triana SA, Zimmerman DS, Lathrop DP (2012) Excitation of inertial modes in an experimental spherical Couette flow. Phys Rev E 86:026304
Rüdiger G, Hollerbach R, Kitchatinov LL (2013) Magnetic processes in astrophysics: theory, simulations, experiments. Wiley, Weinheim
Sauret A, Cébron D, Morize C, Le Bars M (2010) Experimental and numerical study of mean zonal flows generated by librations of a rotating spherical cavity. J Fluid Mech 662:260
Sauret A, Cébron D, Le Bars M (2013) Spontaneous generation of inertial waves from boundary turbulence in a librating sphere. J Fluid Mech 728
Schaeffer N, Jault D, Nataf HC, Fournier A (2017) Turbulent geodynamo simulations: a leap towards Earth’s core. Geophys J Int 211(1):1
Schmitt D, Alboussière T, Brito D, Cardin P, Gagnière N, Jault D, Nataf HC (2008) Rotating spherical Couette flow in a dipolar magnetic field: experimental study of magnetoinertial waves. J Fluid Mech 604:175
Schmitt D, Cardin P, Rizza PL, Nataf HC (2013) MagnetoCoriolis waves in a spherical Couette flow experiment. Eur J Mech B Fluids 37:10
Sisan DR, Mujica N, Tillotson WA, Huang YM, Dorland W, Hassam AB, Antonsen TM, Lathrop DP (2004) Experimental observation and characterization of the magnetorotational instability. Phys Rev Lett 93(11):114502. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.114502
Sloudsky T (1895) De la rotation de la Terre supposeé fluide a son intérieur. Bulletin de la Societe des naturalists de Moscow 9:285
Soldati G, Boschi L, Forte AM (2012) Tomography of coremantle boundary and lowermost mantle coupled by geodynamics. Geophys J Int 189(2):730
Sorokin MP, Khlebutin GN, Shaidurov GF (1966) Study of the motion of a liquid between two rotating spherical surfaces. J Appl Mech Tech Phys 7(6):73
Sous D, Sommeria J, Boyer D (2013) Friction law and turbulent properties in a laboratory Ekman boundary layer. Phys Fluids 25(4):046602
Soward AM, Bassom AP (2016) Frequency staircases in narrowgap spherical Couette flow. Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 110(2):166
Soward A, Dormy E (2010) Shearlayers in magnetohydrodynamic spherical Couette flow with conducting walls. J Fluid Mech 645:145
Starchenko S (1997) Magnetohydrodynamics of a viscous spherical layer rotating in a strong potential field. J Exp Theor Phys 85(6):1125
Stewartson K (1966) On almost rigid rotations. Part 2. J Fluid Mech 26:131
Stewartson K, Roberts P (1963) On the motion of liquid in a spheroidal cavity of a precessing rigid body. J Fluid Mech 17(1):1
Stieglitz R, Müller U (2001) Experimental demonstration of a homogeneous twoscale dynamo. Phys Fluids 13(3):561
Sze EK, van der Hilst RD (2003) Core mantle boundary topography from short period PcP, PKP, and PKKP data. Phys Earth Planet Inter 135(1):27
Tanaka S (2010) Constraints on the coremantle boundary topography from P4KPPcP differential travel times. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 115(B4): B04310?B04323
Tigrine Z, Nataf HC, Schaeffer N, Cardin P, Plunian F (2019) Torsional Alfvén waves in a dipolar magnetic field: experiments and simulations. Geophys J Int 219:S83
Tilgner A (2005) Precession driven dynamos. Phys Fluids 17(3):034104
Travnikov V, Egbers C (2020) Linear stability analysis of the convective flow in a spherical gap with rotating inner surface. Int J Heat Mass Transf 148:119052
Triana SA (2011) Inertial waves in a laboratory model of the Earth’s core. Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland, College Park
Triana S, Zimmerman D, Lathrop D (2012) Precessional states in a laboratory model of the Earth’s core. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 117(B4)
van Gils DPM, Huisman SG, Grossmann S, Sun C, Lohse D (2012) Optimal TaylorCouette turbulence. J Fluid Mech 706:118
Van Hoolst T, Rambaux N, Karatekin Ö, Dehant V, Rivoldini A (2008) The librations, shape, and icy shell of Europa. Icarus 195(1):386
Vantieghem S, Cébron D, Noir J (2015) Latitudinal libration driven flows in triaxial ellipsoids. J Fluid Mech 771:193
Vanyo J (1973) An energy assessment for liquids in a filled precessing spherical cavity. J Appl Mech
Vanyo JP, Dunn JR (2000) Core precession: flow structures and energy. Geophys J Int 142(2):409. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365246x.2000.00170.x
Vanyo JP, Likins PW (1971) Measurement of energy dissipation in a liquidfilled, precessing, spherical cavity. J Appl Mech 38(3):674. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3408872
Vanyo J, Wilde P, Cardin P, Olson P (1995) Experiments on precessing flows in the Earth’s liquid core. Geophys J Int 121(1):136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365246X.1995.tb03516.x
Wei X, Hollerbach R (2008) Instabilities of Shercliffe and Stewartson layers in spherical Couette flow. Phys Rev E 78:026309
Westerburg M, Busse F (2003) Centrifugally driven convection in the rotating cylindrical annulus with modulated boundaries. Nonlinear Process Geophys 10:275
Wicht J (2014) Flow instabilities in the widegap spherical Couette system. J Fluid Mech 738:184
Wieczorek MA, Le Feuvre M (2009) Did a large impact reorient the Moon? Icarus 200(2):358
Williams JG, Boggs DH, Yoder CF, Ratcliff JT, Dickey JO (2001) Lunar rotational dissipation in solid body and molten core. J Geophys Res Planets 106(E11):27933
Wilson A, Kerswell RR (2018) Can libration maintain Enceladus’s ocean? Earth Planet Sci Lett 500:41
Wu CC, Roberts PH (2013) On a dynamo driven topographically by longitudinal libration. Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 107(1–2):20
Yavorskaya I, Belyaev YN (1986) Hydrodynamical stability in rotating spherical layers: application to dynamics of planetary atmospheres. Acta Astronaut 13(6–7):433
Yoder CF (1981) The free librations of a dissipative Moon, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 303(1477):327
Zaussinger F, Haun P, Neben M, Seelig T, Travnikov V, Egbers C, Yoshikawa H, Mutabazi I (2018) Dielectrically driven convection in spherical gap geometry. Phys Rev Fluids 3(9):093501
Zhang K, Earnshaw P, Liao X, Busse FH (2001) On inertial waves in a rotating fluid sphere. J Fluid Mech 437:103
Zhang K, Chan KH, Liao X, Aurnou JM (2013) The nonresonant response of fluid in a rapidly rotating sphere undergoing longitudinal libration. J Fluid Mech 720:212
Zimmerman DS, Triana SA, Nataf HC, Lathrop DP (2014) A turbulent, high magnetic Reynolds number experimental model of Earth’s core. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 119(6):4538
Zimmerman DS, Triana SA, Lathrop DP (2011) Bistability in turbulent, rotating spherical Couette flow. Phys Fluids (1994present) 23(6):065104
Acknowledgements
MLB acknowledges funding by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program through Grant No. 681835FLUDYCOERC2015CoG. NS thanks David Cébron and Philippe Cardin for insightful discussions. FB and JN acknowledge discussions with Yoann Charles and funding through the Swiss National Science Foundation Grant No. 200021_140708 and ETH ZURICH Research Grant No. ETH26 151. DPL acknowledges funding by the US National Science Foundation EAR1909055. All the authors thank ISSI for the organization of the stimulating workshop on Probing the Earth’s Deep Interior Using in Synergy Observations of the Earth’s Gravity and Magnetic Fields, and of the Earth’s Rotation.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Le Bars, M., Barik, A., Burmann, F. et al. Fluid Dynamics Experiments for Planetary Interiors. Surv Geophys 43, 229–261 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712021096811
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712021096811