Abstract
Few studies of land use change were particularly considered the hierarchical data structure originating from different scales and levels. Using interviewing data collected from 107 villages, 1,050 households and 4,780 fields between November 2003 and August 2005, the objective of this paper is to predict the occurrence of land use from field to village level in mountainous area, China, and to improve our understanding of the causes of land use. Household’s behavior in the choice of land use type is guided by multiple, often confiding, household objectives, subject to the available resources, possible productive activities, and external economic and biophysical constraints. For rice model, the household level variables cannot be substituted by village level aggregates. Aggregated variables at village level do not capture any of the variability at the household level. Village level variables can virtually be explained in virtue of the variables of field and household level. The households and the villages show significant clustering of the occurrence of rice, and they explain the 11.3 and 4.5% variance, respectively. For corn model, corn as dependent variable does not show any significant variance component. The variables of household and village level have lower effects on the occurrence of corn. There is a significant relation between slope of a field and the choice to cultivate corn and a significant random effect at the village level. However, cropland size, input–output, transportation cost, even family income in household level and road density and food market development in village level, at some extent, are controlled by slope. These variables do not influence corn cultivation significantly and that those are predominantly determined by slope. In a word, the household level can be crucial in explaining land use at the field level. Multilevel analysis can be applied to statistically model the occurrence of land use, and to explore a number of cross-scale propositions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Declerck, S., de Bie, T., Ercken, D., Hampel, H., Schrijvers, S., van Wichelen, J., Gillard, V., Mandiki, R., Losson, B., Bauwens, D., Keijers, S., Vyverman, W., Goddeeris, B., de Meester, L., Brendonck, L., & Martens, K. (2006). Ecological characteristics of small farmland ponds: Associations with land use practices at multiple spatial scales. Biological Conservation, 131(4), 523–532.
den Berg, M. M. V., Hengsdijk, H., Wolf, J., Van Ittersum, M. K., Wang, G., & Roetter R. P. (2007). The impact of increasing farm size and mechanization on rural income and rice production in Zhejiang province, China. Agricultural Systems, 94(3), 841–850.
Deng, X., Huang, J., Rozelle, S., & Uchida, E. (2006). Cultivated land conversion and potential agricultural productivity in China. Land Use Policy, 23(4), 372–384.
Evans, T. P., & Kelley, H. (2004). Multi-scale analysis of a household level agent-based model of landcover change. Journal of Environmental Management, 72(1–2), 57–72.
Fu, B. J., Zhang, Q.-J., Chen, L.-D., Zhao, W.-W., Gulinck, H., Liu, G.-B., Yang, Q.-K., & Zhu, Y.-G. (2006). Temporal change in land use and its relationship to slope degree and soil type in a small catchment on the Loess Plateau of China. CATENA, 65(1), 41–48.
Heerink, N., Qu, F., Kuiper, M., Shi, X., & Tan, S. (2007). Policy reforms, rice production and sustainable land use in China: A macro–micro analysis. Agricultural Systems, 94(3), 784–800.
Heistermann, M., Müller, C., & Ronneberger, K. (2006). Land in sight?: Achievements, deficits and potentials of continental to global scale land-use modeling. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 114(2–4), 141–158.
Lambin, E. F., Bauleis, X., Bockstael, N., Fischer, G., Krug, T., Leemans, R., Moran, E. F., Rindfuss, R. R., Sato, Y., Skole, II D., Turner, II B. L., & Vogel, C. (1999). Land-use and land-cover change (lucc): Implementation strategy. Technical Report, IGBP Report No. 48 and IHDP Report No. 10. International Geosphere–Biosphere Programme (IGBP) and International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change (IHDP), Stockholm.
Long, H., Tang, G., Li, X., & Heilig, G. K. (2007). Socio-economic driving forces of land-use change in Kunshan, the Yangtze River Delta economic area of China. Journal of Environmental Management, 83(3), 351–364.
Liu, J., Liu, M., Tian, H., Zhuang, D., Zhang, Z., Zhang, W., Tang, X., & Deng, X. (2005). Spatial and temporal patterns of China’s cropland during 1990–2000: An analysis based on Landsat TM data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 98(4), 442–456.
Mertz, O., Wadley, R. L., & Christensen, A. E. (2005). Local land use strategies in a globalizing world: Subsistence farming, cash crops and income diversification. Agricultural Systems, 85(3), 209–215.
Müller, D., & Zeller, M. (2002). Land use dynamics in the central highlands of Vietnam: A spatial model combining village survey data with satellite imagery interpretation. Agricultural Economics, 27(3), 333–354.
Nelson, G. C., Harris, V., & Stone, S. W. (2001). Deforestation, land use and property rights: Empirical evidence from Darien, Panama. Land Economics, 77(2), 187–205.
Ostwald, M., & Chen, D. L. (2006). Land-use change: Impacts of climate variations and policies among small-scale farmers in the Loess Plateau, China. Land Use Policy, 23(4), 361–371.
Overmars, K. P., & Verburg, P. H. (2006). Multilevel modelling of land use from field to village level in the Philippines. Agricultural Systems, 89(2–3), 435–456.
Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., & Congdon, K. (2004). HLM 6, Hierarchical linear and non-linear modelling. SSI, Scientific Software international.
Rindfuss, R. R., Walsh, S. J., Turner, B. L. II, Fox, J., & Mishra, V. (2004). Developing a science of land change: Challenges and methodological issues. PNAS, 101(39), 13976–13981.
Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modelling. New York: Sage, pp. 266.
Swets, J. A. (1988). Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science, 240, 1285–1293.
Tong, C., Hall, C. A. S., & Wang, H. (2003). Land use change in rice, wheat and maize production in China (1961–1998). Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 95(2–3), 523–536.
Veldkamp, A., & Verburg, P. H. (2004). Modelling land use change and environmental impact. Journal of Environmental Management, 72(1–2), 1–3.
Verburg, P. H., Schot P. P., Dijst M. J., & Veldkamp, A. (2004). Land use change modelling: Current practice and research priorities. GeoJournal, 61(4), 309–324.
Verburg, P. H., & Veldkamp, A. (2001). The role of spatially explicit models in land-use change research: A case study for cropping patterns in China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 85(1–3), 177–190.
Walsh, S. J., Crawford, T. W., Welsh, W. F., & Crews-Meyer, K. A. (2001). A multiscale analysis of LULC and NDVI variation in Nang Rong district, northeast Thailand. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 85(1–3), 47–64.
Xie, Y., Yu, M., Tian, G., & Xing, X. (2005). Socio-economic driving forces of arable land conversion: A case study of Wuxian City, China. Global Environmental Change Part A, 15(3), 238–252.
Yemefack, M., Rossiter, D. G., & Njomgang, R. (2005). Multi-scale characterization of soil variability within an agricultural landscape mosaic system in southern Cameroon. Geoderma, 125(1–2), 117–143.
Zang, S., & Huang, X. (2006). An aggregated multivariate regression land-use model and its application to land-use change processes in the Daqing region (northeast China). Ecological Modelling, 193(3–4), 503–516.
Acknowledgements
The research described in this paper is financed by the National Science Foundation of China (No. 49771073) and Key Project of the Chinese Academy of Science (No. KZ952-J1-203).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10708-007-9112-x
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shao, J., Xu, C., Wei, C. et al. Explanation of land use in mountainous area, China: from field to village level. GeoJournal 68, 357–368 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-007-9089-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-007-9089-5