Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Application of EPS to Mitigate Ground Movements Caused by Mechanized Tunneling

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tunnel excavation leads to ground settlement and may cause existing buildings to suffer damage due to excessive deformation. Researchers proposed and studied several protective measures to mitigate the risk of damage to above-ground structures. Concrete and steel diaphragm walls effectively reduce the foundation settlement and are considered successful in protecting nearby structures. Compressing compressible material has advantages as the cost and environmental issues are considered. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of geofoam buffer in reducing surface movement by conducting two-dimensional numerical analyses. Following verification of finite-element analysis through instrumental readings of the Isfahan subway case, numerical models were developed to determine barrier characteristics' effectiveness on the ground deformation. Analysis results show that the pre-installation of the geofoam diaphragm adjacent to the buried tunnel significantly mitigates the ground surface settlement; however, some adverse effects may be developed in the zone behind the Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) diaphragm wall.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

References

  • Anasthas N, Negussey D, Srirajan S (2001) Effect of confining stress on compressive strength of EPS geofoam. In: Paper presented at the procedings of 3rd international conference of EPS Geofoam

  • Anato NJ, Chen J, Tang A, Assogba OC (2021) Numerical investigation of ground settlements induced by the construction of Nanjing WeiSanLu tunnel and parametric analysis. Arab J Sci Eng 46:11223–11239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (2008) Standard specification for rigid, cellular polystyrene thermal insulation

  • Attewell P (1982) Predicting the dynamics of ground settlement and its derivatives caused by tunnelling in soil. Ground Eng 15:13–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai Y, Yang Z, Jiang Z (2014) Key protection techniques adopted and analysis of influence on adjacent buildings due to the Bund Tunnel construction. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 41:24–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilotta E (2008) Use of diaphragm walls to mitigate ground movements induced by tunnelling. Géotechnique 58:143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilotta E, Taylor R (2005) Centrifuge modelling of tunnelling close to a diaphragm wall. Int J Phys Model Geotech 5:27–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen LT, Poulos H, Loganathan N (1999) Pile responses caused by tunneling. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 125:207–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Liu Y, Cao W, He Z (1998) Protection for the former observatory during construction of the Yan An Dong Lu Tunnel. (vol 2): Balkema Rotterdamml

  • Daraei A, Zare S (2019) A new multi-graph approach for selecting the sequential excavation method of civil tunnels. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 91:102999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daraei R, Herki BM, Sherwani AFH (2017) Study on the rapid drawdown and its effect on portal subsidence of Heybat Sultan twin tunnels in Kurdistan-Iraq. Civ Eng J 3:496–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daraei A, Herki BM, Sherwani AFH, Zare S (2018) Rehabilitation of portal subsidence of heybat sultan twin tunnels: selection of shotcrete or geogrid alternatives. Int J Geosynthetics Ground Eng 4:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Mariano A, Gesto J, Gens A, Schwarz H (2007) Ground deformation and mitigating measures associated with the excavation of a new Metro line. In: Paper presented at the Proc. XIV European conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, ECSMGE

  • Duškov M (1997) Materials research on EPS20 and EPS15 under representative conditions in pavement structures. Geotext Geomembr 15:147–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertugrul OL, Trandafir AC (2017) Seismic response of shallow buried box tunnels with geofoam side cushions. In: Geotechnical frontiers 2017 (pp 212–222)

  • Esmaeili-Choobar N, Esmaeili-Falak M, Roohi-hir M, Keshtzad S (2013) Evaluation of collapsibility potential at Talesh. Iran EJGE 18:2561–2573

    Google Scholar 

  • Esmaeili-Falak M, Hajialilue-Bonab M (2012) Numerical studying the effects of gradient degree on slope stability analysis using limit equilibrium and finite element methods. Int J Acad Res 4:216–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esmaeili-Falak M, Katebi H, Javadi A (2018) Experimental study of the mechanical behavior of frozen soils-a case study of tabriz subway. Periodica Polytech Civ Eng 62:117–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Esmaeili-Falak M, Katebi H, Vadiati M, Adamowski J (2019) Predicting triaxial compressive strength and Young’s modulus of frozen sand using artificial intelligence methods. J Cold Reg Eng 33:04019007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esmaeili-Falak M, Benemaran RS (2023) Ensemble deep learning-based models to predict the resilient modulus of modified base materials subjected to wet-dry cycles. Geomech Eng 32(6):583–600. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2023.32.6.583

    Google Scholar 

  • Fantera L, Rampello S, Masini L (2016) A mitigation technique to reduce ground settlements induced by tunnelling using diaphragm walls. Procedia Eng 158:254–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell RP (2011) Tunnelling in sands and the response of buildings. University of Cambridge

  • Gade VK, Dasaka S (2022) Short-and long-term behavior of EPS geofoam in reduction of lateral earth pressure on rigid retaining wall subjected to surcharge loading. Geotext Geomembr 50:868–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge DM, Zhao LC, Esmaeili-Falak M (2022) Estimation of rapid chloride permeability of SCC using hyperparameters optimized random forest models. J Sustain Cement Mater 1–19

  • Gens A, Di Mariano A, Gesto J, Schwarz H (2005) Ground movement control in the construction of a new metro line in Barcelona. Geotech Asp Undergr Constr Soft Ground 389–395

  • González C, Sagaseta C (2001) Patterns of soil deformations around tunnels. Application to the extension of madrid metro. Comput Geotech 28:445–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han J, Wang J, Cheng C, Zhang C, Liang E, Wang Z, Song JJ, Leem J (2023) Mechanical response and parametric analysis of a deep excavation structure overlying an existing subway station: a case study of the Beijing subway station expansion. Front Earth Sci 10:1079837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassankhani E, Halabian A (2018) Parametric study of concrete-face performance in CFRDs considering hardening behavior of rockfill material. Sharif J Civ Eng 34:37–47. https://doi.org/10.24200/J30.2018.1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassankhani E (2020) Applied pressure on box culverts buried in rigid trenches using induced trench method. (Ph.D. Dissertation). Tabriz. Iran

  • Hazarika H (2006) Stress–strain modeling of EPS geofoam for large-strain applications. Geotext Geomembr 24:79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hisatake M (2011) A proposed methodology for analysis of ground settlements caused by tunneling, with particular reference to the “buoyancy” effect. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 26:130–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath JS (1997) The compressible inclusion function of EPS geofoam. Geotext Geomembr 15:77–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath JS (2004) Geofoam compressible inclusions: the new frontier in earth retaining structures. In: Geotechnical engineering for transportation projects (pp 1925–1934)

  • Jauhari N, Hegde A, Chakrabortty P (2023) Full scale field studies for assessing the vibration isolation performance of single and dual trenches. Transport Geotech 39:100932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzenbach R, Leppla S, Vogler M, Seip M, Kurze S (2013) Soil-structure-interaction of tunnels and superstructures during construction and service time. Procedia Eng 57:35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MI, Meguid MA (2021a) Evaluating the role of geofoam properties in reducing lateral loads on retaining walls: a numerical study. Sustainability 13:4754

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MI, Meguid MA (2021b) A numerical study on the role of EPS geofoam in reducing earth pressure on retaining structures under dynamic loading. Int J Geosynthetics Ground Eng 7:1–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MI (2021) On the use of expanded geofoam inclusion to reduce earth pressure on retaining structures under static and dynamic loading

  • Khoiri M, Ou CY (2013) Evaluation of deformation parameter for deep excavation in sand through case histories. Comput Geotech 47:57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai H, Zhang J, Zhang L, Chen R, Yang W (2019) A new method based on centrifuge model test for evaluating ground settlement induced by tunneling. KSCE J Civ Eng 23:2426–2436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leca E, New B (2007) Settlements induced by tunneling in soft ground. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 22:119–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Likitlersuang S, Surarak C, Wanatowski D, Oh E, Balasubramaniam A (2013) Finite element analysis of a deep excavation: a case study from the bangkok MRT. Soils Found 53:756–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loganathan N, Poulos H (1998) Analytical prediction for tunneling-induced ground movements in clays. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124:846–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loganathan N, Poulos H, Stewart D (2000) Centrifuge model testing of tunnelling-induced ground and pile deformations. Géotechnique 50:283–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loganathan N, Poulos H, Xu K (2001) Ground and pile-group responses due to tunnelling. Soils Found 41:57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair R, Rankin W, Essler R, Chipp P (1995) Compensation grouting. In: Paper presented at the international journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences and geomechanics abstracts

  • Maleki M, Imani M (2022) Active lateral pressure to rigid retaining walls in the presence of an adjacent rock mass. Arab J Geosci 15:152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maleki M, Mir Mohammad Hosseini S (2019) Seismic performance of deep excavations restrained by anchorage system using quasi static approach. J Seismol Earthq Eng 21:11–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Maleki M, Mir Mohammad Hosseini SM (2022) Assessment of the pseudo-static seismic behavior in the soil nail walls using numerical analysis. Innov Infrastruct Solut 74:262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maleki M, Nabizadeh A (2021) Seismic performance of deep excavation restrained by guardian truss structures system using quasi-static approach. SN Appl Sci 3:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maleki M, Khezri A, Nosrati M, Hosseini SM (2023) Seismic amplification factor and dynamic response of soil-nailed walls. Model Earth Syst Environ 9:1181–1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masini L, Rampello S, Soga K (2014) An approach to evaluate the efficiency of compensation grouting. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 140:04014073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meguid M, Hussein M, o G, (2017) A numerical procedure for the assessment of contact pressures on buried structures overlain by EPS geofoam inclusion. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 3:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng F, Chen R, Xu Y, Wu H, Li Z (2021) Centrifuge modeling of effectiveness of protective measures on existing tunnel subjected to nearby excavation. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 112:103880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohajerani A, Ashdown M, Abdihashi L, Nazem M (2017) Expanded polystyrene geofoam in pavement construction. Constr Build Mater 157:438–448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moradi G, Hassankhani E, Halabian A (2020b) Investigation of applied earth load on buried box culverts in trenches using induced trench method under embankment pressure. Sharif J Civ Eng 35:53–65. https://doi.org/10.24200/J30.2018.5720.2271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moradi G, Hassankhani E, Halabian AM (2022a) Experimental and numerical analyses of buried box culverts in trenches using geofoam. Proc Instit Civ Eng Geotech Eng 175(3):311–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murillo C, Thorel L, Caicedo B (2009) Ground vibration isolation with geofoam barriers: centrifuge modeling. Geotext Geom 27:423–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negussey D (2007) Design parameters for EPS geofoam. Soils Found 47:161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negussey D, Anasthas N (2001) Young’s modulus of EPS geofoam by simple bending test. In: Paper presented at the 3rd international conference on geofoam blocks in construction applications, Salt Lake City, USA.

  • O’Brien A (2001) EPS behavior during static and cyclic loading from 0.05% strain to failure. In: Paper presented at the proceedings of the third international conference of EPS Geofoam, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

  • O'reilly MP, New B (1982) Settlements above tunnels in the United Kingdom-their magnitude and prediction (090048862X). Retrieved from

  • Oteo C, De la Fuente P, De Assis S (2007) Jet-grouting walls as protection to the buildings near urban tunnels. In: Paper presented at the Geotechnical engineering in urban environments: proceedings of the 14th European conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering

  • Özer AT, Akınay E (2019) First geofoam roadway embankment application in Turkey. Paper presented at the 5th international conference on geofoam blocks in construction applications

  • Peck RB (1969) Deep excavations and tunneling in soft ground. Proc 7th ICSMFE 1969:225–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Plaxis (2020) Plaxis 2D connect edition user's manual (version 20.03) bentley systems

  • Rahmani F, Hosseini SM, Khezri A, Maleki M (2022) Effect of grid-form deep soil mixing on the liquefaction-induced foundation settlement, using numerical approach. Arab J Geosci 15:1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagaseta C (1987) Analysis of undrained soil deformation due to ground loss. Géotechnique 37:301–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkhani Benemaran R, Esmaeili-Falak M, Katebi H (2022) Physical and numerical modelling of pile-stabilised saturated layered slopes. Proc Instit Civ Eng Geotech Eng 175(5):523–538. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.20.00152

    Google Scholar 

  • Schanz T, Vermeer P, Bonnier PG (1999) The hardening soil model formulation and verification. Beyond 2000 Comput Geotech 1:281–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi X, Yu X, Esmaeili-Falak M (2023) Improved arithmetic optimization algorithm and its application to carbon fiber reinforced polymer-steel bond strength estimation. Compos Struct 306:116599

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stark TD, Arellano D, Horvath JS, Leshchinsky D (2004) Geofoam applications in the design and construction of highway embankments. NCHRP Web Doc 65:24–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun L, Hopkins T C, Beckham T L (2009) Reduction of stresses on buried rigid highway structures using the imperfect ditch method and expanded polysterene (geofoam)

  • Surarak C, Likitlersuang S, Wanatowski D, Balasubramaniam A, Oh E, Guan H (2012) Stiffness and strength parameters for hardening soil model of soft and stiff Bangkok clays. Soils Found 52:682–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topal C, Mahmutoğlu Y (2021) Assessment of surface settlement induced by tunnel excavations for the Esenler-Başakşehir (Istanbul, Turkey) subway line. Environ Earth Sci 80:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu JT, Tung SCY (2020) Determination of model parameters for the hardening soil model. Transp Infrastruct Geotechnol 7:55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ying H, Cheng K, Liu S, Xu R, Lin C, Zhu C, Gan X (2022) An efficient method for evaluating the ground surface settlement of Hangzhou metro deep basement considering the excavation process. Acta Geotech 17:5759–5771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao W, Han JY, Chen Y, Jia PJ, Li SG, Li Y, Zhao Z (2018) A numerical study on the influence of anchorage failure for a deep excavation retained by anchored pile walls. Adv Mech Eng 10(2):1687814018756775

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Academic funding program for top talents in disciplines (majors) of universities in 2020.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Anhui Vocational College of Press and Publishing, Hefei, 230601, Anhui, China

    Chun Duan & Meiqin Zheng

Authors
  1. Chun Duan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Meiqin Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CD: Writing-Original draft preparation, Conceptualization, Supervision, Project administration. MZ: Methodology, Software, Validation, Language review.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chun Duan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no competing of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duan, C., Zheng, M. Application of EPS to Mitigate Ground Movements Caused by Mechanized Tunneling. Geotech Geol Eng 42, 1711–1727 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-023-02642-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-023-02642-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation