Skip to main content
Log in

Centrifuge Modeling of Soft Soil Reinforced with Granular Columns

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a geotechnical centrifuge model of an embankment built in stages, over a 6.0 m layer of soft soil reinforced with nine floating granular columns arranged in a 3 × 3 square grid. The container was divided in two compartments where reinforced and unreinforced soil were tested simultaneously for comparison purposes. The load was applied by means of a 4 m high sand embankment (prototype dimensions) built in three steps. For each step, the centrifuge was stopped to allow the placement of the embankment layer and then re-accelerated up to 26 g and the excess of pore pressure was allowed to dissipate after each step. The instrumentation, comprised of total stress cells, pore pressure transducers and displacement transducers, was configured to collect information about the load transfer mechanism between the soil and the instrumented central column for each loading step during pore pressure dissipation. Results showed that despite representing only 30% of the total load, the first step provoked almost 70% of total vertical displacement. Finally, the columns were exhumed for a detailed and comprehensive visual analysis aiming to support and explain the results obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

su :

Undrained shear strength

σv :

Effective vertical stress

OCR:

Over consolidation ratio

g:

Earth’s gravity acceleration

n:

Vertical stress concentration factor

Δσ v(col) :

Increment of vertical stress on the column

Δσ v(soil) :

Increment of vertical stress in the soil

β:

Settlement reduction factor

Ac :

Area of the column

Aa :

Area of soil cell

Δu:

Increment of excess of pore pressure

e0 :

Initial void ratio

emin :

Minimum void ratio

emax :

Maximum void ratio

DR:

Relative density

D10 :

Equivalent 10% grain soil diameter passing by weight

crit :

Critical shear strength friction angle

cc :

Compression index

cs :

Swelling index

References

  • Abusharar SW, Zheng JJ, Chen BG, Yin JH (2009) A simplified method for analysis of a piled embankment reinforced with geosynthetics. Geotext Geomembr 27(1):35–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Khafaji ZA, Craig WH (2000) Drainage and reinforcement of soft clay tank foundation by sand columns. Geotechnique 50(6):709–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida MSS, Marques MES (2013) Design and performance of embankments on very soft soils. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida MSS, Davies MCR, Parry RHG (1985) Centrifuge tests on embankments on strengthened and unstrengthened clay foundations. Geotechnique 35(4):425–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida MSS, Lima B, Riccio M, Jud H, Cascao M, Roza F (2014) Stone columns field test: monitoring data and numerical analyses. Geotech Eng J SEAGS AGSSEA 45(1):103–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambily AP, Gandhi SR, Shailesh R (2007) Behavior of stone columns based on experimental and FEM analysis. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 133(4):405–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basack S, Indraratna B, Rujikiatkamjorn C (2016) Modelling the performance of stone column reinforced soft ground under static and cyclic loads. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 142(2):04015067-1-04015067–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babu MRD, Nayak R, Shivashanka R (2013) A critical review of construction, analysis and behaviour of stone columns. Geotech Geol Eng 31:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-012-9555-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bae WS, Shin BW, An BC (2002) Behavior of foundation system improved with stone columns. In: Proceedings 12th international offshore and polar engineering. Conference, Kitakyushu, Japan, pp 675–678

  • Bachus RC, Barksdale RD (1984) Vertical and lateral behaviour of model stone columns. In: Proceedings of the international conference on in situ soil and rock reinforcement, Paris, pp 99–104

  • Black JA, Sivakumar V, Madhav MR, Hamill GA (2007) Reinforced stone columns in weak deposits: laboratory model study. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 133(9):1154–1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borges JL, Domingues TS, Cardoso AS (2009) Embankments on soft soil reinforced with stone columns: numerical analysis and proposal of a new design method. Geotech Geol Eng 27(6):667–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles JA, Watts KA (1983) Compressibility of soft clay reinforced with granular columns. In: Proceedings of the 8th European conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Helsinki, pp 347–352

  • Daramalinggam JAL (2004) Bearing capacity of clay bed improved by sand compaction piles under caisson loading. MSc Thesis, Singapura, National University of Singapore – NUS, 186p

  • Das AK, Deb K (2016) Response of cylindrical storage tank foundation resting on tensionless stone column-improved soil. Int J Geomech ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das AK, Deb K (2017) Modeling of stone column-supported embankment under axi-symmetric condition. Geotech Geol Eng 35:707–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0136-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb K (2010) A mathematical model to study the soil arching effect in stone column-supported embankment resting on soft soil. Appl Math Modell 34(12):3871–3883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb K, Basudhar PK, Chandra S (2010) Axi-symmetric analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced granular fill-soft soil system with group of stone columns. Geotech Geol Eng 28(2):177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fattah MY, Shlash KT, Al-Waily MJM (2011) Stress concentration ratio of model stone columns in soft clays. Geotech Test J ASTM 34(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • FHWA (1983) Design and construction of stone columns, vol 1. Report FHWA/RD-83/027, Barksdale RD, Bachus RC (eds), Federal Highway Administration

  • Gautray J, Laue J, Springman SM, Almeida MSS (2013) Development of pore water pressure around a stone column. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, Paris, France, pp 1–5

  • Hu W (1995) Physical modelling of group behaviour of stone column foundations. D.Sc. Thesis, Glasgow University, Scotland, p 312

  • Hughes JMO, Withers NJ (1974) Reinforcing of soft cohesive soils with stone columns. Ground Eng 7(3):42–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes JMO, Withers NJ, Greenwood DA (1975) Afield trial of the reinforcing effect of a stone column in soil. Geotechnique 25(1):31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iai S (1988) Large scale model tests and analysis of gravel drains. Report of the Port and Harbor Research Institute 27(3), Japan

  • Indraratna B, Basack S, Rujikiyatkamjorn C (2013) A numerical solution of stone column improved soft soil considering arching, clogging and smear effects. J Geotech Geoenv Eng 139(3):377–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juneja A (2002) Centrifuge model study of the effects of sand compaction pile installation on soft clay ground. Ph.D. Thesis, National University of Singapore

  • Kimura, T (1983) Centrifuge tests on sand compaction piles. In: Proceedings of the seventh Asian regional conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Haifa—Israel, pp 255–260

  • Kitazume M, Miyajima S, Nishida Y (1996) Stability of revetment on soft clay improved by SCP. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on soft soil engineering, Nanjing—China, vol 2, pp 455–460

  • Lee FH, Ng YW, Yong KY (2001) Effects of installation method on sand compaction piles in clay in the centrifuge. Geotech Test J 24(3):314–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima BT, Almeida MSS, Hosseinpour I (2019) Field measured and simulated performance of a stone columns-strengthened soft clay deposit. Int J Geotech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2019.1653506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima BT (2012) Study on the use of stone columns in very soft soil clays. D.Sc. Thesis, COPPE/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, p 321 (in portuguese)

  • McKelvey D, Sivakumar V, Bell A, Graham J (2004) Modeling vibrated stone columns in soft clay. Proc Inst Civ Eng Geotech Eng 157(3):137–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra S, Chattopadhyay BC (1999) Stone columns and design limitations. In: Proceedings, Indian geotechnical conference, Calcutta, India, pp 201–205

  • Murugesan S, Rajagopal K (2010) Studies on the behavior of single and group of geosynthetic encased stone columns. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 136(1):129–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najjar SS, Sadek S, Maakaroun T (2010) Effect of sand columns on the undrained load response of soft clays. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 136(9):1263–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura T, Kitazume M, Takahashi H (2006) Centrifugal model tests and numerical calculations on failure pattern of floating type SCP improved ground. In: Proceedings of geo Shanghai international conference, Shanghai—China, pp 119–126

  • Narasimha Rao S, Prasad YVS, Hanumanta Rao V (1992) Use of stone columns in soft marine clays. In: Proceedings of the 45th Canadian geotechnical conference, Toronto, Ont, October, p 1–9

  • Ng YW (2003) Centrifuge modelling of the installation of sand compaction piles in soft clay. PhD thesis, National University of Singapore

  • Ng YW, Lee FH, Yong KY (1998) Development of an in-flight Sand Compaction Pile (SCP) installer. In: Proceedings of the international conference centrifuge, 98, Tokyo—Japan, pp 837–844

  • Pires LGS (2017) Comportamento de Aterro Experimental Sobre Solo Mole Tratado com Colunas De Brita. MSc Dissertation, COPPE/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, p 143 (in portuguese)

  • Priebe HJ (1995) The design of vibro replacement. Ground Eng 28(10).

  • Rahman Z, Takemura J, Kouda M, Yasumoto K (2000) Experimental study on deformation of soft clay improved by low replacement ratio SCP under backfilled caisson loading. Soils Found 40(5):19–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randolph MF, Houlsby GT (1994) T-bar penetration testing in soft clay. J Geotech Eng 120(12):2230–2235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe RK, Liu K-W (2015) Three-dimensional finite element modelling of a full-scale geosynthetic-reinforced, pile-supported embankment. Can Geotech J 52(12):2041–2054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samadhiya NK, Maheswari P, Basu P, Kumar MB (2008) Load settlement characteristics of granular piles with randomly mixed fibres. Indian Geotech J 38(3):345–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Santiago PAC (2010) Experimental study of buried pipes under pullout load using geotechnical. MSc Dissertation, State University of Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro – UENF, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 101p (In Protuguese)

  • Sasaki Y, Taniguchi E (1982) Shaking table on gravel drains to prevent liquefaction of sand deposits. Soils Found 22(3):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahu JT, Madhav MR, Hayashi S (2000) Analysis of soft ground—granular pile-granular mat system. J Comput Geotech 27(1):45–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terashi M, Kitazume M, Okada H (1991) Applicability of practical formula for bearing capacity of clay improved by SCP. In: Proceedings of the international conference on geotechnical engineering for coastal development: theory and practice on soft ground, Yokohama—Japan, vol 1, pp 405–410

  • Yun-min C, Wei-ping C, Ren-peng C (2008) An experimental investigation of soil arching within basal reinforced and unreinforced piles embankments. Geotext. Geomembr 26(2):164–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber TM, Plotze M, Laue J, Peschke G, Springman SM (2010) Smear zone identification and soil properties around stone columns constructed in-flight in centrifuge model tests. Geotechnique 60(3):197–206. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.8.P.098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber TM, Laue J, Springman S (2006). Centrifuge modelling of sand compaction piles in soft clay under embankment load. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on physical modelling in geotechnics, Hong-Kong, pp 1–6

  • Wood DM, Hu W, Nash DFT (2000) Group effects in stone column foundations: model tests. Geotechnique 50(6):689–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Authors are grateful to Rio de Janeiro Research Agency FAPERJ and Federal Scholarship Agency CAPES for funding this research.

Funding

Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (Grant No. 101.240/2014).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando Saboya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The Authors declare that this manuscript has no conflict of interest and that the data from the tests presented herein are available in http://uenf.br/posgraduacao/engenharia-civil/dissertacoes-de-mestrado/.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saboya, F., Tibana, S., Reis, R.M. et al. Centrifuge Modeling of Soft Soil Reinforced with Granular Columns. Geotech Geol Eng 39, 2955–2967 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01671-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01671-1

Keywords

Navigation