Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic Reliability Investigation of Bearing Capacity of Foundations Based on Limit Analysis and Limit Equilibrium Methods

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, by considering the upper-bound limit analysis method in calculating the seismic bearing capacity of foundations, the comparison between a limit equilibrium method such as Hansen and limit analysis method in terms of reliability is investigated. Limit equilibrium has been the oldest method for performing bearing capacity of foundations. However, it seems that theoretical equations proposed by the majority of old limit equilibrium methods to calculate the bearing capacity of foundations (such as Hansen) do not consider the effects of inertial forces of the earthquake in the soil mass. These methods only take into account the horizontal load applied to the foundation and disregard the earthquake forces applied to the soil. By comparing the results of this study, it can be inferred that the reliability of the Hansen approach is very close to the limit analysis method that ignores the impact of horizontal earthquake forces applied to rigid soil blocks. Since the upper-bound limit analysis takes into account the seismic effect of inertial forces in an earthquake, its results may be considered more accurate than Hansen. This study shows that in both granular and cohesive soils in high seismicity-prone areas, usage of a more realistic method as the limit analysis is more reasonable. Considering the facility of RBD by Hansen method using EXCEL spreadsheet in comparison to the seismic reliability-based design using MATLAB programming following the upper-bound limit analysis method, graphs that offer coefficients for obtaining the equivalent value of target reliability in the limit analysis by using the Hansen formulation are presented. Additionally, this study shows that the horizontal seismic coefficient (kh) is an impressive parameter that affects the differences between the two mentioned approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ang AH-S, Tang WH (1984) Probability concepts in engineering planning and design, vol. 2: Decision, risk, and reliability. Wiley, New York, p 608

    Google Scholar 

  • Askari F, Farzaneh O (2003) Upper-bound solution for seismic bearing capacity of shallow foundations near slopes. Geotechnique 53(8):697–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chenari RJ, Roshandeh SP, Payan M (2019) Stochastic analysis of foundation immediate settlement on heterogeneous spatially random soil considering mechanical anisotropy. SN Appl Sci 1(7):660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0684-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherubini C (2000) Reliability evaluation of shallow foundation bearing capacity on c’φ’soils. Can Geotech J 37(1):264–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury D, Subba Rao KS (2006) Seismic bearing capacity of shallow strip footings embedded in slope. Int J Geomech 6(3):176–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenton GA, Griffiths DV (2008) Risk assessment in geotechnical engineering, vol 461. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hasofer AM, Lind NC (1974) Exact and invariant second-moment code format. J Eng Mech Div 100(1):111–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks MA, Onisiphorou C (2005) Stochastic evaluation of static liquefaction in a predominantly dilative sand fill. Géotechnique 55(2):123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Low BK (2018) Reliability-based design of tunnelling problems and insights for Eurocode 7. Comput Geotech 97:42–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low BK (1996) Practical probabilistic approach using spreadsheet. In: Uncertainty in the geologic environment: From theory to practice. ASCE, pp 1284–1302

  • Low BK (2007) Reliability-based design applied to retaining walls. In: Risk and Variability in Geotechnical Engineering. Thomas Telford Publishing, pp 151–163

  • Low BK (2017) Insights from reliability-based design to complement load and resistance factor design approach. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 143(11):04017089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low BK, Phoon K-K (2015) Reliability-based design and its complementary role to Eurocode 7 design approach. Comput Geotech 65:30–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low BK, Tang WH (1997) Reliability analysis of reinforced embankments on soft ground. Can Geotech J 34(5):672–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low BK, Tang WH (2004) Reliability analysis using object-oriented constrained optimization. Struct Saf 26(1):69–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melchers RE, Beck AT (2018) Structural reliability analysis and prediction. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosallanezhad M, Moayedi H (2017) Comparison analysis of bearing capacity approaches for the strip footing on layered soils. Arab J Sci Eng 42(9):3711–3722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadi B, Askari F, Farzaneh O, Fatolahzadeh S, Mehdizadeh R (2019) Reliability evaluation of regression model for estimating Co-seismic landslide displacement. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 1:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Onisiphorou C (2010) Reliability based assessment of rock slope stability. Rock Mech Civ Environ Eng-Proc Eur Rock Mech Symp 129(6):563–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Phoon K-K (ed) (2014) Reliability-based design in geotechnical engineering: computations and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Phoon K-K, Kulhawy FH (1999) Characterization of geotechnical variability. Can Geotech J 36(4):612–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaie Soufi G, Jamshidi Chenari R, Karimpour Fard M (2019) Influence of random heterogeneity of the friction angle on bearing capacity factor Nγ. Georisk: Assessm Manag Risk Eng Syst Geohazards 1:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2019.1566554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert MAY (2015) The seismic design of shallow foundations: a state of the art exploration

  • Shakir RR (2019) Probabilistic-based analysis of a shallow square footing using Monte Carlo simulation. Eng Sci Technol Int J 22(1):313–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Shojaeian A, Askari F (2019) Variables characteristics effects on static and pseudo-static reliability-based design of near slope shallow foundations. NMCE 3(3):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan S (2005) Geotechnical stability analysis: new methods for an old problem. Aust Geomech 40(30):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Soubra A-H (1999) Upper-bound solutions for bearing capacity of foundations. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 125(1):59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viviescas JC, Osorio JP, Cañón JE (2017) Reliability-based designs procedure of earth retaining walls in geotechnical engineering. Obras y proyectos 22:50–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youssef Abdel Massih DS, Soubra A-H, Low BK (2008) Reliability-based analysis and design of strip footings against bearing capacity failure. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 134(7):917–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faradjollah Askari.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

In this appendix, exact formulations for computation of the parametric velocity related to rigid blocks, the geometry parameters of triangular blocks, and the procedure of calculating the bearing capacity is presented. Equations 4 and 5 represent the parametric velocity related to rigid block i, and Eq 6 shows the relative velocity between adjacent blocks(i and i + 1).

$$V_{1} = \frac{1}{{{ \sin }\left( {\beta_{1} - \varphi } \right)}}$$
(4)
$$V_{i + 1} = V_{i} \frac{{{ \sin }\left( {\pi - \alpha_{i} - \beta_{i} + 2\varphi } \right)}}{{{ \sin }\left( {\beta_{i + 1} - 2\varphi } \right)}}$$
(5)
$$V_{i.i + 1} = V_{i} \frac{{{ \sin }\left( {\alpha_{i} - \beta_{i} - \beta_{i + 1} } \right)}}{{{ \sin }\left( {\beta_{i + 1} - 2\varphi } \right)}}$$
(6)

Equations 79 show the geometry parameters of triangular block i.

$$l_{i} = B_{0} \frac{{\sin \beta_{1} }}{{\sin \left( {\alpha_{1} + \beta_{1} } \right)}}\mathop \prod \limits_{j = 2}^{i} \frac{{\sin \beta_{j} }}{{\sin \left( {\alpha_{j} + \beta_{j} } \right)}}$$
(7)
$$d_{i} = B_{0} \frac{{\sin \beta_{1} }}{{\sin \left( {\alpha_{1} + \beta_{1} } \right)}}\frac{{\sin \alpha_{i} }}{{\sin \beta_{i} }}\mathop \prod \limits_{j = 2}^{i} \frac{{\sin \beta_{j} }}{{\sin \left( {\alpha_{j} + \beta_{j} } \right)}}$$
(8)
$$S_{i} = \frac{{B_{0}^{2} }}{2}\frac{{{ \sin }^{2} \beta_{1} }}{{\sin^{2} \left( {\alpha_{1} + \beta_{1} } \right)}}\frac{{\sin \alpha_{i} \sin \left( {\alpha_{i} + \beta_{i} } \right)}}{{\sin \beta_{i} }}\mathop \prod \limits_{j = 2}^{i} \frac{{{ \sin }^{2} \beta_{j} }}{{\sin^{2} \left( {\alpha_{j} + \beta_{j} } \right)}}$$
(9)

Now, according to the upper bound limit analysis theorem, the amount of bearing capacity can be determined by the equalization of internal and external works (Eqs. 1416) introduced in Eqs. 1013. The external work consists of the work of imposed load to the foundation (\(W_{P} )\), work of soil weight of the block i plus the work due to the inertial force acting on the block (\(W_{{w_{i} }}\)) and the surcharge work (\(W_{q}\)). Internal work includes the work dissipated in velocity discontinuities di and li (\(W_{{d_{i} }}\) and \(W_{{l_{i} }}\)). Energy is dissipated along the lines \(l_{i}\) (i = 1,…, n-1) and \(d_{i}\) (i = 1,…, n). Assuming the velocity of the first block, V1, equal to unity (δ = 1), the calculated load is the bearing capacity of the foundation.

$$W_{P} = P\left( {1 + K_{h} V_{1} \cos \left( {\lambda_{1} - \varphi } \right)} \right)$$
(10)
$$W_{{w_{i} }} = \left( {\gamma S_{i} V_{i} \sin \left( {\lambda_{i} - \varphi } \right)} \right) + \left( {K_{h} \gamma S_{i} V_{i} \cos \left( {\lambda_{i} - \varphi } \right)} \right)$$
(11)
$$W_{{d_{i} }} = cd_{i} V_{i} \cos \left( \varphi \right)$$
(12)
$$W_{{l_{i} }} = cl_{i} V_{i.i + 1} \cos \left( \varphi \right)$$
(13)

\(W_{P}\): Work of imposed load to the foundation, \(W_{{w_{i} }}\): Work of soil weight of block I plus work due to inertial force acting on the block, \(W_{{d_{i} }}\): Work dissipated on velocity discontinuity \(d_{i}\), \(W_{{l_{i} }}\): Work dissipated on velocity discontinuity \(l_{i}\), C: Soil cohesion, \(\varphi\): Internal friction angle of the soil, \(\lambda_{i}\) :The angle between \(l_{i}\) and horizon, \(W_{q}\) :Surcharge work.

$$\overbrace {{W_{P} + W_{{w_{i} }} + W_{q} }}^{External work} = \overbrace {{W_{{d_{i} }} + W_{{l_{i} }} }}^{Internal work}$$
(14)
$$P\left( {1 + K_{h} V_{1} \cos \left( {\lambda_{1} - \varphi } \right)} \right) + \mathop \sum \limits_{i = 1}^{n} \left( {\gamma S_{i} V_{i} \sin \left( {\lambda_{i} - \varphi } \right)} \right) + \left( {K_{h} \gamma S_{i} V_{i} \cos \left( {\lambda_{i} - \varphi } \right)} \right) + W_{q} = \mathop \sum \limits_{i = 1}^{n} cd_{i} V_{i} \cos \left( \varphi \right) + \mathop \sum \limits_{i = 1}^{n - 1} l_{i} V_{i.i + 1} \cos \left( \varphi \right)$$
(15)
$$q_{u} = P = \frac{1}{{\left( {1 + K_{h} V_{1} \cos \left( {\lambda_{1} - \varphi } \right)} \right)}}\left( {\mathop \sum \limits_{i = 1}^{n} cd_{i} V_{i} \cos \left( \varphi \right) + \mathop \sum \limits_{i = 1}^{n - 1} l_{i} V_{i.i + 1} \cos \left( \varphi \right) - \mathop \sum \limits_{i = 1}^{n} \left( {\gamma S_{i} V_{i} \sin \left( {\lambda_{i} - \varphi } \right)} \right) + \left( {K_{h} \gamma S_{i} V_{i} \cos \left( {\lambda_{i} - \varphi } \right)} \right) + W_{q} } \right)$$
(16)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shojaeian, A., Askari, F. Seismic Reliability Investigation of Bearing Capacity of Foundations Based on Limit Analysis and Limit Equilibrium Methods. Geotech Geol Eng 38, 6329–6342 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01438-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01438-8

Keywords

Navigation