Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Numerical Procedure for the Assessment of Contact Pressures on Buried Structures Overlain by EPS Geofoam Inclusion

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Extruded Polystyrene (EPS) geofoam is a light weight material used in a wide range of geotechnical engineering applications including embankment construction and bridge approaches to reduce earth loads imposed on the adjacent or underlying soils and structures. EPS is also used as a compressible material above deeply buried culverts to promote positive arching and reduce the load transferred to the walls of the structure. An important step towards understanding the soil-geofoam-structure interaction and accurately model the load transfer mechanism is choosing a suitable material model for the EPS geofoam that is capable of simulating the material response to compressive loading for various ranges of strains. In this study, a material model that is able to capture the response of EPS geofoam is first established and validated using index test results for three different geofoam materials. To examine the performance of the model in analyzing complex interaction problems, a laboratory experiment that involves a rigid structure buried in granular material with EPS geofoam inclusion is simulated. The contact pressures acting on the walls of the structure are calculated and compared with measured data for three different geofoam materials. The developed numerical model is then used to study the role of geofoam density on the earth loads acting on the buried structure. Significant pressure reduction is achieved using EPS15 with a pressure ratio of 0.28 of the theoretical overburden pressure at the upper wall. The proposed FE modeling approach is found to be efficient in capturing the behavior of EPS geofoam material under complex interaction soil-structure condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Canadian Standards Association (CSA) (2006) Canadian highway bridge design code, Canadian Standards Association (CSA), Mississauga

    Google Scholar 

  2. AASHTO (2012) LRFD bridge design specifications, 6th edn. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  3. McAffee RP, Valsangkar AJ (2008) Field performance, centrifuge testing, and numerical modelling of an induced trench installation. Can Geotech J 45:85–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sladen JA, Oswell JM (1988) The induced trench method—a critical review and case history. Can Geotech J 25:541–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vaslestad J, Johansen TH, Holm W (1993) Load reduction on rigid culverts beneath high fills: long-term behavior. Transp Res Rec 1415:58–68

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liedberg NSD (1997) Load reduction on a rigid pipe: pilot study of a soft cushion installation. Transp Res Record

  7. Sun L, Hopkins T, Beckham T (2011) Long-term monitoring of culvert load reduction using an imperfect ditch backfilled with Geofoam. Transp Res Record 2212:56–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Oshati OS, Valsangkar AJ, Schriver AB (2012) Earth pressures exerted on an induced trench cast-in-place double-cell rectangular box culvert. Can Geotech J 49:1267–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim K, Yoo CH (2002) Design Loading for deeply buried box culverts. Highway Research Center, Auburn University, Report No. IR-02-03., Alabama, USA, p 215

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kang J, Parker F, Kang YJ, Yoo CH (2008) Effects of frictional forces acting on sidewalls of buried box culverts. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 32:289–306

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Sun L, Hopkins TC, Beckham TL (2009) Reduction of stresses on buried rigid highway structures using the imperfect ditch method and expanded polysterene (geofoam) Kentucky Transportaion Center, University of Kentucky, Report No. KTC-07-14-SPR-228-01-1F, Kentucky, USA, p 49

  12. McGuigan BL, Valsangkar AJ (2010) Centrifuge testing and numerical analysis of box culverts installed in induced trenches. Can Geotech J 47:147–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McGuigan BL, Valsangkar AJ (2011) Earth pressures on twin positive projecting and induced trench box culverts under high embankments. Can Geotech J 48:173–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Horvath JS (2001) Concepts for cellular geosynthetics standards with example for EPS-block geofoam as lightweight fill for roads. Manhattan College Research Report No. CGT-2001–4, USA

  15. Takahara T, Miura K (1998) Mechanical characteristics of EPS block fill and its simulation by DEM and FEM. Soils Found 38(1):97–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hazarika H (2006) Stress–Strain modeling of EPS Geofoam for large-strain applications. Geotext Geomembr 24(2):79–90

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Chun BS, Lim HS, Sagong M, Kim K (2004) Development of a hyperbolic constitutive model for expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam under triaxial compression test. Geotext Geomembr 22(4):223–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Leo CJ, Kumruzzaman M, Wong H, Yin JH (2008) Behavior of EPS geofoam in true triaxial compression tests. Geotext Geomembr 26(2):175–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ekanayake SD, Liyanapathirana DS, Leo CJ (2015) Numerical simulation of EPS geofoam behaviour in triaxial tests. Eng Comput 32(5):1372–1390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. ASTM D16210-10—Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Rigid Celleular Plastics

  21. ABAQUS (2013) ABAQUS User’s Manuals, Version 6.13, Dassault Systems Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, USA

  22. Negussey D (2007) Design parameters for EPS geofoam. Soils Found 47(1):161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ahmed M, Tran V, Meguid MA (2015) On the role of geogrid reinforcement in reducing earth pressures on buried pipes. Soils Found 5(33):588–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ahmed MR, Meguid MA, Whalen J (2013) Laboratory Measurement of the Load Reduction on Buried Structures overlain by EPS Geofoam, The 66th Canadian Geotechnical Conference, Montreal, Canada, Paper No. 217 p 8

  25. Hussein MG, Meguid MA (2015) Numerical modeling of soil-structure interaction with applications to geosynthetics. International Conference on Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, Ain Shams University, December, Cairo, Egypt, p 12

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hussein MG, Meguid MA, Whalen J (2015) On the numerical modeling of buried structures with compressible inclusion, GeoQuebec, September, Quebec City, p 8

  27. Ahmed MR (2016) Experimental investigations into the role of geosynthetic inclusions on the earth pressure acting on buried structures. PhD. Thesis, Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics. McGill University, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bolton MD (1986) The strength and dilatancy of sands. Géotech 36(1):65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) CRD project No. 452760-13. The generous support of Plasti-Fab Ltd. throughout this study is appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill University, 817 Sherbrooke St. W., Montreal, QC, H3A 0C3, Canada

    M. A. Meguid & M. G. Hussein

Authors
  1. M. A. Meguid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. G. Hussein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Meguid.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meguid, M.A., Hussein, M.G. A Numerical Procedure for the Assessment of Contact Pressures on Buried Structures Overlain by EPS Geofoam Inclusion. Int. J. of Geosynth. and Ground Eng. 3, 2 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-016-0078-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-016-0078-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation