Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Heterogeneity and Nonlinearity on Uplift Characteristics of Shallow Horizontal Anchor Plates

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the upper bound theorem of limit analysis and variational principle, the uplift resistance of shallow horizontal anchor plates in heterogeneous soil and three-dimensional failure surface of overlying soil are investigated. The results calculated by the theoretical approach are compared with results of the existing solutions and numerical results obtained by software PLAXIS 3D to verify the validity of the variational analysis. Furthermore, the influence of the heterogeneity and nonlinearity on the uplift characteristics of shallow horizontal anchor plates is discussed. The results show that: (i) Increase in the uplift resistance and expansion of failure range are observed with decreasing nonlinear coefficient m and variation coefficient kt of soil uniaxial tensile strength as well as increasing variation coefficient kc of soil initial cohesion. (ii) Heterogeneity and nonlinearity jointly determine the shape of failure surface. This study enriches the analytical method of anchor plates and has great significance for stability and safety of anchor plates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All of the data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51978666), the Hunan Province Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (No. 2021JJ10063). All financial supports are greatly appreciated.

Funding

The authors have introduced the funds in the acknowledgment section. Therefore,the funding statement is as follows: This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51978666), the Hunan Province Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (No. 2021JJ10063). All financial supports are greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shihong Hu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1: Three-Dimensional Failure Mechanism of Circular Anchor Plate

Appendix 1: Three-Dimensional Failure Mechanism of Circular Anchor Plate

1.1 Modelling

When the circular anchor plate is subjected to vertical uplift load, failure mechanism is presented as a three-dimensional axisymmetric failure surface, as shown in Fig. 

Fig. 15
figure 15

Three-dimensional failure mechanism of shallow horizontal circular anchor plate

15b. The rupture surface is constructed through rotating a curve around the z-axis. The curve function in the xoz plane is expressed as x(z), as shown in Fig. 15a. The buried depth and radius of the circular anchor plate are H and r, respectively; the surcharge pressure is q; the uplift load is Pu and ν is the velocity in the kinematically admissible velocity field.

1.2 Theoretical Derivation of the Uplift Resistance for Circular Anchor Plate in Single-Layer Heterogeneous Soil

1.2.1 Calculation of Internal Energy Dissipation Power

The volume dV and the rupture surface area dS corresponding to the unit thickness dz of the overlying heterogeneous soil for the circular anchor plate are calculated respectively as follows:

$${\text{d}}V = {\uppi }x^{2} \left( z \right){\text{d}}z$$
(33)
$${\text{d}}S = 2{\uppi }x\left( z \right)\sqrt {x^{\prime}\left( z \right)^{2} + 1} \cdot {\text{d}}z$$
(34)

The internal energy dissipation power is written as:

$$D = \int_{0}^{H} {2{\uppi }x\left( z \right)\sqrt {x^{\prime}\left( z \right)^{2} + 1} \cdot \left( {\tau \cos \varphi - \sigma_{n} \sin \varphi } \right)} {\text{d}}z \cdot v$$
(35)

1.2.2 Calculation of Power by External Force

The power of gravity can be obtained using Eq. (36):

$$W_{\gamma } = \int_{0}^{H} {\gamma \left( z \right)} \cdot \left( { - v} \right){\text{d}}V = \int_{0}^{H} {{\uppi }\gamma \left( z \right)x^{2} \left( z \right)} {\text{d}}z \cdot \left( { - v} \right)$$
(36)

The power of the uplift load is calculated as follows:

$$W_{{p_{u} }} = P_{u} \cdot v$$
(37)

The power of the surcharge load can be expressed as follows:

$$W_{q} = {\uppi }U^{2} q \cdot \left( { - v} \right)$$
(38)

1.2.3 Calculation of the Uplift Bearing Capacity

Based on the virtual power theory, we can get:

$$D = W_{\gamma } + W_{{p_{u} }} + W_{q}$$
(39)

Similarly

$$\tan \varphi _{t} = x^{\prime } \left( z \right)$$
(40)

The expression of ultimate uplift capacity Pu can be obtained by substituting Eqs. (35) –(38) and (40) into Eq. (39):

$$P_{u} = \int_{0}^{H} {\left\{ {\left. {2{\uppi }x\left( z \right) \cdot \left[ {\tau - \sigma_{n} x^{\prime}\left( z \right)} \right] + {\uppi }\gamma \left( z \right)x^{2} \left( z \right)} \right\}} \right.} {\text{d}}z + {\uppi }U^{2} q$$
(41)

Note

$$\xi \left( {z,x,x^{\prime},\tau ,\sigma_{n} } \right) = 2{\uppi }x\left( z \right) \cdot \left[ {\tau - \sigma_{n} x^{\prime}\left( z \right)} \right] + {\uppi }\gamma \left( z \right)x^{2} \left( z \right)$$
(42)
$$Q = {\uppi }U^{2} q$$
(43)

Substituting Eqs. (15) and (42) into Eq. (16), the following equations can be obtained:

$$x^{\prime}\left( z \right)= \tan \varphi _{t} = \frac{{c_{0} \left( z \right)}}{{m\sigma _{t} \left( z \right)}}\left[ {1 + \sigma _{n} /\sigma _{t} \left( z \right)} \right]^{{\left( {1 - m} \right)/m}}$$
(44)
$$\sigma_{n}^{\prime } { = }\frac{{{\text{d}}\sigma_{n} }}{{{\text{d}}z}} = - \gamma \left( z \right) - \tau /x\left( z \right)$$
(45)

The boundary conditions are:

$$\begin{gathered} x\left( {z = 0} \right) = r \hfill \\ x\left( {z = H} \right) = U \hfill \\ \end{gathered}$$
(46)

Similarly

$$\left. {\left( {\frac{\partial \xi }{{\partial x^{\prime}\left( z \right)}} + \frac{\partial Q}{{\partial U}}} \right)} \right|_{z = H} = 0$$
(47)

1.3 Theoretical Derivation of the Uplift Resistance for Circular Anchor Plate in Multi-layer Heterogeneous Soil

The failure mechanism of the horizontal shallow circular anchor plate in multi-layer heterogeneous soil is constructed by following principles: the soil is divided into n layers along the depth direction. The radius of the circular anchor plate is r; the buried depth is H; the surcharge load is q; and the uplift load is Pu. The thickness of the i-th layer is hi = Hi-Hi-1, and the function expression of the soil rupture surface within the range of Hi-1 ~ Hi in the xoz plane is xi(z), and in the x direction, the failure range at the soil interface Hi is Ui. For the i-th heterogeneous soil layer, the variation of soil parameters also satisfies Eq. (22).

As a result, the expression of the uplift bearing capacity for the circular anchor plate in multi-layer heterogeneous soil is obtained using Eq. (48):

$$P_{u} = \left( {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {\int_{{H_{i - 1} }}^{{H_{i} }} {\xi_{i} } {\text{d}}z} + Q} \right){ 1} \le i \le n$$
(48)

where i represents the i-th layer of soil, and H0 = 0, Hn = H.

Note

$$\xi_{i} \left( {z,x_{i} ,x^{\prime}_{i} ,\tau_{i} ,\sigma_{ni} } \right){ = }2{\uppi }x_{i} \left( z \right) \cdot \left[ {\tau_{i} - \sigma_{ni} x^{\prime}_{i} \left( z \right)} \right] + \gamma_{i} \left( z \right){\uppi }x_{i} \left( z \right)^{2}$$
(49)
$$Q = {\uppi }U_{n}^{2} q$$
(50)

By substituting Eqs. (26) and (49) into Eq. (27), the following equations can be obtained:

$$x^{\prime}_{i} = \tan \varphi_{ti} = \frac{{c_{0i} \left( z \right)}}{{m_{i} \sigma_{ti} \left( z \right)}}\left[ {1 + \sigma_{ni} /\sigma_{ti} \left( z \right)} \right]^{{\left( {1 - m_{i} } \right)/m_{i} }}$$
(51)
$$\sigma_{ni}^{\prime } = \frac{{{\text{d}}\sigma_{ni} }}{{{\text{d}}z}} = - \gamma_{i} \left( z \right) - \tau_{i} /x_{i} \left( z \right)$$
(52)

Displacement boundary conditions:

$$\left\{ \begin{gathered} x_{1} \left( {z = 0} \right) = r \hfill \\ x_{i} \left( {z = H_{i} } \right) = x_{i + 1} \left( {z = H_{i} } \right) = U_{i} \left( {1 \le i \le n - 1} \right) \hfill \\ x_{n} \left( {z = H_{n} } \right) = U_{n} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right.$$
(53)

Similarly

$$\left. {\left( {\frac{{\partial \xi_{n} }}{{\partial x^{\prime}_{n} \left( z \right)}} + \frac{\partial Q}{{\partial U}}} \right)} \right|_{{z = H_{n} }} = 0$$
(54)

Another variation transversality condition can be expressed as follows:

$$\left. {\frac{{\partial \xi_{i} }}{{\partial x_{i}^{\prime } \left( z \right)}}} \right|_{{z = H_{i} - 0}} = \left. {\frac{{\partial \xi_{i + 1} }}{{\partial x^{\prime}_{i + 1} \left( z \right)}}} \right|_{{z = H_{i} + 0}} \Rightarrow \left. {\sigma_{ni} } \right|_{{z = H_{i} - 0}} = \left. {\sigma_{{n\left( {i + 1} \right)}} } \right|_{{z = H_{i} + 0}}$$
(55)

Based on the above conditions and Runge–Kutta method, the uplift resistance of circular anchor plate can be obtained.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, L., Gong, X., Hu, S. et al. Effects of Heterogeneity and Nonlinearity on Uplift Characteristics of Shallow Horizontal Anchor Plates. Geotech Geol Eng 41, 1615–1634 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-022-02357-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-022-02357-6

Keywords

Navigation