Abstract
Water or mud inrush can not only hamper the normal construction of tunnel, but also cause severe casualties and property losses. Through the cause analysis and statistical theory, a total of 9 predictors based on 3 factors, the engineering geology, hydrogeology and construction, were put forward to control the happening of water or mud inrush. Based on the classification principles of forewarning, 3 alert levels, red, orange and yellow, were established. Using the AHP–TOPSIS evaluation theory, the risk prediction model of water or mud inrush was built based on the classification of disaster forewarning. The model was used in the diversion project of Fujian Long Jin–xi and achieved good effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aczel, Sasst TL (1983) Procedures for sythesinzing ratio judgments. J Math Psychol 27:93–102
Du YC, Han XR, Li ZL (2009) Professional evaluating system for karst tunnel gusing based on AHP and its application. Carsological Sin 28:281–287
Kuang X, Bai MZ, Wang CL et al (2010) Research of comprehensive warning of Water inrush hazards in karst tunnel based on fuzzy evolution method. J Highw Transp Res Dev 27:100–103
Li XP, Li YN (2014) Research on risk assessment system for water inrush in the karst tunnel construction based on GIS: case study on the diversion tunnel groups of the Jinping II Hydropower Station. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 40:182–191
Li SC, Li SC, Zhang QS et al (2007) Forecast of karst–fracmred groundwater and defective geological conditions. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 26:217–225
Li CY, Fu HL, Li L (2009) Assessment of collapse disaster during tunnel construction in an underwater tunnel. J Railw Sci Eng 6:22–26
Li LP, Li SC, Zhang QS (2010) Study of mechanism of water inrush induced by hydraulic fracturing in kast tunnels. Rock Soil Mech 31(2):523–528
Li LP, Li SC, Chen J (2011) Construction license mechanism and its application based on karst water inrush risk evaluation. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 30(7):1345–1354
Liu XZ, Ma XJ (2009) Fuzzy safety evaluation for water bursting and mud surging of tunnels through the fault fracture zones. Chin J Undergr Space Eng 12:1786–1790
Ma SW, Mei ZR, Zhang JW (2009) Geologic structural quantitative evaluation of abrupt geologic hazards for long and large tunnels. Mod Tunn Technol 09:99–104
Verma AK, Singh TN (2010) Assessment of tunnel instability–a numerical approach. Arab J Geosci 3:181–192
Verma AK, Singh TN (2013) Influence of Young’s Modulus and Poisson’s Ratio on the displacement around a circular tunnel. Earth Sys Process Disaster Manag 13:181–201. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-28845-6_13
Verma AK, Roy S, Gautam PK (2013) Estimation of groundwater seepage rate into Maneri—Uttarkashi power tunnel: an analytical approach, international. J Earth Sci Eng 6:1429–1433
Wang MS (2004) Hydrologic and geological forecast of tunnel construction in the karst district. Railr Surv 2004:7–9
Xu JP, Wu W (2006) Multiple attribute decision making theory and methods. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing
Zadeh LA (1988) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353
Zhang ZG (2006) Origin of karst. Guangxi Normal University Press, Guilin
Zhang QS, Li SC, Han HW et al (2009) Study on risk evaluation and water inrush disaster preventing technology during construction of karst tunnels. J Shandong Univ Eng Sci 39:106–110
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41672260), the Program of Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China Hubei (Grant No. 2013CFA110), and the Teaching Laboratory Opening Fund of China University of Geosicences (Grant No. SKJ2014065).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peng, Y., Wu, L., Su, Y. et al. Risk Prediction of Tunnel Water or Mud Inrush Based on Disaster Forewarning Grading. Geotech Geol Eng 34, 1923–1932 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0073-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0073-z