Skip to main content
Log in

Dry Stacking of Filtered Iron Ore Tailings: Comparing On-Field Performance of Two Drying Methods

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stacking compacted filtered tailings has become an option to cope with the new Brazilian regulations while providing a safe disposal method for the tailings. It has become feasible due to recent developments in dewatering technologies. Still, the dewatering processes may need to be improved to attain acceptable moisture contents considering the on-field compactable range. Also, the filtered material’s moisture content is highly influenced by the weather conditions, especially during the rainy season in the southeast of Brazil. Additives are a possible solution to accelerate moisture reduction. However, scientific studies in the technical literature still need to attest to the effectiveness of these methods to tailings, mainly on a full scale. Accordingly, the present research evaluates the performance of two additives to hasten filtered iron ore tailings drying for dry stacking purposes: commercially available quicklime and superabsorbent polymer. Also, undrained triaxial tests were conducted on specimens retrieved from on-field compacted layers to investigate the additive’s influence on the tailings’ mechanical behaviour. Initial confining pressures ranging from 100 to 600 kPa were used. The results have shown the inefficacy of the superabsorbent additives in boosting the drying process for on-field conditions and the efficiency of the quicklime in doing so. Furthermore, no substantial changes in the mechanical response were observed due to the insertion of quicklime. This highlights the novelty of the present study in the context of iron ore tailings management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank VALE S.A. (Projects IAP-001247 and IAP-001466) and the Brazilian Research Council (CNPq) for their support of the research group.

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nilo Cesar Consoli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rissoli, A.L.C., Pereira, G.S., Mendes, A.J.C. et al. Dry Stacking of Filtered Iron Ore Tailings: Comparing On-Field Performance of Two Drying Methods. Geotech Geol Eng 42, 2937–2948 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-023-02689-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-023-02689-x

Keywords

Navigation