Skip to main content
Log in

Backyard agricultural rural production and its integration into local food networks in Misantla, Mexico

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies in Asia, Europe, Central America, South America, and a few studies in Mexico related to backyard production, report the type of crops and benefit of the harvest for the producer through individual efforts. These studies, however, leave a gap in how these producers integrate collaboratively to have their products reach their customers. The objective of this research was to describe the configuration of economic agents involved in backyard farming in the intermunicipal region of Misantla, Mexico. Data was collected by means of an interview with 96 families, using a snowball strategy to reach a total of 254 families. However, 27 of them reported not engaging in backyard activities. As a result, the study was carried out with 227 farm families through an in-person structured survey. Findings show that backyard farming and livestock production in 70% of the families in this region of study is mainly for their own consumption, whereas production surplus is typically used as an additional income. Those involved in this production are identified as seed and farming tool providers; backyard producers, and customers-consumers, all of which participate in 4 short-cycle supply chains with a fragile intermediation. These supply chains are the channel for fresh food to the food networks of local economies. These local food networks can help enhance food innocuity, traceability and commercial efficiency for backyard farmers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguilar-Barojas, S. (2005). Fórmulas para el cálculo de la muestra en investigaciones de salud. Salud En Tabasco, 11(1–2), 333–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arfini, F., & Mancini, M. (2018). Synergies between localized agri-food systems and short supply chains for geographical indications in Italy. In A. Kalfagianni & S. Skordili (Eds.), Localizing global food: Short food supply chains as responses to agri-food system challenges (vol. 1, pp. 104–120). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429449284-9

  • Barajas-Rodríguez, M., Soto-Núñez, N. I., Escudero-Barrenechea, A., Sánchez-Galván, F., Hernández-Santiago, Q., & Bautista-Santos, H. (2020). Análisis de la cadena de suministro de la flor de cempasúchil (Tagetes erecta L.); caso de estudio. Agro productividad., 13(3), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.32854/agrop.v13i3.1847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayir, B., Charles, A., Sekhari, A., & Ouzrout, Y. (2022). Issues and challenges in short food supply chains: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 14(5), 3029. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14053029

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, H. R. (2000). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blondeau, S., & Korzenszky, A. (2022). Family farming, legal brief 8 (pp 1–10). Rome: FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb8227en

  • Bobadilla-Soto, E. E., Ochoa-Ambriz, F., & Perea-Peña, M. (2022). El sistema de producción maíz-ovinos de traspatio en los pueblos Mazahuas del Estado de México. Terra Latinoamericana, 40, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.28940/terra.v40i0.945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. J., Suter, T. A., & Churchill, G. A. (2013). Basic marketing research: Customer insight and managerial action (9th ed.). Cenage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, P., Sunmola, F., & Wertheim-Heck, S. (2022). Blockchain enabled quality management in short food supply chains. Procedia Computer Science, 200, 904–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCS.2022.01.288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comisión Nacional de Salarios Mínimos (CONASAMI) (2021). Incremento al salario mínimo para 2021. Recuperado el 05 de diciembre de 2023 de https://acortar.link/fSyTGv

  • Comité Estatal de Información Estadística y Geográfica de Veracruz (CEIEGV) (2021). Sistema de Información Estadística y Geográfica del Estado de Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave (SIEGVER): Cuadernillos municipales 2021. Misantla: Recuperado el 10 de septiembre de 2023 de https://acortar.link/RCDadN

  • Consejo Nacional de Evaluación Política de Desarrollo Social (CONEVAL) (2018). Medición de la pobreza 2008–2018. Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Recuperado el 16 de octubre de 2023 de https://www.coneval.org.mx/Medicion/MP/Paginas/Pobreza-2018.aspx

  • Consejo Nacional de Población (CONAPO). (2020). Índices de marginación 2020. Índices de marginación 2020. Consejo Nacional de Población, Gobierno, gob.mx (www.gob.mx). Accessed 21 Nov 2023

  • Devaux, A., Goffart, J.-P., Kromann, P., Andrade-Piedra, J., Polar, V., & Hareau, G. (2021). The potato of the future: Opportunities and challenges in sustainable agri-food systems. Potato Research, 64(4), 681–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-021-09501-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Doernberg, A., Piorr, A., Zasada, I., Wascher, D., & Schmutz, U. (2022). Sustainability assessment of short food supply chains (SFSC): Developing and testing a rapid assessment tool in one African and three European city regions. Agriculture and Human Values, 39, 885–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-021-10288-w

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2018a). FAO’s work on family farming: Preparing for the decade of family farming (2019–2028) to achieve the SDGs. Food and Agriculture Organization. http://www.fao.org/3/ca1465en/CA1465EN.pdf. Accessed 13 Nov 2023

  • FAO. (2018b). FAO’S WORK ON FAMILY FARMING: Preparing for the decade of family farming (2019–2028) to achieve the SDGs. https://www.fao.org/documents/card/fr/c/CA1465EN. Accessed 01 Aug 2023.

  • FAO. (2018c). Transforming food and agriculture to achieve the SDGs: 20 interconnected actions to guide decision-makers. Technical Reference Document. https://www.fao.org/policy-support/tools-and-publications/resources-details/en/c/1140709/. Accessed 01 Aug 2023.

  • FAO. (2019). El sistema alimentario en México - Oportunidades para el campo mexicano en la Agenda 2030 de Desarrollo Sostenible. https://www.fao.org/publications/card/es/c/CA2910ES/. Accessed 16 May 2023.

  • FAO & IFAD. (2019). United Nations decade of family farming 2019–2028—global action plan. Food and Agriculture Organization and International Fund for Agricultural Development. https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/CA4672EN. Accessed 07 Oct 2023

  • FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, and WHO. (2021). The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2021. Transforming food systems for food security, improved nutrition and affordable healthy diets for all. In The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2021. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 240 p. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb4474en

  • FND. (2020). Financiera Nacional de Desarrollo Agropecuario, Rural, Forestal y Pesquero 2020–2024. Programa Institucional 2020–2024 Financiera Nacional de Desarrollo Agropecuario, Rural, Forestal y Pesquero. Diario Oficial de la Federación. https://acortar.link/aKSaTo. Accessed 23 July 2023.

  • García, M., Saltijeral, J. L., & Sosa, S. M. (2017). Guía para el desarrollo de mercados de productores. Proyecto “Creación de Cadenas Cortas Agroalimentarias en la Ciudad de México”. Ciudad de México: Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura (FAO). https://www.fao.org/3/i8096s/i8096s.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2023.

  • Garner, E. & de la O Campos, A. P. (2015). Identifying the “family farm": An informal discussion of the concepts and definitions (Vol. 14). Food and Agriculture Organization. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4306e.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2023

  • Giampietri, E., Verneau, F., del Giudice, T., Carfora, V., & Finco, A. (2018). A theory of planned behaviour perspective for investigating the role of trust in consumer purchasing decision related to short food supply chains. Food Quality and Preference, 64, 160–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOODQUAL.2017.09.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzmán-Hernández, C., Soto-Albarrán, F., Mendoza-Vilchis, R., López-Ojeda, A., & Hernández-López, R. (2019). Ruta alimentaria en circuitos y producción de traspatio en Donato Guerra, México. Estudios sociales. Revista de Alimentación Contemporánea y Desarrollo Regional, 29(53), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.24836/es.v29i53.696

  • INEGI (2020). Número de habitantes. Veracruz. Población. https://acortar.link/HkzZtM. Accessed 13 July 2023.

  • Jaramillo-Villanueva, J. L., Morales-Jiménez, J., & Domínguez-Torres, V. (2017). Importancia económica del traspatio y su relación con la seguridad alimentaria en comunidades de alta marginación en Puebla, México. Agroproductividad, 10(7), 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarzębowski, S., Bourlakis, M., & Bezat-Jarzębowska, A. (2020). Short food supply chains (SFSC) as local and sustainable systems. Sustainability, 12(11), 4715. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovács, I., Balázsné Lendvai, M., & Beke, J. (2022). The importance of food attributes and motivational factors for purchasing local food products: Segmentation of young local food consumers in hungary. Sustainability, 14(6), 3224. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurowska, K., Marks-Bielska, R., Bielski, S., Aleknavičius, A., & Kowalczyk, C. (2020). Geographic information systems and the sustainable development of rural areas. Land, 10(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10010006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lankauskienė, R., Vidickienė, D., & Gedminaitė-Raudonė, Ž. (2022). Evolution of short food supply chain theory and practice: Two-sided networks and platforms. Energies, 15(3), 1137. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15031137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leguizamón, L. S., Hernández, F. G., Cabañas, A. A. G., & Arias, M. A. L. O. (2023). Agroecosistemas tradicionales del trópico mexicano: Los “bajíos” de Chiapas y sus características en el contexto actual. Revista De Ciencias Sociales, XXIX(2), 108–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loizou, E., Karelakis, C., Galanopoulos, K., & Mattas, K. (2019). The role of agriculture as a development tool for a regional economy. Agricultural Systems, 173, 482–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López, P. L. (2004). Población Muestra y Muestreo. Punto Cero, 9(08), 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowder, S. K., Sánchez, M. v., & Bertini, R. (2019). Farms, family farms, farmland distribution and farm labour: What do we know today? In No 301283, ESA Working papers, Food and Agriculture Organization for the United Nations. Rome: Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA). 80 pp.

  • Matei, A. P., Swagemakers, P., Dominguez Garcia, M. D., da Silva, L. X., Ventura, F., & Milone, P. (2017). State support in Brazil for a local turn to food. Agriculture, 7(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture7010005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogutu, S. O., Gödecke, T., & Qaim, M. (2020). Agricultural commercialisation and nutrition in smallholder farm households. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71(2), 534–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviedo, H. C., & Campo-Arias, A. (2005). Metodología de investigación y lectura crítica de estudios Aproximación al uso del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. Revista Colombiana De Psiquiatría, 34(4), 572–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paciarotti, C., & Torregiani, F. (2021). The logistics of the short food supply chain: A literature review. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 428–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SPC.2020.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Procuraduría Federal del Consumidor (PROFECO) (2023). Productos de primera necesidad. Lunes 28 de agosto, 2023. https://www.profeco.gob.mx/precios/canasta/primeran/2023/QQPPRIMERAN_082823.pdf

  • Ramírez-Juárez, J. (2022). Food security and family farming in Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 13(3), 553–565. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v13i3.2854

  • Ramírez-Juárez, J. (2023). Régimen alimentario y agricultura familiar. Elementos para la soberanía alimentaria. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 14(SPE29). https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v14i29.3533

  • Rossi Scalco, A., Miller Devós Ganga, G., Cristina De Oliveira, S., & Baker, G. (2020). Development and validation of a scale for identification of quality attributes of agri-food products in short chains. Geoforum, 111, 165–175.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEOFORUM.2020.02.012

  • SADER, (Secretaria de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural) (2022). E006 “Generación de proyectos de Investigación”. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP). https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/775823/Diagn_stico_2022_Pp_E006_Generaci_n_de_Proyectos_de_Investigaci_n.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2023.

  • Sánchez-Galván, F., Bautista-Santos, H., Martínez-Flores, J. L., Sánchez-Partida, D., Ireta-Paredes, A. R., & Fernández-Lambert, G. (2019). Backyard agricultural production as a strategy for strengthening local economy: The case of Chontla and Tempoal, Mexico. Sustainability, 11(19), 5400. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreer, V., & Padmanabhan, M. (2020). The many meanings of organic farming: Framing food security and food sovereignty in Indonesia. Organic Agriculture, 10(3), 327–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-019-00277-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera (SIAP). (2023). Producción Agrícola. https://www.gob.mx/siap/acciones-y-programas/produccion-agricola-33119. Accessed 03 Dec 2023

  • Simatupang, T. M., & Sridharan, R. (2002). The collaborative supply chain. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 13(1), 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., Lawrence, G., MacMahon, A., Muller, J., & Brady, M. (2016). The resilience of long and short food chains: A case study of flooding in Queensland, Australia. Agriculture and Human Values, 33(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-015-9603-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, M. F., & Hall, M. N. (2007). A generic model of the integrated food supply chain to aid the investigation of food safety breakdowns. Food Control, 18(7), 755–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOODCONT.2006.01.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tardy, C. H., Tardy, C. A., & Dervin, B. (1988). A handbook for the study of human communication: Methods and instruments for observing, measuring, and assessing communication processes. Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomé, K. M., Cappellesso, G., Ramos, E. L. A., & de Duarte, S. C. L. (2021). Food supply chains and short food supply chains: Coexistence conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123207. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.123207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tittonell, P., Fernandez, M., el Mujtar, V. E., Preiss, P. v., Sarapura, S., Laborda, L., Mendonça, M. A., Alvarez, V. E., Fernandes, G. B., Petersen, P., & Cardoso, I. M. (2021). Emerging responses to the COVID-19 crisis from family farming and the agroecology movement in Latin America – A rediscovery of food, farmers and collective action. Agricultural Systems, 190, 103098. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGSY.2021.103098

  • Torres, M., Paz, K., & Salazar, F. (2006). Tamaño de una muestra para una investigación de mercado. Boletín Electrónico, 2, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vliet, J. A., Schut, A. G. T., Reidsma, P., Descheemaeker, K., Slingerland, M., Van De Ven, G. W. J., & Giller, K. E. (2015). De-mystifying family farming: Features, diversity and trends across the globe. Global Food Security, 5, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2015.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vapnek, J., & Boaz, P. (2021). Legislative and regulatory frameworks for family farming. Food and Agriculture Organization. https://www.fao.org/3/cb6922en/cb6922en.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2023

  • Volpentesta, A. P., Ammirato, S., & della Gala, M. (2013). Classifying short agri-food supply chains under a knowledge and social learning perspective. Rural Society, 22(3), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.5172/rsj.2013.22.3.217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., Kumar, V., Ruan, X., Saad, M., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Kumar, A. (2021). Sustainability concerns on consumers’ attitude towards short food supply chains: An empirical investigation. Operations Management Research, 15, 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-021-00188-x

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Editor of the journal, as well as the anonymous reviewers for their valuable inputs to the earlier version of this manuscript. We would also like to thank all informants and participants involved in this study. The first author is grateful to Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías, of Mexico (CONAHCYT) for the scholarship granted for the study of the PhD in Engineering Sciences at TECNM/ ITS Misantla. (No. 805637/262752).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Nayeli Montlavo-Romero (NMR), Luis E. García-Santamaría (LEGS), Aarón Montiel Rosales (AMR), Alberto A. Aguilar Lasserre (AAL) and Gregorio Fernández-Lambert (GFL). The first draft of the manuscript was written by Nayeli Montalvo-Romero and Gregorio Fernández-Lambert and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Conceptualization: NMR, LEGS and GFL; Methodology: AAL, GFL and NMR; Formal analysis and investigation: GFL, AMR and AAL; Writing—original draft preparation: NMR, LEGS; Writing—review and editing: AAL, GFL and NMR; Resources: All authors; Supervision: GFL and AAL.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregorio Fernández-Lambert.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Annex

Annex

Table 6

Table 6 Survey on backyard farming in the study region

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Romero, N.M., Fernández-Lambert, G., García-Santamaría, L.E. et al. Backyard agricultural rural production and its integration into local food networks in Misantla, Mexico. GeoJournal 89, 12 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-024-11013-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-024-11013-w

Keywords

Navigation